Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Endometrium
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Endometrium

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The mucous membrane lining of the uterine cavity that is hormonally responsive during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,018 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The mucous membrane lining of the uterine cavity that is hormonally responsive during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. The endometrium undergoes cyclic changes that characterize menstruation. After successful fertilization, it serves to sustain the developing embryo.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Endometria.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Uterus
Narrower topics
Decidua

Related concepts

  • Menstrual Cycle
  • Pregnancy
  • Menstruation
  • Fertilization

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 39,078 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Endometrium” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 6,898 of them (17.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 16,427 records.

Reviews account for 4,025 records (10.3%) and meta-analyses for 183. Randomized controlled trials number 990 (2.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 16,427 records; 2000-2009: 7,403 records; 2010-2019: 8,350 records; 2020 onward: 6,898 records16,427through 19997,4032000-20098,3502010-20196,8982020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199916,427
2000-20097,403
2010-20198,350
2020 onward6,898
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.5 percentReviews10.3% (4,025)Meta-analyses0.5% (183)Randomized controlled trials2.5% (990)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 39,078 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,02510.3%
Meta-analyses1830.5%
Randomized controlled trials9902.5%

Method: PubMed query "Endometrium"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives
Stoyancheva G, Mihaylova N, Gerginova M, Krumova E
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 41226831 · DOI · PMC12609489
Molecular Impact of Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbance on Endometrial Function in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Parker J, O'Brien C, Uppal T, Tremellen K
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 41155220 · DOI · PMC12563804
Balancing Decidualization, Autophagy, and Cellular Senescence for Reproductive Success in Endometriosis Biology
Shigetomi H, Nishio M, Umetani M, Imanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kobayashi H
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
11cc by
PMID 41009686 · DOI · PMC12471044
Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies
Kim SR, Lee HY
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
9cc by
PMID 41346706 · DOI · PMC12674934

Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives [1]

Review article Stoyancheva G, Mihaylova N, Gerginova M, Krumova E · · 2025 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The human endometrium, previously considered a sterile environment, is now recognized as a low-biomass but biologically active microbial niche critical to reproductive health.
Closing excerpt
This review gives a new insight into current knowledge on the uterine microbiome and its impact on implantation success, analyzed through the lenses of microbiology, immunology, and oxidative stress.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (306 words)

The human endometrium, previously considered a sterile environment, is now recognized as a low-biomass but biologically active microbial niche critical to reproductive health. Advances in sequencing technologies, particularly shotgun metagenomics, have provided unprecedented insights into the taxonomic and functional complexity of the endometrial microbiome. While 16S rRNA sequencing has delineated the distinction between Lactobacillus-dominant and non-dominant microbial communities, shotgun metagenomics has revealed additional diversity at the species and strain level, uncovering microbial signatures that remain undetected by amplicon-based approaches. Current evidence supports the association of Lactobacillus dominance with endometrial homeostasis and favorable reproductive outcomes. Dysbiosis, characterized by increased microbial diversity and enrichment of anaerobic taxa such as Gardnerella, Atopobium, Prevotella, and Streptococcus, is linked to chronic endometritis, implantation failure, and adverse IVF results. Beyond compositional differences, the endometrial microbiome interacts with the host through immunological, metabolic, and epigenetic mechanisms. These interactions modulate cytokine signaling, epithelial barrier integrity, and receptivity-associated gene expression, ultimately influencing embryo implantation. However, discrepancies between published studies reflect the lack of standardized protocols for sampling, DNA extraction, and bioinformatic analysis, as well as the inherent challenges of studying low-biomass environments. Factors such as geography, ethnicity, hormonal status, and antibiotic exposure further contribute to interindividual variability. Culturomics approaches complement sequencing by enabling the isolation of viable bacterial strains, offering perspectives for microbiome-based biotherapeutics. Emerging 3D endometrial models provide additional tools to dissect microbiome-host interactions under controlled conditions. Taken together, the growing body of data highlights the potential of endometrial microbiome profiling as a biomarker for reproductive success and as a target for personalized interventions. Future research should focus on integrating multi-omics approaches and functional analyses to establish causal relationships and translate findings into clinical practice. This review gives a new insight into current knowledge on the uterine microbiome and its impact on implantation success, analyzed through the lenses of microbiology, immunology, and oxidative stress.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41226831 · DOI · PMC12609489

