Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Lower Extremity
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Lower Extremity

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

The region of the lower limb in animals, extending from the gluteal region to the FOOT, and including the buttocks; HIP; and LEG.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (504 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The region of the lower limb in animals, extending from the gluteal region to the FOOT, and including the buttocks; HIP; and LEG.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Extremities, Lower; Lower Extremities; Extremity, Lower; Lower Limb; Limb, Lower; Limbs, Lower; Lower Limbs; Membrum inferius.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Extremities
Narrower topics
Ankle; Buttocks; Foot; Hip; Knee; Leg; Thigh

Related concepts

  • Buttocks

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 200,663 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Lower Extremity” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 34,702 of them (17.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 85,818 records.

Reviews account for 13,514 records (6.7%) and meta-analyses for 1,376. Randomized controlled trials number 7,795 (3.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 85,818 records; 2000-2009: 32,225 records; 2010-2019: 47,918 records; 2020 onward: 34,702 records85,818through 199932,2252000-200947,9182010-201934,7022020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199985,818
2000-200932,225
2010-201947,918
2020 onward34,702
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.9 percentReviews6.7% (13,514)Meta-analyses0.7% (1,376)Randomized controlled trials3.9% (7,795)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 200,663 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews13,5146.7%
Meta-analyses1,3760.7%
Randomized controlled trials7,7953.9%

Method: PubMed query "Lower Extremity"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Acute lower leg transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation increases leg blood flow and exercise capacity in patients with peripheral arterial disease
Pellinger TK, Neighbors CB, Hefta JC, Luo PH, Suarez CB, Varlas ET, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42479759 · DOI · PMC13394253
Fibrous and membranous tissues of the tarsal tunnel; quantitative 3D anatomy using a digital microscribe
Bruechert GK, Thorpe Lowis CG, Edwards WHB, Fogg QA
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42189268 · DOI · PMC13212641
Real-Time Foot Height Estimation and Activity Classification Using a Foot-Mounted IMU Implemented on a Smartphone
Sharafian Moghaddam E, Hejrati B
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42197973 · DOI · PMC13211119

Acute lower leg transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation increases leg blood flow and exercise capacity in patients with peripheral arterial disease [1]

Randomized controlled trial Pellinger TK, Neighbors CB, Hefta JC, Luo PH, Suarez CB, Varlas ET, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
We tested the hypothesis that two different durations of lower leg transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increase post-TENS popliteal artery blood flow (PABF), popliteal vascular conductance (PVC), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).
Closing excerpt
Our preliminary results suggest that as little as 15 min of lower leg TENS increases leg blood flow and exercise capacity in individuals with PAD.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (146 words)

We tested the hypothesis that two different durations of lower leg transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increase post-TENS popliteal artery blood flow (PABF), popliteal vascular conductance (PVC), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Seven subjects (5 male, 2 female) with PAD (67.9 ± 7.4 years; claudication: ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.90) participated in three randomized treatment sessions: control or bilateral TENS (3.0 Hz burst mode, 250 µs) for either 15 or 45 min. PABF (Doppler ultrasound) was measured before and after treatment. 6MWD and time/distance to claudication onset were measured 25 min post-treatment during each session. PABF, PVC and 6MWD increased after both 15 and 45 min of TENS (P < 0.05, post-TENS vs. pre-TENS baseline/control). Our preliminary results suggest that as little as 15 min of lower leg TENS increases leg blood flow and exercise capacity in individuals with PAD.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42479759 · DOI · PMC13394253

Fibrous and membranous tissues of the tarsal tunnel; quantitative 3D anatomy using a digital microscribe [2]

Research article Bruechert GK, Thorpe Lowis CG, Edwards WHB, Fogg QA · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeThe aetiology of tarsal tunnel syndrome is not always clear.
Closing excerpt
Surgically, this may more precisely inform which tissues need to be targeted for tarsal tunnel release.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (162 words)

PurposeThe aetiology of tarsal tunnel syndrome is not always clear. Treatment commonly involves a single release of the flexor retinaculum, but post-operative outcomes are not always successful. This may be due to the lack of understanding the tissues that may compress the neurovasculature. The aim of this study was to define the tissues that separate the contents of the tarsal tunnel.MethodsFeet from embalmed body donors (n = 15; mean age = 83.9 ± 10.2 years; female = 9, male = 6) were examined. One underwent magnetic resonance imaging. All were dissected and modelled in virtual three-dimensional space.ResultsThe tarsal tunnel was divided into at least five spaces by a fibrous skeleton, formed by septae that were much thicker than previously understood.ConclusionThese data strongly suggest that the fibrous skeleton may compress the neurovasculature and may need to be considered in the diagnosis and management of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Surgically, this may more precisely inform which tissues need to be targeted for tarsal tunnel release.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42189268 · DOI · PMC13212641

