Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Infectious Diseases›Anthrax
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Anthrax

Infectious Diseases · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

An acute infection caused by the spore-forming bacteria bacillus anthracis.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (894 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An acute infection caused by the spore-forming bacteria bacillus anthracis. It commonly affects hoofed animals such as sheep and goats. Infection in humans often involves the skin (cutaneous anthrax), the lungs (inhalation anthrax), or the gastrointestinal tract. Anthrax is not contagious and can be treated with antibiotics.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Bacillus anthracis Infection; Bacillus anthracis Infections.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Bacillaceae Infections

Related concepts

  • Bacillus Anthracis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,755 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Anthrax” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 480 of them (10.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 1,846 records.

Reviews account for 559 records (11.8%) and meta-analyses for 5. Randomized controlled trials number 31 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,381 records; 2000-2009: 1,846 records; 2010-2019: 1,048 records; 2020 onward: 480 records1,381through 19991,8462000-20091,0482010-20194802020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,381
2000-20091,846
2010-20191,048
2020 onward480
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.7 percentReviews11.8% (559)Meta-analyses0.1% (5)Randomized controlled trials0.7% (31)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,755 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews55911.8%
Meta-analyses50.1%
Randomized controlled trials310.7%

Method: PubMed query "Anthrax"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in infectious diseases

Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Bacillus cereus Biovar Anthracis Causing Anthrax in Sub-Saharan Africa-Chromosomal Monophyly and Broad Geographic Distribution
Antonation KS, Grützmacher K, Dupke S, Mabon P, Zimmermann F, Lankester F, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
68cc by
PMID 27607836 · DOI · PMC5015827
Lethal exposure: An integrated approach to pathogen transmission via environmental reservoirs
Turner WC, Kausrud KL, Beyer W, Easterday WR, Barandongo ZR, Blaschke E, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
62cc by
PMID 27265371 · DOI · PMC4893621
Trimethyl Chitosan Nanoparticles Encapsulated Protective Antigen Protects the Mice Against Anthrax
Malik A, Gupta M, Mani R, Gogoi H, Bhatnagar R
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
56cc by
PMID 29616046 · DOI · PMC5870345
Anthrax: Transmission, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment
Sangwan N, Gangwal A, Jain P, Langtso C, Srivastava S, Dhawan U, et al.
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 39998073 · DOI · PMC11860322

Bacillus cereus Biovar Anthracis Causing Anthrax in Sub-Saharan Africa-Chromosomal Monophyly and Broad Geographic Distribution [1]

Research article Antonation KS, Grützmacher K, Dupke S, Mabon P, Zimmermann F, Lankester F, et al. · · 2016 · cited 68 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Through full genome analyses of four atypical Bacillus cereus isolates, designated B.
Closing excerpt
Furthermore, the consumption of wildlife found dead by the local population and presence in a domestic animal reveal potential sources of exposure to humans.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (212 words)

Through full genome analyses of four atypical Bacillus cereus isolates, designated B. cereus biovar anthracis, we describe a distinct clade within the B. cereus group that presents with anthrax-like disease, carrying virulence plasmids similar to those of classic Bacillus anthracis. We have isolated members of this clade from different mammals (wild chimpanzees, gorillas, an elephant and goats) in West and Central Africa (Côte d'Ivoire, Cameroon, Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo). The isolates shared several phenotypic features of both B. anthracis and B. cereus, but differed amongst each other in motility and their resistance or sensitivity to penicillin. They all possessed the same mutation in the regulator gene plcR, different from the one found in B. anthracis, and in addition, carry genes which enable them to produce a second capsule composed of hyaluronic acid. Our findings show the existence of a discrete clade of the B. cereus group capable of causing anthrax-like disease, found in areas of high biodiversity, which are possibly also the origin of the worldwide distributed B. anthracis. Establishing the impact of these pathogenic bacteria on threatened wildlife species will require systematic investigation. Furthermore, the consumption of wildlife found dead by the local population and presence in a domestic animal reveal potential sources of exposure to humans.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27607836 · DOI · PMC5015827

Lethal exposure: An integrated approach to pathogen transmission via environmental reservoirs [2]