Molecular Impact of Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbance on Endometrial Function in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [2]

Review article Parker J, O'Brien C, Uppal T, Tremellen K · · 2025 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a systemic metabolic and endocrine disorder that significantly disrupts reproductive physiology and endometrial function.
Closing excerpt
Overall, our review provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms linking systemic metabolic and endocrine dysfunction with endometrial pathology in PCOS and has broader implications that apply to all women.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a systemic metabolic and endocrine disorder that significantly disrupts reproductive physiology and endometrial function. In this narrative review, we examine the molecular impact of metabolic and hormonal imbalances on the endometrium of women with PCOS. We investigate the specific mechanisms that delineate how hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, chronic low-grade inflammation, and estrogen/progesterone/androgen imbalance contribute to altered epigenetic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, and signaling profiles in a wide array of different cell types within endometrial tissues. The synergistic interplay between upregulated inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1,2,6,8,17,18, and TNF-α), along with key changes in critical molecular pathways associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance (e.g., PI3K/AKT/MAPK, and Wnt/β-catenin), in addition to aberrant sex steroid hormone signaling (e.g., CYP19A1, COX-2, PGE2, HOXA10, 11βHSD2), promotes deleterious changes within the endometrial microenvironment. These anomalies underpin a spectrum of clinical manifestations observed in women with PCOS at each stage of the life course, including abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-age women, impaired decidualization in pregnancy, and altered postmenopausal endometrial physiology. Clinically, these alterations are associated with abnormal uterine bleeding, subfertility, implantation failure, miscarriage, pregnancy complications, and postmenopausal endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. Overall, our review provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms linking systemic metabolic and endocrine dysfunction with endometrial pathology in PCOS and has broader implications that apply to all women.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41155220 · DOI · PMC12563804

Balancing Decidualization, Autophagy, and Cellular Senescence for Reproductive Success in Endometriosis Biology [3]

Review article Shigetomi H, Nishio M, Umetani M, Imanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kobayashi H · · 2025 · cited 11 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Endometriosis is a chronic disease characterized by the ectopic presence of endometrial cells that evade apoptosis and survive and proliferate under harsh environmental conditions.
Closing excerpt
Future development of therapeutic strategies targeting these processes is expected to help overcome infertility associated with endometriosis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (220 words)

Endometriosis is a chronic disease characterized by the ectopic presence of endometrial cells that evade apoptosis and survive and proliferate under harsh environmental conditions. It is closely associated with infertility and pregnancy-related complications. This review focuses on the molecular pathophysiology of endometriosis, particularly the disruption of the p53-AMPK-mTOR signaling axis, and highlights the dysregulation of decidualization and cellular senescence, incorporating recent findings in reproductive physiology. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar without temporal restrictions. Endometriotic cells adapt to the hostile peritoneal environment through resistance to apoptosis and alterations in autophagy. In the early stages, autophagy activation may promote cell survival; however, as the disease progresses, autophagic activity tends to decline. Aberrant activation of mTOR signaling is implicated in this process, contributing to the suppression of autophagy, impaired decidualization, and promotion of cellular senescence, ultimately facilitating lesion progression and infertility. Indeed, in the eutopic endometrium of patients with endometriosis, progesterone resistance, elevated inflammatory cytokines, and epigenetic abnormalities are known to reduce endometrial receptivity. Moreover, suppression of autophagy leads to excessive cellular senescence and secretion of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), thereby interfering with proper decidualization. Maintaining an appropriate balance between decidualization and cellular senescence is essential for reproductive function. Future development of therapeutic strategies targeting these processes is expected to help overcome infertility associated with endometriosis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41009686 · DOI · PMC12471044

Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies [4]

Review article Kim SR, Lee HY · · 2026 · cited 9 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Endometrial regeneration remains a significant clinical challenge for women with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), thin endometrium, or uterine factor infertility, conditions that severely impair fertility and reproductive outcomes.
Closing excerpt
Collectively, these approaches offer a next-generation therapeutic paradigm for restoring endometrial function and fertility.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (277 words)

