Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (785 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Physiologically, the opposition to flow of air caused by the forces of friction. As a part of pulmonary function testing, it is the ratio of driving pressure to the rate of air flow.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Airway Resistances; Resistance, Airway; Resistances, Airway.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Respiratory Function Tests; Respiratory Physiological Phenomena
- See also
- Respiratory Mechanics
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 13,620 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Airway Resistance” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 405 of them (3.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 9,419 records.
Reviews account for 955 records (7.0%) and meta-analyses for 8. Randomized controlled trials number 806 (5.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 9,419 |
| 2000-2009 | 2,336 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,460 |
| 2020 onward | 405 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 955 | 7.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 8 | 0.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 806 | 5.9% |
Method: PubMed query "Airway Resistance"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced expiration measurements in mouse models of obstructive and restrictive lung diseases | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 114 | cc by PMID 28629359 · DOI · PMC5477381 |
| Nasal cavity changes and the respiratory standard after maxillary expansion | 2008 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 37 | cc by PMID 19082360 · DOI · PMC9445931 |
| Four-phase rhinomanometry: a multicentric retrospective analysis of 36,563 clinical measurements | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 31 | cc by PMID 26198284 · DOI · PMC4824807 |
| Exploring upper airway and laryngeal resistance to noninvasive ventilation in healthy awake adults | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 41103067 · DOI · PMC12531353 |
Forced expiration measurements in mouse models of obstructive and restrictive lung diseases [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundPulmonary function measurements are important when studying respiratory disease models.
- Closing excerpt
- Routine combined lung function assessments could increase the translational utility of mouse models.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)
BackgroundPulmonary function measurements are important when studying respiratory disease models. Both resistance and compliance have been used to assess lung function in mice. Yet, it is not always clear how these parameters relate to forced expiration (FE)-related parameters, most commonly used in humans. We aimed to characterize FE measurements in four well-established mouse models of lung diseases.MethodDetailed respiratory mechanics and FE measurements were assessed concurrently in Balb/c mice, using the forced oscillation and negative pressure-driven forced expiration techniques, respectively. Measurements were performed at baseline and following increasing methacholine challenges in control Balb/c mice as well as in four disease models: bleomycin-induced fibrosis, elastase-induced emphysema, LPS-induced acute lung injury and house dust mite-induced asthma.ResultsRespiratory mechanics parameters (airway resistance, tissue damping and tissue elastance) confirmed disease-specific phenotypes either at baseline or following methacholine challenge. Similarly, lung function defects could be detected in each disease model by at least one FE-related parameter (FEV0.1, FEF0.1, FVC, FEV0.1/FVC ratio and PEF) at baseline or during the methacholine provocation assay.ConclusionsFE-derived outcomes in four mouse disease models behaved similarly to changes found in human spirometry. Routine combined lung function assessments could increase the translational utility of mouse models.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28629359 · DOI · PMC5477381
Nasal cavity changes and the respiratory standard after maxillary expansion [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- UnlabelledMandibular cross-sectional deficiency is a dentofacial defect in connection with the narrowing of the mandibular arch width.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionAnteroposterior cephalometric studies show evidence of an enlarged nasal cavity following maxillary expansion.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (160 words)
UnlabelledMandibular cross-sectional deficiency is a dentofacial defect in connection with the narrowing of the mandibular arch width. This abnormality is a significant etiopathogenic factor and it is often associated with nasal breathing difficulties. This atresia may be treated through Rapid Maxillary Expansion or Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion, depending on the patient's age. Both procedures will change the craniofacial structure, especially the nasal cavity.AimBased on literature review, the purpose of this paper was to report the relationship among maxillary expansion, nasal cavity and Nasal Airflow Resistance.MethodA non-systematic literary review was conducted in search of experimental studies to treat maxillary atresia. Papers considering Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion were included, whereas those using Maxillary Expansion through Segmented Osteotomy were excluded.ResultRapid Maxillary Expansion and Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion cause dentofacial changes, especially in the nasal cavity. Consequently, the nose width enlarges, reducing Nasal Airflow Resistance.ConclusionAnteroposterior cephalometric studies show evidence of an enlarged nasal cavity following maxillary expansion.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 19082360 · DOI · PMC9445931
Four-phase rhinomanometry: a multicentric retrospective analysis of 36,563 clinical measurements [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Rhinomanometry can still be considered as the standard technique for the objective assessment of the ventilatory function of the nose.
