Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cardiovascular Medicine›Ventricular Pressure
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Ventricular Pressure

Cardiovascular Medicine · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The pressure within a cardiac ventricle.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,018 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The pressure within a cardiac ventricle. Ventricular pressure waveforms can be measured in the beating heart by catheterization or estimated using imaging techniques (e.g., doppler echocardiography). The information is useful in evaluating the function of the myocardium; cardiac valves; and pericardium, particularly with simultaneous measurement of other (e.g., aortic or atrial) pressures.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Pressures, Ventricular; Pressure, Ventricular; Ventricular Pressures; Intraventricular Pressure; Intraventricular Pressures; Pressure, Intraventricular; Pressures, Intraventricular.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Hemodynamics; Ventricular Function

Related concepts

  • Cardiac Ventricle
  • Doppler Echocardiography
  • Myocardium
  • Cardiac Valves
  • Pericardium

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,148 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Ventricular Pressure” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 419 of them (10.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 1,394 records.

Reviews account for 179 records (4.3%) and meta-analyses for 7. Randomized controlled trials number 66 (1.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 970 records; 2000-2009: 1,394 records; 2010-2019: 1,365 records; 2020 onward: 419 records970through 19991,3942000-20091,3652010-20194192020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999970
2000-20091,394
2010-20191,365
2020 onward419
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.6 percentReviews4.3% (179)Meta-analyses0.2% (7)Randomized controlled trials1.6% (66)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,148 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1794.3%
Meta-analyses70.2%
Randomized controlled trials661.6%

Method: PubMed query "Ventricular Pressure"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cardiovascular medicine

Cardiovascular medicine has an unusually large body of randomized trials, so the type of outcome matters: hard clinical events such as death, heart attack and stroke carry more weight than changes in blood pressure, cholesterol or imaging markers that only predict risk. Observational studies can show associations but are confounded by age, lifestyle and other illness. Check whether a result is about prevention or treatment, the baseline risk of participants, and the absolute rather than only the relative size of any benefit.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Effect of liraglutide on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: randomized placebo-controlled trial
Bizino MB, Jazet IM, Westenberg JJM, van Eyk HJ, Paiman EHM, Smit JWA, et al.
2019Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
108cc by
PMID 31039778 · DOI · PMC6492440
Gut dysbiosis induced by cardiac pressure overload enhances adverse cardiac remodeling in a T cell-dependent manner
Carrillo-Salinas FJ, Anastasiou M, Ngwenyama N, Kaur K, Tai A, Smolgovsky SA, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
103cc by
PMID 33103561 · DOI · PMC7588211
Activating transcription factor 3 deficiency promotes cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction, and fibrosis induced by pressure overload
Zhou H, Shen DF, Bian ZY, Zong J, Deng W, Zhang Y, et al.
2011Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
72cc by
PMID 22053207 · DOI · PMC3203896
Calculation of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure including left atrial function is superior to morphology alone and accurately identifies elevated filling pressures in left heart disease
Backhaus SJ, Schmermund BN, Rieth AJ, Rademann M, Kriechbaum SD, Wolter JS, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41468989 · DOI · PMC13126477

Effect of liraglutide on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: randomized placebo-controlled trial [1]

Randomized controlled trial Bizino MB, Jazet IM, Westenberg JJM, van Eyk HJ, Paiman EHM, Smit JWA, et al. · · 2019 · cited 108 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundLiraglutide is an antidiabetic agent with cardioprotective effect.
Closing excerpt
gov: NCT01761318.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (297 words)

