Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Thorax
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Thorax

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The upper part of the trunk between the NECK and the abdomen.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (878 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The upper part of the trunk between the NECK and the abdomen. It contains the chief organs of the circulatory and respiratory systems. (From Stedman, 25th ed)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Chest; Chests; Thoraces; Thorace.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Torso
Narrower topics
Thoracic Cavity; Thoracic Wall
See also
Mass Chest X-Ray; Radiography, Thoracic; Thoracic Surgery; Thoracoplasty; Thoracoscopy; Thoracostomy; Thoracotomy

Related concepts

  • Abdomen

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 42,165 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Thorax” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 5,539 of them (13.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 21,706 records.

Reviews account for 2,720 records (6.5%) and meta-analyses for 125. Randomized controlled trials number 546 (1.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 21,706 records; 2000-2009: 6,166 records; 2010-2019: 8,754 records; 2020 onward: 5,539 records21,706through 19996,1662000-20098,7542010-20195,5392020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199921,706
2000-20096,166
2010-20198,754
2020 onward5,539
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.3 percentReviews6.5% (2,720)Meta-analyses0.3% (125)Randomized controlled trials1.3% (546)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 42,165 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,7206.5%
Meta-analyses1250.3%
Randomized controlled trials5461.3%

Method: PubMed query "Thorax"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Changes in intrathoracic pressure, not arterial pulsations, exert the greatest effect on tracer influx in the spinal cord
Liu S, Bilston LE, Flores Rodriguez N, Wright C, McMullan S, Lloyd R, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
21cc by
PMID 35135574 · DOI · PMC8822685
Effective deep learning approaches for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from chest computed tomography volumes
Ortiz A, Trivedi A, Desbiens J, Blazes M, Robinson C, Gupta S, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 35110593 · DOI · PMC8810911
Pulmonary and chest wall function in obese adults
Lo Mauro A, Tringali G, Codecasa F, Abbruzzese L, Sartorio A, Aliverti A
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
15cc by
PMID 37852999 · DOI · PMC10585005
Flexible circuit-free system via passive modulated ultrasound for wireless thoracic pressure monitoring
Wang M, Jia L, Jia X, Li H, Feng X
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 39970205 · DOI · PMC11837986

Changes in intrathoracic pressure, not arterial pulsations, exert the greatest effect on tracer influx in the spinal cord [1]

Research article Liu S, Bilston LE, Flores Rodriguez N, Wright C, McMullan S, Lloyd R, et al. · · 2022 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation in the brain has garnered considerable attention in recent times.
Closing excerpt
Arterial pulsations likely drive fluid transport from perivascular spaces into the surrounding interstitium, but their overall impact is less than that of the respiratory cycle on net tracer influx.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (304 words)

BackgroundCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation in the brain has garnered considerable attention in recent times. In contrast, there have been fewer studies focused on the spine, despite the expected importance of CSF circulation in disorders specific to the spine, including syringomyelia. The driving forces that regulate spinal CSF flow are not well defined and are likely to be different to the brain given the anatomical differences and proximity to the heart and lungs. The aims of this study were to determine the effects of heart rate, blood pressure and respiration on the distribution of CSF tracers in the spinal subarachnoid space, as well as into the spinal cord interstitium.MethodsIn Sprague Dawley rats, physiological parameters were manipulated such that the effects of spontaneous breathing (generating alternating positive and negative intrathoracic pressures), mechanical ventilation (positive intrathoracic pressure only), tachy/bradycardia, as well as hyper/hypotension were separately studied. To investigate spinal CSF hydrodynamics, in vivo near-infrared imaging of intracisternally infused indocyanine green was performed. CSF tracer transport was further characterised with in vivo two-photon intravital imaging. Tracer influx at a microscopic level was quantitatively characterised by ex vivo epifluorescence imaging of fluorescent ovalbumin.ResultsCompared to mechanically ventilated controls, spontaneous breathing animals had significantly greater movement of tracer in the subarachnoid space. There was also greater influx into the spinal cord interstitium. Hypertension and tachycardia had no significant effect on spinal subarachnoid spinal CSF tracer flux and exerted less effect than respiration on tracer influx into the spinal cord.ConclusionsIntrathoracic pressure changes that occur over the respiratory cycle, particularly decreased intrathoracic pressures generated during inspiration, have a profound effect on tracer movement after injection into spinal CSF and increase cord parenchymal tracer influx. Arterial pulsations likely drive fluid transport from perivascular spaces into the surrounding interstitium, but their overall impact is less than that of the respiratory cycle on net tracer influx.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35135574 · DOI · PMC8822685