- Closing excerpt
- Adoption of the distribution for the growing nose and analysis of the total nasal resistance is addressed, and typical findings of nasal valve phenomena are outlined.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)
Rhinomanometry can still be considered as the standard technique for the objective assessment of the ventilatory function of the nose. Reliable technical requirements are given by fast digital sensors and modern information technology. However, the xyimaging of the pressure-flow relation typically shows loops as a sign of hysteresis, with the need for resolution of the breath in four phases. The three pillars of 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR) are the replacement of estimations by measurements, the introduction of parameters related to the subjective sensing of obstruction, and the graphical information regarding the disturbed function of the nasal valve. In a meta-analysis of 36,563 clinical measurements, we analyze the errors of the "classic" parameters (flow in 150 Pa) and reject the further use of these parameters as obsolete, because they correspond to an inaccurate estimation rather than proper measurement. In a pre-study of 1580 measurements, the logarithmic effective resistance (Reff) was found to have the highest correlation with values obtained from a visual analog scale. Next, we classify the inspiratory effective resistance in 20,069 measurements without treatment and 16,494 measurements after decongestion with xylometazoline 0.1 % spray in 20 % percentiles. The gradation of obstruction delivers not only "normal" values but also indications for the severity of the obstruction in adult Caucasian noses. Adoption of the distribution for the growing nose and analysis of the total nasal resistance is addressed, and typical findings of nasal valve phenomena are outlined.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26198284 · DOI · PMC4824807
Exploring upper airway and laryngeal resistance to noninvasive ventilation in healthy awake adults [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The interaction between anatomical structures, pressure, and airflow impacts the airway resistance.
- Closing excerpt
- Resistance increases with elevated IPAP levels, particularly within the upper airway.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)
The interaction between anatomical structures, pressure, and airflow impacts the airway resistance. The airflow during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) relies on the upper airway and laryngeal patency. This study aimed to quantify the airflow resistance at these levels during NIV. In this cross-sectional study examining 10 healthy, awake adults, we established a NIV setup incorporating a continuous video-recorded transnasal laryngoscopy and simultaneous airway pressure measurement using a transducer positioned above and below the vocal folds. Airflow and mask pressure were recorded by a pneumotachograph at the mask. NIV was delivered with inspiratory positive pressure (IPAP)/expiratory positive pressure (EPAP) set to 10/4 and 15/4 cmH2O. Upper airway (Ruaw) and translaryngeal (Rtl) resistance were calculated and compared with laryngoscopic findings. During IPAP10/EPAP4, the Ruaw was 4.25/4.21 and Rtl 2.20/3.45. During IPAP15/EPAP4, the Ruaw was 5.18/5.73, and the Rtl was 2.31/3.83. Ruaw was significantly higher than Rtl for inspiration at both IPAP levels (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012), and for expiration with IPAP15/EPAP4 (p = 0.048). The resistance appeared dynamic during the NIV cycle, and the findings aligned with the laryngoscopic observations. NIV modulates upper airway and translaryngeal resistance. Resistance increases with elevated IPAP levels, particularly within the upper airway.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41103067 · DOI · PMC12531353
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway [5]
- Research article Impact of obesity on respiratory function [6]
- Research article Clinical significance and applications of oscillometry [7]
- Research article Body plethysmography--its principles and clinical use [8]
- Research article Clinical applications of forced oscillation to assess peripheral airway function [9]
- Research article Effects of marijuana smoking on the lung [10]
References
- Devos FC, Maaske A, Robichaud A, Pollaris L, Seys S, Lopez CA, et al.. Forced expiration measurements in mouse models of obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. . 2017. PMID 28629359 · DOI · PMC5477381
- Ramires T, Maia RA, Barone JR. Nasal cavity changes and the respiratory standard after maxillary expansion. . 2008. PMID 19082360 · DOI · PMC9445931
- Vogt K, Wernecke KD, Behrbohm H, Gubisch W, Argale M. Four-phase rhinomanometry: a multicentric retrospective analysis of 36,563 clinical measurements. . 2016. PMID 26198284 · DOI · PMC4824807
- Brekka AK, Vollsæter M, Fretheim-Kelly Z, Lujan M, Nilsen RM, Clemm HH, et al.. Exploring upper airway and laryngeal resistance to noninvasive ventilation in healthy awake adults. . 2025. PMID 41103067 · DOI · PMC12531353
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2003. PMID 12717151 · DOI
- Littleton SW. Impact of obesity on respiratory function. Respirology. 2012. PMID 22040049 · DOI
- Kaminsky DA, Simpson SJ, Berger KI, Calverley P, de Melo PL, Dandurand R, et al.. Clinical significance and applications of oscillometry. Eur Respir Rev. 2022. PMID 35140105 · DOI · PMC9488764
- Criée CP, Sorichter S, Smith HJ, Kardos P, Merget R, Heise D, et al.. Body plethysmography--its principles and clinical use. Respir Med. 2011. PMID 21356587 · DOI
- Goldman MD, Saadeh C, Ross D. Clinical applications of forced oscillation to assess peripheral airway function. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2005. PMID 15990365 · DOI
- Tashkin DP. Effects of marijuana smoking on the lung. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013. PMID 23802821 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.