Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Pioglitazone
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Pioglitazone

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A thiazolidinedione and ppar gamma agonist that is used in the treatment of TYPE 2 diabetes mellitus.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (872 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A thiazolidinedione and ppar gamma agonist that is used in the treatment of TYPE 2 diabetes mellitus.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: 5-(4-(2-(5-Ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy)benzyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione; AD 4833; AD-4833; AD4833; U 72107A; U-72107A; U72107A; U72,107A.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Thiazolidinediones
See also
Rosiglitazone

Related concepts

  • Ppar Gamma
  • Diabetes Mellitus

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,555 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Pioglitazone” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 773 of them (17.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,072 records.

Reviews account for 547 records (12.0%) and meta-analyses for 126. Randomized controlled trials number 740 (16.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 75 records; 2000-2009: 1,635 records; 2010-2019: 2,072 records; 2020 onward: 773 records75through 19991,6352000-20092,0722010-20197732020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199975
2000-20091,635
2010-20192,072
2020 onward773
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 12.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 2.8 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 16.2 percentReviews12.0% (547)Meta-analyses2.8% (126)Randomized controlled trials16.2% (740)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,555 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews54712.0%
Meta-analyses1262.8%
Randomized controlled trials74016.2%

Method: PubMed query "Pioglitazone"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis
Hu Y, Tao R, Chen L, Xiong Y, Xue H, Hu L, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
260cc by
PMID 34020670 · DOI · PMC8139165
Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tang H, Shi W, Fu S, Wang T, Zhai S, Song Y, et al.
2018Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
112cc by
PMID 29476615 · DOI · PMC5911601
Pioglitazone for NAFLD Patients With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
Lian J, Fu J
2021Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
97cc by
PMID 33995271 · DOI · PMC8115121
Modifying muscle metabolic dysregulation in inclusion body myositis with pioglitazone: a single-arm trial
Adler BL, Bene MR, Zhang C, Say C, Khare P, Mecoli C, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41832158 · DOI · PMC13136323

Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis [1]

Research article Hu Y, Tao R, Chen L, Xiong Y, Xue H, Hu L, et al. · · 2021 · cited 260 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundEnhanced angiogenesis can promote diabetic wound healing.
Closing excerpt
This offers a promising novel cell-free therapy for treating diabetic wound healing.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (202 words)

BackgroundEnhanced angiogenesis can promote diabetic wound healing. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-derived exosomes, which are cell-free therapeutics, are promising candidates for the treatment of diabetic wound healing. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of exosomes derived from MSCs pretreated with pioglitazone (PGZ-Exos) on diabetic wound healing.ResultsWe isolated PGZ-Exos from the supernatants of pioglitazone-treated BMSCs and found that PGZ-Exos significantly promote the cell viability and proliferation of Human Umbilical Vein Vascular Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) injured by high glucose (HG). PGZ-Exos enhanced the biological functions of HUVECs, including migration, tube formation, wound repair and VEGF expression in vitro. In addition, PGZ-Exos promoted the protein expression of p-AKT, p-PI3K and p-eNOS and suppressed that of PTEN. LY294002 inhibited the biological function of HUVECs through inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/eNOS pathway. In vivo modeling in diabetic rat wounds showed that pioglitazone pretreatment enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs-derived exosomes and accelerated diabetic wound healing via enhanced angiogenesis. In addition, PGZ-Exos promoted collagen deposition, ECM remodeling and VEGF and CD31 expression, indicating adequate angiogenesis in diabetic wound healing.ConclusionsPGZ-Exos accelerated diabetic wound healing by promoting the angiogenic function of HUVECs through activation of the PI3K/AKT/eNOS pathway. This offers a promising novel cell-free therapy for treating diabetic wound healing.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34020670 · DOI · PMC8139165

Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis [2]

