Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Neuroscience›Touch
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Touch

Neuroscience · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Sensation of making physical contact with objects, animate or inanimate.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (704 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Sensation of making physical contact with objects, animate or inanimate. Tactile stimuli are detected by mechanoreceptors in the skin and mucous membranes.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Taction; Tactions; Tactile Sense; Senses, Tactile; Sense, Tactile; Tactile Senses; Sense of Touch; Touch Sense.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Sensation

Related concepts

  • Mechanoreceptors

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 19,804 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Touch” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,613 of them (18.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 6,815 records.

Reviews account for 1,048 records (5.3%) and meta-analyses for 42. Randomized controlled trials number 647 (3.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 6,815 records; 2000-2009: 4,204 records; 2010-2019: 5,172 records; 2020 onward: 3,613 records6,815through 19994,2042000-20095,1722010-20193,6132020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19996,815
2000-20094,204
2010-20195,172
2020 onward3,613
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.3 percentReviews5.3% (1,048)Meta-analyses0.2% (42)Randomized controlled trials3.3% (647)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 19,804 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,0485.3%
Meta-analyses420.2%
Randomized controlled trials6473.3%

Method: PubMed query "Touch"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in neuroscience

Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Sensory Schwann cells set perceptual thresholds for touch and selectively regulate mechanical nociception
Ojeda-Alonso J, Calvo-Enrique L, Paricio-Montesinos R, Kumar R, Zhang MD, Poulet JFA, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
48cc by
PMID 38320986 · DOI · PMC10847425
Multimodal tactile sensing fused with vision for dexterous robotic housekeeping
Mao Q, Liao Z, Yuan J, Zhu R
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
45cc by
PMID 39127714 · DOI · PMC11316753
Self-powered electrotactile textile haptic glove for enhanced human-machine interface
Xu G, Wang H, Zhao G, Fu J, Yao K, Jia S, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
39cc by
PMID 40117358 · DOI · PMC11927614
Bioinspired spiking architecture enables energy constrained touch encoding
Ortone A, Filosa M, Indiveri G, Desoli G, Mazzoni A, Oddo CM
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41605933 · DOI · PMC12953599

Sensory Schwann cells set perceptual thresholds for touch and selectively regulate mechanical nociception [1]

Research article Ojeda-Alonso J, Calvo-Enrique L, Paricio-Montesinos R, Kumar R, Zhang MD, Poulet JFA, et al. · · 2024 · cited 48 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Previous work identified nociceptive Schwann cells that can initiate pain.
Closing excerpt
These results show that sensory Schwann cells within diverse glio-neural mechanosensory end-organs are sensors for mechanical pain as well as necessary for touch perception.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (144 words)

Previous work identified nociceptive Schwann cells that can initiate pain. Consistent with the existence of inherently mechanosensitive sensory Schwann cells, we found that in mice, the mechanosensory function of almost all nociceptors, including those signaling fast pain, were dependent on sensory Schwann cells. In polymodal nociceptors, sensory Schwann cells signal mechanical, but not cold or heat pain. Terminal Schwann cells also surround mechanoreceptor nerve-endings within the Meissner's corpuscle and in hair follicle lanceolate endings that both signal vibrotactile touch. Within Meissner´s corpuscles, two molecularly and functionally distinct sensory Schwann cells positive for Sox10 and Sox2 differentially modulate rapidly adapting mechanoreceptor function. Using optogenetics we show that Meissner's corpuscle Schwann cells are necessary for the perception of low threshold vibrotactile stimuli. These results show that sensory Schwann cells within diverse glio-neural mechanosensory end-organs are sensors for mechanical pain as well as necessary for touch perception.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38320986 · DOI · PMC10847425

Multimodal tactile sensing fused with vision for dexterous robotic housekeeping [2]

