Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (989 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Autoimmune disease characterized by subepidermal blisters and linear deposition of autoantibodies at the dermoepidermal junction. The accumulated autoantibodies are of immunoglobulin A and occasionally immunoglobulin G classes against epidermal basement membrane proteins. The dermatosis is sometimes associated with malignancies and use of certain drugs (e.g., vancomycin).
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Linear IgA Dermatosis; Dermatoses, Linear IgA; Dermatosis, Linear IgA; IgA Dermatoses, Linear; IgA Dermatosis, Linear; Linear IgA Dermatoses; Drug-induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis; Drug induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Autoimmune Diseases
Related concepts
- Immunoglobulin
- Basement Membrane
- Vancomycin
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 257 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 104 of them (40.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 161 records.
Reviews account for 31 records (12.1%) and meta-analyses for 0. Randomized controlled trials number 0 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 0 |
| 2010-2019 | 161 |
| 2020 onward | 104 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 31 | 12.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 0 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 0 | 0.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in immunology
Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab in Recalcitrant Pemphigoid Diseases | 2018 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 71 | cc by PMID 29520266 · DOI · PMC5827539 |
| Linear IgA bullous dermatosis in adults and children: a clinical and immunopathological study of 38 patients | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 45 | cc by PMID 31126328 · DOI · PMC6534856 |
| Clinical and Immunological Study of 30 Cases With Both IgG and IgA Anti-Keratinocyte Cell Surface Autoantibodies Toward the Definition of Intercellular IgG/IgA Dermatosis | 2018 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 18 | cc by PMID 29867971 · DOI · PMC5950707 |
| Linear IgA bullous dermatosis: 32 years of experience | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 4 | cc by PMID 39665877 · DOI · PMC11962816 |
Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab in Recalcitrant Pemphigoid Diseases [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionRituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, a transmembrane protein expressed on B cells, causing B cell depletion.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionRTX can be effective in recalcitrant IgG-dominant pemphigoid diseases, however not in those where IgA is dominant.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (274 words)
IntroductionRituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, a transmembrane protein expressed on B cells, causing B cell depletion. RTX has shown great efficacy in studies of pemphigus vulgaris, but data of pemphigoid diseases are limited.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness and safety of RTX in pemphigoid diseases.MethodsThe medical records of 28 patients with pemphigoid diseases that were treated with RTX were reviewed retrospectively. Early and late endpoints, defined according to international consensus, were disease control (DC), partial remission (PR), complete remission (CR), and relapses. Safety was measured by reported adverse events.ResultsPatients with bullous pemphigoid (n = 8), mucous membrane pemphigoid (n = 14), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (n = 5), and linear IgA disease (n = 1) were included. Treatment with 500 mg RTX (n = 6) or 1,000 mg RTX (n = 22) was administered on days 1 and 15. Eight patients received additional 500 mg RTX at months 6 and 12. Overall, DC was achieved in 67.9%, PR in 57.1%, and CR in 21.4% of the cases. During follow-up, 66.7% patients relapsed. Repeated treatment with RTX led to remission (PR or CR) in 85.7% of the retreated cases. No significant difference in response between pemphigoid subtypes was found. IgA-dominant cases (n = 5) achieved less DC (20 vs. 81.3%; p = 0.007), less PR (20 vs. 62.5%; p = 0.149), and less CR (0 vs. 18.8%; p = 0.549) compared to IgG-dominant cases (n = 16). Five severe adverse events and three deaths were reported. One death was possibly related to RTX and one death was disease related.ConclusionRTX can be effective in recalcitrant IgG-dominant pemphigoid diseases, however not in those where IgA is dominant.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29520266 · DOI · PMC5827539
Linear IgA bullous dermatosis in adults and children: a clinical and immunopathological study of 38 patients [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundLinear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare autoimmune subepithelial vesiculobullous disease due to IgA autoantibodies directed against different antigens of the basement membrane zone (BMZ) of the skin and/or mucosae.
