Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,223 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The fatty portion of milk, separated as a soft yellowish solid when milk or cream is churned. It is processed for cooking and table use. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Butters.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Dietary Fats; Dairy Products
- Narrower topics
- Ghee
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,655 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Butter” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 202 of them (12.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 931 records.
Reviews account for 43 records (2.6%) and meta-analyses for 4. Randomized controlled trials number 95 (5.7%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 931 |
| 2000-2009 | 250 |
| 2010-2019 | 272 |
| 2020 onward | 202 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 43 | 2.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 4 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 95 | 5.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Butter"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Food groups, oils and butter, and cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- To elucidate the role of dietary habits, a study was carried out in 1992-1997 in the province of Pordenone in Northeastern Italy, and those of Rome and Latina in central Italy.
- Closing excerpt
- Thus, frequent consumption of vegetables, citrus fruit, fish and vegetable oils were the major features of a low-risk diet for cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)
To elucidate the role of dietary habits, a study was carried out in 1992-1997 in the province of Pordenone in Northeastern Italy, and those of Rome and Latina in central Italy. Cases were 512 men and 86 women with cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx (lip, salivary glands and nasopharynx excluded) and controls were 1008 men and 483 women who had been admitted to local hospitals for a broad range of acute non-neoplastic conditions. The validated dietary section of the questionnaire included 78 foods or recipes and ten questions on fat intake patterns. After allowance for education, smoking, alcohol and total energy intake, significant trends of increasing risk with increasing intake emerged for soups, eggs, processed meats, cakes and desserts, and butter. Risk was approximately halved in the highest compared to the lowest intake quintile for coffee and tea, white bread, poultry, fish, raw and cooked vegetables, citrus fruit, and olive oil. The inverse association with oils, especially olive oil, was only slightly attenuated by allowance for vegetable intake. Thus, frequent consumption of vegetables, citrus fruit, fish and vegetable oils were the major features of a low-risk diet for cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 10408875 · DOI · PMC2362347
Randomised trial of coconut oil, olive oil or butter on blood lipids and other cardiovascular risk factors in healthy men and women [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionHigh dietary saturated fat intake is associated with higher blood concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), an established risk factor for coronary heart disease.
- Closing excerpt
- Trial registration numberNCT03105947; Results.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (483 words)
IntroductionHigh dietary saturated fat intake is associated with higher blood concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), an established risk factor for coronary heart disease. However, there is increasing interest in whether various dietary oils or fats with different fatty acid profiles such as extra virgin coconut oil may have different metabolic effects but trials have reported inconsistent results. We aimed to compare changes in blood lipid profile, weight, fat distribution and metabolic markers after four weeks consumption of 50 g daily of one of three different dietary fats, extra virgin coconut oil, butter or extra virgin olive oil, in healthy men and women in the general population.DesignRandomised clinical trial conducted over June and July 2017.SettingGeneral community in Cambridgeshire, UK.ParticipantsVolunteer adults were recruited by the British Broadcasting Corporation through their websites. Eligibility criteria were men and women aged 50-75 years, with no known history of cancer, cardiovascular disease or diabetes, not on lipid lowering medication, no contraindications to a high-fat diet and willingness to be randomised to consume one of the three dietary fats for 4 weeks. Of 160 individuals initially expressing an interest and assessed for eligibility, 96 were randomised to one of three interventions; 2 individuals subsequently withdrew and 94 men and women attended a baseline assessment. Their mean age was 60 years, 67% were women and 98% were European Caucasian. Of these, 91 men and women attended a follow-up assessment 4 weeks later.InterventionParticipants were randomised to extra virgin coconut oil, extra virgin olive oil or unsalted butter and asked to consume 50 g daily of one of these fats for 4 weeks, which they could incorporate into their usual diet or consume as a supplement.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was change in serum LDL-C; secondary outcomes were change in total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC and HDL-C), TC/HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C; change in weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, per cent body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose and C reactive protein.ResultsLDL-C concentrations were significantly increased on butter compared with coconut oil (+0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.65 mmol/L, PConclusions and relevanceTwo different dietary fats (butter and coconut oil) which are predominantly saturated fats, appear to have different effects on blood lipids compared with olive oil, a predominantly monounsaturated fat with coconut oil more comparable to olive oil with respect to LDL-C. The effects of different dietary fats on lipid profiles, metabolic markers and health outcomes may vary not just according to the general classification of their main component fatty acids as saturated or unsaturated but possibly according to different profiles in individual fatty acids, processing methods as well as the foods in which they are consumed or dietary patterns. These findings do not alter current dietary recommendations to reduce saturated fat intake in general but highlight the need for further elucidation of the more nuanced relationships between different dietary fats and health.Trial registration numberNCT03105947; Results.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29511019 · DOI · PMC5855206
Is Butter Back? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Butter Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Total Mortality [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundDietary guidelines recommend avoiding foods high in saturated fat.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings do not support a need for major emphasis in dietary guidelines on either increasing or decreasing butter consumption, in comparison to other better established dietary priorities; while also highlighting the need for additional investigation of health and metabolic effects of butter and dairy fat.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (409 words)