Research article Turner WC, Kausrud KL, Beyer W, Easterday WR, Barandongo ZR, Blaschke E, et al. · · 2016 · cited 62 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
To mitigate the effects of zoonotic diseases on human and animal populations, it is critical to understand what factors alter transmission dynamics.
Closing excerpt
Unlike most studies of virulent pathogens that are conducted under controlled conditions for extrapolation to real situations, we evaluate exposure risk under field conditions to estimate the probability of a lethal dose, showing that not all reservoirs with detectable pathogens are significant transmission pathways.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (155 words)

To mitigate the effects of zoonotic diseases on human and animal populations, it is critical to understand what factors alter transmission dynamics. Here we assess the risk of exposure to lethal concentrations of the anthrax bacterium, Bacillus anthracis, for grazing animals in a natural system over time through different transmission mechanisms. We follow pathogen concentrations at anthrax carcass sites and waterholes for five years and estimate infection risk as a function of grass, soil or water intake, age of carcass sites, and the exposure required for a lethal infection. Grazing, not drinking, seems the dominant transmission route, and transmission is more probable from grazing at carcass sites 1-2 years of age. Unlike most studies of virulent pathogens that are conducted under controlled conditions for extrapolation to real situations, we evaluate exposure risk under field conditions to estimate the probability of a lethal dose, showing that not all reservoirs with detectable pathogens are significant transmission pathways.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27265371 · DOI · PMC4893621

Trimethyl Chitosan Nanoparticles Encapsulated Protective Antigen Protects the Mice Against Anthrax [3]

Research article Malik A, Gupta M, Mani R, Gogoi H, Bhatnagar R · · 2018 · cited 56 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Anthrax is an era old deadly disease against which there are only two currently available licensed vaccines named anthrax vaccine adsorbed and precipitated (AVP).
Closing excerpt
Altogether, the results suggest that CpG or Poly I:C adjuvanted, PA-loaded TMC nanoparticles could be used as an effective, non-toxic, second generation subunit-vaccine candidate against anthrax.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (345 words)

Anthrax is an era old deadly disease against which there are only two currently available licensed vaccines named anthrax vaccine adsorbed and precipitated (AVP). Though they can provide a protective immunity, their multiple side-effects owing to their ill-defined composition and presence of toxic proteins (LF and EF) of Bacillus anthracis, the causative organism of anthrax, in the vaccine formulation makes their widespread use objectionable. Hence, an anthrax vaccine that contains well-defined and controlled components would be highly desirable. In this context, we have evaluated the potential of various vaccine formulations comprising of protective antigen (PA) encapsulated trimethyl-chitosan nanoparticles (TMC-PA) in conjunction with either CpG-C ODN 2395 (CpG) or Poly I:C. Each formulation was administered via three different routes, viz., subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM), and intraperitoneal in female BALB/c mice. Irrespective of the route of immunization, CpG or Poly I:C adjuvanted TMC-PA nanoparticles induced a significantly higher humoral response (total serum IgG and its isotypes viz., IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b), compared to their CpG or Poly I:C PA counterparts. This clearly demonstrates the synergistic behavior of CpG and Poly I:C with TMC nanoparticles. The adjuvant potential of TMC nanoparticles could be observed in all the three routes as the TMC-PA nanoparticles by themselves induced IgG titers (1-1.5 × 105) significantly higher than both CpG PA and Poly I:C PA groups (2-8 × 104). The effect of formulations on T-helper (Th) cell development was assessed by quantifying the Th1-dependant (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2), Th2-dependant (IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10), and Th17-type (IL-17A) cytokines. Adjuvanation with CpG and Poly I:C, the TMC-PA nanoparticles triggered a Th1 skewed immune response, as suggested by an increase in the levels of total IgG2a along with IFN-γ cytokine production. Interestingly, the TMC-PA group showed a Th2-biased immune response. Upon challenge with the B. anthracis Ames strain, CpG and Poly I:C adjuvanted TMC-PA nanoparticles immunized via the SC and IM routes showed the highest protective efficacy of ~83%. Altogether, the results suggest that CpG or Poly I:C adjuvanted, PA-loaded TMC nanoparticles could be used as an effective, non-toxic, second generation subunit-vaccine candidate against anthrax.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29616046 · DOI · PMC5870345

Anthrax: Transmission, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment [4]