- Closing excerpt
- The above clinical parameters may be regarded as diagnostic tools for LABD in children.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (268 words)
BackgroundLinear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare autoimmune subepithelial vesiculobullous disease due to IgA autoantibodies directed against different antigens of the basement membrane zone (BMZ) of the skin and/or mucosae. It affects mainly preschool-aged children and adults, with only few studies on large series. The aim of this study was to assess possible differences between adults and children regarding clinical presentation, immunopathologic features, management and course of the disease.MethodsA retrospective review of 38 LABD patients, followed-up from November 2006 to September 2018, was performed.ResultsOf 38 patients, 27 were adults and 11 children. Mean age at diagnosis was 5.4 years and 60.6 years in the pediatric and adult group, respectively. Considering both groups, limbs were the most commonly involved site (73.7%), followed by trunk (55.3%), head (36.8%) and buttocks (13.2%). Interestingly, head (p = 0.008), particularly perioral (p = 0.001), involvement, as well as "string of pearls" arrangement (p = 0.03), were more prevalent in children. Mucosal involvement was seen in 9 (23.7%) patients and was more frequent in children than adults (45.5% vs 14.8%, respectively, p = 0.09). Linear IgA deposits along the BMZ were observed in 30 patients (78.9%), while linear/granular IgA deposits in 8 patients (21.1%). Dapsone was the most commonly used drug (78.9%) and complete remission was achieved in most cases (81.6%).ConclusionsOur epidemiological and clinicopathological findings relative to a large cohort of LABD patients are mostly consistent with the literature data. Interestingly, head, notably perioral, involvement and "string of pearls" arrangement occurred more frequently in the paediatric than adult group. The above clinical parameters may be regarded as diagnostic tools for LABD in children.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31126328 · DOI · PMC6534856
Clinical and Immunological Study of 30 Cases With Both IgG and IgA Anti-Keratinocyte Cell Surface Autoantibodies Toward the Definition of Intercellular IgG/IgA Dermatosis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Several sporadic cases, in which direct and indirect immunofluorescence studies simultaneously detected IgG and IgA autoantibodies to keratinocyte cell surfaces, have been reported mainly under the name of IgG/IgA pemphigus.
- Closing excerpt
- This was the largest study of IGAD to date.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (189 words)
Several sporadic cases, in which direct and indirect immunofluorescence studies simultaneously detected IgG and IgA autoantibodies to keratinocyte cell surfaces, have been reported mainly under the name of IgG/IgA pemphigus. However, there have been no systematic studies for this condition. In this study, we collected 30 cases of this condition from our cohort of more than 5,000 autoimmune bullous disease cases, which were consulted for our diagnostic methods from other institutes, and summarized their clinical and immunological findings. Clinically, there was no male-female prevalence, mean age of disease onset was 55.6 years, and mean duration before this condition was suspected was 18 months. The patients showed clinically bullous and pustular skin lesions preferentially on the trunk and extremities, and histopathologically intraepidermal pustules and blisters with infiltration of neutrophils and eosinophils. Immunologically, ELISAs frequently detected IgG and IgA autoantibodies to both desmogleins and desmocollins. From the characteristic clinical, histopathological, and immunological features, which are considerably different from those in classical IgG types of pemphigus, we propose this disease as a new disease entity with preferential name of intercellular IgG/IgA dermatosis (IGAD). This was the largest study of IGAD to date.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29867971 · DOI · PMC5950707
Linear IgA bullous dermatosis: 32 years of experience [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundLinear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is an uncommon disease with only a few reported studies in large series with long follow-up periods.
