Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Osteoblastoma
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Osteoblastoma

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A benign, painful, tumor of bone characterized by the formation of osteoid tissue, primitive bone and calcified tissue.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (843 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A benign, painful, tumor of bone characterized by the formation of osteoid tissue, primitive bone and calcified tissue. It occurs frequently in the spine of young persons. (From Dorland, 27th ed; Stedman, 25th ed)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Osteoblastomas; Giant Osteoid Osteoma; Giant Osteoid Osteomas; Osteoid Osteoma, Giant; Osteoid Osteomas, Giant; Osteomas, Giant Osteoid; Osteoma, Giant Osteoid.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Neoplasms, Bone Tissue

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 698 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Osteoblastoma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 106 of them (15.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 250 records.

Reviews account for 120 records (17.2%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 0 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 151 records; 2000-2009: 191 records; 2010-2019: 250 records; 2020 onward: 106 records151through 19991912000-20092502010-20191062020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999151
2000-2009191
2010-2019250
2020 onward106
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 17.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews17.2% (120)Meta-analyses0.1% (1)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (0)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 698 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews12017.2%
Meta-analyses10.1%
Randomized controlled trials00.0%

Method: PubMed query "Osteoblastoma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Recurrent rearrangements of FOS and FOSB define osteoblastoma
Fittall MW, Mifsud W, Pillay N, Ye H, Strobl AC, Verfaillie A, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
110cc by
PMID 29858576 · DOI · PMC5984627
Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma
Lam SW, Cleven AHG, Kroon HM, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Szuhai K, Bovée JVMG
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
42cc by
PMID 31768625 · DOI · PMC7085481
Salinomycin activates AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent autophagy in cultured osteoblastoma cells: a negative regulator against cell apoptosis
Zhu LQ, Zhen YF, Zhang Y, Guo ZX, Dai J, Wang XD
2013Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
41cc by
PMID 24358342 · DOI · PMC3866127
Truncated FOS impairs osteogenic differentiation and induces prostaglandin and NFκB signalling in an in vitro cell-of-origin model for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma
Lam SW, Belova T, Franceschini N, van den Akker B, van IJzendoorn DG, Mikkers HM, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 41424327 · DOI · PMC12908201

Recurrent rearrangements of FOS and FOSB define osteoblastoma [1]

Research article Fittall MW, Mifsud W, Pillay N, Ye H, Strobl AC, Verfaillie A, et al. · · 2018 · cited 110 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The transcription factor FOS has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of bone tumours, following the discovery that the viral homologue, v-fos, caused osteosarcoma in laboratory mice.
Closing excerpt
Overall, our findings reveal a human bone tumour defined by mutations of FOS and FOSB.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (124 words)

The transcription factor FOS has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of bone tumours, following the discovery that the viral homologue, v-fos, caused osteosarcoma in laboratory mice. However, mutations of FOS have not been found in human bone-forming tumours. Here, we report recurrent rearrangement of FOS and its paralogue, FOSB, in the most common benign tumours of bone, osteoblastoma and osteoid osteoma. Combining whole-genome DNA and RNA sequences, we find rearrangement of FOS in five tumours and of FOSB in one tumour. Extending our findings into a cohort of 55 cases, using FISH and immunohistochemistry, provide evidence of ubiquitous mutation of FOS or FOSB in osteoblastoma and osteoid osteoma. Overall, our findings reveal a human bone tumour defined by mutations of FOS and FOSB.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29858576 · DOI · PMC5984627

Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma [2]

Research article Lam SW, Cleven AHG, Kroon HM, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Szuhai K, Bovée JVMG · · 2020 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are bone-forming tumors shown to harbor FOS (87%) and FOSB (3%) rearrangements.
Closing excerpt
Moreover, low level of focal expression found in other lesions and tissues might cause diagnostic problems, in which case FISH could be employed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (251 words)

Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are bone-forming tumors shown to harbor FOS (87%) and FOSB (3%) rearrangements. The aim was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of FOS and FOSB in these tumors in comparison to other bone tumors, to evaluate the influence of decalcification, and to correlate immunohistochemical findings with the underlying genetic alteration using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Immunohistochemistry using whole sections was performed on osteoid osteoma (n=23), osteoblastoma (n=22), osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma (n=3), reactive (n=3), and proliferative (n=11) bone lesions. Immunoreactivity in giant cell tumor of bone (n=74), aneurysmal bone cyst (n=6), chondromyxoid fibroma (n=20), osteosarcoma (n=85), chondroblastoma (n=17), and clear cell chondrosarcoma (n=20) was assessed using tissue micro arrays. Strong nuclear expression of FOS in > 50% of the tumor cells was observed in all osteoid osteomas (22/22), in 57% of osteoblastomas (12/21) and in 3/197 control cases. FOS immunoreactivity disappeared after > 3 days decalcification. FOS rearrangements were present in 94% of osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas, with a concordance of 86% between FISH and immunohistochemistry. Two osteoblastomas (5%) were positive for FOSB, as opposed to 8/177 control cases. Additional FISH revealed no FOSB rearrangements in these cases. To conclude, in short decalcified biopsies, FOS immunohistochemistry can be used to diagnose osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, as overexpression is seen in the majority, being rare in their mimics. FOS immunohistochemistry should not be used after long decalcification. Moreover, low level of focal expression found in other lesions and tissues might cause diagnostic problems, in which case FISH could be employed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31768625 · DOI · PMC7085481

Salinomycin activates AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent autophagy in cultured osteoblastoma cells: a negative regulator against cell apoptosis [3]

Research article Zhu LQ, Zhen YF, Zhang Y, Guo ZX, Dai J, Wang XD · · 2013 · cited 41 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe malignant osteoblastoma has poor prognosis, thus the search for novel and more efficient chemo-agents against this disease is urgent.
Closing excerpt
AMPK-autophagy inhibition might be a novel strategy to sensitize salinomycin's effect in cancer cells.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)

BackgroundThe malignant osteoblastoma has poor prognosis, thus the search for novel and more efficient chemo-agents against this disease is urgent. Salinomycin induces broad anti-cancer effects both in vivo and in vitro, however, its role in osteoblastoma is still not clear.Key findingsSalinomycin induced both apoptosis and autophagy in cultured U2OS and MG-63 osteoblastoma cells. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-methyladenine (3-MA), or by RNA interference (RNAi) of light chain 3B (LC3B), enhanced salinomycin-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis. Salinomycin induced a profound AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, which was required for autophagy induction. AMPK inhibition by compound C, or by AMPKα RNAi prevented salinomycin-induced autophagy activation, while facilitating cancer cell death and apoptosis. On the other hand, the AMPK agonist AICAR promoted autophagy activation in U2OS cells. Salinomycin-induced AMPK activation was dependent on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in osteoblastoma cells. Antioxidant n-acetyl cysteine (NAC) significantly inhibited salinomycin-induced AMPK activation and autophagy induction.ConclusionsSalinomycin activates AMPK-dependent autophagy in osteoblastoma cells, which serves as a negative regulator against cell apoptosis. AMPK-autophagy inhibition might be a novel strategy to sensitize salinomycin's effect in cancer cells.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24358342 · DOI · PMC3866127

Truncated FOS impairs osteogenic differentiation and induces prostaglandin and NFκB signalling in an in vitro cell-of-origin model for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma [4]

Research article Lam SW, Belova T, Franceschini N, van den Akker B, van IJzendoorn DG, Mikkers HM, et al. · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are non-malignant bone-forming tumours of the skeleton, characterised by the presence of irregular trabeculae of woven bone.
Closing excerpt
The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (290 words)

Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are non-malignant bone-forming tumours of the skeleton, characterised by the presence of irregular trabeculae of woven bone. Rearrangements in FOS, and less frequently FOSB, have recently been identified in osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Identical rearrangements in FOS were previously detected in epithelioid haemangioma, where these led to truncation of the FOS protein in the C-terminal domain, causing increased protein stability due to impaired degradation. Since FOS plays a role in osteogenic differentiation, the effect of FOS truncation on osteogenic differentiation and proliferation was investigated in an in vitro model for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. In this model, truncated FOS (FOSΔ) was overexpressed in human foetal mesenchymal stem cells through a lentiviral vector. Osteogenic differentiation - assessed by measuring mineralisation, ALPL expression, and ALP activity - and proliferation rate were reduced in cells overexpressing FOSΔ compared to mesenchymal stem cells with an empty lentiviral vector (pLV). Transcriptome-sequencing and differential gene expression analysis revealed decreased gene expression of genes in pathways involving cell cycling and mitosis and osteogenic differentiation, including WNT signalling, extracellular matrix organisation, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), in FOSΔ as compared to empty vector cells, indicating decreased proliferation and osteogenesis. Instead, FOSΔ cells showed upregulation of genes involved in prostaglandin signalling and NF-kB inflammatory pathways. These findings highlight that FOSΔ compromises cellular growth and osteogenesis, which is in line with the morphological features of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma with woven bone formation instead of mature lamellar bone, as well as the indolent clinical behaviour. Additionally, FOSΔ promotes inflammatory signalling instead, which correlates with clinically exquisite response to non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. © 2025 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41424327 · DOI · PMC12908201

