Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Cefuroxime
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Cefuroxime

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

Broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic resistant to beta-lactamase.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,229 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic resistant to beta-lactamase. It has been proposed for infections with gram-negative and gram-positive organisms, gonorrhea, and haemophilus.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Cephuroxime; Ketocef; Zinacef.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cephalosporins

Related concepts

  • Gonorrhea
  • Haemophilus

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,427 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cefuroxime” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 233 of them (9.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,226 records.

Reviews account for 105 records (4.3%) and meta-analyses for 10. Randomized controlled trials number 409 (16.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,226 records; 2000-2009: 488 records; 2010-2019: 480 records; 2020 onward: 233 records1,226through 19994882000-20094802010-20192332020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,226
2000-2009488
2010-2019480
2020 onward233
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 16.9 percentReviews4.3% (105)Meta-analyses0.4% (10)Randomized controlled trials16.9% (409)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,427 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1054.3%
Meta-analyses100.4%
Randomized controlled trials40916.9%

Method: PubMed query "Cefuroxime"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Cyclic di-AMP Oversight of Counter-Ion Osmolyte Pools Impacts Intrinsic Cefuroxime Resistance in Lactococcus lactis
Pham HT, Shi W, Xiang Y, Foo SY, Plan MR, Courtin P, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
28cc by
PMID 33832972 · DOI · PMC8092236
Cefuroxime, levofloxacin, esomeprazole, and bismuth as first-line therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients allergic to penicillin
Song Z, Fu W, Zhou L
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
27cc by
PMID 31345165 · DOI · PMC6659276
Timing of Cefuroxime Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Its Association With Surgical Site Infections
Sommerstein R, Troillet N, Harbarth S, de Kraker MEA, Vuichard-Gysin D, Kuster SP, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
25cc by
PMID 37289455 · DOI · PMC10251212
Cefuroxime axetil dosing regimens and probability of target attainment in adults and children
van Dijkman SC, Kamble P, Kowalski JA, Della Pasqua O
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 40677153 · DOI · PMC12569549

Cyclic di-AMP Oversight of Counter-Ion Osmolyte Pools Impacts Intrinsic Cefuroxime Resistance in Lactococcus lactis [1]

Research article Pham HT, Shi W, Xiang Y, Foo SY, Plan MR, Courtin P, et al. · · 2021 · cited 28 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The broadly conserved cyclic di-AMP (c-di-AMP) is a conditionally essential bacterial second messenger.
Closing excerpt
The regulatory reach of c-di-AMP can be extended to include the main free anions in bacteria.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (384 words)

The broadly conserved cyclic di-AMP (c-di-AMP) is a conditionally essential bacterial second messenger. The pool of c-di-AMP is fine-tuned through diadenylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase activities, and direct binding of c-di-AMP to proteins and riboswitches allows the regulation of a broad spectrum of cellular processes. c-di-AMP has a significant impact on intrinsic β-lactam antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive bacteria; however, the reason for this is currently unclear. In this work, genetic studies revealed that suppressor mutations that decrease the activity of the potassium (K+) importer KupB or the glutamine importer GlnPQ restore cefuroxime (CEF) resistance in diadenylate cyclase (cdaA) mutants of Lactococcus lactis Metabolite analyses showed that glutamine is imported by GlnPQ and then rapidly converted to glutamate, and GlnPQ mutations or c-di-AMP negatively affects the pools of the most abundant free amino acids (glutamate and aspartate) during growth. In a high-c-di-AMP mutant, GlnPQ activity could be increased by raising the internal K+ level through the overexpression of a c-di-AMP-insensitive KupB variant. These results demonstrate that c-di-AMP reduces GlnPQ activity and, therefore, the level of the major free anions in L. lactis through its inhibition of K+ import. Excessive ion accumulation in cdaA mutants results in greater spontaneous cell lysis under hypotonic conditions, while CEF-resistant suppressors exhibit reduced cell lysis and lower osmoresistance. This work demonstrates that the overaccumulation of major counter-ion osmolyte pools in c-di-AMP-defective mutants of L. lactis causes cefuroxime sensitivity.IMPORTANCE The bacterial second messenger cyclic di-AMP (c-di-AMP) is a global regulator of potassium homeostasis and compatible solute uptake in many Gram-positive bacteria, making it essential for osmoregulation. The role that c-di-AMP plays in β-lactam resistance, however, is unclear despite being first identified a decade ago. Here, we demonstrate that the overaccumulation of potassium or free amino acids leads to cefuroxime sensitivity in Lactococcus lactis mutants partially defective in c-di-AMP synthesis. It was shown that c-di-AMP negatively affects the levels of the most abundant free amino acids (glutamate and aspartate) in L. lactis Regulation of these major free anions was found to occur via the glutamine transporter GlnPQ, whose activity increased in response to intracellular potassium levels, which are under c-di-AMP control. Evidence is also presented showing that they are major osmolytes that enhance osmoresistance and cell lysis. The regulatory reach of c-di-AMP can be extended to include the main free anions in bacteria.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33832972 · DOI · PMC8092236