- Closing excerpt
- Other immunoglobulins may be associated with dominant IgA antibody deposition and the most commonly used therapeutic option for LABD patients was oral dapsone.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (258 words)
BackgroundLinear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is an uncommon disease with only a few reported studies in large series with long follow-up periods.ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical presentation, immunopathological features, management, and disease course in LABD patients.MethodsData including demographics, clinical features, histopathological and immunofluorescence findings of LABD patients, in addition to the preferred treatments and responses to treatments were evaluated.ResultsAmong 26 patients diagnosed with LABD, 17 (65.4%) were female. The mean age was 40.3 ± 22.4 (6‒80) years of whom 21 were adults. The most common mucosal involvement was oral (n = 9, 34.6%). Continuous linear IgA deposition was present on the basement membrane zone of all patients in addition to C3 (n = 13), IgG (n = 9), IgM (n = 4), and fibrinogen (n = 4). Three patients were lost to follow-up without any treatment. Dapsone was the treatment of choice in most (n = 21, 91.3%) patients in addition to systemic corticosteroids (n = 17), azathioprine (n = 3), tetracycline and nicotinamide (n = 2). Complete and partial remissions were achieved in 11 (47.8%) and 12 (52.2%) patients, respectively, in a mean follow-up period of 45.9 ± 43.9 (3‒158) months. Furthermore, 17 patients were still under treatment at the end of the follow-up period.Study limitationsRetrospective study conducted in a single center.ConclusionsLABD may occur at two separate peaks, one in the second and the other in the sixth decade of life with a female predominance. Other immunoglobulins may be associated with dominant IgA antibody deposition and the most commonly used therapeutic option for LABD patients was oral dapsone.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39665877 · DOI · PMC11962816
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Drug-induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature [5]
- Research article Linear IgA bullous disease presenting as toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case report and review of the literature [6]
- Research article Linear immunoglobulin a bullous dermatosis: need for an agreement on diagnostic criteria [7]
- Research article S2k guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of linear IgA dermatosis initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology [8]
- Research article Linear IgA/IgG bullous dermatosis reacts with multiple laminins and integrins [9]
- Research article [Linear IgA bullous dermatosis] [10]
References
- Lamberts A, Euverman HI, Terra JB, Jonkman MF, Horváth B. Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab in Recalcitrant Pemphigoid Diseases. . 2018. PMID 29520266 · DOI · PMC5827539
- Genovese G, Venegoni L, Fanoni D, Muratori S, Berti E, Marzano AV. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis in adults and children: a clinical and immunopathological study of 38 patients. . 2019. PMID 31126328 · DOI · PMC6534856
- Hashimoto T, Teye K, Hashimoto K, Wozniak K, Ueo D, Fujiwara S, et al.. Clinical and Immunological Study of 30 Cases With Both IgG and IgA Anti-Keratinocyte Cell Surface Autoantibodies Toward the Definition of Intercellular IgG/IgA Dermatosis. . 2018. PMID 29867971 · DOI · PMC5950707
- Atci T, Pehlivan Ulutas G, Güreler Sirkeci E, Küçükoğlu R. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis: 32 years of experience. . 2025. PMID 39665877 · DOI · PMC11962816
- Lammer J, Hein R, Roenneberg S, Biedermann T, Volz T. Drug-induced Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019. PMID 30809685 · DOI
- Kakar R, Paugh H, Jaworsky C. Linear IgA bullous disease presenting as toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case report and review of the literature. Dermatology. 2013. PMID 24135381 · DOI
- Antiga E, Caproni M, Fabbri P. Linear immunoglobulin a bullous dermatosis: need for an agreement on diagnostic criteria. Dermatology. 2013. PMID 23838482 · DOI
- Caux F, Patsatsi A, Karakioulaki M, Antiga E, Baselga E, Borradori L, et al.. S2k guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of linear IgA dermatosis initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024. PMID 38421060 · DOI
- Li X, Tsuchisaka A, Qian H, Teye K, Ishii N, Sogame R, et al.. Linear IgA/IgG bullous dermatosis reacts with multiple laminins and integrins. Eur J Dermatol. 2015. PMID 26069157 · DOI
- Juratli HA, Sárdy M. [Linear IgA bullous dermatosis]. Hautarzt. 2019. PMID 30874843 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.