Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Dietary Supplements
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Dietary Supplements

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

Products in capsule, tablet or liquid form that provide dietary ingredients, and that are intended to be taken by mouth to increase the intake of nutrients.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (603 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Products in capsule, tablet or liquid form that provide dietary ingredients, and that are intended to be taken by mouth to increase the intake of nutrients. Dietary supplements can include macronutrients, such as proteins, carbohydrates, and fats; and/or micronutrients, such as vitamins; minerals; and phytochemicals.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Dietary Supplement; Supplements, Dietary; Dietary Supplementations; Supplementations, Dietary; Food Supplementations; Food Supplements; Food Supplement; Supplement, Food.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Food
Narrower topics
Prebiotics; Probiotics; Yeast, Dried
See also
Functional Food

Related concepts

  • Micronutrients
  • Vitamins
  • Minerals
  • Phytochemicals

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 127,260 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Dietary Supplements” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 51,151 of them (40.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 52,049 records.

Reviews account for 28,127 records (22.1%) and meta-analyses for 5,009. Randomized controlled trials number 19,028 (15.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,285 records; 2000-2009: 21,775 records; 2010-2019: 52,049 records; 2020 onward: 51,151 records2,285through 199921,7752000-200952,0492010-201951,1512020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,285
2000-200921,775
2010-201952,049
2020 onward51,151
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 22.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.9 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 15.0 percentReviews22.1% (28,127)Meta-analyses3.9% (5,009)Randomized controlled trials15.0% (19,028)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 127,260 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews28,12722.1%
Meta-analyses5,0093.9%
Randomized controlled trials19,02815.0%

Method: PubMed query "Dietary Supplements"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Niche exclusion of a lung pathogen in mice with designed probiotic communities
Hern KE, Phillips AM, Mageeney CM, Williams KP, Sinha A, Carlson HK, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc0
PMID 42550883 · DOI · PMC13436956
Melanocortin Receptor Signaling Modulates Anti-Obesity and Glucose Tolerance Effects of Hafnia alvei 4597 Probiotic Strain in Mice
Zolotarev VA, Murovets VO, Sozontov EA, Sepp AL, Lukina EA, Khropycheva RP, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42589617 · DOI · PMC13467215
Eight-Week Vitamin D3 Supplementation at 4000 IU/Day Was Not Associated with Further Improvements in Speed or Power Performance in Professional Female Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Michalczyk MM, Gepfert M, Roczniok R, Zydek G
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42588083 · DOI · PMC13467743

Niche exclusion of a lung pathogen in mice with designed probiotic communities [1]

Research article Hern KE, Phillips AM, Mageeney CM, Williams KP, Sinha A, Carlson HK, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
For years, the airway microbiota have been theorized to be gatekeepers of respiratory health, as pathogens entering the airway make contact with resident microbes prior to or coincident with their interaction with host cells.
Closing excerpt
This work serves as a foundation for the rational design of probiotic communities for protection against and treatment of respiratory infections.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (144 words)

For years, the airway microbiota have been theorized to be gatekeepers of respiratory health, as pathogens entering the airway make contact with resident microbes prior to or coincident with their interaction with host cells. Thus, modification of the native airway community may serve as a means of altering the local environment in favor of health. In this work, we hypothesize that synthetic bacterial communities introduced into the airway can serve as prophylactic countermeasures against infection by Burkholderia thailandensis in mice. We demonstrate that understanding of antagonistic interactions between a pathogen and airway microbiota in vitro can guide identification of probiotics with protective capabilities in vivo. Specifically, we show that niche overlap between the probiotic and pathogen is indicative of probiotic performance in vivo. This work serves as a foundation for the rational design of probiotic communities for protection against and treatment of respiratory infections.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 42550883 · DOI · PMC13436956

Melanocortin Receptor Signaling Modulates Anti-Obesity and Glucose Tolerance Effects of Hafnia alvei 4597 Probiotic Strain in Mice [2]

