Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Osteoma
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Osteoma

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A benign tumor composed of bone tissue or a hard tumor of bonelike structure developing on a bone (homoplastic osteoma) or on other structures (heteroplastic osteoma).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,001 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A benign tumor composed of bone tissue or a hard tumor of bonelike structure developing on a bone (homoplastic osteoma) or on other structures (heteroplastic osteoma). (From Dorland, 27th ed)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Osteomas.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Neoplasms, Bone Tissue
Narrower topics
Osteoma, Osteoid

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,310 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Osteoma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 405 of them (6.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,088 records.

Reviews account for 504 records (8.0%) and meta-analyses for 6. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,088 records; 2000-2009: 877 records; 2010-2019: 940 records; 2020 onward: 405 records4,088through 19998772000-20099402010-20194052020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,088
2000-2009877
2010-2019940
2020 onward405
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews8.0% (504)Meta-analyses0.1% (6)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (2)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,310 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5048.0%
Meta-analyses60.1%
Randomized controlled trials20.0%

Method: PubMed query "Osteoma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma
Lam SW, Cleven AHG, Kroon HM, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Szuhai K, Bovée JVMG
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
42cc by
PMID 31768625 · DOI · PMC7085481
Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?
Parmeggiani A, Martella C, Ceccarelli L, Miceli M, Spinnato P, Facchini G
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
36cc by
PMID 33839926 · DOI · PMC8578134
What's new in bone forming tumours of the skeleton?
Franceschini N, Lam SW, Cleton-Jansen AM, Bovée JVMG
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
32cc by
PMID 31741049 · DOI · PMC6969005
Robot-assisted Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Osteoid Osteomas
Li K, Li J, Li Z, Yang Z, Li X, Yang Q, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 38556479 · DOI · PMC11062880

Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma [1]

Research article Lam SW, Cleven AHG, Kroon HM, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Szuhai K, Bovée JVMG · · 2020 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are bone-forming tumors shown to harbor FOS (87%) and FOSB (3%) rearrangements.
Closing excerpt
Moreover, low level of focal expression found in other lesions and tissues might cause diagnostic problems, in which case FISH could be employed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (251 words)

Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are bone-forming tumors shown to harbor FOS (87%) and FOSB (3%) rearrangements. The aim was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of FOS and FOSB in these tumors in comparison to other bone tumors, to evaluate the influence of decalcification, and to correlate immunohistochemical findings with the underlying genetic alteration using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Immunohistochemistry using whole sections was performed on osteoid osteoma (n=23), osteoblastoma (n=22), osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma (n=3), reactive (n=3), and proliferative (n=11) bone lesions. Immunoreactivity in giant cell tumor of bone (n=74), aneurysmal bone cyst (n=6), chondromyxoid fibroma (n=20), osteosarcoma (n=85), chondroblastoma (n=17), and clear cell chondrosarcoma (n=20) was assessed using tissue micro arrays. Strong nuclear expression of FOS in > 50% of the tumor cells was observed in all osteoid osteomas (22/22), in 57% of osteoblastomas (12/21) and in 3/197 control cases. FOS immunoreactivity disappeared after > 3 days decalcification. FOS rearrangements were present in 94% of osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas, with a concordance of 86% between FISH and immunohistochemistry. Two osteoblastomas (5%) were positive for FOSB, as opposed to 8/177 control cases. Additional FISH revealed no FOSB rearrangements in these cases. To conclude, in short decalcified biopsies, FOS immunohistochemistry can be used to diagnose osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, as overexpression is seen in the majority, being rare in their mimics. FOS immunohistochemistry should not be used after long decalcification. Moreover, low level of focal expression found in other lesions and tissues might cause diagnostic problems, in which case FISH could be employed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31768625 · DOI · PMC7085481

Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option? [2]

Review article Parmeggiani A, Martella C, Ceccarelli L, Miceli M, Spinnato P, Facchini G · · 2021 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Osteoid osteoma is the third most common benign bone tumor, with well-known clinical presentation and radiological features.
Closing excerpt
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery is the most innovative non-invasive procedure, with the unquestionable advantage to be radiation free.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (207 words)