Real-Time Foot Height Estimation and Activity Classification Using a Foot-Mounted IMU Implemented on a Smartphone [3]

Research article Sharafian Moghaddam E, Hejrati B · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Wearable sensors are transformative tools for continuous gait assessment in daily life.
Closing excerpt
This framework provides a practical foundation for real-time gait intervention and fall prevention applications.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)

Wearable sensors are transformative tools for continuous gait assessment in daily life. Tripping, a leading cause of falls, is closely linked to inadequate foot clearance, making accurate foot height measurement critical for fall risk evaluation. Inertial measurement units offer a practical solution for foot trajectory reconstruction; however, conventional drift correction methods such as zero-velocity updates fail to adequately address cumulative height errors. Recent kinematic constraint-based approaches improve height accuracy but remain limited to offline processing and lack simultaneous activity classification. To address these gaps, we developed a real-time, single-IMU system for continuous foot height trajectory reconstruction with simultaneous classification of five locomotion activities deployed on a smartphone. Twenty healthy adults were recruited for model training and independent validation. Level walking maintained ground reference (0.0 cm, 95% CI: [-1.8, 1.8] cm), cumulative height errors remained below 1.1 cm across ramp and stair negotiation with a mean absolute error of 0.42%, and obstacle clearance was quantified. The system achieved 96.08% overall classification accuracy with less than one gait cycle latency. Toe height was estimated through rigid-body transformation with comparable accuracy to the foot height. This framework provides a practical foundation for real-time gait intervention and fall prevention applications.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42197973 · DOI · PMC13211119

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis [4]
    Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, et al. · Lancet · 2013 · cited 2,473 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Short Physical Performance Battery and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Pavasini R, Guralnik J, Brown JC, di Bari M, Cesari M, Landi F, et al. · BMC Med · 2016 · cited 707 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL · Intensive Care Med · 2016 · cited 288 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A Meta-analysis of Long-term Mortality and Associated Risk Factors following Lower Extremity Amputation [7]
    Stern JR, Wong CK, Yerovinkina M, Spindler SJ, See AS, Panjaki S, et al. · Ann Vasc Surg · 2017 · cited 147 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Risk of hand-foot skin reaction with sorafenib: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Chu D, Lacouture ME, Fillos T, Wu S · Acta Oncol · 2008 · cited 141 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Biomechanical Differences of Foot-Strike Patterns During Running: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis [9]
    Almeida MO, Davis IS, Lopes AD · J Orthop Sports Phys Ther · 2015 · cited 140 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Pellinger TK, Neighbors CB, Hefta JC, Luo PH, Suarez CB, Varlas ET, et al.. Acute lower leg transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation increases leg blood flow and exercise capacity in patients with peripheral arterial disease. . 2026. PMID 42479759 · DOI · PMC13394253
  2. Bruechert GK, Thorpe Lowis CG, Edwards WHB, Fogg QA. Fibrous and membranous tissues of the tarsal tunnel; quantitative 3D anatomy using a digital microscribe. . 2026. PMID 42189268 · DOI · PMC13212641
  3. Sharafian Moghaddam E, Hejrati B. Real-Time Foot Height Estimation and Activity Classification Using a Foot-Mounted IMU Implemented on a Smartphone. . 2026. PMID 42197973 · DOI · PMC13211119
  4. Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, et al.. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013. PMID 23915883 · DOI
  5. Pavasini R, Guralnik J, Brown JC, di Bari M, Cesari M, Landi F, et al.. Short Physical Performance Battery and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2016. PMID 28003033 · DOI · PMC5178082
  6. Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID 26825952 · DOI
  7. Stern JR, Wong CK, Yerovinkina M, Spindler SJ, See AS, Panjaki S, et al.. A Meta-analysis of Long-term Mortality and Associated Risk Factors following Lower Extremity Amputation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID 28389295 · DOI
  8. Chu D, Lacouture ME, Fillos T, Wu S. Risk of hand-foot skin reaction with sorafenib: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncol. 2008. PMID 18210295 · DOI
  9. Almeida MO, Davis IS, Lopes AD. Biomechanical Differences of Foot-Strike Patterns During Running: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015. PMID 26304644 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ButtocksAnatomy and Physiology
  • Upper ExtremityAnatomy and Physiology
  • FootAnatomy and Physiology
  • HeelAnatomy and Physiology
  • HipAnatomy and Physiology
  • Abdominal CavityAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

200,663
PubMed records on this heading
17%
published since 2020
13,514
review articles
7,795
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ButtocksAnatomy and Physiology
  • Upper ExtremityAnatomy and Physiology
  • FootAnatomy and Physiology
  • HeelAnatomy and Physiology
  • HipAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support