Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (944 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The outer margins of the thorax containing SKIN, deep fascia; thoracic vertebrae; RIBS; sternum; and muscles.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Wall, Thoracic; Chest Wall; Wall, Chest.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Thorax
- See also
- Pectoralis Muscles; Respiratory Muscles
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,646 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Thoracic Wall” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,308 of them (23.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,343 records.
Reviews account for 556 records (9.8%) and meta-analyses for 25. Randomized controlled trials number 81 (1.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 736 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,259 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,343 |
| 2020 onward | 1,308 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 556 | 9.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 25 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 81 | 1.4% |
Method: PubMed query "Thoracic Wall"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model-Agnostic Method for Thoracic Wall Segmentation in Fetal Ultrasound Videos | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 28 | cc by PMID 33348873 · DOI · PMC7766150 |
| Anterior chest wall in SAPHO syndrome: magnetic resonance imaging findings | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 25 | cc by PMID 32928273 · DOI · PMC7491189 |
| Forcecardiography: A Novel Technique to Measure Heart Mechanical Vibrations onto the Chest Wall | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 25 | cc by PMID 32668584 · DOI · PMC7411775 |
| Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction Following Cancer | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 41440235 · DOI · PMC12731307 |
Model-Agnostic Method for Thoracic Wall Segmentation in Fetal Ultrasound Videos [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The application of segmentation methods to medical imaging has the potential to create novel diagnostic support models.
- Closing excerpt
- MFCY is expected to facilitate the development of diagnostic support models in fetal ultrasound by providing further accurate segmentation of the thoracic wall.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (212 words)
The application of segmentation methods to medical imaging has the potential to create novel diagnostic support models. With respect to fetal ultrasound, the thoracic wall is a key structure on the assessment of the chest region for examiners to recognize the relative orientation and size of structures inside the thorax, which are critical components in neonatal prognosis. In this study, to improve the segmentation performance of the thoracic wall in fetal ultrasound videos, we proposed a novel model-agnostic method using deep learning techniques: the Multi-Frame + Cylinder method (MFCY). The Multi-frame method (MF) uses time-series information of ultrasound videos, and the Cylinder method (CY) utilizes the shape of the thoracic wall. To evaluate the achieved improvement, we performed segmentation using five-fold cross-validation on 538 ultrasound frames in the four-chamber view (4CV) of 256 normal cases using U-net and DeepLabv3+. MFCY increased the mean values of the intersection over union (IoU) of thoracic wall segmentation from 0.448 to 0.493 for U-net and from 0.417 to 0.470 for DeepLabv3+. These results demonstrated that MFCY improved the segmentation performance of the thoracic wall in fetal ultrasound videos without altering the network structure. MFCY is expected to facilitate the development of diagnostic support models in fetal ultrasound by providing further accurate segmentation of the thoracic wall.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33348873 · DOI · PMC7766150
Anterior chest wall in SAPHO syndrome: magnetic resonance imaging findings [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe anterior chest wall (ACW) involvement is characteristic of synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome, yet little research has focused on its magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.
- Closing excerpt
- The inflammatory changes in the first rib area were highlighted in SAPHO syndrome.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (281 words)
BackgroundThe anterior chest wall (ACW) involvement is characteristic of synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome, yet little research has focused on its magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.PurposeTo characterize the MRI features of the ACW in patients with SAPHO syndrome.MethodsSeventy-one patients with SAPHO syndrome and ACW involvement evidenced by bone scintigraphy were recruited in this cross-sectional study. The ACW region was scanned using sagittal, axial, and oblique coronal Dixon T2-weighted sequences and axial Dixon T1-weighted sequences. The characteristics of both active inflammatory and chronic structural lesions were evaluated.ResultsThe ACW lesions exhibited an asymmetrical distribution and a predilection for the sternocostoclavicular region (93.0%). Notably, 91.5% of the patients had lesions in the area of the anterior first ribs. Bone marrow edema (BME) was observed in 63 (88.7%) patients, which mainly affected the sternocostal joints (87.3%) and the manubrium sterni (84.5%). All of the BMEs were distributed under the articular surface or the bone cortex, consistent with the distribution of the ligaments and joint capsules. Synovitis was detected in 64 (90.1%) patients, with a predilection for the sternoclavicular joints (76.1%). A soft tissue mass or infiltration was found in all the patients who had bone marrow edema. Thirteen (18.3%) patients showed venous stenosis. Structural changes included bone bridge formation (80.3%), hyperostosis (43.7%), and fat infiltration (39.4%). Four common patterns of involvement were observed: the first rib area, the sternoclavicular area, the sternal angle area, and the areas of the second to sixth sternocostal joints.ConclusionThe ACW lesions of SAPHO syndrome demonstrated a triad of enthesitis, synovitis, and osteitis, suggesting complex interactions among the ligaments, synovium, and bones in the region. The inflammatory changes in the first rib area were highlighted in SAPHO syndrome.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32928273 · DOI · PMC7491189
Forcecardiography: A Novel Technique to Measure Heart Mechanical Vibrations onto the Chest Wall [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- This paper presents forcecardiography (FCG), a novel technique to measure local, cardiac-induced vibrations onto the chest wall.
