Clonidine

BackgroundThe benefits and safety of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remain controversial, and guidelines are inconsistent on which medications are preferred across different age groups. We aimed to estimate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of oral medications for ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults.MethodsWe did a literature search for published and unpublished double-blind randomised controlled trials comparing amphetamines (including lisdexamfetamine), atomoxetine, bupropion, clonidine, guanfacine, methylphenidate, and modafinil with each other or placebo. We systematically contacted study authors and drug manufacturers for additional information. Primary outcomes were efficacy (change in severity of ADHD core symptoms based on teachers' and clinicians' ratings) and tolerability (proportion of patients who dropped out of studies because of side-effects) at timepoints closest to 12 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks. We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) using pairwise and network meta-analysis with random effects. We assessed the risk of bias of individual studies with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and confidence of estimates with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for network meta-analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42014008976.Findings133 double-blind randomised controlled trials (81 in children and adolescents, 51 in adults, and one in both) were included. The analysis of efficacy closest to 12 weeks was based on 10 068 children and adolescents and 8131 adults; the analysis of tolerability was based on 11 018 children and adolescents and 5362 adults. The confidence of estimates varied from high or moderate (for some comparisons) to low or very low (for most indirect comparisons). For ADHD core symptoms rated by clinicians in children and adolescents closest to 12 weeks, all included drugs were superior to placebo (eg, SMD -1·02, 95% CI -1·19 to -0·85 for amphetamines, -0·78, -0·93 to -0·62 for methylphenidate, -0·56, -0·66 to -0·45 for atomoxetine). By contrast, for available comparisons based on teachers' ratings, only methylphenidate (SMD -0·82, 95% CI -1·16 to -0·48) and modafinil (-0·76, -1·15 to -0·37) were more efficacious than placebo. In adults (clinicians' ratings), amphetamines (SMD -0·79, 95% CI -0·99 to -0·58), methylphenidate (-0·49, -0·64 to -0·35), bupropion (-0·46, -0·85 to -0·07), and atomoxetine (-0·45, -0·58 to -0·32), but not modafinil (0·16, -0·28 to 0·59), were better than placebo. With respect to tolerability, amphetamines were inferior to placebo in both children and adolescents (odds ratio [OR] 2·30, 95% CI 1·36-3·89) and adults (3·26, 1·54-6·92); guanfacine was inferior to placebo in children and adolescents only (2·64, 1·20-5·81); and atomoxetine (2·33, 1·28-4·25), methylphenidate (2·39, 1·40-4·08), and modafinil (4·01, 1·42-11·33) were less well tolerated than placebo in adults only. In head-to-head comparisons, only differences in efficacy (clinicians' ratings) were found, favouring amphetamines over modafinil, atomoxetine, and methylphenidate in both children and adolescents (SMDs -0·46 to -0·24) and adults (-0·94 to -0·29). We did not find sufficient data for the 26-week and 52-week timepoints.InterpretationOur findings represent the most comprehensive available evidence base to inform patients, families, clinicians, guideline developers, and policymakers on the choice of ADHD medications across age groups. Taking into account both efficacy and safety, evidence from this meta-analysis supports methylphenidate in children and adolescents, and amphetamines in adults, as preferred first-choice medications for the short-term treatment of ADHD. New research should be funded urgently to assess long-term effects of these drugs.FundingStichting Eunethydis (European Network for Hyperkinetic Disorders), and the UK National Institute for Health Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.

The purpose of the current study was to develop tizanidine HCl (TIZ; a myotonolytic agent used for treatment of spasticity) loaded nanotransfersomes intended for rectal administration, aiming to bypass the hepatic first-pass metabolism. TIZ-loaded nanotransfersomes were prepared by thin-film hydration method followed by characterization for various parameters including entrapment efficiency, vesicle diameter, in vitro release and ex vivo permeation studies. Transfersomal formulation composed of phosphatidylcholine and Tween 80 at a weight ratio of (85:15) gave a satisfactory results. It exhibited encapsulation efficiency of 52.39%, mean diameter of 150.33 nm, controlled drug release over 8 h and good permeation characteristics. Optimum formula was then incorporated into Pluronic-based thermoreversible gel using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) as a mucoadhesive polymer. Pharmacokinetic study was performed by rectal administration of transfersomes-loaded in situ gel to rabbits and compared with oral drug solution and rectal TIZ in situ gel. The pharmacokinetic study revealed that the transfersomal formulation successively enhanced the bioavailability of TIZ by about 2.18-fold and increased t1/2 to about 10 h as compared to oral solution. It can be concluded that encapsulation of TIZ into nanotransfersomes can achieve a dual purpose of prolonged TIZ release and enhanced bioavailability and so may be considered as a promising drug delivery system for the treatment of spasticity.

IntroductionWhile several theories have highlighted the importance of the noradrenergic system for behavioral flexibility, a number of recent studies have also shown a role for noradrenaline in motivation, particularly in effort processing. Here, we designed a novel sequential cost/benefit decision task to test the causal influence of noradrenaline on these two functions in rhesus monkeys.MethodsWe manipulated noradrenaline using clonidine, an alpha-2 noradrenergic receptor agonist, which reduces central noradrenaline levels and examined how this manipulation influenced performance on the task.ResultsClonidine had two specific and distinct effects: first, it decreased choice variability, without affecting the cost/benefit trade-off; and second, it reduced force production, without modulating the willingness to work.ConclusionsTogether, these results support an overarching role for noradrenaline in facing challenging situations in two complementary ways: by modulating behavioral volatility, which would facilitate adaptation depending on the lability of the environment, and by modulating the mobilization of resources to face immediate challenges.

IntroductionPreliminary clinical studies have demonstrated that clonidine is an effective adjuvant to spinal anesthesia in neonates and infants. However, the studies conducted previously have had a limited cohort size of 80-100, potentially limiting an accurate measure of its safety.MethodsThe current study retrospectively examines our 5-6-year experience with clonidine as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia in a large cohort of neonates and infants.ResultsThe study cohort included 1420 patients ranging in age from newborn to 36 months (median age 7 months). Ninety-five percent of the patients tolerated spinal anesthesia without requiring conversion to general anesthesia, and over 73% of the patients did not require any additional intraoperative sedation. Hypotension (sBP ≤ 60 mmHg) was the most common intraoperative event (17%) with one patient requiring the administration of an anticholinergic agent for bradycardia. No serious intraoperative adverse events were noted. Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Phase I was bypassed in 75% of cases, and the postoperative admission rate was 7%, with the majority (85%) being planned admissions. Fifty-six patients (4%) returned to the hospital during the first seven postoperative days, primarily for surgical concerns.ConclusionsBased on this retrospective, observational study, clonidine appears to be a safe adjuvant to spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgical procedures in infants and children. We observed a low incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications.