Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Hip
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Hip

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The projecting part on each side of the body, formed by the side of the pelvis and the top portion of the femur.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,064 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The projecting part on each side of the body, formed by the side of the pelvis and the top portion of the femur.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Hips; Coxa; Coxas.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Lower Extremity

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 13,072 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hip” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,191 of them (9.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 7,646 records.

Reviews account for 572 records (4.4%) and meta-analyses for 77. Randomized controlled trials number 452 (3.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 7,646 records; 2000-2009: 1,469 records; 2010-2019: 2,766 records; 2020 onward: 1,191 records7,646through 19991,4692000-20092,7662010-20191,1912020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19997,646
2000-20091,469
2010-20192,766
2020 onward1,191
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.5 percentReviews4.4% (572)Meta-analyses0.6% (77)Randomized controlled trials3.5% (452)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 13,072 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5724.4%
Meta-analyses770.6%
Randomized controlled trials4523.5%

Method: PubMed query "Hip"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study
Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
603cc by
PMID 28209371 · DOI · PMC5522532
Deep Learning for Osteoporosis Classification Using Hip Radiographs and Patient Clinical Covariates
Yamamoto N, Sukegawa S, Kitamura A, Goto R, Noda T, Nakano K, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
88cc by
PMID 33182778 · DOI · PMC7697189
Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a retrospective multicenter study of 237 cases
Xie GP, Jiang N, Liang CX, Zeng JC, Chen ZY, Xu Q, et al.
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
84cc by
PMID 25799575 · DOI · PMC4370558
Acute and long-term effects of hip thrust training on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin S, Cheng M, Yi X, Li Y, Liu R
2026Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41777686 · DOI · PMC12951884

The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study [1]

Research article Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, et al. · · 2017 · cited 603 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTotal joint replacements for end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip and knee are cost-effective and demonstrate significant clinical improvement.
Closing excerpt
FundingOxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, National Institute for Health Research.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (352 words)

BackgroundTotal joint replacements for end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip and knee are cost-effective and demonstrate significant clinical improvement. However, robust population based lifetime-risk data for implant revision are not available to aid patient decision making, which is a particular problem in young patient groups deciding on best-timing for surgery.MethodsWe did implant survival analysis on all patients within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink who had undergone total hip replacement or total knee replacement. These data were adjusted for all-cause mortality with data from the Office for National Statistics and used to generate lifetime risks of revision surgery based on increasing age at the time of primary surgery.FindingsWe identified 63 158 patients who had undergone total hip replacement and 54 276 who had total knee replacement between Jan 1, 1991, and Aug 10, 2011, and followed up these patients to a maximum of 20 years. For total hip replacement, 10-year implant survival rate was 95·6% (95% CI 95·3-95·9) and 20-year rate was 85·0% (83·2-86·6). For total knee replacement, 10-year implant survival rate was 96·1% (95·8-96·4), and 20-year implant survival rate was 89·7% (87·5-91·5). The lifetime risk of requiring revision surgery in patients who had total hip replacement or total knee replacement over the age of 70 years was about 5% with no difference between sexes. For those who had surgery younger than 70 years, however, the lifetime risk of revision increased for younger patients, up to 35% (95% CI 30·9-39·1) for men in their early 50s, with large differences seen between male and female patients (15% lower for women in same age group). The median time to revision for patients who had surgery younger than age 60 was 4·4 years.InterpretationOur study used novel methodology to investigate and offer new insight into the importance of young age and risk of revision after total hip or knee replacement. Our evidence challenges the increasing trend for more total hip replacements and total knee replacements to be done in the younger patient group, and these data should be offered to patients as part of the shared decision making process.FundingOxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, National Institute for Health Research.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28209371 · DOI · PMC5522532

Deep Learning for Osteoporosis Classification Using Hip Radiographs and Patient Clinical Covariates [2]

Research article Yamamoto N, Sukegawa S, Kitamura A, Goto R, Noda T, Nakano K, et al. · · 2020 · cited 88 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This study considers the use of deep learning to diagnose osteoporosis from hip radiographs, and whether adding clinical data improves diagnostic performance over the image mode alone.
Closing excerpt
The CNN models diagnosed osteoporosis from hip radiographs with high accuracy, and their performance improved further with the addition of clinical covariates from patient records.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (179 words)

This study considers the use of deep learning to diagnose osteoporosis from hip radiographs, and whether adding clinical data improves diagnostic performance over the image mode alone. For objective labeling, we collected a dataset containing 1131 images from patients who underwent both skeletal bone mineral density measurement and hip radiography at a single general hospital between 2014 and 2019. Osteoporosis was assessed from the hip radiographs using five convolutional neural network (CNN) models. We also investigated ensemble models with clinical covariates added to each CNN. The accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, negative predictive value (npv), F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) score were calculated for each network. In the evaluation of the five CNN models using only hip radiographs, GoogleNet and EfficientNet b3 exhibited the best accuracy, precision, and specificity. Among the five ensemble models, EfficientNet b3 exhibited the best accuracy, recall, npv, F1 score, and AUC score when patient variables were included. The CNN models diagnosed osteoporosis from hip radiographs with high accuracy, and their performance improved further with the addition of clinical covariates from patient records.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33182778 · DOI · PMC7697189

Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a retrospective multicenter study of 237 cases [3]

Research article Xie GP, Jiang N, Liang CX, Zeng JC, Chen ZY, Xu Q, et al. · · 2015 · cited 84 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeTo review clinical characteristics of pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) in China.
Closing excerpt
Additionally, the present study supports the theory of an association between PVNS and orthopedic surgery, which is not limited to joint replacement.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)

PurposeTo review clinical characteristics of pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) in China.MethodsElectronic medical records (EMR) of four Chinese institutes were queried for patients with histologically proven PVNS between January 2005 and February 2014. Their data were collected including gender, age at diagnosis, clinical presentation, affected site, symptom duration, comorbidities, treatment strategy, recurrence and routine laboratories.ResultsA total of 237 patients with biopsy-proven PVNS were investigated. The gender ratio was 1.35 for a female predominance (101 males and 136 females). The average age was 36 years (range, 2 to 83 years). The median delay from initial clinical symptom to diagnosis was 18 months. Main affected areas were the knee (73.84%) and the hip (18.14%). Forty patients had a clear history of joint trauma. Six patients were concurrently diagnosed with PVNS and avascular necrosis (AVN). Five patients suffered from PVNS following implantation of orthopaedic devices including artificial prosthesis, plate and wire. One hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent arthroscopic synovectomy and 108 open synovectomy. Altogether 48 patients (26 males and 22 females) had recurrence of disease. The relapse rate was 24% (knee) and 6.98% (hip), 20.93% (open surgery) and 19.44% (arthroscopy), respectively. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) rate were elevated in 45.83% and 38.41% of the patients respectively.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this study is the largest sample size of PVNS patients reported as well as the largest sample of PVNS with concurrent AVN reported to date. Our outcomes suggest that PVNS shows a female predominance, occurs mostly between 20-40 years and favors the knee and hip. Recurrence is frequent, particularly in the knee. Serum ESR and CRP may be elevated in some patients. Additionally, the present study supports the theory of an association between PVNS and orthopedic surgery, which is not limited to joint replacement.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25799575 · DOI · PMC4370558

Acute and long-term effects of hip thrust training on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis [4]

Meta-analysis Lin S, Cheng M, Yi X, Li Y, Liu R · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe hip thrust (HT) is a popular exercise, but its transfer to athletic performance is debated.
Closing excerpt
IO/AYFK3.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (241 words)