- Closing excerpt
- Further analyses are foreseen to confirm the advantages of FCG as a technique to improve the scope and significance of pervasive cardiac monitoring.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)
This paper presents forcecardiography (FCG), a novel technique to measure local, cardiac-induced vibrations onto the chest wall. Since the 19th century, several techniques have been proposed to detect the mechanical vibrations caused by cardiovascular activity, the great part of which was abandoned due to the cumbersome instrumentation involved. The recent availability of unobtrusive sensors rejuvenated the research field with the most currently established technique being seismocardiography (SCG). SCG is performed by placing accelerometers onto the subject's chest and provides information on major events of the cardiac cycle. The proposed FCG measures the cardiac-induced vibrations via force sensors placed onto the subject's chest and provides signals with a richer informational content as compared to SCG. The two techniques were compared by analysing simultaneous recordings acquired by means of a force sensor, an accelerometer and an electrocardiograph (ECG). The force sensor and the accelerometer were rigidly fixed to each other and fastened onto the xiphoid process with a belt. The high-frequency (HF) components of FCG and SCG were highly comparable (r > 0.95) although lagged. The lag was estimated by cross-correlation and resulted in about tens of milliseconds. An additional, large, low-frequency (LF) component, associated with ventricular volume variations, was observed in FCG, while not being visible in SCG. The encouraging results of this feasibility study suggest that FCG is not only able to acquire similar information as SCG, but it also provides additional information on ventricular contraction. Further analyses are foreseen to confirm the advantages of FCG as a technique to improve the scope and significance of pervasive cardiac monitoring.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32668584 · DOI · PMC7411775
Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction Following Cancer [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The chest wall represents a complex musculoskeletal structure that provides protection to intrathoracic organs, mechanical support for respiration, and mobility for the upper limbs.
- Closing excerpt
- This review summarizes current evidence on the classification, diagnostic evaluation, surgical strategies, and reconstructive options for chest wall tumors, emphasizing recent innovations that have contributed to improved long-term survival and quality of life in affected patients.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)
The chest wall represents a complex musculoskeletal structure that provides protection to intrathoracic organs, mechanical support for respiration, and mobility for the upper limbs. Neoplastic diseases of the chest wall encompass a heterogeneous group of benign and malignant lesions, which may be classified as primary-originating from bone, cartilage, muscle, or soft tissue-or secondary, resulting from direct invasion or metastatic spread, most commonly from breast or lung carcinomas. Approximately half of all chest wall tumors are malignant, and their management remains a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Surgical resection continues to represent the mainstay of curative treatment, with complete en bloc excision and adequate oncologic margins being critical to minimize local recurrence. Advances in reconstructive techniques, including the use of prosthetic materials, biological meshes, and myocutaneous flaps, have markedly improved postoperative stability, respiratory function, and aesthetic outcomes. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach involving thoracic and plastic surgeons, oncologists, and radiotherapists to ensure individualized and comprehensive care. This review summarizes current evidence on the classification, diagnostic evaluation, surgical strategies, and reconstructive options for chest wall tumors, emphasizing recent innovations that have contributed to improved long-term survival and quality of life in affected patients.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41440235 · DOI · PMC12731307
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks [5]
- Research article Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities [6]
- Research article Bench-to-bedside review: chest wall elastance in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients [7]
- Research article Blunt trauma related chest wall and pulmonary injuries: An overview [8]
- Research article Operative treatment of chest wall injuries: indications, technique, and outcomes [9]
- Research article Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state-of-the-art review [10]
References
- Shozu K, Komatsu M, Sakai A, Komatsu R, Dozen A, Machino H, et al.. Model-Agnostic Method for Thoracic Wall Segmentation in Fetal Ultrasound Videos. . 2020. PMID 33348873 · DOI · PMC7766150
- Yu M, Cao Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Ye Y, Wang L, et al.. Anterior chest wall in SAPHO syndrome: magnetic resonance imaging findings. . 2020. PMID 32928273 · DOI · PMC7491189
- Andreozzi E, Fratini A, Esposito D, Naik G, Polley C, Gargiulo GD, et al.. Forcecardiography: A Novel Technique to Measure Heart Mechanical Vibrations onto the Chest Wall. . 2020. PMID 32668584 · DOI · PMC7411775
- Petrella F, Cara A, Cassina EM, Libretti L, Pirondini E, Raveglia F, et al.. Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction Following Cancer. . 2025. PMID 41440235 · DOI · PMC12731307
- El-Boghdadly K, Wolmarans M, Stengel AD, Albrecht E, Chin KJ, Elsharkawy H, et al.. Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021. PMID 34145070 · DOI
- Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE. Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. PMID 19632563 · DOI
- Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Valenza F. Bench-to-bedside review: chest wall elastance in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care. 2004. PMID 15469597 · DOI · PMC1065004
- Dogrul BN, Kiliccalan I, Asci ES, Peker SC. Blunt trauma related chest wall and pulmonary injuries: An overview. Chin J Traumatol. 2020. PMID 32417043 · DOI · PMC7296362
- Lafferty PM, Anavian J, Will RE, Cole PA. Operative treatment of chest wall injuries: indications, technique, and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011. PMID 21209274 · DOI
- Chin KJ, Versyck B, Pawa A. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID 33426660 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.