Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (864 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A competitive histamine H2-receptor antagonist. Its main pharmacodynamic effect is the inhibition of gastric secretion.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Pepcid; Famotidine Hydrochloride; YM-11170; YM11170; YM 11170; MK-208; MK208; MK 208.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Thiazoles
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,763 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Famotidine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 167 of them (9.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 927 records.
Reviews account for 90 records (5.1%) and meta-analyses for 15. Randomized controlled trials number 358 (20.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 927 |
| 2000-2009 | 408 |
| 2010-2019 | 261 |
| 2020 onward | 167 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 90 | 5.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 15 | 0.9% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 358 | 20.3% |
Method: PubMed query "Famotidine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Apart from prevention using vaccinations, the management options for COVID-19 remain limited.
- Closing excerpt
- Given that pharmacokinetic studies indicate that famotidine can reach concentrations in blood that suffice to antagonize histamine H2 receptors expressed in mast cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils, these observations explain how famotidine may contribute to the reduced histamine-induced inflammation and cytokine release, thereby improving the outcome for patients with COVID-19.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (213 words)
Apart from prevention using vaccinations, the management options for COVID-19 remain limited. In retrospective cohort studies, use of famotidine, a specific oral H2 receptor antagonist (antihistamine), has been associated with reduced risk of intubation and death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. In a case series, nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 experienced rapid symptom resolution after taking famotidine, but the molecular basis of these observations remains elusive. Here we show using biochemical, cellular, and functional assays that famotidine has no effect on viral replication or viral protease activity. However, famotidine can affect histamine-induced signaling processes in infected Caco2 cells. Specifically, famotidine treatment inhibits histamine-induced expression of Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) in SARS-CoV-2 infected cells and can reduce TLR3-dependent signaling processes that culminate in activation of IRF3 and the NF-κB pathway, subsequently controlling antiviral and inflammatory responses. SARS-CoV-2-infected cells treated with famotidine demonstrate reduced expression levels of the inflammatory mediators CCL-2 and IL6, drivers of the cytokine release syndrome that precipitates poor outcome for patients with COVID-19. Given that pharmacokinetic studies indicate that famotidine can reach concentrations in blood that suffice to antagonize histamine H2 receptors expressed in mast cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils, these observations explain how famotidine may contribute to the reduced histamine-induced inflammation and cytokine release, thereby improving the outcome for patients with COVID-19.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34214498 · DOI · PMC8241579
Inhibition of α-, β-, γ-, δ-, ζ- and η-class carbonic anhydrases from bacteria, fungi, algae, diatoms and protozoans with famotidine [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Famotidine, an antiulcer drug belonging to the H2 antagonists class of pharmacological agents, was recently shown to potently inhibit human (h) and bacterial carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.
- Closing excerpt
- 1 nM.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (151 words)
Famotidine, an antiulcer drug belonging to the H2 antagonists class of pharmacological agents, was recently shown to potently inhibit human (h) and bacterial carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1). We investigated the inhibitory effects of famotidine against all classes of CAs from the pathogenic bacteria Vibrio cholerae, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3273 β-CA, as well as the CAs from the nonpathogenic bacteria/cyanobacteria Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonensis, S. azorense, Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis, Colwellia psychrerythraea and Nostoc commune. The δ- and ζ-CAs from the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii, the fungal enzymes from Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida glabrata and Malassezia globosa, as well as the protozoan enzymes from Trypanosoma cruzi and Plasmodium falciparum, were also investigated. Anopheles gambiae β-CA was also investigated. All these enzymes were effectively inhibited by famotidine, with affinities between the low nanomolar to the micromolar range. The best inhibition was observed against C. glabrata β-CA and TweCAζ, with KIs ranging between 13.6 and 22.1 nM.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30727781 · DOI · PMC6366436
Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Antagonist Famotidine as a Therapeutic Alternative Against SARS-CoV2: An In Silico Analysis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The pandemic associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV2) and its disease named COVID-19 challenged the scientific community to discover effective therapeutic solutions in a short period.
- Closing excerpt
- This work will contribute to the pharmacological knowledge of famotidine as an antiviral agent against SARS-CoV2.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (255 words)
The pandemic associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV2) and its disease named COVID-19 challenged the scientific community to discover effective therapeutic solutions in a short period. Repurposing existing drugs is one viable approach that emphasizes speed during these urgent times. Famotidine, a class A G protein-coupled receptor antagonist used for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux was recently identified in an in silico screening. Additionally, a recent retrospective clinical report showed that the treatment with famotidine provided a good outcome in patients infected with SARS-CoV2. A clinical trial testing effectiveness of famotidine in combination with hydroxychloroquine is currently ongoing in the United States (US). In the 1990s, famotidine was described as an antiviral agent against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Interestingly, some HIV protease inhibitors are presently being used against SARS-CoV2. However, it is not clear if famotidine could be effective against SARS-CoV2. Thus, by using a computational analysis, we aimed to examine if the antiviral effect of famotidine could be related to the inhibition of proteases involved in the virus replication. Our results showed that famotidine could interact within the catalytic site of the three proteases associated with SARS-CoV2 replication. However, weak binding affinity of famotidine to these proteases suggests that a successful famotidine therapy could likely be achieved only in combination with other antiviral drugs. Finally, analysis of famotidine's pharmacokinetic parameters indicated that its effect against SARS-CoV2 infection could be reached only upon intravenous administration. This work will contribute to the pharmacological knowledge of famotidine as an antiviral agent against SARS-CoV2.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32599963 · DOI · PMC7355875
Development of a hybrid tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel for gastro-retentive delivery of famotidine [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- A gastro-retentive drug delivery system based on a tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel (SPH) was developed using Famotidine as a model drug for ulcer treatment.