BackgroundLiraglutide is an antidiabetic agent with cardioprotective effect. The purpose of this study is to test efficacy of liraglutide to improve diabetic cardiomyopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) without cardiovascular disease.MethodsPatients with DM2 were randomly assigned to receive liraglutide 1.8 mg/day or placebo in this double-blind trial of 26 weeks. Primary outcome measures were LV diastolic function (early (E) and late (A) transmitral peak flow rate, E/A ratio, early deceleration peak (Edec), early peak mitral annular septal tissue velocity (Ea) and estimated LV filling pressure (E/Ea), and systolic function (stroke volume, ejection fraction, cardiac output, cardiac index and peak ejection rate) assessed with CMR. Intention-to-treat analysis of between-group differences was performed using ANCOVA. Mean estimated treatment differences (95% confidence intervals) are reported.Results23 patients were randomized to liraglutide and 26 to placebo. As compared with placebo, liraglutide significantly reduced E (- 56 mL/s (- 91 to - 21)), E/A ratio (- 0.17 (- 0.27 to - 0.06)), Edec (- 0.9 mL/s2 * 10-3 (- 1.3 to - 0.2)) and E/Ea (- 1.8 (- 3.0 to - 0.6)), without affecting A (3 mL/s (- 35 to 41)) and Ea (0.4 cm/s (- 0.9 to 1.4)). Liraglutide reduced stroke volume (- 9 mL (- 16 to - 2)) and ejection fraction (- 3% (- 6 to - 0.1)), but did not change cardiac output (- 0.4 L/min (- 0.9 to 0.2)), cardiac index (- 0.1 L/min/m2 (- 0.4 to 0.1)) and peak ejection rate (- 46 mL/s (- 95 to 3)).ConclusionsLiraglutide reduced early LV diastolic filling and LV filling pressure, thereby unloading the left ventricle. LV systolic function reduced and remained within normal range. Future studies are needed to investigate if liraglutide-induced left ventricular unloading slows progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy into symptomatic stages. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01761318.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31039778 · DOI · PMC6492440

Gut dysbiosis induced by cardiac pressure overload enhances adverse cardiac remodeling in a T cell-dependent manner [2]

Research article Carrillo-Salinas FJ, Anastasiou M, Ngwenyama N, Kaur K, Tai A, Smolgovsky SA, et al. · · 2020 · cited 103 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Despite the existing association of gut dysbiosis and T cell inflammation in heart failure (HF), whether and how gut microbes contribute to T cell immune responses, cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction in HF remains largely unexplored.
Closing excerpt
These findings demonstrate that cardiac pressure overload induced gut dysbiosis and T cell immune responses contribute to adverse cardiac remodeling, and identify the potential contribution of tryptophan metabolites and the AhR to protection from adverse cardiac remodeling and systolic dysfunction in HF.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (233 words)

Despite the existing association of gut dysbiosis and T cell inflammation in heart failure (HF), whether and how gut microbes contribute to T cell immune responses, cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction in HF remains largely unexplored. Our objective was to investigate whether gut dysbiosis is induced by cardiac pressure overload, and its effect in T cell activation, adverse cardiac remodeling, and cardiac dysfunction. We used 16S rRNA sequencing of fecal samples and discovered that cardiac pressure overload-induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC) results in gut dysbiosis, characterized by a reduction of tryptophan and short-chain fatty acids producing bacteria in WT mice, but not in T cell-deficient mice (Tcra-/- ) mice. These changes did not result in T cell activation in the gut or gut barrier disruption. Strikingly, microbiota depletion in WT mice resulted in decreased heart T cell infiltration, decreased cardiac fibrosis, and protection from systolic dysfunction in response to TAC. Spontaneous reconstitution of the microbiota partially reversed these effects. We observed decreased cardiac expression of the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and enzymes associated with tryptophan metabolism in WT mice, but not in Tcra-/- mice, or in mice depleted of the microbiota. These findings demonstrate that cardiac pressure overload induced gut dysbiosis and T cell immune responses contribute to adverse cardiac remodeling, and identify the potential contribution of tryptophan metabolites and the AhR to protection from adverse cardiac remodeling and systolic dysfunction in HF.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33103561 · DOI · PMC7588211

Activating transcription factor 3 deficiency promotes cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction, and fibrosis induced by pressure overload [3]

