Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Cheese
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Cheese

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A nutritious food consisting primarily of the curd or the semisolid substance formed when milk coagulates.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (934 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A nutritious food consisting primarily of the curd or the semisolid substance formed when milk coagulates.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Cheeses.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cultured Milk Products

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 8,393 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cheese” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,952 of them (23.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,791 records.

Reviews account for 411 records (4.9%) and meta-analyses for 34. Randomized controlled trials number 102 (1.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,664 records; 2000-2009: 1,986 records; 2010-2019: 2,791 records; 2020 onward: 1,952 records1,664through 19991,9862000-20092,7912010-20191,9522020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,664
2000-20091,986
2010-20192,791
2020 onward1,952
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.2 percentReviews4.9% (411)Meta-analyses0.4% (34)Randomized controlled trials1.2% (102)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 8,393 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4114.9%
Meta-analyses340.4%
Randomized controlled trials1021.2%

Method: PubMed query "Cheese"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Plant-Based Alternative Products: Are They Healthy Alternatives? Micro- and Macronutrients and Nutritional Scoring
Pointke M, Pawelzik E
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
75cc by
PMID 35276960 · DOI · PMC8838485
Cheese consumption and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review and updated meta-analysis of prospective studies
Zhang M, Dong X, Huang Z, Li X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, et al.
2023Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
53cc by
PMID 37328108 · DOI · PMC10509445
Nutritional Profiles of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Cheese Alternatives
Craig WJ, Mangels AR, Brothers CJ
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
48cc by
PMID 35334904 · DOI · PMC8952881
Do We Need to Worry About Staphylococcus epidermidis ST0409KOC, a Cheese-Isolated Strain With Bacteriocinogenic Properties?
Carneiro KO, Lima JMS, Todorov SD
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 41540675 · DOI · PMC12808867

Plant-Based Alternative Products: Are They Healthy Alternatives? Micro- and Macronutrients and Nutritional Scoring [1]

Research article Pointke M, Pawelzik E · · 2022 · cited 75 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In recent decades, the demand, supply, and consumption of plant-based (pb) alternative products have increased worldwide.
Closing excerpt
The trend towards consumption of pb alternative products is increasing, but the high level of processing, wide range of nutrients, and high salt content indicate the need for nutritional guidelines for these products.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (220 words)

In recent decades, the demand, supply, and consumption of plant-based (pb) alternative products have increased worldwide. The objective of this study was to characterize pb meat and cheese products and compare them with their respective animal-based products. Data were collected in online market analyses (2019/2021). Nutritional data, Nutri-Score, and analysis of micronutrients are presented in this article. The number of products has grown in all categories, with the largest increase of 110% in pb cheese. The main protein sources in pb meat were soy and wheat, followed by an increasing use of peas. Pb meat generally contained less energy and total and saturated fat, but more carbohydrates and sugars than meat. In pb cheese, the protein content was lower than that of cheese. In 3 of 17 food groups, the salt content of pb alternatives was lower than in animal products. The daily requirement for iron could be covered better by pb alternatives than previously anticipated as well as the need for the vitamins E and K. The calculated Nutri-Score was generally lower for pb meat and higher for pb cheese than for the respective animal products. The trend towards consumption of pb alternative products is increasing, but the high level of processing, wide range of nutrients, and high salt content indicate the need for nutritional guidelines for these products.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35276960 · DOI · PMC8838485

Cheese consumption and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review and updated meta-analysis of prospective studies [2]

Meta-analysis Zhang M, Dong X, Huang Z, Li X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, et al. · · 2023 · cited 53 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This umbrella review aims to provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of current evidence from prospective studies on the diverse health effects of cheese consumption.
Closing excerpt
Our findings suggest that cheese consumption has neutral to moderate benefits for human health.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (291 words)