Osteoid osteoma is the third most common benign bone tumor, with well-known clinical presentation and radiological features. Although surgical excision has been the only therapeutic option for a long time, to date it has been replaced by minimally invasive techniques, which proved satisfactory success rates and low complication occurrence. Therefore, the purpose of this literature review was to describe the main updates of these recent procedures in the field of interventional radiology, with particular attention paid to the results of the leading studies relating to the efficacy, complications, and recurrence rate. Nevertheless, this study aimed to analyze the peculiarities of each reported technique, with specific focus on the possible improvements and pitfalls. Results proved that all mininvasive procedures boast a high success rate with slight number of complications and a low recurrence rate. Radiofrequency ablation is still considered the gold standard procedure for percutaneous treatment of osteoid osteoma, and it has the possibility to combine treatment with a biopsy. Interstitial laser ablation's advantages are the simplicity of use and a lower cost of the electrodes, while cryoablation allows real-time visualization of the ablated zone, increasing the treatment safety. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery is the most innovative non-invasive procedure, with the unquestionable advantage to be radiation free.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33839926 · DOI · PMC8578134

What's new in bone forming tumours of the skeleton? [3]

Review article Franceschini N, Lam SW, Cleton-Jansen AM, Bovée JVMG · · 2020 · cited 32 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Bone tumours are difficult to diagnose and treat, as they are rare and over 60 different subtypes are recognised.
Closing excerpt
Nevertheless, these studies have also pointed towards potential targetable drivers of which the therapeutic merit remains to be further explored.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)

Bone tumours are difficult to diagnose and treat, as they are rare and over 60 different subtypes are recognised. The emergence of next-generation sequencing has partly elucidated the molecular mechanisms behind these tumours, including the group of bone forming tumours (osteoma, osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma and osteosarcoma). Increased knowledge on the molecular mechanism could help to identify novel diagnostic markers and/or treatment options. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma are bone forming tumours without malignant potential that have overlapping morphology. They were recently shown to carry FOS and-to a lesser extent-FOSB rearrangements suggesting that these tumours are closely related. The presence of these rearrangements could help discriminate these entities from other lesions with woven bone deposition. Osteosarcoma is a malignant bone forming tumour for which different histological subtypes are recognised. High-grade osteosarcoma is the prototype of a complex karyotype tumour, and extensive research exploring its molecular background has identified phenomena like chromothripsis and kataegis and some recurrent alterations. Due to lack of specificity, this has not led to a valuable novel diagnostic marker so far. Nevertheless, these studies have also pointed towards potential targetable drivers of which the therapeutic merit remains to be further explored.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31741049 · DOI · PMC6969005

Robot-assisted Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Osteoid Osteomas [4]

Research article Li K, Li J, Li Z, Yang Z, Li X, Yang Q, et al. · · 2024 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivePercutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) is a widely accepted procedure for treatment of osteoid osteomas.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionAs a reliable technique for localizing and resection of nidus, TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA is a safe and effective option for the treatment of osteoid osteomas.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (351 words)

ObjectivePercutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-RFA) is a widely accepted procedure for treatment of osteoid osteomas. However, the application of CT-RFA was restricted as a result of some drawbacks, such as radiation exposure, and inconvenience in general anesthesia. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-operative TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA of osteoid osteomas.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 21 medical files of patients who were treated with percutaneous RFA of osteoid osteomas guided by the TiRobot system in our institution between March 2021 and April 2022. The three-dimensional images obtained by a 3D C-arm intra-operatively were sent to the TiRobot system. The puncture point and trajectory were designed. Then the guide pin was positioned to the lesion with the assistance of TiRobot and the biopsy sheath was inserted into the lesion through the guide pin. The tumor was biopsied for pathological examination. Then the RFA needle was inserted into the nidus through the biopsy sheath for thermal ablation. Data were extracted on the associated complications, the reduction in pain at 1 month and 1 year postoperatively assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). A paired t-test was used to compare the pre-operative and post-operative VAS scores.ResultsThe patients included 17 males and four females with a mean age of 19.5 ± 10.4 years (range 3-45 years). Lesions were located on the femur in nine cases, on the tibia in nine cases, on the humerus in one case, on the calcaneus in one case, and on the acetabulum in one case. TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA was successfully performed on all 21 patients. There was no intra-operative or post-operative complications observed. Pathological diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was obtained in 11 patients, but the other 10 cases were not pathologically diagnosed. The mean follow-up time was 18.8 months (range: 12-26 months).Post-operative VAS scores were reduced significantly in all cases. The mean VAS score decreased from 6.5 pre-operatively to 0.5 at 1 month post-operatively and to 0.1 at 1 year post-operatively.ConclusionAs a reliable technique for localizing and resection of nidus, TiRobot-assisted percutaneous RFA is a safe and effective option for the treatment of osteoid osteomas.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38556479 · DOI · PMC11062880

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities--part II [5]
    Dupuy DE, Goldberg SN · J Vasc Interv Radiol · 2001 · cited 291 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Osteoid osteoma [6]
    Kransdorf MJ, Stull MA, Gilkey FW, Moser RP · Radiographics · 1991 · cited 210 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations [7]
    Greenspan A · Skeletal Radiol · 1993 · cited 206 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma [8]
    Atesok KI, Alman BA, Schemitsch EH, Peyser A, Mankin H · J Am Acad Orthop Surg · 2011 · cited 154 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Current trends in treatment of osteoid osteoma with an emphasis on radiofrequency ablation [9]
    Cantwell CP, Obyrne J, Eustace S · Eur Radiol · 2004 · cited 142 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Choroidal osteoma [10]
    Shields CL, Shields JA, Augsburger JJ · Surv Ophthalmol · 1988 · cited 127 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Lam SW, Cleven AHG, Kroon HM, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Szuhai K, Bovée JVMG. Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. . 2020. PMID 31768625 · DOI · PMC7085481
  2. Parmeggiani A, Martella C, Ceccarelli L, Miceli M, Spinnato P, Facchini G. Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?. . 2021. PMID 33839926 · DOI · PMC8578134
  3. Franceschini N, Lam SW, Cleton-Jansen AM, Bovée JVMG. What's new in bone forming tumours of the skeleton?. . 2020. PMID 31741049 · DOI · PMC6969005
  4. Li K, Li J, Li Z, Yang Z, Li X, Yang Q, et al.. Robot-assisted Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Osteoid Osteomas. . 2024. PMID 38556479 · DOI · PMC11062880
  5. Dupuy DE, Goldberg SN. Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities--part II. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001. PMID 11585879 · DOI
  6. Kransdorf MJ, Stull MA, Gilkey FW, Moser RP. Osteoid osteoma. Radiographics. 1991. PMID 1887121 · DOI
  7. Greenspan A. Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations. Skeletal Radiol. 1993. PMID 8272884 · DOI
  8. Atesok KI, Alman BA, Schemitsch EH, Peyser A, Mankin H. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011. PMID 22052644 · DOI
  9. Cantwell CP, Obyrne J, Eustace S. Current trends in treatment of osteoid osteoma with an emphasis on radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol. 2004. PMID 14663625 · DOI
  10. Shields CL, Shields JA, Augsburger JJ. Choroidal osteoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988. PMID 3051466 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • OsteoblastomaCancer and Oncology
  • AngiomyolipomaCancer and Oncology
  • CarcinosarcomaCancer and Oncology
  • ChondroblastomaCancer and Oncology
  • ChondromaCancer and Oncology
  • ChondrosarcomaCancer and Oncology

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

6,310
PubMed records on this heading
6%
published since 2020
504
review articles
2
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • OsteoblastomaCancer and Oncology
  • AngiomyolipomaCancer and Oncology
  • CarcinosarcomaCancer and Oncology
  • ChondroblastomaCancer and Oncology
  • ChondromaCancer and Oncology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support