Effective deep learning approaches for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from chest computed tomography volumes [2]

Research article Ortiz A, Trivedi A, Desbiens J, Blazes M, Robinson C, Gupta S, et al. · · 2022 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The rapid evolution of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an urgent need for effective clinical tools to reduce transmission and manage severe illness.
Closing excerpt
These approaches enable the automated extraction of clinically relevant features from chest CT volumes for risk stratification of COVID-19 patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)

The rapid evolution of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an urgent need for effective clinical tools to reduce transmission and manage severe illness. Numerous teams are quickly developing artificial intelligence approaches to these problems, including using deep learning to predict COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis from chest computed tomography (CT) imaging data. In this work, we assess the value of aggregated chest CT data for COVID-19 prognosis compared to clinical metadata alone. We develop a novel patient-level algorithm to aggregate the chest CT volume into a 2D representation that can be easily integrated with clinical metadata to distinguish COVID-19 pneumonia from chest CT volumes from healthy participants and participants with other viral pneumonia. Furthermore, we present a multitask model for joint segmentation of different classes of pulmonary lesions present in COVID-19 infected lungs that can outperform individual segmentation models for each task. We directly compare this multitask segmentation approach to combining feature-agnostic volumetric CT classification feature maps with clinical metadata for predicting mortality. We show that the combination of features derived from the chest CT volumes improve the AUC performance to 0.80 from the 0.52 obtained by using patients' clinical data alone. These approaches enable the automated extraction of clinically relevant features from chest CT volumes for risk stratification of COVID-19 patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35110593 · DOI · PMC8810911

Pulmonary and chest wall function in obese adults [3]

Research article Lo Mauro A, Tringali G, Codecasa F, Abbruzzese L, Sartorio A, Aliverti A · · 2023 · cited 15 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Obesity is frequently associated with breathing disorders.
Closing excerpt
In addition, OEP is able to localize the restrictive effect of obesity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)

Obesity is frequently associated with breathing disorders. To investigate if and how the highest levels of obesity impact respiratory function, 17 subjects with obesity (median age: 49 years; BMI: 39.7 kg/m2, 8 females) and 10 normal-weighted subjects (49 years; 23.9 kg/m2, 5 females) were studied. The abdominal volume occupied 41% in the obese group, being higher (p < 0.001) than the normal-weighted group (31%), indicating accumulation of abdominal fat. Restrictive lung defect was present in 17% of subjects with obesity. At rest in the supine position, subjects with obesity breathed with higher minute ventilation (11.9 L/min) and lower ribcage contribution (5.7%) than normal weighted subjects (7.5 L/min, p = 0.001 and 31.1%, p = 0.003, respectively), thus indicating thoracic restriction. Otherwise healthy obesity might not be characterized by a systematic restrictive lung pattern. Despite this, another sign of restriction could be poor thoracic expansion at rest in the supine position, resulting in increased ventilation. Class 3 obesity made respiratory rate further increased. Opto-electronic plethysmography and its thoraco-abdominal analysis of awake breathing add viable and interesting information in subjects with obesity that were complementary to pulmonary function tests. In addition, OEP is able to localize the restrictive effect of obesity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37852999 · DOI · PMC10585005

Flexible circuit-free system via passive modulated ultrasound for wireless thoracic pressure monitoring [4]

Research article Wang M, Jia L, Jia X, Li H, Feng X · · 2025 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Implantable medical devices (IMDs) provide effective medical solutions for diverse health care applications.
Closing excerpt
The PMU provides a human-friendly wireless sensing and communication strategy for IMDs, which promotes advancements in health care applications within the human body.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (160 words)

