Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (872 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A thiazolidinedione and ppar gamma agonist that is used in the treatment of TYPE 2 diabetes mellitus.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: 5-(4-(2-(5-Ethyl-2-pyridyl)ethoxy)benzyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione; AD 4833; AD-4833; AD4833; U 72107A; U-72107A; U72107A; U72,107A.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Thiazolidinediones
- See also
- Rosiglitazone
Related concepts
- Ppar Gamma
- Diabetes Mellitus
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 4,555 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Pioglitazone” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 773 of them (17.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,072 records.
Reviews account for 547 records (12.0%) and meta-analyses for 126. Randomized controlled trials number 740 (16.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 75 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,635 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,072 |
| 2020 onward | 773 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 547 | 12.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 126 | 2.8% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 740 | 16.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Pioglitazone"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 260 | cc by PMID 34020670 · DOI · PMC8139165 |
| Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis | 2018 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 112 | cc by PMID 29476615 · DOI · PMC5911601 |
| Pioglitazone for NAFLD Patients With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis | 2021 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 97 | cc by PMID 33995271 · DOI · PMC8115121 |
| Modifying muscle metabolic dysregulation in inclusion body myositis with pioglitazone: a single-arm trial | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 41832158 · DOI · PMC13136323 |
Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundEnhanced angiogenesis can promote diabetic wound healing.
- Closing excerpt
- This offers a promising novel cell-free therapy for treating diabetic wound healing.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (202 words)
BackgroundEnhanced angiogenesis can promote diabetic wound healing. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-derived exosomes, which are cell-free therapeutics, are promising candidates for the treatment of diabetic wound healing. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of exosomes derived from MSCs pretreated with pioglitazone (PGZ-Exos) on diabetic wound healing.ResultsWe isolated PGZ-Exos from the supernatants of pioglitazone-treated BMSCs and found that PGZ-Exos significantly promote the cell viability and proliferation of Human Umbilical Vein Vascular Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) injured by high glucose (HG). PGZ-Exos enhanced the biological functions of HUVECs, including migration, tube formation, wound repair and VEGF expression in vitro. In addition, PGZ-Exos promoted the protein expression of p-AKT, p-PI3K and p-eNOS and suppressed that of PTEN. LY294002 inhibited the biological function of HUVECs through inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/eNOS pathway. In vivo modeling in diabetic rat wounds showed that pioglitazone pretreatment enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs-derived exosomes and accelerated diabetic wound healing via enhanced angiogenesis. In addition, PGZ-Exos promoted collagen deposition, ECM remodeling and VEGF and CD31 expression, indicating adequate angiogenesis in diabetic wound healing.ConclusionsPGZ-Exos accelerated diabetic wound healing by promoting the angiogenic function of HUVECs through activation of the PI3K/AKT/eNOS pathway. This offers a promising novel cell-free therapy for treating diabetic wound healing.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34020670 · DOI · PMC8139165
Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Current evidence about the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk remains conflict.
- Closing excerpt
- Patients with long-term and high-dose exposure to pioglitazone should be monitored regularly for signs of bladder cancer.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)
Current evidence about the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk remains conflict. We aimed to assess the risk of bladder cancer associated with the use of pioglitazone and identify modifiers that affect the results. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 25 August 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluated the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk. Conventional and cumulative meta-analyses were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A restricted spline regression analysis was used to examine the dose-response relationship with a generalized least-squares trend test. We included two RCTs involving 9114 patients and 20 observational studies (n = 4,846,088 individuals). An increased risk of bladder cancer in patients treated with pioglitazone versus placebo was noted from RCTs (OR, 1.84; 95%CI, 0.99 to 3.42). In observational studies, the increased risk of bladder cancer was slight but significant among ever-users of pioglitazone versus never-users (OR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.03 to 1.25), which appeared to be both time- (P = 0.003) and dose-dependent (P = 0.05). In addition, we observed the association differed by region of studies (Europe, United States, or Asia) or source of funding (sponsored by industry or not). Current evidence suggests that pioglitazone may increase the risk of bladder cancer, possibly in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Patients with long-term and high-dose exposure to pioglitazone should be monitored regularly for signs of bladder cancer.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29476615 · DOI · PMC5911601
Pioglitazone for NAFLD Patients With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with prediabetes or T2DM combined with NAFLD.
- Closing excerpt
- Systematic review registration[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020212025].
