Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Respiratory Mechanics
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Respiratory Mechanics

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The physical or mechanical action of the lungs; diaphragm; RIBS; and chest wall during respiration.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (911 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The physical or mechanical action of the lungs; diaphragm; RIBS; and chest wall during respiration. It includes airflow, lung volume, neural and reflex controls, mechanoreceptors, breathing patterns, etc.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Mechanic, Respiratory; Mechanics, Respiratory; Respiratory Mechanic; Breathing Mechanics; Breathing Mechanic; Mechanic, Breathing; Mechanics, Breathing.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Respiration
Narrower topics
Bronchoconstriction; Exhalation; Inhalation
See also
Airway Resistance; Lung Compliance

Related concepts

  • Lung
  • Diaphragm
  • Thoracic Wall

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 29,783 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Respiratory Mechanics” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,990 of them (10.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 9,199 records.

Reviews account for 2,875 records (9.7%) and meta-analyses for 122. Randomized controlled trials number 2,031 (6.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 9,168 records; 2000-2009: 9,199 records; 2010-2019: 8,426 records; 2020 onward: 2,990 records9,168through 19999,1992000-20098,4262010-20192,9902020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19999,168
2000-20099,199
2010-20198,426
2020 onward2,990
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 6.8 percentReviews9.7% (2,875)Meta-analyses0.4% (122)Randomized controlled trials6.8% (2,031)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 29,783 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,8759.7%
Meta-analyses1220.4%
Randomized controlled trials2,0316.8%

Method: PubMed query "Respiratory Mechanics"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Exhaled aerosol increases with COVID-19 infection, age, and obesity
Edwards DA, Ausiello D, Salzman J, Devlin T, Langer R, Beddingfield BJ, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
160cc by
PMID 33563754 · DOI · PMC7923364
Human Breathomics Database
Kuo TC, Tan CE, Wang SY, Lin OA, Su BH, Hsu MT, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
50cc by
PMID 31976536 · DOI · PMC6978997
The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology
van der Sar IG, Wijbenga N, Nakshbandi G, Aerts JGJV, Manintveld OC, Wijsenbeek MS, et al.
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
47cc by
PMID 34535144 · DOI · PMC8448171
Direct Numerical Simulations of Inhalation in a 23-Generation Lung Model
Atzori M, Gallorini E, Cottini C, Benassi A, Quadrio M
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 42630053 · DOI · PMC13498875

Exhaled aerosol increases with COVID-19 infection, age, and obesity [1]

Research article Edwards DA, Ausiello D, Salzman J, Devlin T, Langer R, Beddingfield BJ, et al. · · 2021 · cited 160 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
COVID-19 transmits by droplets generated from surfaces of airway mucus during processes of respiration within hosts infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus.
Closing excerpt
These findings suggest that quantitative assessment and control of exhaled aerosol may be critical to slowing the airborne spread of COVID-19 in the absence of an effective and widely disseminated vaccine.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (195 words)

COVID-19 transmits by droplets generated from surfaces of airway mucus during processes of respiration within hosts infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. We studied respiratory droplet generation and exhalation in human and nonhuman primate subjects with and without COVID-19 infection to explore whether SARS-CoV-2 infection, and other changes in physiological state, translate into observable evolution of numbers and sizes of exhaled respiratory droplets in healthy and diseased subjects. In our observational cohort study of the exhaled breath particles of 194 healthy human subjects, and in our experimental infection study of eight nonhuman primates infected, by aerosol, with SARS-CoV-2, we found that exhaled aerosol particles vary between subjects by three orders of magnitude, with exhaled respiratory droplet number increasing with degree of COVID-19 infection and elevated BMI-years. We observed that 18% of human subjects (35) accounted for 80% of the exhaled bioaerosol of the group (194), reflecting a superspreader distribution of bioaerosol analogous to a classical 20:80 superspreader of infection distribution. These findings suggest that quantitative assessment and control of exhaled aerosol may be critical to slowing the airborne spread of COVID-19 in the absence of an effective and widely disseminated vaccine.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33563754 · DOI · PMC7923364

Human Breathomics Database [2]

Research article Kuo TC, Tan CE, Wang SY, Lin OA, Su BH, Hsu MT, et al. · · 2020 · cited 50 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Breathomics is a special branch of metabolomics that quantifies volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from collected exhaled breath samples.
Closing excerpt
tw.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (288 words)

Breathomics is a special branch of metabolomics that quantifies volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from collected exhaled breath samples. Understanding how breath molecules are related to diseases, mechanisms and pathways identified from experimental analytical measurements is challenging due to the lack of an organized resource describing breath molecules, related references and biomedical information embedded in the literature. To provide breath VOCs, related references and biomedical information, we aim to organize a database composed of manually curated information and automatically extracted biomedical information. First, VOCs-related disease information was manually organized from 207 literature linked to 99 VOCs and known Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. Then an automated text mining algorithm was used to extract biomedical information from this literature. In the end, the manually curated information and auto-extracted biomedical information was combined to form a breath molecule database-the Human Breathomics Database (HBDB). We first manually curated and organized disease information including MeSH term from 207 literatures associated with 99 VOCs. Then, an automatic pipeline of text mining approach was used to collect 2766 literatures and extract biomedical information from breath researches. We combined curated information with automatically extracted biomedical information to assemble a breath molecule database, the HBDB. The HBDB is a database that includes references, VOCs and diseases associated with human breathomics. Most of these VOCs were detected in human breath samples or exhaled breath condensate samples. So far, the database contains a total of 913 VOCs in relation to human exhaled breath researches reported in 2766 publications. The HBDB is the most comprehensive HBDB of VOCs in human exhaled breath to date. It is a useful and organized resource for researchers and clinicians to identify and further investigate potential biomarkers from the breath of patients. Database URL: https://hbdb.cmdm.tw.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31976536 · DOI · PMC6978997

The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology [3]

Review article van der Sar IG, Wijbenga N, Nakshbandi G, Aerts JGJV, Manintveld OC, Wijsenbeek MS, et al. · · 2021 · cited 47 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
There is a need for timely, accurate diagnosis, and personalised management in lung diseases.
Closing excerpt
Furthermore, recommendations for future research to pave the way for clinical implementation of eNose technology are provided.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (181 words)

There is a need for timely, accurate diagnosis, and personalised management in lung diseases. Exhaled breath reflects inflammatory and metabolic processes in the human body, especially in the lungs. The analysis of exhaled breath using electronic nose (eNose) technology has gained increasing attention in the past years. This technique has great potential to be used in clinical practice as a real-time non-invasive diagnostic tool, and for monitoring disease course and therapeutic effects. To date, multiple eNoses have been developed and evaluated in clinical studies across a wide spectrum of lung diseases, mainly for diagnostic purposes. Heterogeneity in study design, analysis techniques, and differences between eNose devices currently hamper generalization and comparison of study results. Moreover, many pilot studies have been performed, while validation and implementation studies are scarce. These studies are needed before implementation in clinical practice can be realised. This review summarises the technical aspects of available eNose devices and the available evidence for clinical application of eNose technology in different lung diseases. Furthermore, recommendations for future research to pave the way for clinical implementation of eNose technology are provided.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34535144 · DOI · PMC8448171

Direct Numerical Simulations of Inhalation in a 23-Generation Lung Model [4]

Research article Atzori M, Gallorini E, Cottini C, Benassi A, Quadrio M · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The air flows in the proximal and distal portions of the human lungs are interconnected: the lower Reynolds number in the deeper generations causes a progressive flow regularization, but mass conservation requires flow rate oscillations to propagate through the airway bifurcations.
Closing excerpt
Even though these fluctuations are observed here in an idealized, rigid lung model, our findings suggest that the assumptions usually adopted in many of the current lung models might need to be revised.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (247 words)

