Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Disease-Free Survival
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Disease-Free Survival

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Period after successful treatment in which there is no appearance of the symptoms or effects of the disease.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (926 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Period after successful treatment in which there is no appearance of the symptoms or effects of the disease.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Disease Free Survival; Survival, Disease-Free; Survival, Disease Free.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Treatment Outcome; Survival Analysis
See also
Progression-Free Survival

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 85,904 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Disease-Free Survival” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 11,761 of them (13.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 48,200 records.

Reviews account for 8,038 records (9.4%) and meta-analyses for 2,901. Randomized controlled trials number 7,132 (8.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,895 records; 2000-2009: 21,048 records; 2010-2019: 48,200 records; 2020 onward: 11,761 records4,895through 199921,0482000-200948,2002010-201911,7612020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,895
2000-200921,048
2010-201948,200
2020 onward11,761
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 8.3 percentReviews9.4% (8,038)Meta-analyses3.4% (2,901)Randomized controlled trials8.3% (7,132)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 85,904 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews8,0389.4%
Meta-analyses2,9013.4%
Randomized controlled trials7,1328.3%

Method: PubMed query "Disease-Free Survival"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire
van Leeuwen M, Husson O, Alberti P, Arraras JI, Chinot OL, Costantini A, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
176cc by
PMID 29866185 · DOI · PMC5987570
High expression of Wee1 is associated with poor disease-free survival in malignant melanoma: potential for targeted therapy
Magnussen GI, Holm R, Emilsen E, Rosnes AK, Slipicevic A, Flørenes VA
2012Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
129cc by
PMID 22719872 · DOI · PMC3373567
Sarcopenia as a prognostic biomarker of advanced urothelial carcinoma
Fukushima H, Yokoyama M, Nakanishi Y, Tobisu K, Koga F
2015Clinical trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
113cc by
PMID 25612215 · DOI · PMC4303429
Comprehensive Analysis of Enhancer RNAs Identifies LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 as Novel Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma
Zhao S, Jiang H, Liu J, Li DY, Li B, Long QR, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 35251374 · DOI · PMC8892034

Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire [1]

Research article van Leeuwen M, Husson O, Alberti P, Arraras JI, Chinot OL, Costantini A, et al. · · 2018 · cited 176 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackroundThe number of cancer survivors is growing steadily and increasingly, clinical trials are being designed to include long-term follow-up to assess not only survival, but also late effects and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Closing excerpt
We will further develop a core survivorship questionnaire and three site-specific modules for disease-free adult cancer survivors who are at least one year post-treatment.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (281 words)

BackroundThe number of cancer survivors is growing steadily and increasingly, clinical trials are being designed to include long-term follow-up to assess not only survival, but also late effects and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Therefore it is is essential to develop patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that capture the full range of issues relevant to disease-free cancer survivors. The objectives of this project are: 1) to develop a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire that captures the full range of physical, mental and social HRQOL issues relevant to disease-free cancer survivors; and 2) to determine at which minimal time since completion of treatment the questionnaire should be used.MethodsWe reviewed 134 publications on cancer survivorship and interviewed 117 disease-free cancer survivors with 11 different types of cancer across 14 countries in Europe to generate an exhaustive, provisional list of HRQOL issues relevant to cancer survivors. The resulting issue list, the EORTC core questionnaire (QLQ-C30), and site-specific questionnaire modules were completed by a second group of 458 survivors.ResultsWe identified 116 generic survivorship issues. These issues covered body image, cognitive functioning, health behaviors, negative and positive outlook, health distress, mental health, fatigue, sleep problems, physical functioning, pain, several physical symptoms, social functioning, and sexual problems. Patients rated most of the acute symptoms of cancer and its treatment (e.g. nausea) as no longer relevant approximately one year after completion of treatment.ConclusionsCompared to existing cancer survivorship questionnaires, our findings underscore the relevance of assessing issues related to chronic physical side effects of treatment such as neuropathy and joint pain. We will further develop a core survivorship questionnaire and three site-specific modules for disease-free adult cancer survivors who are at least one year post-treatment.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29866185 · DOI · PMC5987570

High expression of Wee1 is associated with poor disease-free survival in malignant melanoma: potential for targeted therapy [2]

