Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Body Height
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Body Height

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The distance from the sole to the crown of the head with body standing on a flat surface and fully extended.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (790 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The distance from the sole to the crown of the head with body standing on a flat surface and fully extended.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Body Heights; Height, Body; Heights, Body.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Body Size; Physical Appearance, Body
Narrower topics
Crown-Rump Length

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 40,579 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Body Height” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 3,554 of them (8.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 18,884 records.

Reviews account for 2,134 records (5.3%) and meta-analyses for 268. Randomized controlled trials number 1,294 (3.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 18,884 records; 2000-2009: 8,730 records; 2010-2019: 9,411 records; 2020 onward: 3,554 records18,884through 19998,7302000-20099,4112010-20193,5542020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199918,884
2000-20098,730
2010-20199,411
2020 onward3,554
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.2 percentReviews5.3% (2,134)Meta-analyses0.7% (268)Randomized controlled trials3.2% (1,294)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 40,579 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,1345.3%
Meta-analyses2680.7%
Randomized controlled trials1,2943.2%

Method: PubMed query "Body Height"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Six-minute walk distance in healthy subjects: reference standards from a general population sample
Cazzoletti L, Zanolin ME, Dorelli G, Ferrari P, Dalle Carbonare LG, Crisafulli E, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
56cc by
PMID 35382813 · DOI · PMC8985335
Whole-genome sequencing in 333,100 individuals reveals rare non-coding single variant and aggregate associations with height
Hawkes G, Beaumont RN, Li Z, Mandla R, Li X, Albert CM, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
47cc by
PMID 39362880 · DOI · PMC11450065
Reliability of Self-Reported Height and Weight in Children: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study and a Review
Rios-Leyvraz M, Ortega N, Chiolero A
2022Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
26cc by
PMID 36615731 · DOI · PMC9824624
Height, weight, and body mass index trajectories and their correlation with functional outcome assessments in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Schiava M, Dang UJ, Wood C, Wong SC, Ward LM, Lofra RM, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 40887311 · DOI · PMC12875185

Six-minute walk distance in healthy subjects: reference standards from a general population sample [1]

Research article Cazzoletti L, Zanolin ME, Dorelli G, Ferrari P, Dalle Carbonare LG, Crisafulli E, et al. · · 2022 · cited 56 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionThe 6-min walking distance (6MWD) test is a useful tool to obtain a measure of functional exercise capacity.
Closing excerpt
These findings will help to improve the evaluation of Italian and European patients with diseases influencing their functional capacity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (262 words)

IntroductionThe 6-min walking distance (6MWD) test is a useful tool to obtain a measure of functional exercise capacity. However, reference equations have been mainly based on selected populations or small samples. The purpose of this study was to determine the reference equations to predict the 6MWD in a large Italian population sample of healthy adults of a wide age range.MethodsIn the frame of the multi case-control population-based study Gene Environment Interaction in Respiratory Diseases (GEIRD), we studied 530 healthy subjects: 287 females ranging 21-76 and 243 males ranging 21-78 years of age. We measured 6MWD, demographic and anthropometric data and collected the reported physical activity. A multiple linear regression model for the 6MWD included age, age2, height, weight and physical activity for both sex equations. The two-way interaction age-height and age-weight and the quadratic terms of weight and height were also tested for inclusion separately in each model.ResultsThe mean ± SD for 6MWD was 581.4 ± 66.5 m (range 383-800 m) for females and 608.7 ± 80.1 m (range 410-875 m) for males. The reference equations were 6MWD = 8.10*age + 1.61*heightcm-0.99*weightkg + 22.58*active-0.10*age2 + 222.55 for females (R squared = 0.238) and 6MWD = 26.80*age + 8.46*heightcm-0.45*weightkg-2.54*active-0.06*age2-0.13*age*heightcm-890.18 for males (R squared = 0.159), where "active" is 1 when the subject is physically active, 0 otherwise.ConclusionThis study is the first to describe the 6MWD in a large population sample of young, middle aged and elderly healthy Caucasian subjects, and to determine reference equations. These findings will help to improve the evaluation of Italian and European patients with diseases influencing their functional capacity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35382813 · DOI · PMC8985335

Whole-genome sequencing in 333,100 individuals reveals rare non-coding single variant and aggregate associations with height [2]

Research article Hawkes G, Beaumont RN, Li Z, Mandla R, Li X, Albert CM, et al. · · 2024 · cited 47 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The role of rare non-coding variation in complex human phenotypes is still largely unknown.
Closing excerpt
We have developed an approach for identifying non-coding rare variants in regulatory regions with large effects from whole-genome sequencing data associated with complex traits.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)

The role of rare non-coding variation in complex human phenotypes is still largely unknown. To elucidate the impact of rare variants in regulatory elements, we performed a whole-genome sequencing association analysis for height using 333,100 individuals from three datasets: UK Biobank (N = 200,003), TOPMed (N = 87,652) and All of Us (N = 45,445). We performed rare ( < 0.1% minor-allele-frequency) single-variant and aggregate testing of non-coding variants in regulatory regions based on proximal-regulatory, intergenic-regulatory and deep-intronic annotation. We observed 29 independent variants associated with height at P < 6×10-10 after conditioning on previously reported variants, with effect sizes ranging from -7cm to +4.7 cm. We also identified and replicated non-coding aggregate-based associations proximal to HMGA1 containing variants associated with a 5 cm taller height and of highly-conserved variants in MIR497HG on chromosome 17. We have developed an approach for identifying non-coding rare variants in regulatory regions with large effects from whole-genome sequencing data associated with complex traits.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39362880 · DOI · PMC11450065

Reliability of Self-Reported Height and Weight in Children: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study and a Review [3]