- Closing excerpt
- Overall, the tablet-integrated SPH system represents an effective gastro-retentive approach for enhancing the therapeutic performance of Famotidine.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (245 words)
A gastro-retentive drug delivery system based on a tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel (SPH) was developed using Famotidine as a model drug for ulcer treatment. The objective of this study was to enhance gastric retention and sustained drug release, thereby improving the bioavailability of Famotidine, a BCS Class III drug with limited permeability and incomplete absorption. The SPH system was designed to retain the formulation in the upper gastrointestinal tract, the primary site of drug absorption, and was prepared using a gas-blowing (foaming) technique. A 3² full factorial design was employed to optimize the formulation by varying the concentrations of Crosspovidone and Cassia tora as independent variables. The developed SPH formulations were evaluated for porosity, swelling index, void fraction, water retention capacity, morphology, drug-excipient compatibility, and in vitro and in vivo drug release behaviour. The optimized formulation (F1) exhibited a high cumulative drug release of 98.2191 ± 0.06%, a swelling ratio of 297.2 ± 0.11%, void fraction of 0.4366 ± 0.015, porosity of 0.171 ± 0.07, and water retention time of 0.9552 ± 0.07 min. FTIR analysis confirmed the compatibility between Famotidine and excipients, while DSC studies indicated that the drug remained in its stable form without alteration during formulation. In vivo radiographic studies demonstrated that the optimized SPH formulation remained buoyant and retained in the stomach for up to 12 h, providing prolonged gastric residence and sustained drug release. Overall, the tablet-integrated SPH system represents an effective gastro-retentive approach for enhancing the therapeutic performance of Famotidine.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42102138 · DOI · PMC13155634
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Famotidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases [5]
- Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics of famotidine [6]
- Research article Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing lansoprazole with ranitidine or famotidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer [7]
- Research article The tolerability and safety profile of famotidine [8]
- Research article An overview of famotidine polymorphs: solid-state characteristics, thermodynamics, polymorphic transformation and quality control [9]
- Research article Does Famotidine Reduce the Risk of Progression to Severe Disease, Death, and Intubation for COVID-19 Patients? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis [10]
References
- Mukherjee R, Bhattacharya A, Bojkova D, Mehdipour AR, Shin D, Khan KS, et al.. Famotidine inhibits toll-like receptor 3-mediated inflammatory signaling in SARS-CoV-2 infection. . 2021. PMID 34214498 · DOI · PMC8241579
- Angeli A, Pinteala M, Maier SS, Del Prete S, Capasso C, Simionescu BC, et al.. Inhibition of α-, β-, γ-, δ-, ζ- and η-class carbonic anhydrases from bacteria, fungi, algae, diatoms and protozoans with famotidine. . 2019. PMID 30727781 · DOI · PMC6366436
- Ortega JT, Serrano ML, Jastrzebska B. Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Antagonist Famotidine as a Therapeutic Alternative Against SARS-CoV2: An In Silico Analysis. . 2020. PMID 32599963 · DOI · PMC7355875
- Thombre N, Chandramore K, Tajanpure A, Al Fatease A, Hani U, Alamri AH, et al.. Development of a hybrid tablet-integrated superporous hydrogel for gastro-retentive delivery of famotidine. . 2026. PMID 42102138 · DOI · PMC13155634
- Langtry HD, Grant SM, Goa KL. Famotidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases. Drugs. 1989. PMID 2573505 · DOI
- Echizen H, Ishizaki T. Clinical pharmacokinetics of famotidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991. PMID 1764869 · DOI
- Poynard T, Lemaire M, Agostini H. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing lansoprazole with ranitidine or famotidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995. PMID 8590162
- Howden CW, Tytgat GN. The tolerability and safety profile of famotidine. Clin Ther. 1996. PMID 8851452 · DOI
- Lin SY. An overview of famotidine polymorphs: solid-state characteristics, thermodynamics, polymorphic transformation and quality control. Pharm Res. 2014. PMID 24577998 · DOI
- Sun C, Chen Y, Hu L, Wu Y, Liang M, Ayaz Ahmed M, et al.. Does Famotidine Reduce the Risk of Progression to Severe Disease, Death, and Intubation for COVID-19 Patients? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2021. PMID 33625613 · DOI · PMC7903022
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.