Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,488 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
In utero measurement corresponding to the sitting height (crown to rump) of the fetus. Length is considered a more accurate criterion of the age of the fetus than is the weight. The average crown-rump length of the fetus at term is 36 cm. (From Williams Obstetrics, 18th ed, p91)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Crown Rump Length; Crown-Rump Lengths; Length, Crown-Rump; Lengths, Crown-Rump.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Body Height; Body Weights and Measures; Anthropometry
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 964 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Crown-Rump Length” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 129 of them (13.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 430 records.
Reviews account for 49 records (5.1%) and meta-analyses for 8. Randomized controlled trials number 9 (0.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 108 |
| 2000-2009 | 297 |
| 2010-2019 | 430 |
| 2020 onward | 129 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 49 | 5.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 8 | 0.8% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 9 | 0.9% |
Method: PubMed query "Crown-Rump Length"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Association of Weight for Length vs Body Mass Index During the First 2 Years of Life With Cardiometabolic Risk in Early Adolescence [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceThe American Academy of Pediatrics currently recommends weight for length (WFL) for assessment of weight status in children younger than 2 years but body mass index (BMI) for children older than 2 years.
- Closing excerpt
- The findings appear to have important implications for investigators seeking to use BMI as a growth metric for epidemiologic research and for practitioners monitoring the weight status of children younger than 2 years.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (528 words)
ImportanceThe American Academy of Pediatrics currently recommends weight for length (WFL) for assessment of weight status in children younger than 2 years but body mass index (BMI) for children older than 2 years. However, the clinical implications of using WFL vs BMI in children younger than 2 years as an indicator of future health outcomes remains understudied.ObjectiveTo compare associations of overweight based on WFL vs BMI in children younger than 2 years with cardiometabolic outcomes during early adolescence.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective study of birth cohorts in the United States (Project Viva) and Belarus (Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial [PROBIT]) performed from June 1, 1996, to November 31, 2002, included 13 666 children younger than 2 years.Main exposuresOverweight defined as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WFL in the 95th percentile or greater, World Health Organization (WHO) WFL in the 97.7th percentile or greater, or WHO BMI in the 97.7th percentile or greater at 6, 12, 18, or 24 months of age.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were fat mass index, insulin resistance, metabolic risk score, and obesity during early adolescence. Secondary outcomes were height and BMI z scores, sum of skinfolds, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure during early adolescence.ResultsThe study included 919 children (mean [SD] age, 12.9 [0.9] years; 460 [50.1%] male; and 598 [65.1%] white) from Project Viva and 12 747 children (mean [SD] age, 11.5 [0.5] years; 6204 [48.7%] male; and 12 747 [100%] white) from PROBIT. During 6 to 24 months of age, in Project Viva, 206 children (22.4%) were overweight at any of the 4 times points according to the CDC WFL, 160 (17.4%) according to WHO WFL, and 161 (17.5%) according to WHO BMI cut points. In PROBIT, 3715 children (29.1%) were overweight at any of the 4 time points according to the CDC WFL, 3069 (24.1%) according to WHO WFL, and 3125 (24.5%) according to WHO BMI cut points. After maternal and child characteristics were adjusted for, being ever overweight (vs never overweight) during 6 to 24 months of age was associated with higher likelihood of adverse cardiometabolic risk markers during early adolescence, but associations did not differ substantially across WFL and BMI cut points in either cohort. For example, for fat mass index in Project Viva, β = 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.4) for the CDC WFL, β = 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6-1.6) for WHO WFL, and β = 1.4 (95% CI, 0.9-1.9) for WHO BMI. For PROBIT, β = 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6) for the CDC WFL, β = 0.6 (95% CI, 0.5-0.7) for WHO WFL, and β = 0.6 (95% CI, 0.5-0.6) for WHO BMI. Neither growth metric in infancy was superior over the others based on F statistics (Project Viva: 17.1-17.8; PROBIT: 87.1-88.7). Findings were similar for insulin resistance, metabolic risk score, obesity, and secondary outcomes.Conclusions and relevanceChoice of WFL vs BMI to define overweight during the first 2 years of life may not greatly affect the association with cardiometabolic outcomes during early adolescence. The findings appear to have important implications for investigators seeking to use BMI as a growth metric for epidemiologic research and for practitioners monitoring the weight status of children younger than 2 years.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30646168 · DOI · PMC6324504
Estimation of gestational age in early pregnancy from crown-rump length when gestational age range is truncated: the case study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundFetal ultrasound scanning is considered vital for routine antenatal care with first trimester scans recommended for accurate estimation of gestational age (GA).
