Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Functional Food
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Functional Food

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Components of the usual diet that may provide health benefits beyond basic nutrients.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (966 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Components of the usual diet that may provide health benefits beyond basic nutrients. Examples of functional foods include soy, nuts, chocolate, and cranberries (From nccam Backgrounder, March 2004, p3).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Food, Functional; Foods, Functional; Functional Foods.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Food
See also
Dietary Supplements

Related concepts

  • Nccam

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 3,789 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Functional Food” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,928 of them (50.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 1,928 records.

Reviews account for 1,677 records (44.3%) and meta-analyses for 17. Randomized controlled trials number 131 (3.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 72 records; 2010-2019: 1,834 records; 2020 onward: 1,928 records0through 1999722000-20091,8342010-20191,9282020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-200972
2010-20191,834
2020 onward1,928
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 44.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.5 percentReviews44.3% (1,677)Meta-analyses0.4% (17)Randomized controlled trials3.5% (131)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 3,789 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,67744.3%
Meta-analyses170.4%
Randomized controlled trials1313.5%

Method: PubMed query "Functional Food"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates
Gorissen SHM, Crombag JJR, Senden JMG, Waterval WAH, Bierau J, Verdijk LB, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
604cc by
PMID 30167963 · DOI · PMC6245118
Postbiotics-parabiotics: the new horizons in microbial biotherapy and functional foods
Nataraj BH, Ali SA, Behare PV, Yadav H
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
390cc by
PMID 32819443 · DOI · PMC7441679
Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides in Human Health: Challenges and Opportunities
Chakrabarti S, Guha S, Majumder K
2018Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
367cc by
PMID 30424533 · DOI · PMC6265732
Functional Foods in Modern Nutrition Science: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Public Health Implications
Fekete M, Lehoczki A, Kryczyk-Poprawa A, Zábó V, Varga JT, Bálint M, et al.
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
63cc by
PMID 40647258 · DOI · PMC12251440

Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates [1]

Research article Gorissen SHM, Crombag JJR, Senden JMG, Waterval WAH, Bierau J, Verdijk LB, et al. · · 2018 · cited 604 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The postprandial rise in essential amino acid (EAA) concentrations modulates the increase in muscle protein synthesis rates after protein ingestion.
Closing excerpt
Combinations of various plant-based protein isolates or blends of animal and plant-based proteins can provide protein characteristics that closely reflect the typical characteristics of animal-based proteins.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (265 words)

The postprandial rise in essential amino acid (EAA) concentrations modulates the increase in muscle protein synthesis rates after protein ingestion. The EAA content and AA composition of the dietary protein source contribute to the differential muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of different proteins. Lower EAA contents and specific lack of sufficient leucine, lysine, and/or methionine may be responsible for the lower anabolic capacity of plant-based compared with animal-based proteins. We compared EAA contents and AA composition of a large selection of plant-based protein sources with animal-based proteins and human skeletal muscle protein. AA composition of oat, lupin, wheat, hemp, microalgae, soy, brown rice, pea, corn, potato, milk, whey, caseinate, casein, egg, and human skeletal muscle protein were assessed using UPLC-MS/MS. EAA contents of plant-based protein isolates such as oat (21%), lupin (21%), and wheat (22%) were lower than animal-based proteins (whey 43%, milk 39%, casein 34%, and egg 32%) and muscle protein (38%). AA profiles largely differed among plant-based proteins with leucine contents ranging from 5.1% for hemp to 13.5% for corn protein, compared to 9.0% for milk, 7.0% for egg, and 7.6% for muscle protein. Methionine and lysine were typically lower in plant-based proteins (1.0 ± 0.3 and 3.6 ± 0.6%) compared with animal-based proteins (2.5 ± 0.1 and 7.0 ± 0.6%) and muscle protein (2.0 and 7.8%, respectively). In conclusion, there are large differences in EAA contents and AA composition between various plant-based protein isolates. Combinations of various plant-based protein isolates or blends of animal and plant-based proteins can provide protein characteristics that closely reflect the typical characteristics of animal-based proteins.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30167963 · DOI · PMC6245118

Postbiotics-parabiotics: the new horizons in microbial biotherapy and functional foods [2]

Review article Nataraj BH, Ali SA, Behare PV, Yadav H · · 2020 · cited 390 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Probiotics have several health benefits by modulating gut microbiome; however, techno-functional limitations such as viability controls have hampered their full potential applications in the food and pharmaceutical sectors.
Closing excerpt
The current review comprehensively summarizes and discussed various methodologies implied to extract, purify, and identification of paraprobiotic and postbiotic compounds and their potential health benefits.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (254 words)

