Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Cefoperazone
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Cefoperazone

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Semisynthetic broad-spectrum cephalosporin with a tetrazolyl moiety that is resistant to beta-lactamase.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,034 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Semisynthetic broad-spectrum cephalosporin with a tetrazolyl moiety that is resistant to beta-lactamase. It may be used to treat Pseudomonas infections.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Cefoperazon; T1551; T-1551; T 1551; Cefoperazone Sodium; Sodium, Cefoperazone; Cefoperazone Sodium Salt; Salt, Cefoperazone Sodium.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cefamandole

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,351 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cefoperazone” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 152 of them (11.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 913 records.

Reviews account for 46 records (3.4%) and meta-analyses for 4. Randomized controlled trials number 94 (7.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 913 records; 2000-2009: 126 records; 2010-2019: 160 records; 2020 onward: 152 records913through 19991262000-20091602010-20191522020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999913
2000-2009126
2010-2019160
2020 onward152
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 3.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 7.0 percentReviews3.4% (46)Meta-analyses0.3% (4)Randomized controlled trials7.0% (94)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,351 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews463.4%
Meta-analyses40.3%
Randomized controlled trials947.0%

Method: PubMed query "Cefoperazone"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans
Guinan J, Wang S, Hazbun TR, Yadav H, Thangamani S
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
131cc by
PMID 31222159 · DOI · PMC6586901
Drug combinations against Borrelia burgdorferi persisters in vitro: eradication achieved by using daptomycin, cefoperazone and doxycycline
Feng J, Auwaerter PG, Zhang Y
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
87cc by
PMID 25806811 · DOI · PMC4373819
Nitrite Promotes ROS Production to Potentiate Cefoperazone-Sulbactam-Mediated Elimination to Lab-Evolved and Clinical-Evolved Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Kuang SF, Li X, Feng DY, Wu WB, Li H, Peng B, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
25cc by
PMID 35863024 · DOI · PMC9430864
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam versus ceftriaxone and flomoxef in acute cholangitis: a multicenter retrospective study
Chen C-C, Chen J-h, Huang W-H, Hsieh T-L, Chen L-W, Tsai M-C, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42283553 · DOI · PMC13321815

Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans [1]

Research article Guinan J, Wang S, Hazbun TR, Yadav H, Thangamani S · · 2019 · cited 131 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Candida albicans is the fourth most common cause of systemic nosocomial infections, posing a significant risk in immunocompromised individuals.
Closing excerpt
albicans.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (162 words)

Candida albicans is the fourth most common cause of systemic nosocomial infections, posing a significant risk in immunocompromised individuals. As the majority of systemic C. albicans infections stem from endogenous gastrointestinal (GI) colonization, understanding the mechanisms associated with GI colonization is essential in the development of novel methods to prevent C. albicans-related mortality. In this study, we investigated the role of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) including acetate, butyrate, and propionate on growth, morphogenesis, and GI colonization of C. albicans. Our results indicate that cefoperazone-treated mice susceptible to C. albicans infection had significantly decreased levels of SCFAs in the cecal contents that correlate with a higher fungal load in the feces. Further, using in vivo concentration of SCFAs, we demonstrated that SCFAs inhibit the growth, germ tube, hyphae and biofilm development of C. albicans in vitro. Collectively, results from this study suggest that antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of SCFAs in the cecum enhances the growth and GI colonization of C. albicans.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31222159 · DOI · PMC6586901

Drug combinations against Borrelia burgdorferi persisters in vitro: eradication achieved by using daptomycin, cefoperazone and doxycycline [2]

Research article Feng J, Auwaerter PG, Zhang Y · · 2015 · cited 87 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Although most Lyme disease patients can be cured with antibiotics doxycycline or amoxicillin using 2-4 week treatment durations, some patients suffer from persistent arthritis or post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome.
Closing excerpt
Further studies are needed to validate whether such combination antimicrobial approaches are useful in animal models and human infection.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (263 words)

Although most Lyme disease patients can be cured with antibiotics doxycycline or amoxicillin using 2-4 week treatment durations, some patients suffer from persistent arthritis or post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome. Why these phenomena occur is unclear, but possibilities include host responses, antigenic debris, or B. burgdorferi organisms remaining despite antibiotic therapy. In vitro, B. burgdorferi developed increasing antibiotic tolerance as morphology changed from typical spirochetal form in log phase growth to variant round body and microcolony forms in stationary phase. B. burgdorferi appeared to have higher persister frequencies than E. coli as a control as measured by SYBR Green I/propidium iodide (PI) viability stain and microscope counting. To more effectively eradicate the different persister forms tolerant to doxycycline or amoxicillin, drug combinations were studied using previously identified drugs from an FDA-approved drug library with high activity against such persisters. Using a SYBR Green/PI viability assay, daptomycin-containing drug combinations were the most effective. Of studied drugs, daptomycin was the common element in the most active regimens when combined with doxycycline plus either beta-lactams (cefoperazone or carbenicillin) or an energy inhibitor (clofazimine). Daptomycin plus doxycycline and cefoperazone eradicated the most resistant microcolony form of B. burgdorferi persisters and did not yield viable spirochetes upon subculturing, suggesting durable killing that was not achieved by any other two or three drug combinations. These findings may have implications for improved treatment of Lyme disease, if persistent organisms or detritus are responsible for symptoms that do not resolve with conventional therapy. Further studies are needed to validate whether such combination antimicrobial approaches are useful in animal models and human infection.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25806811 · DOI · PMC4373819

