Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (886 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A condition caused by prolonged exposure to excessive human growth hormone in adults. It is characterized by bony enlargement of the FACE; lower jaw (prognathism); hands; FEET; HEAD; and thorax. The most common etiology is a growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. (From Joynt, Clinical Neurology, 1992, Ch36, pp79-80)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Inappropriate Growth Hormone Secretion Syndrome (Acromegaly); Somatotropin Hypersecretion Syndrome (Acromegaly); Hypersecretion Syndrome, Somatotropin (Acromegaly); Hypersecretion Syndromes, Somatotropin (Acromegaly); Somatotropin Hypersecretion Syndromes (Acromegaly); Syndrome, Somatotropin Hypersecretion (Acromegaly); Syndromes, Somatotropin Hypersecretion (Acromegaly); Inappropriate GH Secretion Syndrome (Acromegaly).
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Bone Diseases, Endocrine; Hyperpituitarism
Related concepts
- Human Growth Hormone
- Prognathism
- Thorax
- Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 9,800 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Acromegaly” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,306 of them (13.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 5,059 records.
Reviews account for 1,565 records (16.0%) and meta-analyses for 70. Randomized controlled trials number 134 (1.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 5,059 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,669 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,766 |
| 2020 onward | 1,306 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,565 | 16.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 70 | 0.7% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 134 | 1.4% |
Method: PubMed query "Acromegaly"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in neuroscience
Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission | 2024 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 151 | cc by PMID 37923946 · DOI · PMC10837217 |
| More than a decade of real-world experience of pegvisomant for acromegaly: ACROSTUDY | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 56 | cc by PMID 34342594 · DOI · PMC8428076 |
| Renal effects of growth hormone in health and in kidney disease | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 51 | cc by PMID 34143299 · DOI · PMC8260426 |
| Rapid and Sustained Response of Biochemically Uncontrolled Acromegaly to Once-daily Oral Paltusotine Treatment | 2026 | Randomized controlled trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 11 | cc by PMID 41128642 · DOI · PMC13016795 |
Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposeThe 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionConsensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)
PurposeThe 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.MethodsFifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes.ResultsIn a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches.ConclusionConsensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37923946 · DOI · PMC10837217
More than a decade of real-world experience of pegvisomant for acromegaly: ACROSTUDY [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectiveTo report the final long-term safety and efficacy analyses of patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant from the ACROSTUDY.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionThis comprehensive review of the complete cohort in ACROSTUDY confirmed the overall favourable benefit-to-risk profile and high efficacy of PEGV as mono- and combination therapy in patients with an aggressive course/uncontrolled/active acromegaly requiring long-term medical therapy for control.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (239 words)
ObjectiveTo report the final long-term safety and efficacy analyses of patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant from the ACROSTUDY.DesignGlobal (15 countries), multicentre, non-interventional study (2004-2017).MethodsThe complete ACROSTUDY cohort comprised patients with acromegaly, who were being treated with pegvisomant (PEGV) prior to the study or at enrolment. The main endpoints were long-term safety (comorbidities, adverse events (AEs), pituitary tumour volumes, liver tests) and efficacy (IGF1 changes).ResultsPatients (n = 2221) were treated with PEGV for a median of 9.3 years (range, 0-20.8 years) and followed up for a median of 7.4 years (range, 0-13.9 years). Before PEGV, 96.3% had received other acromegaly treatments (surgery/radiotherapy/medications). Before PEGV treatment, 87.2% of patients reported comorbidities. During ACROSTUDY, 5567 AEs were reported in 56.5% of patients and of these 613 were considered treatment-related (in 16.5% of patients) and led to drug withdrawal in 1.3%. Pituitary imaging showed a tumour size increase in 7.1% of patients; the majority (71.1%) reported no changes. Abnormal AST or ALT liver tests occurred in 3.2% of patients. IGF1 normalization rate improved over time, increasing from 11.4% at PEGV start to 53.7% at year 1, and reaching 75.4% at year 10 with the use of ≥30 mg PEGV/day in an increasing proportion of patients.ConclusionThis comprehensive review of the complete cohort in ACROSTUDY confirmed the overall favourable benefit-to-risk profile and high efficacy of PEGV as mono- and combination therapy in patients with an aggressive course/uncontrolled/active acromegaly requiring long-term medical therapy for control.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34342594 · DOI · PMC8428076
Renal effects of growth hormone in health and in kidney disease [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Growth hormone (GH) and its mediator insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) have manifold effects on the kidneys.