Meta-analysis Rios-Leyvraz M, Ortega N, Chiolero A · · 2022 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Since anthropometric measurements are not always feasible in large surveys, self-reported values are an alternative.
Closing excerpt
Self-reported weight and height in children can be a reliable alternative to measurements, but should be used with caution to estimate over- or underweight prevalence.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (213 words)

Since anthropometric measurements are not always feasible in large surveys, self-reported values are an alternative. Our objective was to assess the reliability of self-reported weight and height values compared to measured values in children with (1) a cross-sectional study in Switzerland and (2) a comprehensive review with a meta-analysis. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a school-based study in Switzerland of 2616 children and a review of 63 published studies including 122,629 children. In the cross-sectional study, self-reported and measured values were highly correlated (weight: r = 0.96; height: r = 0.92; body mass index (BMI) r = 0.88), although self-reported values tended to underestimate measured values (weight: -1.4 kg; height: -0.9 cm; BMI: -0.4 kg/m2). Prevalence of underweight was overestimated and prevalence of overweight was underestimated using self-reported values. In the meta-analysis, high correlations were found between self-reported and measured values (weight: r = 0.94; height: r = 0.87; BMI: r = 0.88). Weight (-1.4 kg) and BMI (-0.7 kg/m2) were underestimated, and height was slightly overestimated (+0.1 cm) with self-reported values. Self-reported values tended to be more reliable in children above 11 years old. Self-reported weight and height in children can be a reliable alternative to measurements, but should be used with caution to estimate over- or underweight prevalence.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36615731 · DOI · PMC9824624

Height, weight, and body mass index trajectories and their correlation with functional outcome assessments in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy [4]

Randomized controlled trial Schiava M, Dang UJ, Wood C, Wong SC, Ward LM, Lofra RM, et al. · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AimTo examine the factors influencing height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) z-scores, and the relationship between them and motor performance, in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).
Closing excerpt
This emphasizes the need for weight management strategies and discussions that support treatment.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (156 words)

AimTo examine the factors influencing height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) z-scores, and the relationship between them and motor performance, in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).MethodThis was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial involving 32 study sites across five countries. Height, weight, BMI z-scores, and clinical outcome assessments (COAs)-rise from supine velocity, 10-m walk/run velocity, NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment, and 6-minute walk test-were analysed in 4-year-old to 7-year-old boys with DMD randomized to 0.75 mg/kg/day prednisone, 0.75 mg/kg/day intermittent prednisone, or 0.90 mg/kg/day deflazacort in the FOR-DMD study. Trajectories were modelled using a linear mixed-effects model and correlations were explored through Spearman's partial correlations.ResultsIn 194 boys with DMD, higher height at glucocorticoid initiation was associated with slower growth (p InterpretationChanges in anthropometric measures after glucocorticoid initiation are associated with COA performance and larger correlations closer to the age of loss of ambulation. This emphasizes the need for weight management strategies and discussions that support treatment.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40887311 · DOI · PMC12875185

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry [5]
    Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper KE, Zheng Z, Wood AR, Weedon MN, et al. · Hum Mol Genet · 2018 · cited 2,012 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S · Obes Rev · 2012 · cited 1,439 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0·5 could be a suitable global boundary value [7]
    Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M · Nutr Res Rev · 2010 · cited 922 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Adult height, nutrition, and population health [8]
    Perkins JM, Subramanian SV, Davey Smith G, Özaltin E · Nutr Rev · 2016 · cited 262 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester [9]
    Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M, Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy, Barnhart KT, et al. · N Engl J Med · 2013 · cited 216 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effect of stimulants on height and weight: a review of the literature [10]
    Faraone SV, Biederman J, Morley CP, Spencer TJ · J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry · 2008 · cited 178 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Cazzoletti L, Zanolin ME, Dorelli G, Ferrari P, Dalle Carbonare LG, Crisafulli E, et al.. Six-minute walk distance in healthy subjects: reference standards from a general population sample. . 2022. PMID 35382813 · DOI · PMC8985335
  2. Hawkes G, Beaumont RN, Li Z, Mandla R, Li X, Albert CM, et al.. Whole-genome sequencing in 333,100 individuals reveals rare non-coding single variant and aggregate associations with height. . 2024. PMID 39362880 · DOI · PMC11450065
  3. Rios-Leyvraz M, Ortega N, Chiolero A. Reliability of Self-Reported Height and Weight in Children: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study and a Review. . 2022. PMID 36615731 · DOI · PMC9824624
  4. Schiava M, Dang UJ, Wood C, Wong SC, Ward LM, Lofra RM, et al.. Height, weight, and body mass index trajectories and their correlation with functional outcome assessments in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. . 2026. PMID 40887311 · DOI · PMC12875185
  5. Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper KE, Zheng Z, Wood AR, Weedon MN, et al.. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet. 2018. PMID 30124842 · DOI · PMC6488973
  6. Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2012. PMID 22106927 · DOI
  7. Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M. A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0·5 could be a suitable global boundary value. Nutr Res Rev. 2010. PMID 20819243 · DOI
  8. Perkins JM, Subramanian SV, Davey Smith G, Özaltin E. Adult height, nutrition, and population health. Nutr Rev. 2016. PMID 26928678 · DOI · PMC4892290
  9. Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M, Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy, Barnhart KT, et al.. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID 24106937 · DOI
  10. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Morley CP, Spencer TJ. Effect of stimulants on height and weight: a review of the literature. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008. PMID 18580502 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Ideal Body WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Body WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fetal WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Birth WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Crown-Rump LengthAnatomy and Physiology
  • Body Mass IndexAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

40,579
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
2,134
review articles
1,294
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Ideal Body WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Body WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fetal WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Birth WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • Crown-Rump LengthAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support