BackgroundDietary guidelines recommend avoiding foods high in saturated fat. Yet, emerging evidence suggests cardiometabolic benefits of dairy products and dairy fat. Evidence on the role of butter, with high saturated dairy fat content, for total mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes remains unclear. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association of butter consumption with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes in general populations.Methods and findingsWe searched 9 databases from inception to May 2015 without restriction on setting, or language, using keywords related to butter consumption and cardiometabolic outcomes. Prospective cohorts or randomized clinical trials providing estimates of effects of butter intake on mortality, cardiovascular disease including coronary heart disease and stroke, or diabetes in adult populations were included. One investigator screened titles and abstracts; and two reviewed full-text articles independently in duplicate, and extracted study and participant characteristics, exposure and outcome definitions and assessment methods, analysis methods, and adjusted effects and associated uncertainty, all independently in duplicate. Study quality was evaluated by a modified Newcastle-Ottawa score. Random and fixed effects meta-analysis pooled findings, with heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic and publication bias by Egger's test and visual inspection of funnel plots. We identified 9 publications including 15 country-specific cohorts, together reporting on 636,151 unique participants with 6.5 million person-years of follow-up and including 28,271 total deaths, 9,783 cases of incident cardiovascular disease, and 23,954 cases of incident diabetes. No RCTs were identified. Butter consumption was weakly associated with all-cause mortality (N = 9 country-specific cohorts; per 14g(1 tablespoon)/day: RR = 1.01, 95%CI = 1.00, 1.03, P = 0.045); was not significantly associated with any cardiovascular disease (N = 4; RR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.98, 1.02; P = 0.704), coronary heart disease (N = 3; RR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.96, 1.03; P = 0.537), or stroke (N = 3; RR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.98, 1.03; P = 0.737), and was inversely associated with incidence of diabetes (N = 11; RR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.93, 0.99; P = 0.021). We did not identify evidence for heterogeneity nor publication bias.ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis suggests relatively small or neutral overall associations of butter with mortality, CVD, and diabetes. These findings do not support a need for major emphasis in dietary guidelines on either increasing or decreasing butter consumption, in comparison to other better established dietary priorities; while also highlighting the need for additional investigation of health and metabolic effects of butter and dairy fat.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27355649 · DOI · PMC4927102
Partial Fat Substitution in Butter Cookies Using Thermochemically Modified Unripe Plantain (Musa paradisiaca AAB) Flour Treated with Fumaric Acid [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- This study evaluated thermochemically modified unripe plantain flour treated with fumaric acid as a fat substitute in butter cookies.
- Closing excerpt
- Reduced-fat cookies exhibited greater firmness and crispness but also greater browning intensity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (134 words)
This study evaluated thermochemically modified unripe plantain flour treated with fumaric acid as a fat substitute in butter cookies. Incorporating this modified flour with a 24.73% fat reduction increased sensory acceptability by 65% compared with native unripe plantain flour. Fat reduction caused changes in mass loss during baking and porous structure while maintaining stable ash and protein contents and a higher proportion of nondigestible carbohydrates. Enzymatic hydrolysis analysis confirmed higher resistant starch content and lower proportions of rapidly and slowly digestible starch than in the control cookies. Thermochemically modified unripe plantain flour treated with fumaric acid proved to be a promising alternative for developing reduced-fat butter cookies by improving sensory acceptability, textural properties (increased crispness), and functional potential through reduced product digestibility. Reduced-fat cookies exhibited greater firmness and crispness but also greater browning intensity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42593682 · DOI · PMC13473310
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Milk fat: opportunities, challenges and innovation [5]
- Research article Butter, margarine and serum lipoproteins [6]
- Research article Use of butter and cheese in 10 European countries: a case of contrasting educational differences [7]
- Research article Effects of dietary fish oil and butterfat on serum lipids and monocyte and platelet interactions with aortic endothelial cells [8]
- Research article The unsettled question: butter or margarine? [9]
- Research article Pragmatic selection of cooking oils [10]
References
- Franceschi S, Favero A, Conti E, Talamini R, Volpe R, Negri E, et al.. Food groups, oils and butter, and cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx. . 1999. PMID 10408875 · DOI · PMC2362347
- Khaw KT, Sharp SJ, Finikarides L, Afzal I, Lentjes M, Luben R, et al.. Randomised trial of coconut oil, olive oil or butter on blood lipids and other cardiovascular risk factors in healthy men and women. . 2018. PMID 29511019 · DOI · PMC5855206
- Pimpin L, Wu JH, Haskelberg H, Del Gobbo L, Mozaffarian D. Is Butter Back? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Butter Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Total Mortality. . 2016. PMID 27355649 · DOI · PMC4927102
- Armenta-Roncancio JE, Muentes-Arismendy NJ, Rodriguez Sandoval E, Gil-Gonzalez JH, Alonso-Gomez LA. Partial Fat Substitution in Butter Cookies Using Thermochemically Modified Unripe Plantain (Musa paradisiaca AAB) Flour Treated with Fumaric Acid. . 2026. PMID 42593682 · DOI · PMC13473310
- Mohan MS, O'Callaghan TF, Kelly P, Hogan SA. Milk fat: opportunities, challenges and innovation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021. PMID 32649226 · DOI
- Zock PL, Katan MB. Butter, margarine and serum lipoproteins. Atherosclerosis. 1997. PMID 9180239 · DOI
- Prättälä RS, Groth MV, Oltersdorf US, Roos GM, Sekula W, Tuomainen HM. Use of butter and cheese in 10 European countries: a case of contrasting educational differences. Eur J Public Health. 2003. PMID 12803410 · DOI
- Foxall TL, Shwaery GT. Effects of dietary fish oil and butterfat on serum lipids and monocyte and platelet interactions with aortic endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis. 1990. PMID 2178614 · DOI
- Gattereau A, Delisle HF. The unsettled question: butter or margarine?. Can Med Assoc J. 1970. PMID 4914981 · PMC1930387
- Gupta L, Khandelwal D. Pragmatic selection of cooking oils. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017. PMID 28585605
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.