Nitrite Promotes ROS Production to Potentiate Cefoperazone-Sulbactam-Mediated Elimination to Lab-Evolved and Clinical-Evolved Pseudomonas aeruginosa [3]

Research article Kuang SF, Li X, Feng DY, Wu WB, Li H, Peng B, et al. · · 2022 · cited 25 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF)-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a big challenge in the use of SCF to treat infection caused by the pathogen.
Closing excerpt
These results not only disclose a nitrite-ROS-potentiated SCF-mediated killing, but also show SCF-mediated killing is dependent upon ROS.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (362 words)

Cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF)-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a big challenge in the use of SCF to treat infection caused by the pathogen. We have recently shown exogenous nitrite-enabled killing of naturally and artificially evolved Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (AP-RCLIN-EVO and AP-RLAB-EVO, respectively) by SCF. However, the underlying mechanism is unknown. Here, reprogramming metabolomics was adopted to investigate how nitrite enhanced the SCF-mediated killing efficacy. Nitrite-reprogrammed metabolome displayed an activated pyruvate cycle (P cycle), which was confirmed by elevated activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, succinate dehydrogenase, and malate dehydrogenase. The activated P cycle provided NADH for the electron transport chain and thereby increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), which potentiated SCF to kill AP-RCLIN-EVO and AP-RLAB-EVO. The nitrite-enabled killing of AP-RCLIN-EVO and AP-RLAB-EVO by SCF was inhibited by PDH inhibitor furfural and ROS scavenger N-Acetyl-L-cysteine but promoted by ROS promoter Fe3+. SCF alone could not induce ROS, but SCF-mediated killing efficacy was enhanced by ROS. In addition, the present study demonstrated that nitrite repressed antioxidants, which were partly responsible for the elevated ROS. These results reveal a nitrite-reprogrammed metabolome mechanism by which AP-RCLIN-EVO and AP-RLAB-EVO sensitivity to SCF is elevated. IMPORTANCE Antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa has become a real concern in hospital-acquired infections, especially in critically ill and immunocompromised patients. Understanding antibiotic resistance mechanisms and developing novel control measures are highly appreciated. We have recently shown that a reduced nitrite-dependent NO biosynthesis contributes to cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF) resistance, which is reverted by exogenous nitrite, in both naturally and artificially evolved P. aeruginosa strains (AP-RCLIN-EVO and AP-RLAB-EVO, respectively). However, the mechanism is unknown. The present study reports that the nitrite-enabled killing of AP-RCLIN-EVO and AP-RLAB-EVO by SCF is attributed to the promoted production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Nitrite activates the pyruvate cycle to generate NADH for the electron transport chain, which in turn promotes ROS generation. Nitrite-potentiated SCF-mediated killing is decreased by pyruvate dehydrogenase inhibitor furfural and ROS scavenger N-Acetyl-L-cysteine but increased by ROS promoter Fe3+. Furthermore, SCF-mediated killing is promoted by H2O2 in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, the combination of nitrite and H2O2 greatly enhances SCF-mediated killing. These results not only disclose a nitrite-ROS-potentiated SCF-mediated killing, but also show SCF-mediated killing is dependent upon ROS.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35863024 · DOI · PMC9430864

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam versus ceftriaxone and flomoxef in acute cholangitis: a multicenter retrospective study [4]

Research article Chen C-C, Chen J-h, Huang W-H, Hsieh T-L, Chen L-W, Tsai M-C, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Acute cholangitis is a potentially life-threatening biliary tract infection requiring prompt antibiotic therapy.
Closing excerpt
These findings support its continued clinical use while awaiting confirmation in larger randomized trials.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (247 words)