- Closing excerpt
- Finally, the impact of short- and long-term treatment with rhGH/rhIGF-1 on kidney function in patients with kidney diseases will be discussed.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (227 words)
Growth hormone (GH) and its mediator insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) have manifold effects on the kidneys. GH and IGF receptors are abundantly expressed in the kidney, including the glomerular and tubular cells. GH can act either directly on the kidneys or via circulating or paracrine-synthesized IGF-1. The GH/IGF-1 system regulates glomerular hemodynamics, renal gluconeogenesis, tubular sodium and water, phosphate, and calcium handling, as well as renal synthesis of 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D3 and the antiaging hormone Klotho. The latter also acts as a coreceptor of the phosphaturic hormone fibroblast-growth factor 23 in the proximal tubule. Recombinant human GH (rhGH) is widely used in the treatment of short stature in children, including those with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Animal studies and observations in acromegalic patients demonstrate that GH-excess can have deleterious effects on kidney health, including glomerular hyperfiltration, renal hypertrophy, and glomerulosclerosis. In addition, elevated GH in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus was thought to induce podocyte injury and thereby contribute to the development of diabetic nephropathy. This manuscript gives an overview of the physiological actions of GH/IGF-1 on the kidneys and the multiple alterations of the GH/IGF-1 system and its consequences in patients with acromegaly, CKD, nephrotic syndrome, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Finally, the impact of short- and long-term treatment with rhGH/rhIGF-1 on kidney function in patients with kidney diseases will be discussed.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34143299 · DOI · PMC8260426
Rapid and Sustained Response of Biochemically Uncontrolled Acromegaly to Once-daily Oral Paltusotine Treatment [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ContextPaltusotine is a nonpeptide, selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly.
- Closing excerpt
- Paltusotine was associated with rapid, sustained IGF-I reduction, significant symptom improvement and stable or reduced pituitary tumor size and was well tolerated.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)
ContextPaltusotine is a nonpeptide, selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist in development as once-daily oral treatment for acromegaly.ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety of paltusotine in patients with biochemically uncontrolled acromegaly not currently receiving medical therapy.MethodsIn this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with medically untreated acromegaly at randomization (stratum 1: medication-naïve or off acromegaly medications ≥4 months [IGF-I ≥ 1.3 × upper limit of normal {ULN}]; stratum 2: controlled on a somatostatin receptor ligand and underwent washout [IGF-I increase ≥30% to ≥1.1 × ULN]) received paltusotine or placebo for 24 weeks.ResultsA total of 111 patients (stratum 1, n = 82; stratum 2, n = 29) enrolled (paltusotine, n = 54; placebo, n = 57). The primary endpoint of IGF-I normalization at 24 weeks was met in 55.6% of paltusotine-treated patients vs 5.3% for placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 42.81; 95% CI, 8.44-455.82; P ConclusionIGF-I normalized in significantly more patients with uncontrolled acromegaly treated with paltusotine vs placebo. Paltusotine was associated with rapid, sustained IGF-I reduction, significant symptom improvement and stable or reduced pituitary tumor size and was well tolerated.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41128642 · DOI · PMC13016795
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline [5]
- Research article A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes [6]
- Research article Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis [7]
- Research article Acromegaly [8]
- Research article Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus [9]
- Research article A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines [10]
References
- Giustina A, Biermasz N, Casanueva FF, Fleseriu M, Mortini P, Strasburger C, et al.. Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission. . 2024. PMID 37923946 · DOI · PMC10837217
- Fleseriu M, Führer-Sakel D, van der Lely AJ, De Marinis L, Brue T, van der Lans-Bussemaker J, et al.. More than a decade of real-world experience of pegvisomant for acromegaly: ACROSTUDY. . 2021. PMID 34342594 · DOI · PMC8428076
- Haffner D, Grund A, Leifheit-Nestler M. Renal effects of growth hormone in health and in kidney disease. . 2021. PMID 34143299 · DOI · PMC8260426
- Biller BMK, Casagrande A, Elenkova A, Boguszewski CL, Jallad RS, Hu B, et al.. Rapid and Sustained Response of Biochemically Uncontrolled Acromegaly to Once-daily Oral Paltusotine Treatment. . 2026. PMID 41128642 · DOI · PMC13016795
- Katznelson L, Laws ER, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, et al.. Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014. PMID 25356808 · DOI
- Melmed S, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Klibanski A, Casanueva FF, Wass JAH, et al.. A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018. PMID 30050156 · DOI · PMC7136157
- Dekkers OM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Vandenbroucke JP. Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008. PMID 17971431 · DOI
- Colao A, Grasso LFS, Giustina A, Melmed S, Chanson P, Pereira AM, et al.. Acromegaly. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019. PMID 30899019 · DOI
- Giustina A, Barkhoudarian G, Beckers A, Ben-Shlomo A, Biermasz N, Biller B, et al.. Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2020. PMID 32914330 · DOI · PMC7942783
- Fleseriu M, Biller BMK, Freda PU, Gadelha MR, Giustina A, Katznelson L, et al.. A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines. Pituitary. 2021. PMID 33079318 · DOI · PMC7864830
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.