Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Suppositories
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Suppositories

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Medicated dosage forms that are designed to be inserted into the rectal, vaginal, or urethral orifice of the body for absorption.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (779 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Medicated dosage forms that are designed to be inserted into the rectal, vaginal, or urethral orifice of the body for absorption. Generally, the active ingredients are packaged in dosage forms containing fatty bases such as cocoa butter, hydrogenated oil, or glycerogelatin that are solid at room temperature but melt or dissolve at body temperature.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Vaginal Suppositories; Suppositories, Vaginal; Vaginal Suppository; Suppository, Vaginal; Rectal Suppositories; Suppositories, Rectal.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Dosage Forms
See also
Rectal Absorption

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,078 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Suppositories” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 153 of them (3.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 3,144 records.

Reviews account for 189 records (4.6%) and meta-analyses for 17. Randomized controlled trials number 509 (12.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,144 records; 2000-2009: 442 records; 2010-2019: 339 records; 2020 onward: 153 records3,144through 19994422000-20093392010-20191532020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,144
2000-2009442
2010-2019339
2020 onward153
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 12.5 percentReviews4.6% (189)Meta-analyses0.4% (17)Randomized controlled trials12.5% (509)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,078 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1894.6%
Meta-analyses170.4%
Randomized controlled trials50912.5%

Method: PubMed query "Suppositories"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Phase I trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus vaginal suppository for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in women
Czaja CA, Stapleton AE, Yarova-Yarovaya Y, Stamm WE
2007Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
57cc by
PMID 18288237 · DOI · PMC2216064
Achievements in Thermosensitive Gelling Systems for Rectal Administration
Bialik M, Kuras M, Sobczak M, Oledzka E
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
25cc by
PMID 34071110 · DOI · PMC8197127
A qualitative study to identify community structures for management of severe malaria: a basis for introducing rectal artesunate in the under five years children in Nakonde District of Zambia
Kaona FA, Tuba M
2005Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
15cc by
PMID 15792501 · DOI · PMC1079879

Phase I trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus vaginal suppository for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in women [1]

Randomized controlled trial Czaja CA, Stapleton AE, Yarova-Yarovaya Y, Stamm WE · · 2007 · cited 57 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesWe performed a phase I trial to assess the safety and tolerance of a Lactobacillus vaginal suppository for prevention of recurrent UTI.
Closing excerpt
Mild inflammation of the urinary tract was noted in some women.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (147 words)

ObjectivesWe performed a phase I trial to assess the safety and tolerance of a Lactobacillus vaginal suppository for prevention of recurrent UTI.MethodsPremenopausal women with a history of recurrent UTI were randomized to use L. crispatus CTV-05 or placebo vaginal suppositories daily for five days.Results30 women were randomized (15 to L. crispatus CTV-05). No severe adverse events occurred. Mild to moderate vaginal discharge and genital irritation were reported by women in both study arms. Seven women randomized to L. crispatus CTV-05 developed pyuria without associated symptoms. Most women had high concentrations of vaginal H202-producing lactobacilli before randomization. L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri were the most common Lactobacillus species identified, with stable prevalence over time.ConclusionsL. crispatus CTV-05 can be given as a vaginal suppository with minimal sideeffects to healthy women with a history of recurrent UTI. Mild inflammation of the urinary tract was noted in some women.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 18288237 · DOI · PMC2216064

Achievements in Thermosensitive Gelling Systems for Rectal Administration [2]

Review article Bialik M, Kuras M, Sobczak M, Oledzka E · · 2021 · cited 25 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Rectal drug delivery is an effective alternative to oral and parenteral treatments.
Closing excerpt
Continued research and development in this field would undoubtedly further reveal the hidden potential of rectal drug delivery systems.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)

Rectal drug delivery is an effective alternative to oral and parenteral treatments. This route allows for both local and systemic drug therapy. Traditional rectal dosage formulations have historically been used for localised treatments, including laxatives, hemorrhoid therapy and antipyretics. However, this form of drug dosage often feels alien and uncomfortable to a patient, encouraging refusal. The limitations of conventional solid suppositories can be overcome by creating a thermosensitive liquid suppository. Unfortunately, there are currently only a few studies describing their use in therapy. However, recent trends indicate an increase in the development of this modern therapeutic system. This review introduces a novel rectal drug delivery system with the goal of summarising recent developments in thermosensitive liquid suppositories for analgesic, anticancer, antiemetic, antihypertensive, psychiatric, antiallergic, anaesthetic, antimalarial drugs and insulin. The report also presents the impact of various types of components and their concentration on the properties of this rectal dosage form. Further research into such formulations is certainly needed in order to meet the high demand for modern, efficient rectal gelling systems. Continued research and development in this field would undoubtedly further reveal the hidden potential of rectal drug delivery systems.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34071110 · DOI · PMC8197127

A qualitative study to identify community structures for management of severe malaria: a basis for introducing rectal artesunate in the under five years children in Nakonde District of Zambia [3]

Research article Kaona FA, Tuba M · · 2005 · cited 15 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundMalaria is a serious illness among children aged 5 years and below in Zambia, which carries with it many adverse effects including anemia and high parasites exposure that lead to infant and childhood mortality.
Closing excerpt
Therefore rectal artesunate may be a well-received intervention in Nakonde District, provided effective sensitisation, to mothers and CHWs is given which will strengthen the health care delivery system at community level.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (441 words)