Cefuroxime, levofloxacin, esomeprazole, and bismuth as first-line therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients allergic to penicillin [2]

Research article Song Z, Fu W, Zhou L · · 2019 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundEradicating Helicobacter pylori infection is clinically challenging, notably in cases with penicillin allergy.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsCefuroxime, levofloxacin, esomeprazole, and bismuth achieved decent efficacy, safety and compliance as first-line antimicrobial regimen in patients with Helicobacter pylori and penicillin allergy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (251 words)

BackgroundEradicating Helicobacter pylori infection is clinically challenging, notably in cases with penicillin allergy. Cephalosporin could be used in lieu of amoxicillin to eradicate Helicobacter pylori. The current work aimed to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety of a cefuroxime-based quadruple regimen in treatment-naïve individuals with penicillin allergy, as well as patient compliance.MethodsIn the present prospective single-center cohort study, 152 Helicobacter pylori infected individuals with penicillin allergy received eradication therapy with cefuroxime (500 mg twice/day), levofloxacin (500 mg once/day), esomeprazole (20 mg twice/day) and bismuth potassium citrate (220 mg twice/day; 14 days). Safety and compliance were evaluated 1 to 3 days upon eradication. The urea breath test was carried out 8 to 12 weeks upon eradication for efficacy assessment.ResultsThis quadruple antimicrobial regimen eradicated the pathogen at 85.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 79.6-90.8%), 88.4% (95% CI 83.0-93.2%) and 90.1% (95% CI 85.2-94.4%) in intention-to-treat, modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively, with resistance rates of 4.6 and 40.0% in the background of cefuroxime and levofloxacin, respectively. Meanwhile, 21.3% of patients had adverse reactions, but none was serious. A total of 95.3% of patients showed good compliance. Poor compliance and cefuroxime resistance were detected by uni- or multivariate analyses as independent factors predicting therapeutic failure. Eradication rates in patients with dual levofloxacin and cefuroxime susceptibility, isolated levofloxacin resistance, isolated cefuroxime resistance and dual resistance were 97.2, 84.0, 50.0, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.002).ConclusionsCefuroxime, levofloxacin, esomeprazole, and bismuth achieved decent efficacy, safety and compliance as first-line antimicrobial regimen in patients with Helicobacter pylori and penicillin allergy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31345165 · DOI · PMC6659276

Timing of Cefuroxime Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Its Association With Surgical Site Infections [3]

Research article Sommerstein R, Troillet N, Harbarth S, de Kraker MEA, Vuichard-Gysin D, Kuster SP, et al. · · 2023 · cited 25 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceWorld Health Organization guidelines recommend administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), including cefuroxime, within 120 minutes prior to incision.
Closing excerpt
93; P Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, administration of cefuroxime SAP closer to the incision time was associated with significantly lower odds of SSI, suggesting that cefuroxime SAP should be administrated within 60 minutes prior to incision, and ideally within 10 to 25 minutes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (340 words)

ImportanceWorld Health Organization guidelines recommend administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), including cefuroxime, within 120 minutes prior to incision. However, data from clinical settings supporting this long interval is limited.ObjectiveTo assess whether earlier vs later timing of administration of cefuroxime SAP is associated with the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI).Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study included adult patients who underwent 1 of 11 major surgical procedures with cefuroxime SAP, documented by the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system between January 2009 and December 2020 at 158 Swiss hospitals. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to April 2023.ExposuresTiming of cefuroxime SAP administration before incision was divided into 3 groups: 61 to 120 minutes before incision, 31 to 60 minutes before incision, and 0 to 30 minutes before incision. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed with time windows of 30 to 55 minutes and 10 to 25 minutes as a surrogate marker for administration in the preoperating room vs in the operating room, respectively. The timing of SAP administration was defined as the start of the infusion obtained from the anesthesia protocol.Main outcomes and measuresOccurrence of SSI according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for institutional, patient, and perioperative variables were applied.ResultsOf 538 967 surveilled patients, 222 439 (104 047 men [46.8%]; median [IQR] age, 65.7 [53.9-74.2] years), fulfilled inclusion criteria. SSI was identified in 5355 patients (2.4%). Cefuroxime SAP was administered 61 to 120 minutes prior to incision in 27 207 patients (12.2%), 31 to 60 minutes prior to incision in 118 004 patients (53.1%), and 0 to 30 minutes prior to incision in 77 228 patients (34.7%). SAP administration at 0 to 30 minutes was significantly associated with a lower SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; P Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, administration of cefuroxime SAP closer to the incision time was associated with significantly lower odds of SSI, suggesting that cefuroxime SAP should be administrated within 60 minutes prior to incision, and ideally within 10 to 25 minutes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37289455 · DOI · PMC10251212

Cefuroxime axetil dosing regimens and probability of target attainment in adults and children [4]

Research article van Dijkman SC, Kamble P, Kowalski JA, Della Pasqua O · · 2025 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AimsCefuroxime axetil exists in several dosage forms for oral administration, and is indicated for treatment of respiratory, genitourinary, skin and soft tissue infections.
Closing excerpt
As resistance patterns evolve, and differ between countries or regions, cefuroxime doses may require adjustments considering local bacterial susceptibility.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (254 words)

