Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Tooth
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Tooth

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

One of a set of bone-like structures in the mouth used for biting and chewing.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (699 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

One of a set of bone-like structures in the mouth used for biting and chewing.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Teeth.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Dentition
Narrower topics
Bicuspid; Cuspid; Incisor; Molar; Tooth, Deciduous; Tooth, Unerupted
See also
Dentition; Mastication; Odontogenesis; Paleodontology

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 103,297 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Tooth” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 15,328 of them (14.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 44,766 records.

Reviews account for 5,057 records (4.9%) and meta-analyses for 744. Randomized controlled trials number 4,624 (4.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 44,766 records; 2000-2009: 18,623 records; 2010-2019: 24,580 records; 2020 onward: 15,328 records44,766through 199918,6232000-200924,5802010-201915,3282020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199944,766
2000-200918,623
2010-201924,580
2020 onward15,328
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 4.5 percentReviews4.9% (5,057)Meta-analyses0.7% (744)Randomized controlled trials4.5% (4,624)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 103,297 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5,0574.9%
Meta-analyses7440.7%
Randomized controlled trials4,6244.5%

Method: PubMed query "Tooth"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Dual Framework for Classification and Detection of Third Molar Impaction in Panoramic Radiographs
Khurshid Z, Alsleem MH, Aljubairah FA, Alghafli HA, Alasafirah AO, Alibrahim BA, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 41655402 · DOI · PMC12907845
Pulpotomy for treating primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a call for action
Philip N, Duggal M, Nazzal H
2026Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41964851 · DOI · PMC13461656
Research progress in heterogeneity of dental mesenchymal stem cells
Fu H, Chen P, Wu Z, Kong X, Xu L, Fang X, et al.
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41932866 · DOI · PMC13049117

Dual Framework for Classification and Detection of Third Molar Impaction in Panoramic Radiographs [1]

Research article Khurshid Z, Alsleem MH, Aljubairah FA, Alghafli HA, Alasafirah AO, Alibrahim BA, et al. · · 2026 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars present significant clinical challenges, where accurate preoperative assessment is crucial to mitigate risks such as Inferior Alveolar Nerve injury.
Closing excerpt
This work advances artificial intelligence-assisted surgical planning by providing reliable F1-score-based evaluation, reliable real-time detection, and enhanced preoperative risk stratification in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (267 words)

BackgroundThe surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars present significant clinical challenges, where accurate preoperative assessment is crucial to mitigate risks such as Inferior Alveolar Nerve injury. Although artificial intelligence shows promise in dental radiology, existing approaches are often limited to binary classification, affected by class imbalance, and lack standardized evaluation protocols, thereby restricting their clinical applicability.MethodsThis study proposes two independent deep learning frameworks for comprehensive analysis of third molar impactions. The first framework is an end-to-end object detection pipeline employing modified YOLOv10 and YOLOv11n architectures enhanced with multihead self-attention. The second framework is a feature-based classification approach, where deep features extracted using ResNet50 and InceptionNetV3 are classified using traditional machine learning algorithms.ResultsValidated on a multinational dataset of 5796 expertly annotated orthopantomograms with high inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.92), the proposed frameworks demonstrated competitive performance. The Fine KNN classifier using ResNet50 features achieved the best classification performance, yielding 97.56% accuracy, 96.07% precision, 96.21% recall, and an F1-score of 96.10%, while InceptionNetV3-based classification achieved 97.33% accuracy with an F1-score of 95.30%. For object detection, YOLOv11n attained a mean average precision of 88.9% (mAP@0.5) and 85.7% (mAP@0.5:0.95), while maintaining substantially lower computational complexity (19.7 vs 28.4 GFLOPs). Ablation experiments confirmed that the integration of multihead self-attention modules and generative adversarial network-based augmentation improved detection performance by 6.4% mean average precision.ConclusionsThe proposed frameworks enable accurate and automated multiclass assessment of third molar impactions, achieving high diagnostic performance while preserving computational efficiency suitable for clinical deployment. This work advances artificial intelligence-assisted surgical planning by providing reliable F1-score-based evaluation, reliable real-time detection, and enhanced preoperative risk stratification in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41655402 · DOI · PMC12907845

Pulpotomy for treating primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a call for action [2]

Systematic review Philip N, Duggal M, Nazzal H · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeThis narrative review aims to assimilate the current state of evidence for considering pulpotomy as a treatment option to manage vital primary teeth clinically diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.
Closing excerpt
The paper calls for revision of international guidelines to incorporate these developments and reduce unnecessary invasive interventions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (203 words)

PurposeThis narrative review aims to assimilate the current state of evidence for considering pulpotomy as a treatment option to manage vital primary teeth clinically diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.MethodsA structured literature search was undertaken on four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to compile evidence for this narrative review. Eligible studies included clinical investigations and systematic reviews assessing outcomes of pulpotomy for treating primary teeth with clinical signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.ResultsSeven clinical studies and two meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria for data synthesis. Across the clinical studies,clinical success of pulpotomy for management of irreversible pulpitis-affected primary teeth ranged from 95-100%, while radiographic success ranged from 90-100% at the 6-month to 1-year post-treatment follow-up. The meta-analyses of these clinical studies concluded that pulpotomy may represent a viable alternative to conventional pulpectomy for the management of irreversible pulpitis in primary teeth. Based on current evidence, new diagnostic considerations and treatment procedural guidelines have been proposed for primary tooth pulpitis.ConclusionsAccumulating histological and clinical evidence supports pulpotomy as a successful, minimally invasive treatment option for management of primary teeth with clinical symptoms of irreversible pulpitis. The paper calls for revision of international guidelines to incorporate these developments and reduce unnecessary invasive interventions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41964851 · DOI · PMC13461656