Probiotics have several health benefits by modulating gut microbiome; however, techno-functional limitations such as viability controls have hampered their full potential applications in the food and pharmaceutical sectors. Therefore, the focus is gradually shifting from viable probiotic bacteria towards non-viable paraprobiotics and/or probiotics derived biomolecules, so-called postbiotics. Paraprobiotics and postbiotics are the emerging concepts in the functional foods field because they impart an array of health-promoting properties. Although, these terms are not well defined, however, for time being these terms have been defined as here. The postbiotics are the complex mixture of metabolic products secreted by probiotics in cell-free supernatants such as enzymes, secreted proteins, short chain fatty acids, vitamins, secreted biosurfactants, amino acids, peptides, organic acids, etc. While, the paraprobiotics are the inactivated microbial cells of probiotics (intact or ruptured containing cell components such as peptidoglycans, teichoic acids, surface proteins, etc.) or crude cell extracts (i.e. with complex chemical composition)". However, in many instances postbiotics have been used for whole category of postbiotics and parabiotics. These elicit several advantages over probiotics like; (i) availability in their pure form, (ii) ease in production and storage, (iii) availability of production process for industrial-scale-up, (iv) specific mechanism of action, (v) better accessibility of Microbes Associated Molecular Pattern (MAMP) during recognition and interaction with Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRR) and (vi) more likely to trigger only the targeted responses by specific ligand-receptor interactions. The current review comprehensively summarizes and discussed various methodologies implied to extract, purify, and identification of paraprobiotic and postbiotic compounds and their potential health benefits.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32819443 · DOI · PMC7441679

Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides in Human Health: Challenges and Opportunities [3]

Review article Chakrabarti S, Guha S, Majumder K · · 2018 · cited 367 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Recent scientific evidence suggests that food proteins not only serve as nutrients, but can also modulate the body's physiological functions.
Closing excerpt
This review article discusses the current techniques, challenges of the current bioactive peptide production techniques, the oral use and gastrointestinal bioavailability of these food-derived bioactive peptides, and the overall regulatory environment.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (163 words)

Recent scientific evidence suggests that food proteins not only serve as nutrients, but can also modulate the body's physiological functions. These physiological functions are primarily regulated by some peptides that are encrypted in the native protein sequences. These bioactive peptides can exert health beneficial properties and thus are considered as a lead compound for the development of nutraceuticals or functional foods. In the past few decades, a wide range of food-derived bioactive peptide sequences have been identified, with multiple health beneficial activities. However, the commercial application of these bioactive peptides has been delayed because of the absence of appropriate and scalable production methods, proper exploration of the mechanisms of action, high gastro-intestinal digestibility, variable absorption rate, and the lack of well-designed clinical trials to provide the substantial evidence for potential health claims. This review article discusses the current techniques, challenges of the current bioactive peptide production techniques, the oral use and gastrointestinal bioavailability of these food-derived bioactive peptides, and the overall regulatory environment.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30424533 · DOI · PMC6265732

Functional Foods in Modern Nutrition Science: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Public Health Implications [4]

Review article Fekete M, Lehoczki A, Kryczyk-Poprawa A, Zábó V, Varga JT, Bálint M, et al. · · 2025 · cited 63 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In recent years, functional foods have garnered increasing scientific and public health interest due to their potential to confer physiological benefits beyond basic nutritional value.
Closing excerpt
Looking forward, innovations in artificial intelligence, microbiome research, and genomic technologies may unlock novel opportunities for the targeted and effective application of functional foods in population health.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (284 words)

In recent years, functional foods have garnered increasing scientific and public health interest due to their potential to confer physiological benefits beyond basic nutritional value. International bodies such as EFSA, FDA, and WHO define functional foods as those containing bioactive components that may contribute to the prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers. The evolving paradigm of "food as medicine" reflects a broader shift in nutritional science towards proactive, health-oriented dietary strategies. This article provides a comprehensive, interdisciplinary overview of functional foods by examining their biological mechanisms, clinical evidence, public health significance, regulatory frameworks, and future prospects-particularly in the context of advances in personalized nutrition and nutrigenomics. A thorough literature review was conducted, drawing from recent peer-reviewed studies and guidelines from key health authorities. The review highlights the roles of specific compounds such as probiotics and prebiotics in modulating the gut microbiome, flavonoids and polyphenols in anti-inflammatory processes, omega-3 fatty acids in cardiometabolic regulation, and vitamins and minerals in supporting immune function. While an expanding body of clinical trials and meta-analyses supports the health benefits of these compounds-including reductions in LDL cholesterol, improved insulin sensitivity, and mitigation of oxidative stress-the integration of functional foods into everyday diets remains challenging. Socioeconomic disparities and limited health literacy often impede their accessibility and widespread adoption in public health practice. Functional foods represent a promising component of prevention-focused modern healthcare. To maximize their impact, a coordinated, evidence-based approach is essential, involving collaboration among healthcare professionals, nutrition scientists, policymakers, and the food industry. Looking forward, innovations in artificial intelligence, microbiome research, and genomic technologies may unlock novel opportunities for the targeted and effective application of functional foods in population health.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40647258 · DOI · PMC12251440