Meta-analysis Tang H, Shi W, Fu S, Wang T, Zhai S, Song Y, et al. · · 2018 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Current evidence about the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk remains conflict.
Closing excerpt
Patients with long-term and high-dose exposure to pioglitazone should be monitored regularly for signs of bladder cancer.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)

Current evidence about the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk remains conflict. We aimed to assess the risk of bladder cancer associated with the use of pioglitazone and identify modifiers that affect the results. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 25 August 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk. Conventional and cumulative meta-analyses were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A restricted spline regression analysis was used to examine the dose-response relationship with a generalized least-squares trend test. We included two RCTs involving 9114 patients and 20 observational studies (n = 4,846,088 individuals). An increased risk of bladder cancer in patients treated with pioglitazone versus placebo was noted from RCTs (OR, 1.84; 95%CI, 0.99 to 3.42). In observational studies, the increased risk of bladder cancer was slight but significant among ever-users of pioglitazone versus never-users (OR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.03 to 1.25), which appeared to be both time- (P = 0.003) and dose-dependent (P = 0.05). In addition, we observed the association differed by region of studies (Europe, United States, or Asia) or source of funding (sponsored by industry or not). Current evidence suggests that pioglitazone may increase the risk of bladder cancer, possibly in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Patients with long-term and high-dose exposure to pioglitazone should be monitored regularly for signs of bladder cancer.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29476615 · DOI · PMC5911601

Pioglitazone for NAFLD Patients With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis [3]

Meta-analysis Lian J, Fu J · · 2021 · cited 97 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with prediabetes or T2DM combined with NAFLD.
Closing excerpt
Systematic review registration[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020212025].
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (223 words)

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with prediabetes or T2DM combined with NAFLD.MethodsThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases were searched until August 2020 for publications written in English. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, continuous data extraction, independent assessment of bias risk, and graded the strength of evidence. Our primary outcomes were the individual number of patients with improvement of at least 1 point in each of the histological parameters. Baseline characteristic data, such as BMI, weight, total body fat, fasting plasma glucose and fasting plasma insulin, and liver biological indicators, such as triglyceride level, HDL cholesterol level, plasma AST, and plasma ALT, were used as secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 4 studies were included. Compared with placebo, pioglitazone significantly improved steatosis grade, inflammation grade and ballooning grade, while in the fibrosis stage, there was no significant improvement in pioglitazone compared with placebo. In addition, pioglitazone can also improve blood glucose and liver function.ConclusionPioglitazone can significantly improve the histological performance of the liver and insulin sensitivity. Additionally, it can significantly reduce fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, plasma AST, ALT and other liver biological indicators. Due to the lack of relevant randomized controlled trials and short intervention times, long-term studies are still needed to verify its efficacy and safety.Systematic review registration[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020212025].

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33995271 · DOI · PMC8115121

Modifying muscle metabolic dysregulation in inclusion body myositis with pioglitazone: a single-arm trial [4]

Research article Adler BL, Bene MR, Zhang C, Say C, Khare P, Mecoli C, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial evaluated the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone in patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM).
Closing excerpt
Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03440034.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (203 words)

This single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial evaluated the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone in patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM). After a 16-week observation (lead-in) period, participants received pioglitazone 45 mg daily for 32 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in PPARGC1A expression and related metabolic pathways in muscle after 16 weeks of treatment compared with the lead-in period. Of the 16 enrolled participants, 13 initiated pioglitazone and completed at least one on-treatment assessment; the trial was terminated early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At baseline, muscle metabolomics revealed broad metabolic abnormalities compared with controls. Pioglitazone reversed elements of this signature, increasing PPARGC1A expression (p = 0.099) and modulating downstream pathways in muscle, including enhanced oxidative phosphorylation. Clinical outcomes were unchanged overall, but a subset with favorable metabolic responses showed slower decline in the IBM-Functional Rating Score (IBM-FRS) and Modified Timed Up and Go (m-TUG). Reported adverse effects included myalgia and heart failure exacerbation. As a phase 1 trial with a limited cohort, these findings provide preliminary evidence that pioglitazone modulates muscle metabolism and warrants further investigation in IBM. This study was supported by the Ira T. Discovery Fund and the Peter and Carmen Lucia Buck Foundation Myositis Discovery Fund. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03440034.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41832158 · DOI · PMC13136323

