Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Aminoglycosides
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Aminoglycosides

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

Glycosylated compounds in which there is an amino substituent on the glycoside.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (607 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Glycosylated compounds in which there is an amino substituent on the glycoside. Some of them are clinically important antibiotics.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Aminoglycoside.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Glycosides
Narrower topics
Anthracyclines; Butirosin Sulfate; Calicheamicins; Gentamicins; Hygromycin B; Kanamycin; Metrizamide; Neomycin; Paromomycin; Puromycin; Spectinomycin; Streptomycin; Streptothricins; Streptozocin
See also
Amino Sugars

Related concepts

  • Antibiotics

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 181,388 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Aminoglycosides” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 25,257 of them (13.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 86,765 records.

Reviews account for 9,327 records (5.1%) and meta-analyses for 640. Randomized controlled trials number 7,055 (3.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 86,765 records; 2000-2009: 28,910 records; 2010-2019: 40,456 records; 2020 onward: 25,257 records86,765through 199928,9102000-200940,4562010-201925,2572020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199986,765
2000-200928,910
2010-201940,456
2020 onward25,257
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.9 percentReviews5.1% (9,327)Meta-analyses0.4% (640)Randomized controlled trials3.9% (7,055)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 181,388 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews9,3275.1%
Meta-analyses6400.4%
Randomized controlled trials7,0553.9%

Method: PubMed query "Aminoglycosides"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Targeting the powerhouse: the mitochondrial perspective on gentamicin-induced kidney injury
Korkut Celikates B, Ilgin S, Yilmaz MU, Atli Eklioglu O
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 41654647 · DOI · PMC13086777
A systematic literature review and (network) meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam for treating adult patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections
Collings H, Stone M, Chrysostomou M, Hirst A, Waldenberg TE, Yucel E, et al.
2026Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 41532768 · DOI · PMC12888884
Synergy between immune system and antibiotics drives infection control in mice
Padmakumari RG, Roy R, Mahmud F, Dehari D, Tesfaw G, Thomas C, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 41646972 · DOI · PMC12868242

Targeting the powerhouse: the mitochondrial perspective on gentamicin-induced kidney injury [1]

Review article Korkut Celikates B, Ilgin S, Yilmaz MU, Atli Eklioglu O · · 2026 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Gentamicin (GEN), an aminoglycoside antibiotic, induces nephrotoxicity primarily via mitochondrial dysfunction.
Closing excerpt
Overall, preserving mitochondrial function represents a promising avenue for reducing nephrotoxicity while maintaining the antibacterial efficacy of GEN.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (176 words)

Gentamicin (GEN), an aminoglycoside antibiotic, induces nephrotoxicity primarily via mitochondrial dysfunction. This review summarizes mechanisms including reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage, impairment of oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) activation. These mitochondrial alterations lead to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion, apoptosis, and renal injury. In addition to apoptotic pathways, necrotic cell death can also be triggered, further aggravating kidney damage. Furthermore, GEN has been reported to directly interfere with mitochondrial ribosomes and gene expression, highlighting mitochondria as both targets and amplifiers of cellular toxicity. Therapeutic approaches targeting mitochondrial integrity, including antioxidants and mitochondrial transplantation, demonstrate potential nephroprotection. Additional strategies such as mPTP, stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis, and pharmacological modulators of mitochondrial respiration have also shown promise in experimental studies. Understanding mitochondrial mechanisms underlying gentamicin-induced renal injury is crucial for developing targeted therapeutic strategies. A more comprehensive knowledge of mitochondrial regulation, organelle crosstalk, and early biomarkers of dysfunction will facilitate translation into clinical practice. Overall, preserving mitochondrial function represents a promising avenue for reducing nephrotoxicity while maintaining the antibacterial efficacy of GEN.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41654647 · DOI · PMC13086777

A systematic literature review and (network) meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam for treating adult patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections [2]

Systematic review Collings H, Stone M, Chrysostomou M, Hirst A, Waldenberg TE, Yucel E, et al. · · 2026 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Multidrug-resistantant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major public health concern necessitating new antimicrobials.
Closing excerpt
Larger prospective studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to further inform clinical decision-making.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (253 words)

Multidrug-resistantant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major public health concern necessitating new antimicrobials. There are new antimicrobials available with activity against MDR-P. aeruginosa, but there is a lack of robust evidence synthesis to guide clinical decision-making for patients with infections caused by MDR-P. aeruginosa. This study, which was supported by Merck & Co., Inc., aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) compared to other commonly used therapies (aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam [CZA]) among adults with MDR-P. aeruginosa infections. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify real-world clinical and healthcare-resource utilization outcomes for C/T versus comparators. A feasibility assessment excluded comparators that were not aminoglycosides/polymyxins or CZA due to insufficient data for comparisons. A meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on the included studies. Heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using I2 statistic. The NMA displayed statistically significant results for clinical cure (odds ratio [OR] = 0.308, 95% CI = 0.168-0.515) and all-cause mortality (OR = 1.651, 95% CI = 1.114-2.501) for C/T versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins, while microbiological cure and length of stay did not display statistical significance. However, comparisons for C/T versus CZA demonstrated no statistical significance for any of the outcomes explored. These findings suggest that C/T is more likely to achieve clinical cure and less likely to result in all-cause mortality compared to aminoglycosides/polymyxins. In the absence of head-to-head trials, this real-world evidence indicates potential advantages of using C/T over aminoglycosides/polymyxins for MDR-P. aeruginosa infections. Larger prospective studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to further inform clinical decision-making.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41532768 · DOI · PMC12888884