Research article Mao Q, Liao Z, Yuan J, Zhu R · · 2024 · cited 45 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
As robots are increasingly participating in our daily lives, the quests to mimic human abilities have driven the advancements of robotic multimodal senses.
Closing excerpt
Furthermore, we showcase a robotic desktop-cleaning task, the robot autonomously accomplishes multi-item sorting and cleaning desktop, demonstrating its promising potential for smart housekeeping.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)

As robots are increasingly participating in our daily lives, the quests to mimic human abilities have driven the advancements of robotic multimodal senses. However, current perceptual technologies still unsatisfied robotic needs for home tasks/environments, particularly facing great challenges in multisensory integration and fusion, rapid response capability, and highly sensitive perception. Here, we report a flexible tactile sensor utilizing thin-film thermistors to implement multimodal perceptions of pressure, temperature, matter thermal property, texture, and slippage. Notably, the tactile sensor is endowed with an ultrasensitive (0.05 mm/s) and ultrafast (4 ms) slip sensing that is indispensable for dexterous and reliable grasping control to avoid crushing fragile objects or dropping slippery objects. We further propose and develop a robotic tactile-visual fusion architecture that seamlessly encompasses multimodal sensations from the bottom level to robotic decision-making at the top level. A series of intelligent grasping strategies with rapid slip feedback control and a tactile-visual fusion recognition strategy ensure dexterous robotic grasping and accurate recognition of daily objects, handling various challenging tasks, for instance grabbing a paper cup containing liquid. Furthermore, we showcase a robotic desktop-cleaning task, the robot autonomously accomplishes multi-item sorting and cleaning desktop, demonstrating its promising potential for smart housekeeping.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39127714 · DOI · PMC11316753

Self-powered electrotactile textile haptic glove for enhanced human-machine interface [3]

Research article Xu G, Wang H, Zhao G, Fu J, Yao K, Jia S, et al. · · 2025 · cited 39 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Human-machine interface (HMI) plays an important role in various fields, where haptic technologies provide crucial tactile feedback that greatly enhances user experience, especially in virtual reality/augmented reality, prosthetic control, and therapeutic applications.
Closing excerpt
This makes the SPETH glove an enhanced, battery-free HMI suitable for a wide range of applications.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Human-machine interface (HMI) plays an important role in various fields, where haptic technologies provide crucial tactile feedback that greatly enhances user experience, especially in virtual reality/augmented reality, prosthetic control, and therapeutic applications. Through tactile feedback, users can interact with devices in a more realistic way, thereby improving the overall effectiveness of the experience. However, existing haptic devices are often bulky due to cumbersome instruments and power modules, limiting comfort and portability. Here, we introduce a concept of wearable haptic technology: a thin, soft, self-powered electrotactile textile haptic (SPETH) glove that uses the triboelectric effect and gas breakdown discharge for localized electrical stimulation. Daily hand movements generate sufficient mechanical energy to power the SPETH glove. Its features-softness, lightweight, self-sustainability, portability, and affordability-enable it to provide tactile feedback anytime and anywhere without external equipment. This makes the SPETH glove an enhanced, battery-free HMI suitable for a wide range of applications.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40117358 · DOI · PMC11927614

Bioinspired spiking architecture enables energy constrained touch encoding [4]

Research article Ortone A, Filosa M, Indiveri G, Desoli G, Mazzoni A, Oddo CM · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The sense of touch is essential for safe interactions with the external world, enabling humans to rapidly detect and localize physical stimuli.
Closing excerpt
These results demonstrate a scalable, energetically sustainable solution for touch perception, with immediate applications in autonomous systems requiring safe human interaction and operation in dynamic environments.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (216 words)