Research article Zolotarev VA, Murovets VO, Sozontov EA, Sepp AL, Lukina EA, Khropycheva RP, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The present study aimed to elucidate whether the metabolic effects of the probiotic bacterium Hafnia alvei 4597 depend on melanocortin receptor (MCR) signaling.
Closing excerpt
alvei are mediated by MCR signaling.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (216 words)

The present study aimed to elucidate whether the metabolic effects of the probiotic bacterium Hafnia alvei 4597 depend on melanocortin receptor (MCR) signaling. The response to a 3-week intragastric treatment with the H. alvei bacterial suspension or total protein extract was compared between genetically similar mouse sub-strains but with different MCR sensitivity: KK and KK.Cg-Ay/a (KK-Ay)-the latter overproducing Agouti protein. Treatment of KK mice with H. alvei protein extract stimulated energy expenditure and carbohydrate oxidation but reduced lipid oxidation, leptin level, pancreatic weight, and hypothalamic insulin and leptin receptor mRNA expression. Live bacteria in KK mice reduced food intake and stimulated hypothalamic mRNA expression of proopiomelanocortin, Agouti-related peptide, and insulin receptors. In the sub-strain KK-Ay, probiotics had no effect on the aforementioned metabolic parameters. H. alvei-based probiotics improved glucose tolerance and decreased body fat and liver glycogen in both mouse sub-strains. Activation of MC4R by H. alvei protein extract was revealed by in vitro study using β-arrestin recruitment. These findings confirm beneficial effects of the H. alvei bacteria and show that, for several parameters, the bacterial protein extract may be more effective than bacterial suspension. Differential responses to the treatment between the mouse sub-strains, particularly in energy metabolism, as well as in vitro data, indicate that the effects of H. alvei are mediated by MCR signaling.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42589617 · DOI · PMC13467215

Eight-Week Vitamin D3 Supplementation at 4000 IU/Day Was Not Associated with Further Improvements in Speed or Power Performance in Professional Female Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial [3]

Randomized controlled trial Michalczyk MM, Gepfert M, Roczniok R, Zydek G · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background: Vitamin D is involved in musculoskeletal function, but evidence that supplementation improves athletic performance remains inconsistent, particularly in athletes with sufficient baseline vitamin D status.
Closing excerpt
gov (NCT07641075) on 8 June 2026.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (243 words)

Background: Vitamin D is involved in musculoskeletal function, but evidence that supplementation improves athletic performance remains inconsistent, particularly in athletes with sufficient baseline vitamin D status. Methods: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 18 professional female soccer players were randomized during the autumn preparatory period (August-September) to receive vitamin D3 (4000 IU/day; n = 9) or placebo (n = 9) for eight weeks. Outcomes included total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] concentrations, hematological variables, RAST total sprint time, 5- and 30-m sprint performance, and countermovement-jump outcomes. Results: At baseline, after summer exposure, 25% of participants had insufficient or deficient 25(OH)D concentrations (≤30 ng/mL). The remaining cohort (75%) had sufficient 25(OH)D concentrations (>30 ng/mL). After eight weeks, no statistically significant between-group differences were observed in vitamin D metabolites, hematological variables, or performance outcomes (Δ25(OH)D: SG +12.4 ± 8.2 ng/mL vs. PG +3.1 ± 6.5 ng/mL; p = 0.12). RAST total sprint time (p = 0.001) and 30-m sprint performance (p = 0.005) improved over time. Conclusions: Vitamin D3 supplementation at 4000 IU/day for eight weeks was not associated with additional improvements in muscle strength, sprint performance, or countermovement-jump outcomes compared with placebo. Because most participants had sufficient baseline 25(OH)D concentrations, larger trials in female athletes with confirmed vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency are needed to determine whether individualized supplementation or longer intervention periods provide additional physiological or performance-related benefits. The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07641075) on 8 June 2026.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42588083 · DOI · PMC13467743

