Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 3 complete abstracts (1,098 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Any infection acquired in the community, that is, contrasted with those acquired in a health care facility (cross infection). An infection would be classified as community-acquired if the patient had not recently been in a health care facility or been in contact with someone who had been recently in a health care facility.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Infection, Community-Acquired; Community Acquired Infection; Acquired Infection, Community; Acquired Infections, Community; Community Acquired Infections; Infection, Community Acquired; Infections, Community Acquired; Community-Acquired Infection.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Infections
- Narrower topics
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- See also
- Cross Infection
Related concepts
- Cross Infection
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 17,732 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Community-Acquired Infections” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,547 of them (20.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 7,082 records.
Reviews account for 3,023 records (17.0%) and meta-analyses for 287. Randomized controlled trials number 568 (3.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,128 |
| 2000-2009 | 5,975 |
| 2010-2019 | 7,082 |
| 2020 onward | 3,547 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 3,023 | 17.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 287 | 1.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 568 | 3.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Community-Acquired Infections"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| External Validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score in Children With Suspected Community-Acquired Sepsis | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 25 | cc by PMID 40116825 · DOI · PMC11929021 |
| Prevalence and molecular characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hospital and community-acquired infections | 2024 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 21 | cc by PMID 39639352 · DOI · PMC11622690 |
| Antibiotic De-Escalation in Adults Hospitalized for Community-Onset Sepsis | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 15 | cc by PMID 41428290 · DOI · PMC12723592 |
External Validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score in Children With Suspected Community-Acquired Sepsis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceThe novel Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria were derived and validated using a multicountry dataset and proposed as a new definition for sepsis in children.
- Closing excerpt
- The small proportion of children meeting Phoenix sepsis criteria, missingness of data, timing of application, and lack of sensitivity for in-hospital mortality limit the clinical utility of the criteria.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (390 words)
ImportanceThe novel Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria were derived and validated using a multicountry dataset and proposed as a new definition for sepsis in children.ObjectiveTo externally validate the Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria in a cohort of children hospitalized with suspected community-acquired sepsis.Design, setting, and participantsThis diagnostic study used data from the multicenter, multicountry Sepsis Epidemiology in Australian and New Zealand Emergency Departments (SENTINEL) study, collected from 2021 to 2023 and including 90-day follow-up. Children admitted to the hospital through 11 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand and treated with parenteral antibiotics with either (1) a provisional diagnosis of sepsis or (2) treatment for sepsis (intravenous fluid bolus to treat poor perfusion) were included.ExposureDevelopment of organ dysfunction over the first 24 hours of hospitalization.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcomes were (1) in-hospital mortality and (2) death or requirement for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) within 72 hours of hospitalization.ResultsA total of 6232 children were included in the analysis, with a median (IQR) age of 2.1 (0.3-7.1) years, 3386 (54.1%) male, in-hospital mortality of 60 (1.0%), and death or ECLS within 72 hours in 36 (0.6%). In this population, the worst Phoenix Sepsis Score calculated over the first 24 hours of hospitalization had an area under the precision recall curve of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.07-0.28) for predicting in-hospital mortality and 0.23 (95% CI, 0.11-0.36) for predicting death or ECLS within 72 hours. Overall, 306 children (4.9%) met the Phoenix sepsis criteria, of whom 33 (10.8%) died in the hospital (nearly half of the total number who died) and 28 (9.2%) died or required ECLS within 72 hours. The Phoenix sepsis criteria had a sensitivity of 55.0% (95% CI, 41.6%-67.9%) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 10.8% (95% CI, 7.6%-14.9%) for in-hospital mortality and sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI, 60.8%-89.9%) and PPV of 9.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-13.0%) for death or ECLS within 72 hours. Coagulation data for the calculation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score were missing in more than 85% of children.Conclusions and relevanceIn this multicenter diagnostic study of children hospitalized with suspected sepsis, the Phoenix Sepsis Score and sepsis criteria had similar performance to the original derivation and validation cohorts. The small proportion of children meeting Phoenix sepsis criteria, missingness of data, timing of application, and lack of sensitivity for in-hospital mortality limit the clinical utility of the criteria.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40116825 · DOI · PMC11929021
Prevalence and molecular characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hospital and community-acquired infections [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) represent a significant global health threat.
- Closing excerpt
- One limitation of this study is the high heterogeneity, which partly attributed to regional and institutional variations in antibiotic use and stewardship practices.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (342 words)
BackgroundESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) represent a significant global health threat. In response to this growing concern and the lack of a surveillance system for ESBL-PE infections in Egypt, we conducted this meta-analysis. In this study, we aimed to quantify the prevalence of ESBL-PE based on the source of infection and characterize their molecular dissemination. Additionally, we sought to uncover temporal trends to assess the spread of ESBL-PE over time.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Egyptian Knowledge Bank to identify studies that: (1) report the prevalence of ESBL-PE in Egypt; (2) use valid detection methods; (3) involve clinical specimens; and (4) were published between 2010 and 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the "Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist". Meta-analysis was performed using the R meta package, reporting pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) via a random effects model.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 34 studies with 4,528 isolates, spanning 2007 to 2023. The overall prevalence of ESBL-PE in Egypt was 60% (95% CI: 54-65). The leave-one-out meta-analysis demonstrated the absence of influential outliers and Egger's test indicated no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.25). The prevalence of ESBL-PE was 62% (95% CI: 55-68) in nosocomial infections and 65% (95% CI: 52-75) in community-acquired infections, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.68). The prevalence of ESBL producers in E. coli (64%) and K. pneumoniae (63%) is higher than in Proteus mirabilis (46%) (P = 0.06). Temporal analysis showed a stable ESBL prevalence over time. Moreover, in phenotypically confirmed ESBL-producing, E. coli harboring blaCTX-M was most prevalent (73%), followed by blaTEM (60%) and blaSHV (22%), with significant differences (P CTX-M-15 as the predominant variant of the blaCTX-M gene.ConclusionsThe prevalence of ESBL-PE in Egypt is alarmingly high at 60%. The observed high rates in both hospital and community-acquired infections underscore the need for public health strategies targeting both settings. One limitation of this study is the high heterogeneity, which partly attributed to regional and institutional variations in antibiotic use and stewardship practices.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39639352 · DOI · PMC11622690
Antibiotic De-Escalation in Adults Hospitalized for Community-Onset Sepsis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceProlonged exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) may be associated with patient harm.
