Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,044 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Antibacterial obtained from Streptomyces orientalis. It is a glycopeptide related to ristocetin that inhibits bacterial cell wall assembly and is toxic to kidneys and the inner ear.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Vancomycin Hydrochloride; Hydrochloride, Vancomycin; Vancocin; Vancocine; Vancocin HCl; Vancomycin Lilly; Vancomycin Sulfate; Sulfate, Vancomycin.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Glycopeptides
Related concepts
- Ristocetin
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 18,447 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Vancomycin” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 4,358 of them (23.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 6,038 records.
Reviews account for 1,681 records (9.1%) and meta-analyses for 230. Randomized controlled trials number 577 (3.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,516 |
| 2000-2009 | 3,535 |
| 2010-2019 | 6,038 |
| 2020 onward | 4,358 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,681 | 9.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 230 | 1.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 577 | 3.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Vancomycin"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
International survey of antibiotic dosing and monitoring in adult intensive care units [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundIn recent years, numerous dosing studies have been conducted to optimize therapeutic antibiotic exposures in patients with serious infections.
- Closing excerpt
- Beta-lactams are more commonly administered as extended infusions, and therapeutic drug monitoring use has increased, which align with emerging evidence.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)
BackgroundIn recent years, numerous dosing studies have been conducted to optimize therapeutic antibiotic exposures in patients with serious infections. These studies have led to the inclusion of dose optimization recommendations in international clinical practice guidelines. The last international survey describing dosing, administration and monitoring of commonly prescribed antibiotics for critically ill patients was published in 2015 (ADMIN-ICU 2015). This study aimed to describe the evolution of practice since this time.MethodsA cross-sectional international survey distributed through professional societies and networks was used to obtain information on practices used in the dosing, administration and monitoring of vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and aminoglycosides.ResultsA total of 538 respondents (71% physicians and 29% pharmacists) from 409 hospitals in 45 countries completed the survey. Vancomycin was mostly administered as an intermittent infusion, and loading doses were used by 74% of respondents with 25 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg the most favoured doses for intermittent and continuous infusions, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem were most frequently administered as an extended infusion (42% and 51%, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was undertaken by 90%, 82%, 43%, and 39% of respondents for vancomycin, aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem, respectively, and was more frequently performed in high-income countries. Respondents rarely used dosing software to guide therapy in clinical practice and was most frequently used with vancomycin (11%).ConclusionsWe observed numerous changes in practice since the ADMIN-ICU 2015 survey was conducted. Beta-lactams are more commonly administered as extended infusions, and therapeutic drug monitoring use has increased, which align with emerging evidence.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37331935 · DOI · PMC10278304
Phage and Antibiotic Combinations Reduce Staphylococcus aureus in Static and Dynamic Biofilms Grown on an Implant Material [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of implant-related infections.
- Closing excerpt
- Dynamic biofilms were found to have a substantial impact on apparent treatment efficacy, as they were more resilient to combination treatments than static biofilms.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of implant-related infections. These infections present as biofilms, in which bacteria adhere to the surface of foreign materials and form robust communities that are resilient to the human immune system and antibiotic drugs. The heavy use of broad-spectrum antibiotics against these pathogens disturbs the host's microbiome and contributes to the growing problem of antibiotic-resistant infections. The use of bacteriophages as antibacterial agents is a potential alternative therapy. In this study, bioluminescent strains of S. aureus were grown to form 48-h biofilms on polyether ether ketone (PEEK), a material used to manufacture orthopaedic implants, in either static or dynamic growth conditions. Biofilms were treated with vancomycin, staphylococcal phage, or a combination of the two. We showed that vancomycin and staph phages were able to independently reduce the total bacterial load. Most phage-antibiotic combinations produced greater log reductions in surviving bacteria compared to single-agent treatments, suggesting antimicrobial synergism. In addition to demonstrating the efficacy of combining vancomycin and staph phage, our results demonstrate the importance of growth conditions in phage-antibiotic combination studies. Dynamic biofilms were found to have a substantial impact on apparent treatment efficacy, as they were more resilient to combination treatments than static biofilms.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36851674 · DOI · PMC9963128
Comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundIn the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs), vancomycin stands as the prevalent therapeutic agent.