Acute cholangitis is a potentially life-threatening biliary tract infection requiring prompt antibiotic therapy. Cefoperazone-sulbactam is a recommended option for mild-to-moderate disease, but comparative evidence versus ceftriaxone and flomoxef is limited. In this multicenter retrospective study, 389 adults with acute cholangitis from nine Taiwanese centers (January 2022-July 2024) received cefoperazone-sulbactam (n = 249), ceftriaxone (n = 37), or flomoxef (n = 103). The primary outcome was clinical response (cure or improvement) on days 4, 7, and 14. Secondary outcomes were microbiological response, in-hospital mortality, and adverse events (AEs). Multivariable logistic regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, biliary stenting, comorbidities, malignancy, disease severity, and timing of biliary drainage. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups (mean age, 67 years; 91.8% had mild-to-moderate disease; 33.2% had bacteremia). Day 4 clinical response rates were 96.8% with cefoperazone-sulbactam, 97.3% with ceftriaxone, and 93.2% with flomoxef (P = 0.05). Day 7 response did not differ significantly. Compared with cefoperazone-sulbactam, the adjusted odds ratio for day 4 clinical response was 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-11.78) for ceftriaxone and 0.50 (95% CI: 0.18-1.43) for flomoxef. AEs were uncommon (2%-5%), mostly mild and not associated with sequelae. Cefoperazone-sulbactam appears to be an effective and safe empiric therapy for acute cholangitis in real-world practice, with high observed early clinical response rates. Although outcomes were statistically similar to those of ceftriaxone and flomoxef, the underpowered between-group comparisons preclude definitive conclusions regarding comparative efficacy. These findings support its continued clinical use while awaiting confirmation in larger randomized trials.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42283553 · DOI · PMC13321815

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article beta-Lactamase inhibition and in vitro activity of sulbactam and sulbactam/cefoperazone [5]
    Williams JD · Clin Infect Dis · 1997 · cited 60 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Sulbactam-containing beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations [6]
    Akova M · Clin Microbiol Infect · 2008 · cited 43 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cefoperazone/sulbactam: New composites against multiresistant gram negative bacteria? [7]
    Ku YH, Yu WL · Infect Genet Evol · 2021 · cited 37 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam in empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia: A systemic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Lan SH, Chang SP, Lai CC, Lu LC, Tang HJ · Medicine (Baltimore) · 2020 · cited 11 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam in Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [9]
    Lan SH, Chao CM, Chang SP, Lu LC, Lai CC · Surg Infect (Larchmt) · 2021 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cefoperazone prevents the inactivation of alpha(1)-antitrypsin by activated neutrophils [10]
    Dallegri F, Dapino P, Arduino N, Bertolotto M, Ottonello L · Antimicrob Agents Chemother · 1999 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Guinan J, Wang S, Hazbun TR, Yadav H, Thangamani S. Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans. . 2019. PMID 31222159 · DOI · PMC6586901
  2. Feng J, Auwaerter PG, Zhang Y. Drug combinations against Borrelia burgdorferi persisters in vitro: eradication achieved by using daptomycin, cefoperazone and doxycycline. . 2015. PMID 25806811 · DOI · PMC4373819
  3. Kuang SF, Li X, Feng DY, Wu WB, Li H, Peng B, et al.. Nitrite Promotes ROS Production to Potentiate Cefoperazone-Sulbactam-Mediated Elimination to Lab-Evolved and Clinical-Evolved Pseudomonas aeruginosa. . 2022. PMID 35863024 · DOI · PMC9430864
  4. Chen C-C, Chen J-h, Huang W-H, Hsieh T-L, Chen L-W, Tsai M-C, et al.. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam versus ceftriaxone and flomoxef in acute cholangitis: a multicenter retrospective study. . 2026. PMID 42283553 · DOI · PMC13321815
  5. Williams JD. beta-Lactamase inhibition and in vitro activity of sulbactam and sulbactam/cefoperazone. Clin Infect Dis. 1997. PMID 9114205 · DOI
  6. Akova M. Sulbactam-containing beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008. PMID 18154545 · DOI
  7. Ku YH, Yu WL. Cefoperazone/sulbactam: New composites against multiresistant gram negative bacteria?. Infect Genet Evol. 2021. PMID 33418147 · DOI
  8. Lan SH, Chang SP, Lai CC, Lu LC, Tang HJ. Efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam in empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID 32080150 · DOI · PMC7034635
  9. Lan SH, Chao CM, Chang SP, Lu LC, Lai CC. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam in Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021. PMID 33625294 · DOI
  10. Dallegri F, Dapino P, Arduino N, Bertolotto M, Ottonello L. Cefoperazone prevents the inactivation of alpha(1)-antitrypsin by activated neutrophils. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999. PMID 10471586 · DOI · PMC89468

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • CefazolinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftriaxoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • CephalexinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftazidimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefepimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefuroximeDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

1,351
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
46
review articles
94
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • CefazolinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftriaxoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • CephalexinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftazidimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefepimeDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support