- Closing excerpt
- Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, de-escalation of empiric BSA therapy at day 4 was associated with similar safety outcomes, fewer antibiotic days, and shorter length of hospitalization among patients with community-onset sepsis compared with those who continued BSA therapy but varied widely in practice.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (366 words)
ImportanceProlonged exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) may be associated with patient harm.ObjectiveTo assess outcomes of BSA de-escalation compared with continuation on encounter day 4 in patients hospitalized for community-onset sepsis.Design, setting, and participantsThis target trial emulation study was conducted at 67 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium. Patients 18 years and older hospitalized for community-onset sepsis from June 2020 through September 2024 who initiated empiric BSA therapy without evidence of multidrug-resistant organism infection were included. Data were analyzed from September 2024 to November 2025.ExposureInverse probability of treatment-weighted cohort exposed to de-escalation of BSA vs continuation at day 4.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, and days of antibiotic therapy.ResultsAmong 36 924 patients with community-onset sepsis, 18 559 (50.3%) were female, 18 365 (49.7%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 71 (61-80) years. A total of 6926 (18.8%) and 11 149 (30.2%) were eligible for target trial emulations evaluating de-escalation of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA; or other resistant gram-negative bacteria) antibiotics, respectively. Of these, 2993 (43.2%) and 2493 (22.4%) were de-escalated from anti-MRSA and anti-PSA coverage. After weighting, patients who were de-escalated vs continued on BSA were well balanced on baseline characteristics. In weighted analyses, anti-MRSA and anti-PSA de-escalation were associated with similar 90-day mortality as continued BSA therapy (anti-MRSA: odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88-1.14; anti-PSA: odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.86-1.13). Additionally, anti-MRSA and anti-PSA de-escalation were associated with fewer days of antibiotics to day 14 (anti-MRSA de-escalation: risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.93; anti-PSA de-escalation: RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93) and shorter length of hospitalization (anti-MRSA de-escalation: RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.92; anti-PSA de-escalation: RR, 0.91; 0.88-0.93). All other secondary outcomes were similar. Across 67 hospitals, the proportion of eligible patients de-escalated from BSA varied more than 2-fold (anti-MRSA de-escalation, 27.3% to 61.7%; anti-PSA de-escalation, 6.9% to 37.7%).Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, de-escalation of empiric BSA therapy at day 4 was associated with similar safety outcomes, fewer antibiotic days, and shorter length of hospitalization among patients with community-onset sepsis compared with those who continued BSA therapy but varied widely in practice.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41428290 · DOI · PMC12723592
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America [4]
- Research article Community-acquired bloodstream infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Pneumonia [6]
- Research article Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection and antibiotics: a meta-analysis [7]
- Research article Tigecycline antibacterial activity, clinical effectiveness, and mechanisms and epidemiology of resistance: narrative review [8]
- Research article Prevalence of ESKAPE pathogens in the environment: Antibiotic resistance status, community-acquired infection and risk to human health [9]
References
- Long E, Borland ML, George S, Jani S, Tan E, Phillips N, et al.. External Validation of the Phoenix Sepsis Score in Children With Suspected Community-Acquired Sepsis. . 2025. PMID 40116825 · DOI · PMC11929021
- Azzam A, Khaled H, Samer D, Nageeb WM. Prevalence and molecular characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Egypt: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hospital and community-acquired infections. . 2024. PMID 39639352 · DOI · PMC11622690
- Gupta AB, Heath M, Walzl E, Ratz D, Munroe E, Vaughn VM, et al.. Antibiotic De-Escalation in Adults Hospitalized for Community-Onset Sepsis. . 2026. PMID 41428290 · DOI · PMC12723592
- Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, et al.. Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID 31573350 · DOI · PMC6812437
- Reddy EA, Shaw AV, Crump JA. Community-acquired bloodstream infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010. PMID 20510282 · DOI · PMC3168734
- Torres A, Cilloniz C, Niederman MS, Menéndez R, Chalmers JD, Wunderink RG, et al.. Pneumonia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021. PMID 33833230 · DOI
- Deshpande A, Pasupuleti V, Thota P, Pant C, Rolston DD, Sferra TJ, et al.. Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection and antibiotics: a meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013. PMID 23620467 · DOI
- Yaghoubi S, Zekiy AO, Krutova M, Gholami M, Kouhsari E, Sholeh M, et al.. Tigecycline antibacterial activity, clinical effectiveness, and mechanisms and epidemiology of resistance: narrative review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022. PMID 33403565 · DOI · PMC7785128
- Denissen J, Reyneke B, Waso-Reyneke M, Havenga B, Barnard T, Khan S, et al.. Prevalence of ESKAPE pathogens in the environment: Antibiotic resistance status, community-acquired infection and risk to human health. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022. PMID 35841823 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.