BackgroundThe hip thrust (HT) is a popular exercise, but its transfer to athletic performance is debated. We aimed to quantify the acute and long-term effects of HT training on performance.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of six electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. Data from 20 studies assessing the effects of HT training on strength, acceleration, and jump performance were synthesized using random-effects models to calculate pooled Hedges' g effect sizes (ES).ResultsAcutely, the HT induced a moderate post-activation performance enhancement on sprinting (ES = 0.55), dependent on protocol (e.g., multiple sets, ≥4 min recovery). Long-term, HT training significantly improved its own specific strength (ES = 0.53) but failed to transfer to squat strength or jumping performance. While small transfers to change of direction (ES = 0.25) were found, isolated HT training produced borderline - significant sprint transfer (ES = 0.22, p = 0.05) when excluding combined-training protocols, suggesting minimal independent benefit for sprint acceleration. The overall certainty of evidence was 'Low' to 'Very Low' due to high risk of bias.ConclusionsThe HT effectively builds exercise-specific strength, but these gains fail to transfer to squat strength or jumping. Acutely, it offers moderate, protocol-dependent PAPE on sprinting. Long-term, its independent sprint contribution is minimal and borderline-significant (per sensitivity analysis). Based on 'Low' to 'Very Low' evidence certainty, the HT is a valuable complement, not a replacement, for a complete athletic program.RegistrationThis review was registered on the OSF platform, registration number https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AYFK3.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41777686 · DOI · PMC12951884

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: an Updated Review of ARCO on Pathogenesis, Staging and Treatment [5]
    Hines JT, Jo WL, Cui Q, Mont MA, Koo KH, Cheng EY, et al. · J Korean Med Sci · 2021 · cited 174 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Trunk and hip control neuromuscular training for the prevention of knee joint injury [6]
    Myer GD, Chu DA, Brent JL, Hewett TE · Clin Sports Med · 2008 · cited 163 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome have weak hip muscles: a systematic review [7]
    Prins MR, van der Wurff P · Aust J Physiother · 2009 · cited 160 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Is hip strength a risk factor for patellofemoral pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Rathleff MS, Rathleff CR, Crossley KM, Barton CJ · Br J Sports Med · 2014 · cited 150 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis [9]
    Beck TJ · Curr Osteoporos Rep · 2007 · cited 150 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes [10]
    Cvetanovich GL, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ · Arthroscopy · 2015 · cited 139 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, et al.. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. . 2017. PMID 28209371 · DOI · PMC5522532
  2. Yamamoto N, Sukegawa S, Kitamura A, Goto R, Noda T, Nakano K, et al.. Deep Learning for Osteoporosis Classification Using Hip Radiographs and Patient Clinical Covariates. . 2020. PMID 33182778 · DOI · PMC7697189
  3. Xie GP, Jiang N, Liang CX, Zeng JC, Chen ZY, Xu Q, et al.. Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a retrospective multicenter study of 237 cases. . 2015. PMID 25799575 · DOI · PMC4370558
  4. Lin S, Cheng M, Yi X, Li Y, Liu R. Acute and long-term effects of hip thrust training on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2026. PMID 41777686 · DOI · PMC12951884
  5. Hines JT, Jo WL, Cui Q, Mont MA, Koo KH, Cheng EY, et al.. Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: an Updated Review of ARCO on Pathogenesis, Staging and Treatment. J Korean Med Sci. 2021. PMID 34155839 · DOI · PMC8216992
  6. Myer GD, Chu DA, Brent JL, Hewett TE. Trunk and hip control neuromuscular training for the prevention of knee joint injury. Clin Sports Med. 2008. PMID 18503876 · DOI · PMC2586107
  7. Prins MR, van der Wurff P. Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome have weak hip muscles: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother. 2009. PMID 19226237 · DOI
  8. Rathleff MS, Rathleff CR, Crossley KM, Barton CJ. Is hip strength a risk factor for patellofemoral pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2014. PMID 24687010 · DOI
  9. Beck TJ. Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2007. PMID 17521505 · DOI
  10. Cvetanovich GL, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ. Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015. PMID 25703289 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ButtocksAnatomy and Physiology
  • FootAnatomy and Physiology
  • HeelAnatomy and Physiology
  • Lower ExtremityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Waist-Hip RatioAnatomy and Physiology
  • Hip JointAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

13,072
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
572
review articles
452
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ButtocksAnatomy and Physiology
  • FootAnatomy and Physiology
  • HeelAnatomy and Physiology
  • Lower ExtremityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Waist-Hip RatioAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support