Review article Sangwan N, Gangwal A, Jain P, Langtso C, Srivastava S, Dhawan U, et al. · · 2025 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Bacillus anthracis is a deadly pathogen that under unfavourable conditions forms highly resistant spores which enable them to survive for a long period of time.
Closing excerpt
anthracis as well as the current state of its prevention, treatment, vaccines and possible therapeutic uses in cancer.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (182 words)

Bacillus anthracis is a deadly pathogen that under unfavourable conditions forms highly resistant spores which enable them to survive for a long period of time. Spores of B. anthracis are transmitted through the contaminated soil or animal products and enter to the host through the skin, lungs or oral route and can cause cutaneous, injection, inhalation and gastrointestinal anthrax, respectively. The disease is caused by the toxin which is produced by them once they germinate within the host cell. Anthrax toxin is the major virulence factor which has the ability to kill the host cell. The role of protein kinases and phosphatases of B. anthracis in toxin production and other virulence related properties have also been reported. There are two vaccines, BioThrax and CYFENDUSTM, which are approved by the FDA-USA to prevent anthrax disease. Recently, anthrax toxin has also been shown to be a potential candidate for cancer therapeutics. Through present review, we aim to provide insights into sporulation, transmission and pathogenesis of B. anthracis as well as the current state of its prevention, treatment, vaccines and possible therapeutic uses in cancer.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39998073 · DOI · PMC11860322

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Anthrax [5]
    Mock M, Fouet A · Annu Rev Microbiol · 2001 · cited 730 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anthrax [6]
    Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC · N Engl J Med · 1999 · cited 661 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense [7]
    Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Friedlander AM, et al. · JAMA · 1999 · cited 407 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anthrax vaccines: past, present and future [8]
    Turnbull PC · Vaccine · 1991 · cited 211 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anthrax Pathogenesis [9]
    Moayeri M, Leppla SH, Vrentas C, Pomerantsev AP, Liu S · Annu Rev Microbiol · 2015 · cited 207 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The ecology of Bacillus anthracis [10]
    Hugh-Jones M, Blackburn J · Mol Aspects Med · 2009 · cited 207 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Antonation KS, Grützmacher K, Dupke S, Mabon P, Zimmermann F, Lankester F, et al.. Bacillus cereus Biovar Anthracis Causing Anthrax in Sub-Saharan Africa-Chromosomal Monophyly and Broad Geographic Distribution. . 2016. PMID 27607836 · DOI · PMC5015827
  2. Turner WC, Kausrud KL, Beyer W, Easterday WR, Barandongo ZR, Blaschke E, et al.. Lethal exposure: An integrated approach to pathogen transmission via environmental reservoirs. . 2016. PMID 27265371 · DOI · PMC4893621
  3. Malik A, Gupta M, Mani R, Gogoi H, Bhatnagar R. Trimethyl Chitosan Nanoparticles Encapsulated Protective Antigen Protects the Mice Against Anthrax. . 2018. PMID 29616046 · DOI · PMC5870345
  4. Sangwan N, Gangwal A, Jain P, Langtso C, Srivastava S, Dhawan U, et al.. Anthrax: Transmission, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment. . 2025. PMID 39998073 · DOI · PMC11860322
  5. Mock M, Fouet A. Anthrax. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001. PMID 11544370 · DOI
  6. Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. Anthrax. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID 10477781 · DOI
  7. Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, Friedlander AM, et al.. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. JAMA. 1999. PMID 10328075 · DOI
  8. Turnbull PC. Anthrax vaccines: past, present and future. Vaccine. 1991. PMID 1771966 · DOI
  9. Moayeri M, Leppla SH, Vrentas C, Pomerantsev AP, Liu S. Anthrax Pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2015. PMID 26195305 · DOI
  10. Hugh-Jones M, Blackburn J. The ecology of Bacillus anthracis. Mol Aspects Med. 2009. PMID 19720074 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsInfectious Diseases
  • TetanusInfectious Diseases
  • Buruli UlcerInfectious Diseases
  • CholeraInfectious Diseases
  • DiphtheriaInfectious Diseases
  • Latent TuberculosisInfectious Diseases

All 102 articles in Infectious Diseases →

At a glance

4,755
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
559
review articles
31
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsInfectious Diseases
  • TetanusInfectious Diseases
  • Buruli UlcerInfectious Diseases
  • CholeraInfectious Diseases
  • DiphtheriaInfectious Diseases

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support