Endometrial regeneration remains a significant clinical challenge for women with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), thin endometrium, or uterine factor infertility, conditions that severely impair fertility and reproductive outcomes. Traditional hormonal and surgical interventions often fail to restore the structural and functional integrity of damaged endometrial tissue. This review comprehensively examines integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration, focusing on the synergistic applications of biomaterials, stem cells, organoids, and organ-on-a-chip technologies. Natural polymers such as collagen, gelatin, alginate, hyaluronic acid, and synthetic polymers including PCL, PLA, PGA, and PLGA have been comprehensively evaluated for their ability to mimic extracellular matrix, support cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and modulate immune responses. The incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells, extracellular vesicles, and growth factors into bioengineered scaffolds, such as hydrogels and nanofiber membranes, enhances regenerative efficacy. Furthermore, emerging platforms, such as endometrial organoids, 3D bioprinting, and organ-on-a-chip systems, offer physiologically relevant models for precision regenerative medicine. Innovations such as AI-assisted monitoring, 4D printing, and advanced drug delivery systems represent transformative approaches to overcome current therapeutic limitations. This review highlights the convergence of materials science, stem cell biology, and microengineering as a foundation for next-generation, personalized therapies aimed at restoring endometrial function and fertility. In addition, the review highlights biomaterial-based strategies as the foundation of endometrial regeneration, by detailing how natural polymers (e.g., collagen, gelatin, alginate, hyaluronic acid) and synthetic polymers (e.g., PCL, PLA, PLGA) support tissue repair structurally and by mediating biological functions. The integration of advanced technologies, such as 4D printing, AI-assisted monitoring, and stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle delivery has emerged as a transformative direction for overcoming current clinical challenges. Collectively, these approaches offer a next-generation therapeutic paradigm for restoring endometrial function and fertility.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41346706 · DOI · PMC12674934

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, et al. · Hum Reprod Update · 2014 · cited 425 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The endometrial immune environment of women with endometriosis [6]
    Vallvé-Juanico J, Houshdaran S, Giudice LC · Hum Reprod Update · 2019 · cited 386 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al. · Hum Reprod Update · 2019 · cited 382 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Physiology of the Endometrium and Regulation of Menstruation [8]
    Critchley HOD, Maybin JA, Armstrong GM, Williams ARW · Physiol Rev · 2020 · cited 364 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Dynamic Function and Composition Changes of Immune Cells During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy at the Maternal-Fetal Interface [9]
    Yang F, Zheng Q, Jin L · Front Immunol · 2019 · cited 351 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature) [10]
    Smolarz B, Szyłło K, Romanowicz H · Int J Mol Sci · 2021 · cited 332 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Stoyancheva G, Mihaylova N, Gerginova M, Krumova E. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives. . 2025. PMID 41226831 · DOI · PMC12609489
  2. Parker J, O'Brien C, Uppal T, Tremellen K. Molecular Impact of Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbance on Endometrial Function in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. . 2025. PMID 41155220 · DOI · PMC12563804
  3. Shigetomi H, Nishio M, Umetani M, Imanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kobayashi H. Balancing Decidualization, Autophagy, and Cellular Senescence for Reproductive Success in Endometriosis Biology. . 2025. PMID 41009686 · DOI · PMC12471044
  4. Kim SR, Lee HY. Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies. . 2026. PMID 41346706 · DOI · PMC12674934
  5. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, et al.. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014. PMID 24664156 · DOI
  6. Vallvé-Juanico J, Houshdaran S, Giudice LC. The endometrial immune environment of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID 31424502 · DOI · PMC6737540
  7. Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al.. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID 30624659 · DOI
  8. Critchley HOD, Maybin JA, Armstrong GM, Williams ARW. Physiology of the Endometrium and Regulation of Menstruation. Physiol Rev. 2020. PMID 32031903 · DOI
  9. Yang F, Zheng Q, Jin L. Dynamic Function and Composition Changes of Immune Cells During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Front Immunol. 2019. PMID 31681264 · DOI · PMC6813251
  10. Smolarz B, Szyłło K, Romanowicz H. Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature). Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID 34638893 · DOI · PMC8508982

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • DeciduaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fallopian TubesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cervix UteriAnatomy and Physiology
  • Corpus LuteumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cumulus CellsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Follicular FluidAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

39,078
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
4,025
review articles
990
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • DeciduaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fallopian TubesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cervix UteriAnatomy and Physiology
  • Corpus LuteumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cumulus CellsAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support