- Closing excerpt
- More randomized and prospective studies are needed to assess this association.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (324 words)
BackgroundIn the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs), vancomycin stands as the prevalent therapeutic agent. Daptomycin remains an alternative antibiotic to treat MRSA BSIs in cases where vancomycin proves ineffective. However, studies have conflicted on whether daptomycin is more effective than vancomycin among patients with MRSA BSI.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin for the prevention of mortality among adult patients with MRSA BSI.MethodsSystematic searches of databases were performed, including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) were used to assess the quality of individual observational and randomized control studies, respectively. Pooled odd ratios were calculated using random effects models.ResultsTwenty studies were included based on a priori set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Daptomycin treatment was associated with non-significant lower mortality odds, compared to vancomycin treatment (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62, 1.06). Sub-analyses based on the time patients were switched from another anti-MRSA treatment to daptomycin demonstrated that switching to daptomycin within 3 or 5 days was significantly associated with 55% and 45% decreased odds of all-cause mortality, respectively. However, switching to daptomycin any time after five days of treatment was not significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. Stratified analysis based on vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) revealed that daptomycin treatment among patients infected with MRSA strains with MIC≥1 mg/L was significantly associated with 40% lower odds of mortality compared to vancomycin treatment.ConclusionCompared with vancomycin, an early switch from vancomycin to daptomycin was significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. In contrast, switching to daptomycin at any time only showed a trend towards reduced mortality, with a non-significant association. Therefore, the efficacy of early daptomycin use over vancomycin against mortality among MRSA BSIs patients may add evidence to the existing literature in support of switching to daptomycin early over remaining on vancomycin. More randomized and prospective studies are needed to assess this association.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 38381737 · DOI · PMC10881006
Vancomycin disrupts mitochondrial morphology and function and impairs macrophage fungal killing [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Vancomycin is a widely prescribed antibiotic used in the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections.
- Closing excerpt
- This work identifies a direct mechanism by which antibiotics may impair antifungal immunity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (277 words)
Vancomycin is a widely prescribed antibiotic used in the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. We previously showed that this antibiotic disrupted protective antifungal immune responses via microbiome dysbiosis, enhancing susceptibility to invasive candidiasis. Antibiotics are an independent risk factor for developing this life-threatening fungal infection, but whether microbiota-independent mechanisms also drive this association is not clear. Here, we show that vancomycin directly impairs macrophage responses to Candida albicans, the main causative agent of invasive candidiasis. Vancomycin-treated macrophages were less able to kill C. albicans despite normal phagocytosis rates and were hyper-inflammatory and more likely to die during infection. Using a fluorescently labeled vancomycin, we observed vancomycin uptake by macrophages in vivo and within close proximity to the mitochondrial outer membrane. Vancomycin treatment led to a significant depolarization, reduced respiratory capacity, and a hyper-fragmented morphology of mitochondria, as well as increased cellular ROS production. Taken together, this work demonstrates direct effects of vancomycin on mammalian immune cells, helping us to understand the pro-inflammatory effects of this drug and how it promotes susceptibility to life-threatening fungal infection.IMPORTANCEAntibiotics are widely prescribed drugs used to treat bacterial infections; however, their use may increase the likelihood of developing life-threatening fungal infections in vulnerable patients. Candida albicans is a commensal fungus in humans but may cause serious disease in patients with defined risk factors, including antibiotic exposure. We find that the antibiotic vancomycin significantly impairs the ability of macrophages to kill C. albicans yeast. Vancomycin-induced defects in fungal killing were associated with changes to mitochondria in antibiotic-exposed macrophages, which also exhibited enhanced oxidative stress and reduced survival during fungal infection. This work identifies a direct mechanism by which antibiotics may impair antifungal immunity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42053308 · DOI · PMC13251413
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists [5]
- Research article Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter [6]
- Research article The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
- Research article The Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin [8]
- Research article Emergence and spread of vancomycin resistance among enterococci in Europe [9]
- Research article Molecular mechanisms of vancomycin resistance [10]
References
- Williams PG, Tabah A, Cotta MO, Sandaradura I, Kanji S, Scheetz MH, et al.. International survey of antibiotic dosing and monitoring in adult intensive care units. . 2023. PMID 37331935 · DOI · PMC10278304
- Joo H, Wu SM, Soni I, Wang-Crocker C, Matern T, Beck JP, et al.. Phage and Antibiotic Combinations Reduce Staphylococcus aureus in Static and Dynamic Biofilms Grown on an Implant Material. . 2023. PMID 36851674 · DOI · PMC9963128
- Adamu Y, Puig-Asensio M, Dabo B, Schweizer ML. Comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. . 2024. PMID 38381737 · DOI · PMC10881006
- Bojang E, Sheriff L, Morris E, Rouvray S, Fu MS, Wellings C, et al.. Vancomycin disrupts mitochondrial morphology and function and impairs macrophage fungal killing. . 2026. PMID 42053308 · DOI · PMC13251413
- Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R, Craig W, Billeter M, et al.. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009. PMID 19106348 · DOI
- van Hal SJ, Paterson DL, Lodise TP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013. PMID 23165462 · DOI · PMC3553731
- van Hal SJ, Lodise TP, Paterson DL. The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. PMID 22302374 · DOI
- Filippone EJ, Kraft WK, Farber JL. The Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017. PMID 28474732 · DOI · PMC5579760
- Werner G, Coque TM, Hammerum AM, Hope R, Hryniewicz W, Johnson A, et al.. Emergence and spread of vancomycin resistance among enterococci in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2008. PMID 19021959 · DOI
- Stogios PJ, Savchenko A. Molecular mechanisms of vancomycin resistance. Protein Sci. 2020. PMID 31899563 · DOI · PMC7020976
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.