Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Nitrofurantoin
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Nitrofurantoin

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A urinary anti-infective agent effective against most gram-positive and gram-negative organisms.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,024 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A urinary anti-infective agent effective against most gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. Although sulfonamides and antibiotics are usually the agents of choice for urinary tract infections, nitrofurantoin is widely used for prophylaxis and long-term suppression.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Furadantin; Furadantine; Macrodantin; Nitrofurantoin, Monohydrate; Nitrofurantoin Sodium Salt; Furantoin; Furadonine; Furadoine.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Nitrofurans

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,950 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Nitrofurantoin” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 309 of them (10.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,041 records.

Reviews account for 204 records (6.9%) and meta-analyses for 19. Randomized controlled trials number 106 (3.6%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,041 records; 2000-2009: 250 records; 2010-2019: 350 records; 2020 onward: 309 records2,041through 19992502000-20093502010-20193092020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,041
2000-2009250
2010-2019350
2020 onward309
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.6 percentReviews6.9% (204)Meta-analyses0.6% (19)Randomized controlled trials3.6% (106)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,950 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2046.9%
Meta-analyses190.6%
Randomized controlled trials1063.6%

Method: PubMed query "Nitrofurantoin"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for adults with repeated urinary tract infections (AnTIC): a randomised, open-label trial
Fisher H, Oluboyede Y, Chadwick T, Abdel-Fattah M, Brennand C, Fader M, et al.
2018Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
85cc by
PMID 30037647 · DOI · PMC6105581
Molecular mechanisms of collateral sensitivity to the antibiotic nitrofurantoin
Roemhild R, Linkevicius M, Andersson DI
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
73cc by
PMID 31986134 · DOI · PMC7004380
A new framework for advancing in drug-induced liver injury research. The Prospective European DILI Registry
Björnsson ES, Stephens C, Atallah E, Robles-Diaz M, Alvarez-Alvarez I, Gerbes A, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
55cc by
PMID 35899490 · DOI · PMC7614006
Early Symptom Response in Patients With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Treated With Gepotidacin or Nitrofurantoin: Pooled Analysis From Two Pivotal Phase 3 Studies
Sheets AJ, Dennison J, Pogue JM, Kaye KS, Perry C, Millns H, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41495938 · DOI · PMC13131927

Continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for adults with repeated urinary tract infections (AnTIC): a randomised, open-label trial [1]

Randomized controlled trial Fisher H, Oluboyede Y, Chadwick T, Abdel-Fattah M, Brennand C, Fader M, et al. · · 2018 · cited 85 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundRepeated symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) affect 25% of people who use clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC) to empty their bladder.
Closing excerpt
FundingUK National Institute for Health Research.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (383 words)

BackgroundRepeated symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) affect 25% of people who use clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC) to empty their bladder. We aimed to determine the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of recurrent UTIs in adult users of CISC.MethodsIn this randomised, open-label, superiority trial, we enrolled participants from 51 UK National Health Service organisations. These participants were community-dwelling (as opposed to hospital inpatient) users of CISC with recurrent UTIs. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) to receive either antibiotic prophylaxis once daily (prophylaxis group) or no prophylaxis (control group) for 12 months by use of an internet-based system with permuted blocks of variable length. Trial and laboratory staff who assessed outcomes were masked to allocation but participants were aware of their treatment group. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic, antibiotic-treated UTIs over 12 months. Participants who completed at least 6 months of follow-up were assumed to provide a reliable estimate of UTI incidence and were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. Change in antimicrobial resistance of urinary and faecal bacteria was monitored as a secondary outcome. The AnTIC trial is registered at ISRCTN, number 67145101; and EudraCT, number 2013-002556-32.FindingsBetween Nov 25, 2013, and Jan 29, 2016, we screened 1743 adult users of CISC for eligibility, of whom 404 (23%) participants were enrolled between Nov 26, 2013, and Jan 31, 2016. Of these 404 participants, 203 (50%) were allocated to receive prophylaxis and 201 (50%) to receive no prophylaxis. 1339 participants were excluded before randomisation. The primary analysis included 181 (89%) adults allocated to the prophylaxis group and 180 (90%) adults in the no prophylaxis (control) group. 22 participants in the prophylaxis group and 21 participants in the control group were not included in the primary analysis because they were missing follow-up data before 6 months. The incidence of symptomatic antibiotic-treated UTIs over 12 months was 1·3 cases per person-year (95% CI 1·1-1·6) in the prophylaxis group and 2·6 (2·3-2·9) in the control group, giving an incidence rate ratio of 0·52 (0·44-0·61; pInterpretationContinuous antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in reducing UTI frequency in CISC users with recurrent UTIs, and it is well tolerated in these individuals. However, increased resistance of urinary bacteria is a concern that requires surveillance if prophylaxis is started.FundingUK National Institute for Health Research.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30037647 · DOI · PMC6105581