Synergy between immune system and antibiotics drives infection control in mice [3]

Research article Padmakumari RG, Roy R, Mahmud F, Dehari D, Tesfaw G, Thomas C, et al. · · 2025 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundAntibiotics and host immunity are traditionally viewed as independent defenses, with antibiotics reducing bacterial load to levels manageable by the immune system.
Closing excerpt
They highlight the therapeutic potential of augmenting innate immune activation to improve infection outcomes, particularly in immunocompromised patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)

BackgroundAntibiotics and host immunity are traditionally viewed as independent defenses, with antibiotics reducing bacterial load to levels manageable by the immune system. Modeling studies, however, predict that synergy between these defenses is critical for infection control, but this has not been experimentally verified.MethodsWe tested this concept using a Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infection model in immunocompetent (C57BL/6) and immunocompromised (NSG) mice treated with systemic tobramycin.ResultsIn C57BL/6 mice, tobramycin-mediated bacterial killing increased pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) - namely lipopolysaccharide (LPS) - which in turn amplified local inflammation, enhancing antibiotic efficacy in a manner largely dependent on neutrophils. In contrast, NSG mice failed to potentiate tobramycin bacterial killing to increase PAMPs and mount Tobramycin-induced boost in immune activation, resulting in reduced infection control. Importantly, topical PAMPs (LPS and N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP)) restored immune activation and improved infection control in NSG mice in a manner that was also dependent on neutrophil's function.ConclusionThese findings provide direct experimental evidence that antibiotic efficacy requires synergy with host immunity. They highlight the therapeutic potential of augmenting innate immune activation to improve infection outcomes, particularly in immunocompromised patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41646972 · DOI · PMC12868242

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: An update on the molecular mechanism and novel therapeutic strategies for effective management [4]
    Rawat PS, Jaiswal A, Khurana A, Bhatti JS, Navik U · Biomed Pharmacother · 2021 · cited 620 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Doxorubicin-An Agent with Multiple Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity [5]
    Kciuk M, Gielecińska A, Mujwar S, Kołat D, Kałuzińska-Kołat Ż, Celik I, et al. · Cells · 2023 · cited 563 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials [6]
    Hills RK, Castaigne S, Appelbaum FR, Delaunay J, Petersdorf S, Othus M, et al. · Lancet Oncol · 2014 · cited 563 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Underlying the Mechanisms of Doxorubicin-Induced Acute Cardiotoxicity: Oxidative Stress and Cell Death [7]
    Kong CY, Guo Z, Song P, Zhang X, Yuan YP, Teng T, et al. · Int J Biol Sci · 2022 · cited 333 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Review and meta-analysis of incidence and clinical predictors of anthracycline cardiotoxicity [8]
    Lotrionte M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Abbate A, Lanzetta G, D'Ascenzo F, Malavasi V, et al. · Am J Cardiol · 2013 · cited 275 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials [9]
    Paul M, Benuri-Silbiger I, Soares-Weiser K, Leibovici L · BMJ · 2004 · cited 260 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Korkut Celikates B, Ilgin S, Yilmaz MU, Atli Eklioglu O. Targeting the powerhouse: the mitochondrial perspective on gentamicin-induced kidney injury. . 2026. PMID 41654647 · DOI · PMC13086777
  2. Collings H, Stone M, Chrysostomou M, Hirst A, Waldenberg TE, Yucel E, et al.. A systematic literature review and (network) meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam for treating adult patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. . 2026. PMID 41532768 · DOI · PMC12888884
  3. Padmakumari RG, Roy R, Mahmud F, Dehari D, Tesfaw G, Thomas C, et al.. Synergy between immune system and antibiotics drives infection control in mice. . 2025. PMID 41646972 · DOI · PMC12868242
  4. Rawat PS, Jaiswal A, Khurana A, Bhatti JS, Navik U. Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: An update on the molecular mechanism and novel therapeutic strategies for effective management. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021. PMID 34243633 · DOI
  5. Kciuk M, Gielecińska A, Mujwar S, Kołat D, Kałuzińska-Kołat Ż, Celik I, et al.. Doxorubicin-An Agent with Multiple Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity. Cells. 2023. PMID 36831326 · DOI · PMC9954613
  6. Hills RK, Castaigne S, Appelbaum FR, Delaunay J, Petersdorf S, Othus M, et al.. Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2014. PMID 25008258 · DOI · PMC4137593
  7. Kong CY, Guo Z, Song P, Zhang X, Yuan YP, Teng T, et al.. Underlying the Mechanisms of Doxorubicin-Induced Acute Cardiotoxicity: Oxidative Stress and Cell Death. Int J Biol Sci. 2022. PMID 35002523 · DOI · PMC8741835
  8. Lotrionte M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Abbate A, Lanzetta G, D'Ascenzo F, Malavasi V, et al.. Review and meta-analysis of incidence and clinical predictors of anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Am J Cardiol. 2013. PMID 24075281 · DOI
  9. Paul M, Benuri-Silbiger I, Soares-Weiser K, Leibovici L. Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2004. PMID 14996699 · DOI · PMC381218

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AmikacinDrugs and Chemicals
  • AnthracyclinesDrugs and Chemicals
  • DaunorubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • EpirubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • IdarubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • KanamycinDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

181,388
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
9,327
review articles
7,055
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AmikacinDrugs and Chemicals
  • AnthracyclinesDrugs and Chemicals
  • DaunorubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • EpirubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • IdarubicinDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support