AimsCefuroxime axetil exists in several dosage forms for oral administration, and is indicated for treatment of respiratory, genitourinary, skin and soft tissue infections. Evolving patterns of bacterial susceptibility, expressed as increasing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), warrant monitoring of antibiotic efficacy. Here we investigate the performance of different cefuroxime axetil doses required to yield the desired target exposure against the predominant pathogens for each indication.MethodsThe pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime in plasma/serum and urine was characterized after oral, intravenous and intramuscular administration. Covariates included the effect of weight on clearance and volume of distribution, and formulation on absorption parameters. Subsequently, systemic cefuroxime concentrations over time were simulated to assess the time above the MIC (T > MIC) and the probability of target attainment (PTA) for different dosing regimens in adults and children.ResultsTablet doses of 250 and 500 mg twice daily achieved the target T > MIC (40%) and PTA (≥90%) for MICs up to 0.25 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively, thereby covering most European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints for key pathogens. Due to its absorption profile, the oral suspension covers even higher MICs, up to 1.0 mg/L. As cefuroxime is mostly excreted unchanged in urine, cefuroxime axetil doses of 250 mg twice daily for urinary tract infection yield a PTA of 100% for MIC values up to 8 mg/L.ConclusionsOur analysis provides insight into the performance of different doses and dosing regimens for cefuroxime axetil for key pathogens. As resistance patterns evolve, and differ between countries or regions, cefuroxime doses may require adjustments considering local bacterial susceptibility.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40677153 · DOI · PMC12569549

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin and vancomycin at the end of cataract surgery: a meta-analysis [5]
    Bowen RC, Zhou AX, Bondalapati S, Lawyer TW, Snow KB, Evans PR, et al. · Br J Ophthalmol · 2018 · cited 83 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Regulatory considerations of pharmaceutical solid polymorphism in Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) [6]
    Raw AS, Furness MS, Gill DS, Adams RC, Holcombe FO, Yu LX · Adv Drug Deliv Rev · 2004 · cited 70 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections [7]
    Scott LJ, Ormrod D, Goa KL · Drugs · 2001 · cited 52 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cefuroxime axetil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy [8]
    Perry CM, Brogden RN · Drugs · 1996 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cefuroxime: mechanisms of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical applications, adverse reactions and therapeutic indications [9]
    Gold B, Rodriguez WJ · Pharmacotherapy · 1983 · cited 28 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Comparison of intraoperative versus 24 hour antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint replacement. A controlled prospective study [10]
    Ritter MA, Campbell E, Keating EM, Faris PM · Orthop Rev · 1989 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Pham HT, Shi W, Xiang Y, Foo SY, Plan MR, Courtin P, et al.. Cyclic di-AMP Oversight of Counter-Ion Osmolyte Pools Impacts Intrinsic Cefuroxime Resistance in Lactococcus lactis. . 2021. PMID 33832972 · DOI · PMC8092236
  2. Song Z, Fu W, Zhou L. Cefuroxime, levofloxacin, esomeprazole, and bismuth as first-line therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients allergic to penicillin. . 2019. PMID 31345165 · DOI · PMC6659276
  3. Sommerstein R, Troillet N, Harbarth S, de Kraker MEA, Vuichard-Gysin D, Kuster SP, et al.. Timing of Cefuroxime Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Its Association With Surgical Site Infections. . 2023. PMID 37289455 · DOI · PMC10251212
  4. van Dijkman SC, Kamble P, Kowalski JA, Della Pasqua O. Cefuroxime axetil dosing regimens and probability of target attainment in adults and children. . 2025. PMID 40677153 · DOI · PMC12569549
  5. Bowen RC, Zhou AX, Bondalapati S, Lawyer TW, Snow KB, Evans PR, et al.. Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin and vancomycin at the end of cataract surgery: a meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID 29326317 · DOI · PMC6041193
  6. Raw AS, Furness MS, Gill DS, Adams RC, Holcombe FO, Yu LX. Regulatory considerations of pharmaceutical solid polymorphism in Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs). Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004. PMID 14962589 · DOI
  7. Scott LJ, Ormrod D, Goa KL. Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections. Drugs. 2001. PMID 11558834 · DOI
  8. Perry CM, Brogden RN. Cefuroxime axetil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1996. PMID 8799689 · DOI
  9. Gold B, Rodriguez WJ. Cefuroxime: mechanisms of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical applications, adverse reactions and therapeutic indications. Pharmacotherapy. 1983. PMID 6344037 · DOI
  10. Ritter MA, Campbell E, Keating EM, Faris PM. Comparison of intraoperative versus 24 hour antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint replacement. A controlled prospective study. Orthop Rev. 1989. PMID 2664670

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • CefazolinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefepimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefoperazoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftazidimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftriaxoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • CephalexinDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

2,427
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
105
review articles
409
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • CefazolinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefepimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefoperazoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftazidimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftriaxoneDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support