Implantable medical devices (IMDs) provide effective medical solutions for diverse health care applications. Electrical circuits are crucial for implantable devices due to the requirement of intended functions, such as communication with external devices. Circuits have several risks, such as biocompatibility issues, power limitations, or size constraints. In this work, we propose a passive modulated ultrasound (PMU) principle for IMDs and develop a circuit-free ultrasonic system (CUS) for thoracic pressure monitoring. The PMU principle can passively modulate monitored physiological signals into ultrasound pulses without using electrical circuits or power supply. The size of the developed CUS is only 2.5 millimeters in radius and 850 micrometers in height. Animal experiments demonstrated that the CUS, with a high sensitivity (-22.96 millivolts per kilopascal), can monitor thoracic pressure to assist in diagnosing different heart diseases, including cardiac arrest and myocardial infarction. The PMU provides a human-friendly wireless sensing and communication strategy for IMDs, which promotes advancements in health care applications within the human body.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39970205 · DOI · PMC11837986

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks [5]
    El-Boghdadly K, Wolmarans M, Stengel AD, Albrecht E, Chin KJ, Elsharkawy H, et al. · Reg Anesth Pain Med · 2021 · cited 216 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pneumothorax following thoracentesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Gordon CE, Feller-Kopman D, Balk EM, Smetana GW · Arch Intern Med · 2010 · cited 198 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Blunt trauma related chest wall and pulmonary injuries: An overview [7]
    Dogrul BN, Kiliccalan I, Asci ES, Peker SC · Chin J Traumatol · 2020 · cited 149 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ITMIG Classification of Mediastinal Compartments and Multidisciplinary Approach to Mediastinal Masses [8]
    Carter BW, Benveniste MF, Madan R, Godoy MC, de Groot PM, Truong MT, et al. · Radiographics · 2017 · cited 117 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state-of-the-art review [9]
    Chin KJ, Versyck B, Pawa A · Anaesthesia · 2021 · cited 115 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging [10]
    Kinsey CM, Arenberg DA · Am J Respir Crit Care Med · 2014 · cited 92 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Liu S, Bilston LE, Flores Rodriguez N, Wright C, McMullan S, Lloyd R, et al.. Changes in intrathoracic pressure, not arterial pulsations, exert the greatest effect on tracer influx in the spinal cord. . 2022. PMID 35135574 · DOI · PMC8822685
  2. Ortiz A, Trivedi A, Desbiens J, Blazes M, Robinson C, Gupta S, et al.. Effective deep learning approaches for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from chest computed tomography volumes. . 2022. PMID 35110593 · DOI · PMC8810911
  3. Lo Mauro A, Tringali G, Codecasa F, Abbruzzese L, Sartorio A, Aliverti A. Pulmonary and chest wall function in obese adults. . 2023. PMID 37852999 · DOI · PMC10585005
  4. Wang M, Jia L, Jia X, Li H, Feng X. Flexible circuit-free system via passive modulated ultrasound for wireless thoracic pressure monitoring. . 2025. PMID 39970205 · DOI · PMC11837986
  5. El-Boghdadly K, Wolmarans M, Stengel AD, Albrecht E, Chin KJ, Elsharkawy H, et al.. Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021. PMID 34145070 · DOI
  6. Gordon CE, Feller-Kopman D, Balk EM, Smetana GW. Pneumothorax following thoracentesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID 20177035 · DOI
  7. Dogrul BN, Kiliccalan I, Asci ES, Peker SC. Blunt trauma related chest wall and pulmonary injuries: An overview. Chin J Traumatol. 2020. PMID 32417043 · DOI · PMC7296362
  8. Carter BW, Benveniste MF, Madan R, Godoy MC, de Groot PM, Truong MT, et al.. ITMIG Classification of Mediastinal Compartments and Multidisciplinary Approach to Mediastinal Masses. Radiographics. 2017. PMID 28129068 · DOI
  9. Chin KJ, Versyck B, Pawa A. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID 33426660 · DOI
  10. Kinsey CM, Arenberg DA. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID 24484269 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Thoracic WallAnatomy and Physiology
  • MediastinumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pleural CavityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Waist CircumferenceAnatomy and Physiology
  • Situs InversusRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Abdominal WallAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

42,165
PubMed records on this heading
13%
published since 2020
2,720
review articles
546
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Thoracic WallAnatomy and Physiology
  • MediastinumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pleural CavityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Waist CircumferenceAnatomy and Physiology
  • Situs InversusRare and Inherited Diseases

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support