The air flows in the proximal and distal portions of the human lungs are interconnected: the lower Reynolds number in the deeper generations causes a progressive flow regularization, but mass conservation requires flow rate oscillations to propagate through the airway bifurcations. To explain how these competing effects shape the flow state in the deeper generations, we have performed the first high-fidelity numerical simulation of the air flow in a lung model that includes 23 successive bifurcations of a single planar airway. Turbulence modeling or assumptions on flow regimes are not required. The chosen flow rate is steady on average, and representative of the peak inspiratory flow reached by adult patients breathing through therapeutic inhalers. As expected, advection becomes progressively less important after each bifurcation, until a time-dependent Stokes regime governed solely by viscous diffusion is established in the smallest generations. However, fluctuations in this regime are relatively fast and large with respect to the mean flow, which is in contrast with the commonly agreed picture that only the breathing frequency is relevant at the scale of the alveoli. We demonstrate that the characteristic frequency and amplitude of these fluctuations are linked to the flow in the upper part of the bronchial tree, as they originate from the time-dependent flow splitting in the upper bifurcations. Even though these fluctuations are observed here in an idealized, rigid lung model, our findings suggest that the assumptions usually adopted in many of the current lung models might need to be revised.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42630053 · DOI · PMC13498875

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise [5]
    Laveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A, Babb T, Barreiro E, Dres M, et al. · Eur Respir J · 2019 · cited 567 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Piezos thrive under pressure: mechanically activated ion channels in health and disease [6]
    Murthy SE, Dubin AE, Patapoutian A · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2017 · cited 484 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives [7]
    Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, Goligher EC, Carteaux G, Rittayamai N, et al. · Intensive Care Med · 2016 · cited 376 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Understanding the rhythm of breathing: so near, yet so far [8]
    Feldman JL, Del Negro CA, Gray PA · Annu Rev Physiol · 2013 · cited 330 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom [9]
    Guérin C, Albert RK, Beitler J, Gattinoni L, Jaber S, Marini JJ, et al. · Intensive Care Med · 2020 · cited 324 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ventilator-induced Lung Injury [10]
    Beitler JR, Malhotra A, Thompson BT · Clin Chest Med · 2016 · cited 250 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Edwards DA, Ausiello D, Salzman J, Devlin T, Langer R, Beddingfield BJ, et al.. Exhaled aerosol increases with COVID-19 infection, age, and obesity. . 2021. PMID 33563754 · DOI · PMC7923364
  2. Kuo TC, Tan CE, Wang SY, Lin OA, Su BH, Hsu MT, et al.. Human Breathomics Database. . 2020. PMID 31976536 · DOI · PMC6978997
  3. van der Sar IG, Wijbenga N, Nakshbandi G, Aerts JGJV, Manintveld OC, Wijsenbeek MS, et al.. The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology. . 2021. PMID 34535144 · DOI · PMC8448171
  4. Atzori M, Gallorini E, Cottini C, Benassi A, Quadrio M. Direct Numerical Simulations of Inhalation in a 23-Generation Lung Model. . 2026. PMID 42630053 · DOI · PMC13498875
  5. Laveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A, Babb T, Barreiro E, Dres M, et al.. ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise. Eur Respir J. 2019. PMID 30956204 · DOI
  6. Murthy SE, Dubin AE, Patapoutian A. Piezos thrive under pressure: mechanically activated ion channels in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017. PMID 28974772 · DOI
  7. Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, Goligher EC, Carteaux G, Rittayamai N, et al.. Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID 27334266 · DOI
  8. Feldman JL, Del Negro CA, Gray PA. Understanding the rhythm of breathing: so near, yet so far. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013. PMID 23121137 · DOI · PMC3671763
  9. Guérin C, Albert RK, Beitler J, Gattinoni L, Jaber S, Marini JJ, et al.. Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom. Intensive Care Med. 2020. PMID 33169218 · DOI · PMC7652705
  10. Beitler JR, Malhotra A, Thompson BT. Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Clin Chest Med. 2016. PMID 27842744 · DOI · PMC5131805

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • RespirationAnatomy and Physiology
  • Respiratory RateAnatomy and Physiology
  • BronchoconstrictionAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pulmonary Gas ExchangeAnatomy and Physiology
  • Work of BreathingAnatomy and Physiology
  • DiaphragmAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

29,783
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
2,875
review articles
2,031
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • RespirationAnatomy and Physiology
  • Respiratory RateAnatomy and Physiology
  • BronchoconstrictionAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pulmonary Gas ExchangeAnatomy and Physiology
  • Work of BreathingAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support