The sense of touch is essential for safe interactions with the external world, enabling humans to rapidly detect and localize physical stimuli. Biological systems achieve these abilities through hundreds of thousands of mechanoreceptors distributed across the skin and efficiently processing vast streams of tactile information. Replicating these affordances in autonomous systems is crucial for advancing robotics. However, current tactile sensing solutions face critical challenges, including excessive wiring, high energy demnds of AI computing, and limitations in scalability and parallel processing. Here, we present a modular artificial tactile system combining a Fiber Bragg Grating-based e-skin with a spiking neural network (SNN) that mimics the early stages of the human somatosensory system. Our architecture achieves up to 10× localization super-resolution, improving localization accuracy by 32% over state-of-the-art deep learning methods and effectively generalizing to multitouch and dynamic conditions. Crucially, when implemented on a neuromorphic chip, the SNN demonstrates robustness to the constrained resolution and mismatches of analog neurons, bolstering highly parallel and sub-mWatt hardwired computation. Bioinspired connectivity is shown to functionally influence tactile processing, offering mechanistic insights in a framework that bridges physiological hypotheses, modeling, and validation in a real-world tactile scenario. These results demonstrate a scalable, energetically sustainable solution for touch perception, with immediate applications in autonomous systems requiring safe human interaction and operation in dynamic environments.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41605933 · DOI · PMC12953599

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The sensory neurons of touch [5]
    Abraira VE, Ginty DD · Neuron · 2013 · cited 1,170 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks [6]
    Johansson RS, Flanagan JR · Nat Rev Neurosci · 2009 · cited 961 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Sensory perception in autism [7]
    Robertson CE, Baron-Cohen S · Nat Rev Neurosci · 2017 · cited 778 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling [8]
    McGlone F, Wessberg J, Olausson H · Neuron · 2014 · cited 625 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article 'Where' and 'what' in the whisker sensorimotor system [9]
    Diamond ME, von Heimendahl M, Knutsen PM, Kleinfeld D, Ahissar E · Nat Rev Neurosci · 2008 · cited 466 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants [10]
    Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2016 · cited 457 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Ojeda-Alonso J, Calvo-Enrique L, Paricio-Montesinos R, Kumar R, Zhang MD, Poulet JFA, et al.. Sensory Schwann cells set perceptual thresholds for touch and selectively regulate mechanical nociception. . 2024. PMID 38320986 · DOI · PMC10847425
  2. Mao Q, Liao Z, Yuan J, Zhu R. Multimodal tactile sensing fused with vision for dexterous robotic housekeeping. . 2024. PMID 39127714 · DOI · PMC11316753
  3. Xu G, Wang H, Zhao G, Fu J, Yao K, Jia S, et al.. Self-powered electrotactile textile haptic glove for enhanced human-machine interface. . 2025. PMID 40117358 · DOI · PMC11927614
  4. Ortone A, Filosa M, Indiveri G, Desoli G, Mazzoni A, Oddo CM. Bioinspired spiking architecture enables energy constrained touch encoding. . 2026. PMID 41605933 · DOI · PMC12953599
  5. Abraira VE, Ginty DD. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron. 2013. PMID 23972592 · DOI · PMC3811145
  6. Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009. PMID 19352402 · DOI
  7. Robertson CE, Baron-Cohen S. Sensory perception in autism. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017. PMID 28951611 · DOI
  8. McGlone F, Wessberg J, Olausson H. Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron. 2014. PMID 24853935 · DOI
  9. Diamond ME, von Heimendahl M, Knutsen PM, Kleinfeld D, Ahissar E. 'Where' and 'what' in the whisker sensorimotor system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008. PMID 18641667 · DOI
  10. Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID 27885658 · DOI · PMC6464366

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • TasteNeuroscience
  • SmellNeuroscience
  • Acute PainNeuroscience
  • Back PainNeuroscience
  • Cancer PainNeuroscience
  • Chronic PainNeuroscience

All 110 articles in Neuroscience →

At a glance

19,804
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
1,048
review articles
647
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • TasteNeuroscience
  • SmellNeuroscience
  • Acute PainNeuroscience
  • Back PainNeuroscience
  • Cancer PainNeuroscience

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support