Molecular mechanisms of collateral sensitivity to the antibiotic nitrofurantoin [2]

Research article Roemhild R, Linkevicius M, Andersson DI · · 2020 · cited 73 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Antibiotic resistance increasingly limits the success of antibiotic treatments, and physicians require new ways to achieve efficient treatment despite resistance.
Closing excerpt
A mechanistic understanding of CS will help to develop drug switches that combat resistance.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Antibiotic resistance increasingly limits the success of antibiotic treatments, and physicians require new ways to achieve efficient treatment despite resistance. Resistance mechanisms against a specific antibiotic class frequently confer increased susceptibility to other antibiotic classes, a phenomenon designated collateral sensitivity (CS). An informed switch of antibiotic may thus enable the efficient treatment of resistant strains. CS occurs in many pathogens, but the mechanisms that generate hypersusceptibility are largely unknown. We identified several molecular mechanisms of CS against the antibiotic nitrofurantoin (NIT). Mutants that are resistant against tigecycline (tetracycline), mecillinam (β-lactam), and protamine (antimicrobial peptide) all show CS against NIT. Their hypersusceptibility is explained by the overexpression of nitroreductase enzymes combined with increased drug uptake rates, or increased drug toxicity. Increased toxicity occurs through interference of the native drug-response system for NIT, the SOS response, with growth. A mechanistic understanding of CS will help to develop drug switches that combat resistance.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31986134 · DOI · PMC7004380

A new framework for advancing in drug-induced liver injury research. The Prospective European DILI Registry [3]

Research article Björnsson ES, Stephens C, Atallah E, Robles-Diaz M, Alvarez-Alvarez I, Gerbes A, et al. · · 2023 · cited 55 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background & aimsNo multi-national prospective study of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has originated in Europe.
Closing excerpt
This European initiative provides an important opportunity to advance the study on DILI.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (253 words)

Background & aimsNo multi-national prospective study of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has originated in Europe. The design of a prospective European DILI registry, clinical features and short-term outcomes of the cases and controls is reported.MethodsPatients with suspected DILI were prospectively enrolled in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, Portugal and Iceland, 2016-2021. DILI cases or non-DILI acute liver injury controls following causality assessment were enrolled.ResultsOf 446 adjudicated patients, 246 DILI patients and 100 had acute liver injury due to other aetiologies, mostly autoimmune hepatitis (n = 42) and viral hepatitis (n = 34). DILI patients (mean age 56 years), 57% women, 60% with jaundice and 3.6% had pre-existing liver disease. DILI cases and non-DILI acute liver injury controls had similar demographics, clinical features and outcomes. A single agent was implicated in 199 (81%) DILI cases. Amoxicillin-clavulanate, flucloxacillin, atorvastatin, nivolumab/ipilimumab, infliximab and nitrofurantoin were the most commonly implicated drugs. Multiple conventional medications were implicated in 37 (15%) and 18 cases were caused by herbal and dietary supplements. The most common single causative drug classes were antibacterials (40%) and antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents (27%). Overall, 13 (5.3%) had drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis due to nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, infliximab, methylprednisolone and minocycline. Only six (2.4%) DILI patients died (50% had liver-related death), and another six received liver transplantation.ConclusionsIn this first multi-national European prospective DILI Registry study, antibacterials were the most commonly implicated medications, whereas antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents accounted for higher proportion of DILI than previously described. This European initiative provides an important opportunity to advance the study on DILI.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35899490 · DOI · PMC7614006

Early Symptom Response in Patients With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Treated With Gepotidacin or Nitrofurantoin: Pooled Analysis From Two Pivotal Phase 3 Studies [4]

Randomized controlled trial Sheets AJ, Dennison J, Pogue JM, Kaye KS, Perry C, Millns H, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundUncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) can cause distressing symptoms seriously impacting daily activities.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsGepotidacin and nitrofurantoin provide meaningful and similar early relief from uUTI symptoms.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (238 words)

BackgroundUncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) can cause distressing symptoms seriously impacting daily activities. Early symptom relief during treatment, though fundamental to patients, is often overlooked in clinical trials. Gepotidacin, a new antibacterial agent, was noninferior to the first-line treatment nitrofurantoin in two randomized controlled trials (EAGLE-2 [NCT04020341] and EAGLE-3 [NCT04187144]). The current analysis utilized pooled data from these two trials to evaluate symptom responses during and after treatment in participants with uUTI.MethodsParticipants were aged ≥12 years with at least two uUTI symptoms, urinary nitrite and/or pyuria, and no complicating factors. Participants were randomized 1:1 to oral gepotidacin (1500 mg) or nitrofurantoin (100 mg), both taken twice daily for 5 days. At baseline (Day 1), on-therapy (OT; Days 2-4), and test-of-cure (TOC; Days 10-13) visits, urinary symptoms were assessed (0-3; none-severe) from which a total score (0-12) was derived.ResultsOverall, 3136 participants were randomized (1572 gepotidacin, 1564 nitrofurantoin). Mean (median) baseline symptom scores for gepotidacin and nitrofurantoin arms were 7.1 (7.0) and 7.2 (7.0), respectively; at OT, this decreased to 3.6 (3.0) for both arms. At the OT visit, >80% of participants had clinical improvement/resolution. Among those with baseline symptoms affecting everyday activities (moderate or severe), 53.2% (728/1369) assigned gepotidacin and 53.6% (738/1377) assigned nitrofurantoin reported at OT that symptoms no longer affected everyday activities (mild or absent); at TOC, these percentages were 93.8% (1232/1313) and 93.3% (1254/1344), respectively.ConclusionsGepotidacin and nitrofurantoin provide meaningful and similar early relief from uUTI symptoms.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41495938 · DOI · PMC13131927

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Nitrofurantoin revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials [5]
    Huttner A, Verhaegh EM, Harbarth S, Muller AE, Theuretzbacher U, Mouton JW · J Antimicrob Chemother · 2015 · cited 178 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis [6]
    Czaja AJ · Dig Dis Sci · 2011 · cited 169 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Review of the pharmacokinetic properties of nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline [7]
    Wijma RA, Huttner A, Koch BCP, Mouton JW, Muller AE · J Antimicrob Chemother · 2018 · cited 102 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Other antimicrobials of interest in the era of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline [8]
    Garau J · Clin Microbiol Infect · 2008 · cited 92 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An update on the role of nitrofurans in the management of urinary tract infections [9]
    Guay DR · Drugs · 2001 · cited 92 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Nitrofurantoin [10]
    D'Arcy PF · Drug Intell Clin Pharm · 1985 · cited 56 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Fisher H, Oluboyede Y, Chadwick T, Abdel-Fattah M, Brennand C, Fader M, et al.. Continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for adults with repeated urinary tract infections (AnTIC): a randomised, open-label trial. . 2018. PMID 30037647 · DOI · PMC6105581
  2. Roemhild R, Linkevicius M, Andersson DI. Molecular mechanisms of collateral sensitivity to the antibiotic nitrofurantoin. . 2020. PMID 31986134 · DOI · PMC7004380
  3. Björnsson ES, Stephens C, Atallah E, Robles-Diaz M, Alvarez-Alvarez I, Gerbes A, et al.. A new framework for advancing in drug-induced liver injury research. The Prospective European DILI Registry. . 2023. PMID 35899490 · DOI · PMC7614006
  4. Sheets AJ, Dennison J, Pogue JM, Kaye KS, Perry C, Millns H, et al.. Early Symptom Response in Patients With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Treated With Gepotidacin or Nitrofurantoin: Pooled Analysis From Two Pivotal Phase 3 Studies. . 2026. PMID 41495938 · DOI · PMC13131927
  5. Huttner A, Verhaegh EM, Harbarth S, Muller AE, Theuretzbacher U, Mouton JW. Nitrofurantoin revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015. PMID 26066581 · DOI
  6. Czaja AJ. Drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2011. PMID 21327704 · DOI
  7. Wijma RA, Huttner A, Koch BCP, Mouton JW, Muller AE. Review of the pharmacokinetic properties of nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018. PMID 30184207 · DOI
  8. Garau J. Other antimicrobials of interest in the era of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008. PMID 18154548 · DOI
  9. Guay DR. An update on the role of nitrofurans in the management of urinary tract infections. Drugs. 2001. PMID 11293646 · DOI
  10. D'Arcy PF. Nitrofurantoin. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1985. PMID 3896715 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • MonensinDrugs and Chemicals
  • FuransDrugs and Chemicals
  • NigericinDrugs and Chemicals
  • RanitidineDrugs and Chemicals
  • MethicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CefoperazoneDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

2,950
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
204
review articles
106
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • MonensinDrugs and Chemicals
  • FuransDrugs and Chemicals
  • NigericinDrugs and Chemicals
  • RanitidineDrugs and Chemicals
  • MethicillinDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support