Research article Magnussen GI, Holm R, Emilsen E, Rosnes AK, Slipicevic A, Flørenes VA · · 2012 · cited 129 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Notoriously resistant malignant melanoma is one of the most increasing forms of cancer worldwide; there is thus a precarious need for new treatment options.
Closing excerpt
Together these results reveal the importance of Wee1 as a prognostic biomarker in melanomas, and indicate a potential role for targeted therapy, alone or in combination with other agents.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (288 words)

Notoriously resistant malignant melanoma is one of the most increasing forms of cancer worldwide; there is thus a precarious need for new treatment options. The Wee1 kinase is a major regulator of the G(2)/M checkpoint, and halts the cell cycle by adding a negative phosphorylation on CDK1 (Tyr15). Additionally, Wee1 has a function in safeguarding the genome integrity during DNA synthesis. To assess the role of Wee1 in development and progression of malignant melanoma we examined its expression in a panel of paraffin-embedded patient derived tissue of benign nevi and primary- and metastatic melanomas, as well as in agarose-embedded cultured melanocytes. We found that Wee1 expression increased in the direction of malignancy, and showed a strong, positive correlation with known biomarkers involved in cell cycle regulation: Cyclin A (p<0.0001), Ki67 (p<0.0001), Cyclin D3 (p = 0.001), p21(Cip1/WAF1) (p = 0.003), p53 (p = 0.025). Furthermore, high Wee1 expression was associated with thicker primary tumors (p = 0.001), ulceration (p = 0.005) and poor disease-free survival (p = 0.008). Transfections using siWee1 in metastatic melanoma cell lines; WM239(WTp53), WM45.1(MUTp53) and LOX(WTp53), further support our hypothesis of a tumor promoting role of Wee1 in melanomas. Whereas no effect was observed in LOX cells, transfection with siWee1 led to accumulation of cells in G(1)/S and S phase of the cell cycle in WM239 and WM45.1 cells, respectively. Both latter cell lines displayed DNA damage and induction of apoptosis, in the absence of Wee1, indicating that the effect of silencing Wee1 may not be solely dependent of the p53 status of the cells. Together these results reveal the importance of Wee1 as a prognostic biomarker in melanomas, and indicate a potential role for targeted therapy, alone or in combination with other agents.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22719872 · DOI · PMC3373567

Sarcopenia as a prognostic biomarker of advanced urothelial carcinoma [3]

Clinical trial Fukushima H, Yokoyama M, Nakanishi Y, Tobisu K, Koga F · · 2015 · cited 113 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesSarcopenia, a novel concept reflecting the degenerative loss of skeletal muscle mass, is an objective indicator of cancer cachexia.
Closing excerpt
Evaluating sarcopenia can be helpful for decision-making processes in the management of advanced UC patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (149 words)

ObjectivesSarcopenia, a novel concept reflecting the degenerative loss of skeletal muscle mass, is an objective indicator of cancer cachexia. We investigated its role as a prognostic biomarker in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients.MethodsThis retrospective study consisted of 88 UC patients with cT4 and/or metastases to lymph nodes/distant organs. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), an indicator of whole-body muscle mass, was measured from computed tomography (CT) images at the diagnosis. Sarcopenia was defined as SMIs of ResultsSixty-seven patients (76%) died during the median follow-up of 13 months. The median OS rate was 13 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that SMI was a significant and independent predictor of shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, P ConclusionSarcopenia, which is readily evaluated on routine CT scans, is a useful prognostic biomarker of advanced UC. Non-sarcopenic patients can expect long-term survival. Evaluating sarcopenia can be helpful for decision-making processes in the management of advanced UC patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25612215 · DOI · PMC4303429

Comprehensive Analysis of Enhancer RNAs Identifies LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 as Novel Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma [4]

Research article Zhao S, Jiang H, Liu J, Li DY, Li B, Long QR, et al. · · 2022 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) have emerged as key players in the pathology of several tumors, including uveal melanoma.
Closing excerpt
Overall, we identified two novel UVM-related eRNAs, LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 which may serve as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers of UVM patients for clinical decision-making.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)

Enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) have emerged as key players in the pathology of several tumors, including uveal melanoma. Here, we aimed to explore the prognostic values of eRNAs in uveal melanoma (UVM) patients. The expressing data and survival data of UVM patients were downloaded from TCGA and GSE22138 datasets. The Kaplan-Meier methods with the log-rank test were applied to screen survival-related eRNAs in UVM. GEPIA was applied to analyze the associations between expressions of eRNA and disease-free survival. KEGG assays were applied to explore the potential signaling pathways of the key eRNA. The prognostic values of eRNAs were further explored by multivariate assays by the R package survival. The eRNAs were validated in pan-cancer. In this study, we identified 89 survival-related eRNAs in UVM based on TCGA datasets. Based on GSE22138 datasets, we found 27 survival-related eRNAs in UVM. Only two eRNAs (LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1) were overlapped in both two datasets. The results of multivariate analysis revealed that both LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 were independent prognostic factors in UVM patients. The pan-cancer validation results further confirmed the prognostic values of LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 in eight tumors. Overall, we identified two novel UVM-related eRNAs, LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 which may serve as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers of UVM patients for clinical decision-making.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35251374 · DOI · PMC8892034

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Thyroid cancer [5]
    Cabanillas ME, McFadden DG, Durante C · Lancet · 2016 · cited 1,138 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Vera-Badillo FE, Templeton AJ, Duran I, Ocana A, de Gouveia P, Aneja P, et al. · Eur Urol · 2015 · cited 158 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Progression-free survival as surrogate and as true end point: insights from the breast and colorectal cancer literature [7]
    Saad ED, Katz A, Hoff PM, Buyse M · Ann Oncol · 2010 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with HER2-positive, early breast cancer in trials of adjuvant trastuzumab for up to 1 year: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Saad ED, Squifflet P, Burzykowski T, Quinaux E, Delaloge S, Mavroudis D, et al. · Lancet Oncol · 2019 · cited 68 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: A systematic review [9]
    Li J, Zhou Z, Dong J, Fu Y, Li Y, Luan Z, et al. · PLoS One · 2021 · cited 61 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Assessment of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point of Overall Survival in First-Line Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [10]
    Paoletti X, Lewsley LA, Daniele G, Cook A, Yanaihara N, Tinker A, et al. · JAMA Netw Open · 2020 · cited 49 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. van Leeuwen M, Husson O, Alberti P, Arraras JI, Chinot OL, Costantini A, et al.. Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire. . 2018. PMID 29866185 · DOI · PMC5987570
  2. Magnussen GI, Holm R, Emilsen E, Rosnes AK, Slipicevic A, Flørenes VA. High expression of Wee1 is associated with poor disease-free survival in malignant melanoma: potential for targeted therapy. . 2012. PMID 22719872 · DOI · PMC3373567
  3. Fukushima H, Yokoyama M, Nakanishi Y, Tobisu K, Koga F. Sarcopenia as a prognostic biomarker of advanced urothelial carcinoma. . 2015. PMID 25612215 · DOI · PMC4303429
  4. Zhao S, Jiang H, Liu J, Li DY, Li B, Long QR, et al.. Comprehensive Analysis of Enhancer RNAs Identifies LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 as Novel Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma. . 2022. PMID 35251374 · DOI · PMC8892034
  5. Cabanillas ME, McFadden DG, Durante C. Thyroid cancer. Lancet. 2016. PMID 27240885 · DOI
  6. Vera-Badillo FE, Templeton AJ, Duran I, Ocana A, de Gouveia P, Aneja P, et al.. Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID 24882670 · DOI
  7. Saad ED, Katz A, Hoff PM, Buyse M. Progression-free survival as surrogate and as true end point: insights from the breast and colorectal cancer literature. Ann Oncol. 2010. PMID 19901012 · DOI
  8. Saad ED, Squifflet P, Burzykowski T, Quinaux E, Delaloge S, Mavroudis D, et al.. Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with HER2-positive, early breast cancer in trials of adjuvant trastuzumab for up to 1 year: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID 30709633 · DOI · PMC7050571
  9. Li J, Zhou Z, Dong J, Fu Y, Li Y, Luan Z, et al.. Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021. PMID 33861809 · DOI · PMC8051758
  10. Paoletti X, Lewsley LA, Daniele G, Cook A, Yanaihara N, Tinker A, et al.. Assessment of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point of Overall Survival in First-Line Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID 31922558 · DOI · PMC6991254

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Progression-Free SurvivalClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Confidence IntervalsClinical Research
  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

85,904
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
8,038
review articles
7,132
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Progression-Free SurvivalClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Confidence IntervalsClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support