Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Infectious Diseases›Diphtheria
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Diphtheria

Infectious Diseases · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A localized infection of mucous membranes or skin caused by toxigenic strains of corynebacterium diphtheriae.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,010 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A localized infection of mucous membranes or skin caused by toxigenic strains of corynebacterium diphtheriae. It is characterized by the presence of a pseudomembrane at the site of infection. diphtheria toxin, produced by C. diphtheriae, can cause myocarditis, polyneuritis, and other systemic toxic effects.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Corynebacterium diphtheriae Infection; Corynebacterium diphtheriae Infections; Infection, Corynebacterium diphtheriae.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Corynebacterium Infections

Related concepts

  • Corynebacterium Diphtheriae
  • Diphtheria Toxin

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,180 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Diphtheria” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 487 of them (6.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 5,612 records.

Reviews account for 308 records (4.3%) and meta-analyses for 14. Randomized controlled trials number 116 (1.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 5,612 records; 2000-2009: 486 records; 2010-2019: 595 records; 2020 onward: 487 records5,612through 19994862000-20095952010-20194872020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19995,612
2000-2009486
2010-2019595
2020 onward487
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.6 percentReviews4.3% (308)Meta-analyses0.2% (14)Randomized controlled trials1.6% (116)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,180 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3084.3%
Meta-analyses140.2%
Randomized controlled trials1161.6%

Method: PubMed query "Diphtheria"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in infectious diseases

Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, Messonnier NE, Reingold A, Sawyer M, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
290cc by
PMID 29702631 · DOI · PMC5919600
Global Epidemiology of Diphtheria, 2000-20171
Clarke KEN, MacNeil A, Hadler S, Scott C, Tiwari TSP, Cherian T
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
98cc by
PMID 31538559 · DOI · PMC6759252
NGS-based phylogeny of diphtheria-related pathogenicity factors in different Corynebacterium spp. implies species-specific virulence transmission
Dangel A, Berger A, Konrad R, Sing A
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
67cc by
PMID 30709334 · DOI · PMC6359835
Up-to-date MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae species complex for improved diagnostics
Rau J, Berger A, Dangel A, Dyk M, Eisenberg T, Hiller E, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 42171534 · DOI · PMC13251421

Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) [1]

Research article Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, Messonnier NE, Reingold A, Sawyer M, et al. · · 2018 · cited 290 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding prevention and control of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in the United States.
Closing excerpt
After receipt of Tdap, adolescents and adults are recommended to receive a booster tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine every 10 years to assure ongoing protection against tetanus and diphtheria.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (187 words)

This report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding prevention and control of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in the United States. As a comprehensive summary of previously published recommendations, this report does not contain any new recommendations and replaces all previously published reports and policy notes; it is intended for use by clinicians and public health providers as a resource. ACIP recommends routine vaccination for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis. Infants and young children are recommended to receive a 5-dose series of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines, with one adolescent booster dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Adults who have never received Tdap also are recommended to receive a booster dose of Tdap. Women are recommended to receive a dose of Tdap during each pregnancy, which should be administered from 27 through 36 weeks' gestation, regardless of previous receipt of Tdap. After receipt of Tdap, adolescents and adults are recommended to receive a booster tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine every 10 years to assure ongoing protection against tetanus and diphtheria.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29702631 · DOI · PMC5919600

Global Epidemiology of Diphtheria, 2000-20171 [2]

Research article Clarke KEN, MacNeil A, Hadler S, Scott C, Tiwari TSP, Cherian T · · 2019 · cited 98 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In 2017, a total of 8,819 cases of diphtheria were reported worldwide, the most since 2004.
Closing excerpt
Collection and use of data on subnational and booster dose coverage, enhanced laboratory capacity, and case-based surveillance would improve data quality.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (113 words)

In 2017, a total of 8,819 cases of diphtheria were reported worldwide, the most since 2004. However, recent diphtheria epidemiology has not been well described. We analyzed incidence data and data from the literature to describe diphtheria epidemiology. World Health Organization surveillance data were 81% complete; completeness varied by region, indicating underreporting. As national diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) 3 coverage increased, the proportion of case-patients 15 years of age, consistent with waning vaccine immunity. Global DTP3 coverage is suboptimal. Attaining high DTP3 coverage and implementing recommended booster doses are necessary to decrease diphtheria incidence. Collection and use of data on subnational and booster dose coverage, enhanced laboratory capacity, and case-based surveillance would improve data quality.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31538559 · DOI · PMC6759252