This umbrella review aims to provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of current evidence from prospective studies on the diverse health effects of cheese consumption. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify meta-analyses/pooled analyses of prospective studies examining the association between cheese consumption and major health outcomes from inception to August 31, 2022. We reanalyzed and updated previous meta-analyses and performed de novo meta-analyses with recently published prospective studies, where appropriate. We calculated the summary effect size, 95% prediction confidence intervals, between-study heterogeneity, small-study effects, and excess significance bias for each health outcome. We identified 54 eligible articles of meta-analyses/pooled analyses. After adding newly published original articles, we performed 35 updated meta-analyses and 4 de novo meta-analyses. Together with 8 previous meta-analyses, we finally included 47 unique health outcomes. Cheese consumption was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (highest compared with lowest category: RR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.99), incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.96), coronary heart disease (CHD) (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86, 0.98), stroke (RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.98), estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.97), type 2 diabetes (RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.98), total fracture (RR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.86, 0.95), and dementia (RR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.99). Null associations were found for other outcomes. According to the NutriGrade scoring system, moderate quality of evidence was observed for inverse associations of cheese consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, incident CVD, CHD, and stroke, and for null associations with cancer mortality, incident hypertension, and prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that cheese consumption has neutral to moderate benefits for human health.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37328108 · DOI · PMC10509445

Nutritional Profiles of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Cheese Alternatives [3]

Research article Craig WJ, Mangels AR, Brothers CJ · · 2022 · cited 48 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
With the growing interest in non-dairy products, there has been a surge of interest in consumers seeking plant-based cheese alternatives spurred by a desire to improve individual health and achieve a more sustainable food supply.
Closing excerpt
Few of these products could be considered good dietary sources of either protein or calcium.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (221 words)

With the growing interest in non-dairy products, there has been a surge of interest in consumers seeking plant-based cheese alternatives spurred by a desire to improve individual health and achieve a more sustainable food supply. The aim of this study was to conduct a cross-sectional survey of non-dairy cheese alternatives available in the United States and to evaluate their nutritional content. A total of 245 non-dairy plant-based cheese alternatives were analyzed using their nutritional facts labels. The various cheese alternatives were based upon coconut oil (n = 106), cashews and coconut (n = 61), cashews (n = 35), oats (n = 16), almonds (n = 7), soy (n = 6), palm fruit oil (n = 5), and other blends (n = 9). Only 3% of these cheese alternatives had 5 g or more of protein, while 19%, 14%, and 1% were fortified with calcium, vitamin B12, and vitamin D, respectively. Almost 60% had high levels of saturated fat, while 15% had low sodium levels. The products based on cashews alone more commonly had the highest protein levels and the lowest sodium and saturated fat levels. Those containing coconut oil more commonly had higher saturated fat and sodium levels and were most frequently fortified with vitamin B12. Few of these products could be considered good dietary sources of either protein or calcium.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35334904 · DOI · PMC8952881

Do We Need to Worry About Staphylococcus epidermidis ST0409KOC, a Cheese-Isolated Strain With Bacteriocinogenic Properties? [4]

Research article Carneiro KO, Lima JMS, Todorov SD · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Staphylococcus epidermidis is widely found throughout the entire length of human skin and animals since the first year of life, providing a natural protective barrier against other pathogenic microorganisms.
Closing excerpt
epidermidis ST0409KOC strain is a strong candidate for use as a probiotic in different applications, and further studies are needed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (202 words)

Staphylococcus epidermidis is widely found throughout the entire length of human skin and animals since the first year of life, providing a natural protective barrier against other pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, related to its reputation, it is of utmost importance to investigate the virulence capacity for strains of this species. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of S. epidermidis ST0409KOC, a strain isolated from Bulgarian feta-type cheese, and to explore its bacteriocinogenic property against different strains of Listeria monocytogenes and other pathogens. S. epidermidis ST0409KOC can be considered a safe strain regarding its virulence genetic background, presenting only a virulence gene of IS257 among the 18 genes investigated. Moreover, it showed high bacteriocinogenic activity against different serotypes of L. monocytogenes, and its bacteriocin may be of great interest for controlling this pathogen. However, bacteriocin production when associated with pathogenic or opportunistic strains can be considered as a virulence factor, since it will improve survival abilities for the producer. Related to the observed results regarding the safety of the investigated strain, production of bacteriocin, and potential beneficial features, the S. epidermidis ST0409KOC strain is a strong candidate for use as a probiotic in different applications, and further studies are needed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41540675 · DOI · PMC12808867