Research article Zhou H, Shen DF, Bian ZY, Zong J, Deng W, Zhang Y, et al. · · 2011 · cited 72 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3), which is encoded by an adaptive-response gene induced by various stimuli, plays an important role in the cardiovascular system.
Closing excerpt
Our results suggested that ATF3 plays a crucial role in the development of cardiac hypertrophy via negative regulation of the MEK-ERK1/2 and JNK pathways.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (179 words)

Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3), which is encoded by an adaptive-response gene induced by various stimuli, plays an important role in the cardiovascular system. However, the effect of ATF3 on cardiac hypertrophy induced by a pathological stimulus has not been determined. Here, we investigated the effects of ATF3 deficiency on cardiac hypertrophy using in vitro and in vivo models. Aortic banding (AB) was performed to induce cardiac hypertrophy in mice. Cardiac hypertrophy was estimated by echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements and by pathological and molecular analysis. ATF3 deficiency promoted cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction and fibrosis after 4 weeks of AB compared to the wild type (WT) mice. Furthermore, enhanced activation of the MEK-ERK1/2 and JNK pathways was found in ATF3-knockout (KO) mice compared to WT mice. In vitro studies performed in cultured neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes confirmed that ATF3 deficiency promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy induced by angiotensin II, which was associated with the amplification of MEK-ERK1/2 and JNK signaling. Our results suggested that ATF3 plays a crucial role in the development of cardiac hypertrophy via negative regulation of the MEK-ERK1/2 and JNK pathways.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22053207 · DOI · PMC3203896

Calculation of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure including left atrial function is superior to morphology alone and accurately identifies elevated filling pressures in left heart disease [4]

Research article Backhaus SJ, Schmermund BN, Rieth AJ, Rademann M, Kriechbaum SD, Wolter JS, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundRight heart catheterization (RHC) with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) assessment is the reference standard for diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but remains largely underused.
Closing excerpt
53, p ConclusionFunctional PCWP may aid in the identification of post-capillary involvement in PH and HFpEF superiorly compared to morphology-derived PCWP and shows prognostic implications.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (309 words)

BackgroundRight heart catheterization (RHC) with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) assessment is the reference standard for diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but remains largely underused. Different approaches for non-invasive PCWP calculation have been proposed. However, as left atrial strain (LA Es) and end-systolic volume index (ESVi) emerge as key criteria in HFpEF, we sought to investigate them for PCWP calculation.MethodsThe derivation population consisted of patients referred to RHC and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging who were enrolled in a prospective monocentric registry. Patients were classified by RHC according to current guideline recommendations. The external validation population consisted of patients included in the HFpEF-Stress trial who underwent exercise-stress RHC and CMR with follow-up after 4 years for hospitalized cardiovascular events. Performance of strain-derived PCWP was compared to a published LA volume (LAV) and left ventricular mass (LVM) derived method.ResultsThe derivation population consisted of n = 209 patients, n = 123 underwent exercise-stress RHC (n = 55 without pulmonary hypertension [PH], n = 72 pre-capillary, n = 27 combined post- and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension [CpcPH], n = 15 isolated post-capillary pulmonary hypertension [IpcPH], n = 34 exercise, and n = 6 unclassified PH). Linear regression models identified the following formulae for functional PCWPrest 10.304 - 0.095 * Es + 0.098 * ESVi and functional PCWPstress 24.666 - 0.251 * Es + 0.056 * ESVi calculation. The validation population consisted of n = 74 patients (n = 15 without, n = 5 pre-capillary, n = 8 CpcPH, n = 10 IpcPH, and n = 32 exercise PH with n = 4 remaining unclassified). Functional PCWPrest (11.8) and RHC-derived PCWPrest (11 mmHg) were statistically similar (p = 0.285) and showed moderate correlation (r = 0.53, p ConclusionFunctional PCWP may aid in the identification of post-capillary involvement in PH and HFpEF superiorly compared to morphology-derived PCWP and shows prognostic implications.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41468989 · DOI · PMC13126477