Research progress in heterogeneity of dental mesenchymal stem cells [3]

Review article Fu H, Chen P, Wu Z, Kong X, Xu L, Fang X, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Dental tissues development involves two distinct cell lineages: mesenchymal cells (derived from the cranial neural crest) and epithelial cells (derived from oral ectoderm and pharyngeal epithelium).
Closing excerpt
These insights not only advance fundamental understanding of the developmental mechanisms of teeth and periodontal tissues, but also establish a promising framework for achieving more efficient tissue regeneration and repair engineering.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

Dental tissues development involves two distinct cell lineages: mesenchymal cells (derived from the cranial neural crest) and epithelial cells (derived from oral ectoderm and pharyngeal epithelium). Emerging evidence highlights the remarkable functional heterogeneity of cranial neural crest-derived dental mesenchymal stem cells (DMSCs), exhibiting pluripotency, self-renewal, and differentiation capacities. This heterogeneity enables a single DMSC population to generate specialized subpopulations with unique roles in teeth and periodontal tissues formation. Significant progress has been made in characterizing six major types of DMSCs and two populations of closely related cells: Tooth germ progenitor cells (TGPCs) and dental follicle stem cells (DFSCs), critical during early morphogenesis; Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs) and apical papilla stem cells (SCAPs), pivotal for root development; Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), gingival mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) and alveolar bone mesenchymal stem cells (ABMSCs), essential for maintaining and regenerating mature dental tissues. A key breakthrough has unveiled the development and hierarchy of DMSCs by applying new techniques like single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). To integrate insights into the development of teeth and periodontal tissues, this review synthesizes current knowledge on both developmental heterogeneity and subpopulation heterogeneity within DMSCs and related cells. These insights not only advance fundamental understanding of the developmental mechanisms of teeth and periodontal tissues, but also establish a promising framework for achieving more efficient tissue regeneration and repair engineering.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41932866 · DOI · PMC13049117

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Estimated prevalence of erosive tooth wear in permanent teeth of children and adolescents: an epidemiological systematic review and meta-regression analysis [4]
    Salas MM, Nascimento GG, Huysmans MC, Demarco FF · J Dent · 2015 · cited 170 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [5]
    Carter K, Worthington S · J Dent Res · 2016 · cited 142 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth with complete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Chung WC, Tu YK, Lin YH, Lu HK · J Clin Periodontol · 2014 · cited 121 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Tooth loss in molars with and without furcation involvement - a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Nibali L, Zavattini A, Nagata K, Di Iorio A, Lin GH, Needleman I, et al. · J Clin Periodontol · 2016 · cited 118 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Bovine tooth is a substitute for human tooth on bond strength studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies [8]
    Soares FZ, Follak A, da Rosa LS, Montagner AF, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO · Dent Mater · 2016 · cited 108 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth [9]
    Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Keightley AJ, Lamont T, Santamaria RM · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2015 · cited 106 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Khurshid Z, Alsleem MH, Aljubairah FA, Alghafli HA, Alasafirah AO, Alibrahim BA, et al.. Dual Framework for Classification and Detection of Third Molar Impaction in Panoramic Radiographs. . 2026. PMID 41655402 · DOI · PMC12907845
  2. Philip N, Duggal M, Nazzal H. Pulpotomy for treating primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a call for action. . 2026. PMID 41964851 · DOI · PMC13461656
  3. Fu H, Chen P, Wu Z, Kong X, Xu L, Fang X, et al.. Research progress in heterogeneity of dental mesenchymal stem cells. . 2026. PMID 41932866 · DOI · PMC13049117
  4. Salas MM, Nascimento GG, Huysmans MC, Demarco FF. Estimated prevalence of erosive tooth wear in permanent teeth of children and adolescents: an epidemiological systematic review and meta-regression analysis. J Dent. 2015. PMID 25446243 · DOI
  5. Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016. PMID 26561441 · DOI
  6. Chung WC, Tu YK, Lin YH, Lu HK. Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth with complete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014. PMID 24393101 · DOI
  7. Nibali L, Zavattini A, Nagata K, Di Iorio A, Lin GH, Needleman I, et al.. Tooth loss in molars with and without furcation involvement - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2016. PMID 26932323 · DOI
  8. Soares FZ, Follak A, da Rosa LS, Montagner AF, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO. Bovine tooth is a substitute for human tooth on bond strength studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2016. PMID 27692438 · DOI
  9. Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Keightley AJ, Lamont T, Santamaria RM. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID 26718872 · DOI · PMC7387869

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Periodontal LigamentAnatomy and Physiology
  • PeriodontiumAnatomy and Physiology
  • BicuspidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dental EnamelAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dental PulpAnatomy and Physiology
  • DentinAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

103,297
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
5,057
review articles
4,624
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Periodontal LigamentAnatomy and Physiology
  • PeriodontiumAnatomy and Physiology
  • BicuspidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dental EnamelAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dental PulpAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support