NGS-based phylogeny of diphtheria-related pathogenicity factors in different Corynebacterium spp. implies species-specific virulence transmission [3]

Research article Dangel A, Berger A, Konrad R, Sing A · · 2019 · cited 67 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDiphtheria toxin (DT) is produced by toxigenic strains of the human pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae as well as zoonotic C.
Closing excerpt
ulcerans imply that tox transmission pathways between isolates may differ in the zoonotic species and contribute to their emerging pathogenic potential.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (325 words)

BackgroundDiphtheria toxin (DT) is produced by toxigenic strains of the human pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae as well as zoonotic C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis. Toxigenic strains may cause severe respiratory diphtheria, myocarditis, neurological damage or cutaneous diphtheria. The DT encoding tox gene is located in a mobile genomic region and tox variability between C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans has been postulated based on sequences of a few isolates. In contrast, species-specific sequence analysis of the diphtheria toxin repressor gene (dtxR), occurring both in toxigenic and non-toxigenic Corynebacterium species, has not been done yet. We used whole genome sequencing data from 91 toxigenic and 46 non-toxigenic isolates of different pathogenic Corynebacterium species of animal or human origin to elucidate differences in extracted DT, DtxR and tox-surrounding genetic elements by a phylogenetic analysis in a large sample set.ResultsSequences of both DT and DtxR, extracted from whole genome sequencing data, could be classified in four distinct, nearly species-specific clades, corresponding to C. diphtheriae, C. pseudotuberculosis, C. ulcerans and atypical C. ulcerans from a non-toxigenic toxin gene-bearing wildlife cluster. Average amino acid similarities were above 99% for DT and DtxR within the four groups, but lower between them. For DT, subgroups below species level could be identified, correlating with different tox-comprising mobile genetic elements. In most C. diphtheriae, tox genes were located within known prophages. In contrast, in C. ulcerans diverse tox-including mobile elements could be identified: either prophages differing from C. diphtheriae prophages or an alternative pathogenicity island (PAI) described previously. One isolate showed a different, shorter tox-comprising putative PAI. Beyond the tox-overlapping elements, most isolates harbored a variety of additional prophages.ConclusionOur NGS data from 137 isolates indicate the existence of different genetic backgrounds of DT-mediated pathogenicity in different Corynebacterium species and evolution of once acquired pathogenicity features with the strains. Different groups of pathogenicity-related elements within C. ulcerans imply that tox transmission pathways between isolates may differ in the zoonotic species and contribute to their emerging pathogenic potential.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30709334 · DOI · PMC6359835

Up-to-date MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae species complex for improved diagnostics [4]

Research article Rau J, Berger A, Dangel A, Dyk M, Eisenberg T, Hiller E, et al. · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The Corynebacterium (C.
Closing excerpt
This approach to community-driven database expansion and validation is certainly a model for other bacterial species of interest to react to current taxonomic revisions in a short time frame.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (385 words)

The Corynebacterium (C.) diphtheriae species complex (CdSC) comprises the closely related pathogenic species C. diphtheriae, C. belfantii, C. rouxii, C. ulcerans, C. silvaticum, C. ramonii, and C. pseudotuberculosis according to the taxonomic revisions after 2018. Due to their close relationship, reliable species identification within the CdSC is also challenging using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) for fast and reliable identification of bacteria. This is relevant for human and veterinary medicine. However, the Bruker MALDI-Biotyper (MBT), a commonly used MALDI-TOF MS system, does not reflect the current CdSC taxonomy, which includes C. belfantii, C. ramonii, C. rouxii, and C. silvaticum as additional Corynebacterium species in the CdSC. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to expand the commercial Bruker database version K (MBTK) in order to achieve reliable identification for all currently known Corynebacterium species within the CdSC. Furthermore, the database expansions were verified with a systematic formal validation procedure in accordance with the German guideline for species identification by MALDI-TOF MS. For this, 328 spectra made from 321 strains including all seven valid species of the CdSC were identified using the MBTK database and a customer-supplemented modified MBTK database. This custom database version included 33 reference spectra of the CdSC covering all member species. The results of the formal validations for both the commercial and the extended database, combined partly with a single signal analysis, provide a substantiated basis for the identification of bacteria of the CdSC. A key element for a fast up-to-date identification has been the exchange of user-generated sets of main spectrum profiles (MSPs) on the open access MALDI User Platform (MALDI-UP) catalog.IMPORTANCEBacteria belonging to the Corynebacterium (C.) diphtheriae complex are relevant pathogens for humans and animals with zoonotic potential. Identification of the novel species of this complex described since 2018, that is, C. belfantii, C. rouxii, C. ramonii, and C. silvaticum, is possible using the widely approved MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. This is important for targeted therapies, preventive measures, and epidemiological studies. Precise species identification has been achieved by using a supplemented Bruker MALDI reference database. Comprehensive validation of database entries meets the requirements for accurate pathogen identification in accordance with recognized guidelines. This approach to community-driven database expansion and validation is certainly a model for other bacterial species of interest to react to current taxonomic revisions in a short time frame.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42171534 · DOI · PMC13251421