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers [5]
    Burkhoff D, Mirsky I, Suga H · Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol · 2005 · cited 544 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The right ventricle under pressure: cellular and molecular mechanisms of right-heart failure in pulmonary hypertension [6]
    Bogaard HJ, Abe K, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Voelkel NF · Chest · 2009 · cited 513 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Correlation with invasive left ventricular filling pressures and prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic diastolic parameters used in the 2016 ESC heart failure guidelines and in the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations: a systematic review in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [7]
    Nauta JF, Hummel YM, van der Meer P, Lam CSP, Voors AA, van Melle JP · Eur J Heart Fail · 2018 · cited 148 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Gender differences in older patients with pressure-overload hypertrophy of the left ventricle [8]
    Aurigemma GP, Gaasch WH · Cardiology · 1995 · cited 71 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressure [9]
    Nagueh SF · Eur J Heart Fail · 2018 · cited 70 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights into diagnosis and pathophysiology [10]
    Nagueh SF · Cardiovasc Res · 2021 · cited 64 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Bizino MB, Jazet IM, Westenberg JJM, van Eyk HJ, Paiman EHM, Smit JWA, et al.. Effect of liraglutide on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: randomized placebo-controlled trial. . 2019. PMID 31039778 · DOI · PMC6492440
  2. Carrillo-Salinas FJ, Anastasiou M, Ngwenyama N, Kaur K, Tai A, Smolgovsky SA, et al.. Gut dysbiosis induced by cardiac pressure overload enhances adverse cardiac remodeling in a T cell-dependent manner. . 2020. PMID 33103561 · DOI · PMC7588211
  3. Zhou H, Shen DF, Bian ZY, Zong J, Deng W, Zhang Y, et al.. Activating transcription factor 3 deficiency promotes cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction, and fibrosis induced by pressure overload. . 2011. PMID 22053207 · DOI · PMC3203896
  4. Backhaus SJ, Schmermund BN, Rieth AJ, Rademann M, Kriechbaum SD, Wolter JS, et al.. Calculation of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure including left atrial function is superior to morphology alone and accurately identifies elevated filling pressures in left heart disease. . 2026. PMID 41468989 · DOI · PMC13126477
  5. Burkhoff D, Mirsky I, Suga H. Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005. PMID 16014610 · DOI
  6. Bogaard HJ, Abe K, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Voelkel NF. The right ventricle under pressure: cellular and molecular mechanisms of right-heart failure in pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2009. PMID 19265089 · DOI
  7. Nauta JF, Hummel YM, van der Meer P, Lam CSP, Voors AA, van Melle JP. Correlation with invasive left ventricular filling pressures and prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic diastolic parameters used in the 2016 ESC heart failure guidelines and in the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations: a systematic review in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018. PMID 29877602 · DOI
  8. Aurigemma GP, Gaasch WH. Gender differences in older patients with pressure-overload hypertrophy of the left ventricle. Cardiology. 1995. PMID 7553706 · DOI
  9. Nagueh SF. Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018. PMID 28990316 · DOI
  10. Nagueh SF. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights into diagnosis and pathophysiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2021. PMID 32717061 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Venous PressureCardiovascular Medicine
  • Central Venous PressureCardiovascular Medicine
  • Atrial PressureCardiovascular Medicine
  • Ventricular RemodelingCardiovascular Medicine
  • Arterial PressureCardiovascular Medicine
  • Vascular ResistanceCardiovascular Medicine

All 105 articles in Cardiovascular Medicine →

At a glance

4,148
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
179
review articles
66
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Venous PressureCardiovascular Medicine
  • Central Venous PressureCardiovascular Medicine
  • Atrial PressureCardiovascular Medicine
  • Ventricular RemodelingCardiovascular Medicine
  • Arterial PressureCardiovascular Medicine

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support