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations [5]
    Greenspan A · Skeletal Radiol · 1993 · cited 206 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma [6]
    Atesok KI, Alman BA, Schemitsch EH, Peyser A, Mankin H · J Am Acad Orthop Surg · 2011 · cited 154 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinicopathologic features and treatment of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma in children and adolescents [7]
    Frassica FJ, Waltrip RL, Sponseller PD, Ma LD, McCarthy EF · Orthop Clin North Am · 1996 · cited 101 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Bisphosphonates for treatment and prevention of bone metastases [8]
    Michaelson MD, Smith MR · J Clin Oncol · 2005 · cited 97 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas of the spine [9]
    Zileli M, Cagli S, Basdemir G, Ersahin Y · Neurosurg Focus · 2003 · cited 74 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Aggressive "benign" primary spine neoplasms: osteoblastoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, and giant cell tumor [10]
    Harrop JS, Schmidt MH, Boriani S, Shaffrey CI · Spine (Phila Pa 1976) · 2009 · cited 72 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Fittall MW, Mifsud W, Pillay N, Ye H, Strobl AC, Verfaillie A, et al.. Recurrent rearrangements of FOS and FOSB define osteoblastoma. . 2018. PMID 29858576 · DOI · PMC5984627
  2. Lam SW, Cleven AHG, Kroon HM, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Szuhai K, Bovée JVMG. Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. . 2020. PMID 31768625 · DOI · PMC7085481
  3. Zhu LQ, Zhen YF, Zhang Y, Guo ZX, Dai J, Wang XD. Salinomycin activates AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent autophagy in cultured osteoblastoma cells: a negative regulator against cell apoptosis. . 2013. PMID 24358342 · DOI · PMC3866127
  4. Lam SW, Belova T, Franceschini N, van den Akker B, van IJzendoorn DG, Mikkers HM, et al.. Truncated FOS impairs osteogenic differentiation and induces prostaglandin and NFκB signalling in an in vitro cell-of-origin model for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. . 2026. PMID 41424327 · DOI · PMC12908201
  5. Greenspan A. Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations. Skeletal Radiol. 1993. PMID 8272884 · DOI
  6. Atesok KI, Alman BA, Schemitsch EH, Peyser A, Mankin H. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011. PMID 22052644 · DOI
  7. Frassica FJ, Waltrip RL, Sponseller PD, Ma LD, McCarthy EF. Clinicopathologic features and treatment of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma in children and adolescents. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996. PMID 8649737 · DOI
  8. Michaelson MD, Smith MR. Bisphosphonates for treatment and prevention of bone metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID 16278476 · DOI
  9. Zileli M, Cagli S, Basdemir G, Ersahin Y. Osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas of the spine. Neurosurg Focus. 2003. PMID 15323462 · DOI
  10. Harrop JS, Schmidt MH, Boriani S, Shaffrey CI. Aggressive "benign" primary spine neoplasms: osteoblastoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, and giant cell tumor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID 19829276 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • OsteomaCancer and Oncology
  • Giant Cell Tumor of BoneCancer and Oncology
  • Giant Cell TumorsCancer and Oncology
  • DermatofibrosarcomaCancer and Oncology
  • AngiomyolipomaCancer and Oncology
  • CarcinosarcomaCancer and Oncology

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

698
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
120
review articles
0
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • OsteomaCancer and Oncology
  • Giant Cell Tumor of BoneCancer and Oncology
  • Giant Cell TumorsCancer and Oncology
  • DermatofibrosarcomaCancer and Oncology
  • AngiomyolipomaCancer and Oncology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support