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Understanding the mode of action of diphtheria toxin: a perspective on progress during the 20th century [5]
    Collier RJ · Toxicon · 2001 · cited 231 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adolescents: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) [6]
    Broder KR, Cortese MM, Iskander JK, Kretsinger K, Slade BA, Brown KH, et al. · MMWR Recomm Rep · 2006 · cited 167 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diphtheria [7]
    Sharma NC, Efstratiou A, Mokrousov I, Mutreja A, Das B, Ramamurthy T · Nat Rev Dis Primers · 2019 · cited 144 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Biology and molecular epidemiology of diphtheria toxin and the tox gene [8]
    Holmes RK · J Infect Dis · 2000 · cited 133 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The pathology of diphtheria [9]
    Hadfield TL, McEvoy P, Polotsky Y, Tzinserling VA, Yakovlev AA · J Infect Dis · 2000 · cited 133 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diphtheria in the former Soviet Union: reemergence of a pandemic disease [10]
    Vitek CR, Wharton M · Emerg Infect Dis · 1998 · cited 133 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, Messonnier NE, Reingold A, Sawyer M, et al.. Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). . 2018. PMID 29702631 · DOI · PMC5919600
  2. Clarke KEN, MacNeil A, Hadler S, Scott C, Tiwari TSP, Cherian T. Global Epidemiology of Diphtheria, 2000-20171. . 2019. PMID 31538559 · DOI · PMC6759252
  3. Dangel A, Berger A, Konrad R, Sing A. NGS-based phylogeny of diphtheria-related pathogenicity factors in different Corynebacterium spp. implies species-specific virulence transmission. . 2019. PMID 30709334 · DOI · PMC6359835
  4. Rau J, Berger A, Dangel A, Dyk M, Eisenberg T, Hiller E, et al.. Up-to-date MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae species complex for improved diagnostics. . 2026. PMID 42171534 · DOI · PMC13251421
  5. Collier RJ. Understanding the mode of action of diphtheria toxin: a perspective on progress during the 20th century. Toxicon. 2001. PMID 11595641 · DOI
  6. Broder KR, Cortese MM, Iskander JK, Kretsinger K, Slade BA, Brown KH, et al.. Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adolescents: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006. PMID 16557217 · DOI
  7. Sharma NC, Efstratiou A, Mokrousov I, Mutreja A, Das B, Ramamurthy T. Diphtheria. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019. PMID 31804499 · DOI
  8. Holmes RK. Biology and molecular epidemiology of diphtheria toxin and the tox gene. J Infect Dis. 2000. PMID 10657208 · DOI
  9. Hadfield TL, McEvoy P, Polotsky Y, Tzinserling VA, Yakovlev AA. The pathology of diphtheria. J Infect Dis. 2000. PMID 10657202 · DOI
  10. Vitek CR, Wharton M. Diphtheria in the former Soviet Union: reemergence of a pandemic disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998. PMID 9866730 · DOI · PMC2640235

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AnthraxInfectious Diseases
  • Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsInfectious Diseases
  • TetanusInfectious Diseases
  • Buruli UlcerInfectious Diseases
  • CholeraInfectious Diseases
  • Latent TuberculosisInfectious Diseases

All 102 articles in Infectious Diseases →

At a glance

7,180
PubMed records on this heading
7%
published since 2020
308
review articles
116
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AnthraxInfectious Diseases
  • Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsInfectious Diseases
  • TetanusInfectious Diseases
  • Buruli UlcerInfectious Diseases
  • CholeraInfectious Diseases

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support