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Functional Foods: Product Development, Technological Trends, Efficacy Testing, and Safety [5]
    Granato D, Barba FJ, Bursać Kovačević D, Lorenzo JM, Cruz AG, Putnik P · Annu Rev Food Sci Technol · 2020 · cited 257 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Composition, physicochemical properties of pea protein and its application in functional foods [6]
    Lu ZX, He JF, Zhang YC, Bing DJ · Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr · 2020 · cited 214 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Microbial Medicine: Prebiotic and Probiotic Functional Foods to Target Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome [7]
    Green M, Arora K, Prakash S · Int J Mol Sci · 2020 · cited 174 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Seaweeds as a Functional Ingredient for a Healthy Diet [8]
    Peñalver R, Lorenzo JM, Ros G, Amarowicz R, Pateiro M, Nieto G · Mar Drugs · 2020 · cited 160 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Consumer Acceptance toward Functional Foods: A Scoping Review [9]
    Baker MT, Lu P, Parrella JA, Leggette HR · Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2022 · cited 153 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Structural-features of food-derived bioactive peptides with anti-inflammatory activity: A brief review [10]
    Guha S, Majumder K · J Food Biochem · 2019 · cited 137 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Gorissen SHM, Crombag JJR, Senden JMG, Waterval WAH, Bierau J, Verdijk LB, et al.. Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. . 2018. PMID 30167963 · DOI · PMC6245118
  2. Nataraj BH, Ali SA, Behare PV, Yadav H. Postbiotics-parabiotics: the new horizons in microbial biotherapy and functional foods. . 2020. PMID 32819443 · DOI · PMC7441679
  3. Chakrabarti S, Guha S, Majumder K. Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides in Human Health: Challenges and Opportunities. . 2018. PMID 30424533 · DOI · PMC6265732
  4. Fekete M, Lehoczki A, Kryczyk-Poprawa A, Zábó V, Varga JT, Bálint M, et al.. Functional Foods in Modern Nutrition Science: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Public Health Implications. . 2025. PMID 40647258 · DOI · PMC12251440
  5. Granato D, Barba FJ, Bursać Kovačević D, Lorenzo JM, Cruz AG, Putnik P. Functional Foods: Product Development, Technological Trends, Efficacy Testing, and Safety. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2020. PMID 31905019 · DOI
  6. Lu ZX, He JF, Zhang YC, Bing DJ. Composition, physicochemical properties of pea protein and its application in functional foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020. PMID 31429319 · DOI
  7. Green M, Arora K, Prakash S. Microbial Medicine: Prebiotic and Probiotic Functional Foods to Target Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID 32326175 · DOI · PMC7215979
  8. Peñalver R, Lorenzo JM, Ros G, Amarowicz R, Pateiro M, Nieto G. Seaweeds as a Functional Ingredient for a Healthy Diet. Mar Drugs. 2020. PMID 32517092 · DOI · PMC7345263
  9. Baker MT, Lu P, Parrella JA, Leggette HR. Consumer Acceptance toward Functional Foods: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID 35162240 · DOI · PMC8835010
  10. Guha S, Majumder K. Structural-features of food-derived bioactive peptides with anti-inflammatory activity: A brief review. J Food Biochem. 2019. PMID 31353488 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • SeafoodAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dietary SupplementsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Food AdditivesAnatomy and Physiology
  • BreadAnatomy and Physiology
  • ButterAnatomy and Physiology
  • CandyAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

3,789
PubMed records on this heading
51%
published since 2020
1,677
review articles
131
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • SeafoodAnatomy and Physiology
  • Dietary SupplementsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Food AdditivesAnatomy and Physiology
  • BreadAnatomy and Physiology
  • ButterAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support