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The Effect of Prebiotics and Probiotics on Levels of Depression, Anxiety, and Cognitive Function: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [4]
    Zandifar A, Badrfam R, Mohammaditabar M, Kargar B, Goodarzi S, Hajialigol A, et al. · Brain Behav · 2025 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effects of Dietary Fiber Supplementation on Modulating Uremic Toxins and Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [5]
    Wathanavasin W, Cheungpasitporn W, Thongprayoon C, Fülöp T · Toxins (Basel) · 2025 · cited 25 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of stratified aggregate data [6]
    Jolliffe DA, Camargo CA, Sluyter JD, Aglipay M, Aloia JF, Bergman P, et al. · Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol · 2025 · cited 22 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo and incident type 2 diabetes in an ancillary study of the randomized Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial [7]
    Tobias DK, Pradhan AD, Duran EK, Li C, Song Y, Buring JE, et al. · Nat Commun · 2025 · cited 19 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical effects of probiotics on the treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Benavides-Reyes C, Cabello I, Magán-Fernández A, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Usta SN, Mesa F · BMC Oral Health · 2025 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effects of oral supplementation of probiotics on body weight and visceral fat in obese patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review [9]
    Guo M, Li J, Zhang L, Chen C, Wei Y, Shen ZA · Sci Rep · 2025 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hern KE, Phillips AM, Mageeney CM, Williams KP, Sinha A, Carlson HK, et al.. Niche exclusion of a lung pathogen in mice with designed probiotic communities. . 2026. PMID 42550883 · DOI · PMC13436956
  2. Zolotarev VA, Murovets VO, Sozontov EA, Sepp AL, Lukina EA, Khropycheva RP, et al.. Melanocortin Receptor Signaling Modulates Anti-Obesity and Glucose Tolerance Effects of Hafnia alvei 4597 Probiotic Strain in Mice. . 2026. PMID 42589617 · DOI · PMC13467215
  3. Michalczyk MM, Gepfert M, Roczniok R, Zydek G. Eight-Week Vitamin D3 Supplementation at 4000 IU/Day Was Not Associated with Further Improvements in Speed or Power Performance in Professional Female Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial. . 2026. PMID 42588083 · DOI · PMC13467743
  4. Zandifar A, Badrfam R, Mohammaditabar M, Kargar B, Goodarzi S, Hajialigol A, et al.. The Effect of Prebiotics and Probiotics on Levels of Depression, Anxiety, and Cognitive Function: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Brain Behav. 2025. PMID 40038860 · DOI · PMC11879892
  5. Wathanavasin W, Cheungpasitporn W, Thongprayoon C, Fülöp T. Effects of Dietary Fiber Supplementation on Modulating Uremic Toxins and Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Toxins (Basel). 2025. PMID 39998074 · DOI · PMC11860371
  6. Jolliffe DA, Camargo CA, Sluyter JD, Aglipay M, Aloia JF, Bergman P, et al.. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of stratified aggregate data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025. PMID 39993397 · DOI · PMC12056739
  7. Tobias DK, Pradhan AD, Duran EK, Li C, Song Y, Buring JE, et al.. Vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo and incident type 2 diabetes in an ancillary study of the randomized Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial. Nat Commun. 2025. PMID 40199888 · DOI · PMC11978796
  8. Benavides-Reyes C, Cabello I, Magán-Fernández A, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Usta SN, Mesa F. Clinical effects of probiotics on the treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID 40186219 · DOI · PMC11971800
  9. Guo M, Li J, Zhang L, Chen C, Wei Y, Shen ZA. Effects of oral supplementation of probiotics on body weight and visceral fat in obese patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID 39984625 · DOI · PMC11845779

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ProbioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • PrebioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Functional FoodAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dietary FiberAnatomy and Physiology
  • SeafoodAnatomy and Physiology
  • Food AdditivesAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

127,260
PubMed records on this heading
40%
published since 2020
28,127
review articles
19,028
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ProbioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • PrebioticsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Functional FoodAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dietary FiberAnatomy and Physiology
  • SeafoodAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support