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (223 words)
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with prediabetes or T2DM combined with NAFLD.MethodsThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases were searched until August 2020 for publications written in English. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, continuous data extraction, independent assessment of bias risk, and graded the strength of evidence. Our primary outcomes were the individual number of patients with improvement of at least 1 point in each of the histological parameters. Baseline characteristic data, such as BMI, weight, total body fat, fasting plasma glucose and fasting plasma insulin, and liver biological indicators, such as triglyceride level, HDL cholesterol level, plasma AST, and plasma ALT, were used as secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 4 studies were included. Compared with placebo, pioglitazone significantly improved steatosis grade, inflammation grade and ballooning grade, while in the fibrosis stage, there was no significant improvement in pioglitazone compared with placebo. In addition, pioglitazone can also improve blood glucose and liver function.ConclusionPioglitazone can significantly improve the histological performance of the liver and insulin sensitivity. Additionally, it can significantly reduce fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, plasma AST, ALT and other liver biological indicators. Due to the lack of relevant randomized controlled trials and short intervention times, long-term studies are still needed to verify its efficacy and safety.Systematic review registration[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020212025].
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33995271 · DOI · PMC8115121
Modifying muscle metabolic dysregulation in inclusion body myositis with pioglitazone: a single-arm trial [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- This single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial evaluated the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone in patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM).
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03440034.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (203 words)
This single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial evaluated the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone in patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM). After a 16-week observation (lead-in) period, participants received pioglitazone 45 mg daily for 32 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in PPARGC1A expression and related metabolic pathways in muscle after 16 weeks of treatment compared with the lead-in period. Of the 16 enrolled participants, 13 initiated pioglitazone and completed at least one on-treatment assessment; the trial was terminated early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At baseline, muscle metabolomics revealed broad metabolic abnormalities compared with controls. Pioglitazone reversed elements of this signature, increasing PPARGC1A expression (p = 0.099) and modulating downstream pathways in muscle, including enhanced oxidative phosphorylation. Clinical outcomes were unchanged overall, but a subset with favorable metabolic responses showed slower decline in the IBM-Functional Rating Score (IBM-FRS) and Modified Timed Up and Go (m-TUG). Reported adverse effects included myalgia and heart failure exacerbation. As a phase 1 trial with a limited cohort, these findings provide preliminary evidence that pioglitazone modulates muscle metabolism and warrants further investigation in IBM. This study was supported by the Ira T. Discovery Fund and the Peter and Carmen Lucia Buck Foundation Myositis Discovery Fund. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03440034.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41832158 · DOI · PMC13136323
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes [5]
- Research article Rethinking pioglitazone as a cardioprotective agent: a new perspective on an overlooked drug [6]
- Research article Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials [7]
- Research article Repositioning of diabetes treatments for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials [8]
- Research article Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis: State of the art on effective therapeutics based on the gold standard method for diagnosis [9]
- Research article Pioglitazone for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients with or at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis [10]
References
- Hu Y, Tao R, Chen L, Xiong Y, Xue H, Hu L, et al.. Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis. . 2021. PMID 34020670 · DOI · PMC8139165
- Tang H, Shi W, Fu S, Wang T, Zhai S, Song Y, et al.. Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2018. PMID 29476615 · DOI · PMC5911601
- Lian J, Fu J. Pioglitazone for NAFLD Patients With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. . 2021. PMID 33995271 · DOI · PMC8115121
- Adler BL, Bene MR, Zhang C, Say C, Khare P, Mecoli C, et al.. Modifying muscle metabolic dysregulation in inclusion body myositis with pioglitazone: a single-arm trial. . 2026. PMID 41832158 · DOI · PMC13136323
- DeFronzo RA, Inzucchi S, Abdul-Ghani M, Nissen SE. Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2019. PMID 30706731 · DOI
- Nesti L, Tricò D, Mengozzi A, Natali A. Rethinking pioglitazone as a cardioprotective agent: a new perspective on an overlooked drug. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021. PMID 34006325 · DOI · PMC8130304
- Alam F, Islam MA, Mohamed M, Ahmad I, Kamal MA, Donnelly R, et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID 30926892 · DOI · PMC6441028
- Moulton CD, Hopkins CWP, Ismail K, Stahl D. Repositioning of diabetes treatments for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018. PMID 29775878 · DOI
- Mahjoubin-Tehran M, De Vincentis A, Mikhailidis DP, Atkin SL, Mantzoros CS, Jamialahmadi T, et al.. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis: State of the art on effective therapeutics based on the gold standard method for diagnosis. Mol Metab. 2021. PMID 32673798 · DOI · PMC8324680
- Zhou Y, Huang Y, Ji X, Wang X, Shen L, Wang Y. Pioglitazone for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients with or at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020. PMID 31822895 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.