BackgroundMalaria is a serious illness among children aged 5 years and below in Zambia, which carries with it many adverse effects including anemia and high parasites exposure that lead to infant and childhood mortality. Due to poor accessibility to modern health facilities, malaria is normally managed at home using indigenous and cosmopolitan medicines. In view of problems and implications associated with management of severe malaria at home, rectal artesunate is being proposed as a first aid drug to slow down multiplication of parasites in children before accessing appropriate treatment.MethodsA qualitative study using standardised in-depth and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) guides to collect information from four (4) villages in Nakonde district, was conducted between February and March 2004. The guides were administered on 29 key informants living in the community and those whose children were admitted in the health facility. Participants in the 12 FGDs came from the 4 participating villages. Participants and key informants were fathers, younger and older mothers including grandmothers and other influential people at household level. Others were traditional healers, headmen, village secretaries, traditional birth attendants, church leaders and blacksmiths. FGDs and interview transcriptions were coded to identify common themes that were related to recognition, classification and naming of malaria illness, care-seeking behaviour and community treatment practices for severe malaria.ResultsParental prior knowledge of the disease was important as the majority of informants (23 out of 29) and participants (69 out of 97) mentioned four combined symptoms that were used to recognise severe malaria. The symptoms were excessive body hotness, convulsions, vomiting yellow things and bulging of the fontanelle. On the other hand, all informants mentioned two or more of symptoms associated with severe malaria. In all 12 FGDs, participants reported that treatment of severe malaria commenced with the family and moved into the community as the illness progressed. Although treatment of severe diarrheal effects, were common among the Winamwanga, no rectal medicines to treat severe malaria were identified. Apart from the anti-malarial fansidar, which was mentioned by 23 in IDIs and 40 in FGDs, participants and informants also frequently mentioned indigenous medicines provided by healers and other respectable herbalists for repelling evil spirits, once a child had severe malaria. Mothers were the important arms for administration of ant-malarial drugs in the villages. Referrals began with healers to CHWs, where no CHWs existed healers directly referred sick children to the health facility.ConclusionOur findings showed that there is a precedent for rectal application of traditional medicine for childhood illness. Therefore rectal artesunate may be a well-received intervention in Nakonde District, provided effective sensitisation, to mothers and CHWs is given which will strengthen the health care delivery system at community level.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 15792501 · DOI · PMC1079879

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Advances in rectal drug delivery systems [4]
    Purohit TJ, Hanning SM, Wu Z · Pharm Dev Technol · 2018 · cited 66 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Designing and developing suppository formulations for anti-HIV drug delivery [5]
    Ham AS, Buckheit RW · Ther Deliv · 2017 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Management of bowel problems in older people: an update [6]
    Potter J, Wagg A · Clin Med (Lond) · 2005 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The suppository form of antibiotic administration: pharmacokinetics and clinical application [7]
    Bergogne-Bérézin E, Bryskier A · J Antimicrob Chemother · 1999 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article [Ano-rectal and colonic complications of suppositories and enemas] [8]
    de Parades V, Sultan S, Bauer P · Gastroenterol Clin Biol · 1996 · cited 13 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Enemas, suppositories and rectal stimulation are not effective in accelerating enteral feeding or meconium evacuation in low-birthweight infants: a systematic review [9]
    Kamphorst K, Sietsma Y, Brouwer AJ, Rood PJ, van den Hoogen A · Acta Paediatr · 2016 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Czaja CA, Stapleton AE, Yarova-Yarovaya Y, Stamm WE. Phase I trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus vaginal suppository for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in women. . 2007. PMID 18288237 · DOI · PMC2216064
  2. Bialik M, Kuras M, Sobczak M, Oledzka E. Achievements in Thermosensitive Gelling Systems for Rectal Administration. . 2021. PMID 34071110 · DOI · PMC8197127
  3. Kaona FA, Tuba M. A qualitative study to identify community structures for management of severe malaria: a basis for introducing rectal artesunate in the under five years children in Nakonde District of Zambia. . 2005. PMID 15792501 · DOI · PMC1079879
  4. Purohit TJ, Hanning SM, Wu Z. Advances in rectal drug delivery systems. Pharm Dev Technol. 2018. PMID 29888992 · DOI
  5. Ham AS, Buckheit RW. Designing and developing suppository formulations for anti-HIV drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2017. PMID 28825395 · DOI · PMC6123880
  6. Potter J, Wagg A. Management of bowel problems in older people: an update. Clin Med (Lond). 2005. PMID 16011223 · DOI · PMC4952217
  7. Bergogne-Bérézin E, Bryskier A. The suppository form of antibiotic administration: pharmacokinetics and clinical application. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999. PMID 11252322 · DOI
  8. de Parades V, Sultan S, Bauer P. [Ano-rectal and colonic complications of suppositories and enemas]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1996. PMID 8761142
  9. Kamphorst K, Sietsma Y, Brouwer AJ, Rood PJ, van den Hoogen A. Enemas, suppositories and rectal stimulation are not effective in accelerating enteral feeding or meconium evacuation in low-birthweight infants: a systematic review. Acta Paediatr. 2016. PMID 27506482 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • 1-PropanolDrugs and Chemicals
  • 2-AcetylaminofluoreneDrugs and Chemicals
  • 2-PropanolDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetaldehydeDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetaminophenDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetatesDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

4,078
PubMed records on this heading
4%
published since 2020
189
review articles
509
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • 1-PropanolDrugs and Chemicals
  • 2-AcetylaminofluoreneDrugs and Chemicals
  • 2-PropanolDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetaldehydeDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetaminophenDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support