Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (786 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The tearing or bursting of the wall along any portion of the aorta, such as thoracic or abdominal. It may result from the rupture of an aneurysm or it may be due to trauma.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Aortic Ruptures; Rupture, Aortic; Ruptures, Aortic; Aortic Aneurysm, Ruptured; Aneurysm, Ruptured Aortic; Aneurysms, Ruptured Aortic; Aortic Aneurysms, Ruptured; Ruptured Aortic Aneurysms.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Aneurysm, Ruptured; Aortic Aneurysm; Rupture
Related concepts
- Aorta
- Trauma
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 10,683 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Aortic Rupture” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,091 of them (10.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,560 records.
Reviews account for 1,091 records (10.2%) and meta-analyses for 98. Randomized controlled trials number 56 (0.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,560 |
| 2000-2009 | 2,295 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,737 |
| 2020 onward | 1,091 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,091 | 10.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 98 | 0.9% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 56 | 0.5% |
Method: PubMed query "Aortic Rupture"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in cardiovascular medicine
Cardiovascular medicine has an unusually large body of randomized trials, so the type of outcome matters: hard clinical events such as death, heart attack and stroke carry more weight than changes in blood pressure, cholesterol or imaging markers that only predict risk. Observational studies can show associations but are confounded by age, lifestyle and other illness. Check whether a result is about prevention or treatment, the baseline risk of participants, and the absolute rather than only the relative size of any benefit.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The mechanism and therapy of aortic aneurysms | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 188 | cc by PMID 36737432 · DOI · PMC9898314 |
| Aortic aneurysms: current pathogenesis and therapeutic targets | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 113 | cc by PMID 38036736 · DOI · PMC10766996 |
| Inherited Thoracic Aortic Disease: New Insights and Translational Targets | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 74 | cc by PMID 32392100 · DOI · PMC7217141 |
| Sex- and Age-specific Outcomes After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Nationwide Cohort Study | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42599759 · DOI · PMC13652115 |
The mechanism and therapy of aortic aneurysms [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Aortic aneurysm is a chronic aortic disease affected by many factors.
- Closing excerpt
- The disease is usually asymptomatic but leads to high mortality due to the risk of artery rupture.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (214 words)
Aortic aneurysm is a chronic aortic disease affected by many factors. Although it is generally asymptomatic, it poses a significant threat to human life due to a high risk of rupture. Because of its strong concealment, it is difficult to diagnose the disease in the early stage. At present, there are no effective drugs for the treatment of aneurysms. Surgical intervention and endovascular treatment are the only therapies. Although current studies have discovered that inflammatory responses as well as the production and activation of various proteases promote aortic aneurysm, the specific mechanisms remain unclear. Researchers are further exploring the pathogenesis of aneurysms to find new targets for diagnosis and treatment. To better understand aortic aneurysm, this review elaborates on the discovery history of aortic aneurysm, main classification and clinical manifestations, related molecular mechanisms, clinical cohort studies and animal models, with the ultimate goal of providing insights into the treatment of this devastating disease. The underlying problem with aneurysm disease is weakening of the aortic wall, leading to progressive dilation. If not treated in time, the aortic aneurysm eventually ruptures. An aortic aneurysm is a local enlargement of an artery caused by a weakening of the aortic wall. The disease is usually asymptomatic but leads to high mortality due to the risk of artery rupture.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36737432 · DOI · PMC9898314
Aortic aneurysms: current pathogenesis and therapeutic targets [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Aortic aneurysm is a chronic disease characterized by localized expansion of the aorta, including the ascending aorta, arch, descending aorta, and abdominal aorta.
- Closing excerpt
- This review summarizes the latest research findings and current pathogenic mechanisms of aortic aneurysms, which may enhance our understanding of aortic aneurysms.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)
Aortic aneurysm is a chronic disease characterized by localized expansion of the aorta, including the ascending aorta, arch, descending aorta, and abdominal aorta. Although aortic aneurysms are generally asymptomatic, they can threaten human health by sudden death due to aortic rupture. Aortic aneurysms are estimated to lead to 150,000 ~ 200,000 deaths per year worldwide. Currently, there are no effective drugs to prevent the growth or rupture of aortic aneurysms; surgical repair or endovascular repair is the only option for treating this condition. The pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic targets for aortic aneurysms have been examined over the past decade; however, there are unknown pathogenic mechanisms involved in cellular heterogeneity and plasticity, the complexity of the transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway, inflammation, cell death, intramural neovascularization, and intercellular communication. This review summarizes the latest research findings and current pathogenic mechanisms of aortic aneurysms, which may enhance our understanding of aortic aneurysms.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38036736 · DOI · PMC10766996
Inherited Thoracic Aortic Disease: New Insights and Translational Targets [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Inherited thoracic aortopathies denote a group of congenital conditions that predispose to disease of the thoracic aorta.
- Closing excerpt
- Here, we summarize the current understanding of the genetically determined mechanisms underlying inherited aortopathies and critically appraise the available blood biomarkers, imaging techniques, and therapeutic targets that have shown promise for improving the management of patients with these important and potentially fatal conditions.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (177 words)
Inherited thoracic aortopathies denote a group of congenital conditions that predispose to disease of the thoracic aorta. Aortic wall weakness and abnormal aortic hemodynamic profiles predispose these patients to dilatation of the thoracic aorta, which is generally silent but can precipitate aortic dissection or rupture with devastating and often fatal consequences. Current strategies to assess the future risk of aortic dissection or rupture are based primarily on monitoring aortic diameter. However, diameter alone is a poor predictor of risk, with many patients experiencing dissection or rupture below current intervention thresholds. Developing tools that improve the risk assessment of those with aortopathy is internationally regarded as a research priority. A robust understanding of the molecular pathways that lead to aortic wall weakness is required to identify biomarkers and therapeutic targets that could improve patient management. Here, we summarize the current understanding of the genetically determined mechanisms underlying inherited aortopathies and critically appraise the available blood biomarkers, imaging techniques, and therapeutic targets that have shown promise for improving the management of patients with these important and potentially fatal conditions.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32392100 · DOI · PMC7217141
Sex- and Age-specific Outcomes After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Nationwide Cohort Study [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundRuptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) remains a medical catastrophe.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings indicate that optimization of care for women with a RAAA is not confined to perioperative mortality, but extends across the entire care pathway.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (245 words)
BackgroundRuptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) remains a medical catastrophe. Although early outcomes improved, contemporary data integrating early and long-term survival, and postdischarge care needs across sex- and age groups is limited.MethodsThis nationwide cohort included Dutch RAAA repairs between 2014 and 2023. Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit data were linked to Statistics Netherlands registries. Outcomes included 90-day mortality, long-term survival, and postdischarge care.ResultsOf the 3642 patients, 15.2% were women, who were older (76.3 vs. 74.0 y) and more often required open repair (61.4% vs. 54.0%). Ninety-day mortality increased with age and was higher in women (39.1% vs. 29.1%), but female sex was not independently associated with early mortality after adjustment.Among 90-day survivors, absolute long-term survival was similar, but relative survival was lower in women (5-year relative survival 68.0% vs. 78.3%). Women were less often discharged home (42.4% vs. 56.7%) and more frequently required early homecare (47.7% vs. 34.7%). Reinterventions were more common after EVAR than open repair and occurred less frequently in women.ConclusionIn this nationwide linked audit-registry analysis, outcomes after RAAA repair improved substantially, despite lower estimated in-hospital turndown rates than in earlier eras. The higher early mortality in women WAS reflected by differences in age, presentation severity, and repair type - possibly reflecting less favorable aneurysm anatomy. Female sex also associated with an increased long-term excess mortality and greater postdischarge dependency. These findings indicate that optimization of care for women with a RAAA is not confined to perioperative mortality, but extends across the entire care pathway.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42599759 · DOI · PMC13652115
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms [5]
- Research article Abdominal aortic aneurysm: update on pathogenesis and medical treatments [6]
- Research article Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms [7]
- Research article Acute aortic syndromes [8]
- Research article Traumatic aortic rupture: twenty-year metaanalysis of mortality and risk of paraplegia [9]
- Research article Pathogenesis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysm [10]
References
- Gao J, Cao H, Hu G, Wu Y, Xu Y, Cui H, et al.. The mechanism and therapy of aortic aneurysms. . 2023. PMID 36737432 · DOI · PMC9898314
- Cho MJ, Lee MR, Park JG. Aortic aneurysms: current pathogenesis and therapeutic targets. . 2023. PMID 38036736 · DOI · PMC10766996
- Fletcher AJ, Syed MBJ, Aitman TJ, Newby DE, Walker NL. Inherited Thoracic Aortic Disease: New Insights and Translational Targets. . 2020. PMID 32392100 · DOI · PMC7217141
- Biemond MJ, van Schaik J, Hamming JF, de Bruin JL, Brouwers JJWM, Dirven M, et al.. Sex- and Age-specific Outcomes After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Nationwide Cohort Study. . 2026. PMID 42599759 · DOI · PMC13652115
- Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID 21079638 · DOI
- Golledge J. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: update on pathogenesis and medical treatments. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019. PMID 30443031 · DOI
- Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Powell JT, RESCAN collaborators. Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2012. PMID 22389113 · DOI
- Tsai TT, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation. 2005. PMID 16344407 · DOI
- von Oppell UO, Dunne TT, De Groot MK, Zilla P. Traumatic aortic rupture: twenty-year metaanalysis of mortality and risk of paraplegia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994. PMID 8067877 · DOI
- Golledge J, Thanigaimani S, Powell JT, Tsao PS. Pathogenesis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Heart J. 2023. PMID 37387260 · DOI · PMC10393073
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.