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes [5]
    DeFronzo RA, Inzucchi S, Abdul-Ghani M, Nissen SE · Diab Vasc Dis Res · 2019 · cited 160 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Rethinking pioglitazone as a cardioprotective agent: a new perspective on an overlooked drug [6]
    Nesti L, Tricò D, Mengozzi A, Natali A · Cardiovasc Diabetol · 2021 · cited 91 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials [7]
    Alam F, Islam MA, Mohamed M, Ahmad I, Kamal MA, Donnelly R, et al. · Sci Rep · 2019 · cited 79 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Repositioning of diabetes treatments for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials [8]
    Moulton CD, Hopkins CWP, Ismail K, Stahl D · Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2018 · cited 67 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis: State of the art on effective therapeutics based on the gold standard method for diagnosis [9]
    Mahjoubin-Tehran M, De Vincentis A, Mikhailidis DP, Atkin SL, Mantzoros CS, Jamialahmadi T, et al. · Mol Metab · 2021 · cited 57 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pioglitazone for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients with or at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis [10]
    Zhou Y, Huang Y, Ji X, Wang X, Shen L, Wang Y · J Clin Endocrinol Metab · 2020 · cited 57 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hu Y, Tao R, Chen L, Xiong Y, Xue H, Hu L, et al.. Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis. . 2021. PMID 34020670 · DOI · PMC8139165
  2. Tang H, Shi W, Fu S, Wang T, Zhai S, Song Y, et al.. Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2018. PMID 29476615 · DOI · PMC5911601
  3. Lian J, Fu J. Pioglitazone for NAFLD Patients With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. . 2021. PMID 33995271 · DOI · PMC8115121
  4. Adler BL, Bene MR, Zhang C, Say C, Khare P, Mecoli C, et al.. Modifying muscle metabolic dysregulation in inclusion body myositis with pioglitazone: a single-arm trial. . 2026. PMID 41832158 · DOI · PMC13136323
  5. DeFronzo RA, Inzucchi S, Abdul-Ghani M, Nissen SE. Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2019. PMID 30706731 · DOI
  6. Nesti L, Tricò D, Mengozzi A, Natali A. Rethinking pioglitazone as a cardioprotective agent: a new perspective on an overlooked drug. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021. PMID 34006325 · DOI · PMC8130304
  7. Alam F, Islam MA, Mohamed M, Ahmad I, Kamal MA, Donnelly R, et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID 30926892 · DOI · PMC6441028
  8. Moulton CD, Hopkins CWP, Ismail K, Stahl D. Repositioning of diabetes treatments for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018. PMID 29775878 · DOI
  9. Mahjoubin-Tehran M, De Vincentis A, Mikhailidis DP, Atkin SL, Mantzoros CS, Jamialahmadi T, et al.. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis: State of the art on effective therapeutics based on the gold standard method for diagnosis. Mol Metab. 2021. PMID 32673798 · DOI · PMC8324680
  10. Zhou Y, Huang Y, Ji X, Wang X, Shen L, Wang Y. Pioglitazone for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients with or at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020. PMID 31822895 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • RosiglitazoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • ThiazolidinedionesDrugs and Chemicals
  • FamotidineDrugs and Chemicals
  • LevamisoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetazolamideDrugs and Chemicals
  • DasatinibDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

4,555
PubMed records on this heading
17%
published since 2020
547
review articles
740
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • RosiglitazoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • ThiazolidinedionesDrugs and Chemicals
  • FamotidineDrugs and Chemicals
  • LevamisoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetazolamideDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support