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The role and application of enterococci in food and health [5]
    Foulquié Moreno MR, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, De Vuyst L · Int J Food Microbiol · 2006 · cited 570 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavour profiling of cheese products [6]
    Smit G, Smit BA, Engels WJ · FEMS Microbiol Rev · 2005 · cited 503 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Traditional cheeses: rich and diverse microbiota with associated benefits [7]
    Montel MC, Buchin S, Mallet A, Delbes-Paus C, Vuitton DA, Desmasures N, et al. · Int J Food Microbiol · 2014 · cited 340 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Invited review: perspectives on the basis of the rheology and texture properties of cheese [8]
    Lucey JA, Johnson ME, Horne DS · J Dairy Sci · 2003 · cited 331 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cheese whey management: a review [9]
    Prazeres AR, Carvalho F, Rivas J · J Environ Manage · 2012 · cited 234 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Flavours of cheese products: metabolic pathways, analytical tools and identification of producing strains [10]
    Marilley L, Casey MG · Int J Food Microbiol · 2004 · cited 227 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Pointke M, Pawelzik E. Plant-Based Alternative Products: Are They Healthy Alternatives? Micro- and Macronutrients and Nutritional Scoring. . 2022. PMID 35276960 · DOI · PMC8838485
  2. Zhang M, Dong X, Huang Z, Li X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, et al.. Cheese consumption and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review and updated meta-analysis of prospective studies. . 2023. PMID 37328108 · DOI · PMC10509445
  3. Craig WJ, Mangels AR, Brothers CJ. Nutritional Profiles of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Cheese Alternatives. . 2022. PMID 35334904 · DOI · PMC8952881
  4. Carneiro KO, Lima JMS, Todorov SD. Do We Need to Worry About Staphylococcus epidermidis ST0409KOC, a Cheese-Isolated Strain With Bacteriocinogenic Properties?. . 2026. PMID 41540675 · DOI · PMC12808867
  5. Foulquié Moreno MR, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, De Vuyst L. The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006. PMID 16216368 · DOI
  6. Smit G, Smit BA, Engels WJ. Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavour profiling of cheese products. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005. PMID 15935512 · DOI
  7. Montel MC, Buchin S, Mallet A, Delbes-Paus C, Vuitton DA, Desmasures N, et al.. Traditional cheeses: rich and diverse microbiota with associated benefits. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014. PMID 24642348 · DOI
  8. Lucey JA, Johnson ME, Horne DS. Invited review: perspectives on the basis of the rheology and texture properties of cheese. J Dairy Sci. 2003. PMID 14507008 · DOI
  9. Prazeres AR, Carvalho F, Rivas J. Cheese whey management: a review. J Environ Manage. 2012. PMID 22721610 · DOI
  10. Marilley L, Casey MG. Flavours of cheese products: metabolic pathways, analytical tools and identification of producing strains. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. PMID 14698096 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • YogurtAnatomy and Physiology
  • MilkAnatomy and Physiology
  • WheyAnatomy and Physiology
  • BeerAnatomy and Physiology
  • ButterAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dairy ProductsAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

8,393
PubMed records on this heading
23%
published since 2020
411
review articles
102
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • YogurtAnatomy and Physiology
  • MilkAnatomy and Physiology
  • WheyAnatomy and Physiology
  • BeerAnatomy and Physiology
  • ButterAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support