- Closing excerpt
- These approaches may be a solution to other truncation problems involving similar data though their application to other settings would need to be evaluated.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (335 words)
BackgroundFetal ultrasound scanning is considered vital for routine antenatal care with first trimester scans recommended for accurate estimation of gestational age (GA). A reliable estimate of gestational age is key information underpinning clinical care and allows estimation of expected date of delivery. Fetal crown-rump length (CRL) is recommended over last menstrual period for estimating GA when measured in early pregnancy i.e. 9+0-13+6 weeks.MethodsThe INTERGROWTH-21st Project is the largest prospective study to collect data on CRL in geographically diverse populations and with a high level of quality control measures in place. We aim to develop a new gestational age estimation equation based on the crown-rump length (CRL) from women recruited between 9+0-13+6 weeks. The main statistical challenge is modelling data when the outcome variable (GA) is truncated at both ends, i.e. at 9 and 14 weeks.We explored three alternative statistical approaches to overcome the truncation of GA. To evaluate these strategies we generated a data set with no truncation of GA that was similar to the INTERGROWTH-21st Project CRL data, which we used to explore the performance of different methods of analysis of these data when we imposed truncation at 9 and 14 weeks of gestation. These 3 methods were first tested in a simulation based study using a previously published dating equation by Verburg et al. and evaluated how well each of them performed in relation to the model from which the data were generated. After evaluating the 3 approaches using simulated data based on the Verburg equations, the best approach will be applied to the INTERGROWTH-21st Project data to estimate GA from CRL.ResultsResults of these rather "ad hoc" statistical methods correspond very closely to the "real data" for Verburg, a data set that is similar to the INTERGROWTH-21st project CRL data set.ConclusionsWe are confident that we can use these approaches to get reliable estimates based on INTERGROWTH-21st Project CRL data. These approaches may be a solution to other truncation problems involving similar data though their application to other settings would need to be evaluated.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24314232 · DOI · PMC4029763
Embryonic size and growth and adverse birth outcomes: the Rotterdam Periconception Cohort [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Study questionIs early embryonic size and growth in the first trimester of pregnancy associated with adverse birth outcomes?
- Closing excerpt
- Trial registration numberNL4115.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (364 words)
Study questionIs early embryonic size and growth in the first trimester of pregnancy associated with adverse birth outcomes?Summary answerLarger embryonic crown-rump length (CRL) and embryonic volume (EV) are associated with lower odds of adverse birth outcomes, especially small for gestational age (SGA).What is already knownPreterm birth, SGA, and congenital anomalies are the most prevalent adverse birth outcomes with lifelong health consequences as well as high medical and societal costs. In the late first and second trimesters of pregnancy, fetuses at risk for adverse birth outcomes can be identified using 2-dimensional ultrasonography (US).Study design, size, durationBetween 2009 and 2018, singleton pregnancies were enrolled in this ongoing prospective Rotterdam Periconception Cohort.Participants/materials, setting, methodsThis study included 918 pregnant women from a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. Pregnancy dating was based on either a regular menstrual cycle (for natural pregnancies) or a conception date (for ART pregnancies). CRL and EV were measured using Virtual Reality software on 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound scans, repeatedly performed around 7, 9, and 11 weeks of gestation. The main outcome measure was adverse birth outcome, defined as the composite of SGA (birth weight 16th week of pregnancy), or early neonatal mortality (≤7 days of life). Reference curves for CRL and EV were constructed. Cross-sectional (CRL/EV Main results and the role of chanceOf the 918 pregnant women included, the median age was 32.3 years, and 404 (44%) pregnancies had been conceived via ART. In 199 (22%) pregnancies, there was an adverse birth outcome. Regression analyses showed that at 7 weeks of gestation onwards, embryos with a CRL Limitations, reasons for cautionThe tertiary hospital population and the availability of sophisticated 3D-ultrasound techniques limit the generalizability of this study to general populations and settings.Wider implications of the findingsAlready very early in the first trimester of pregnancy, embryos with increased risks of an adverse birth outcome can be identified by using 3D-US and Virtual Reality. This expands the window of opportunity to enable the development of future interventions to potentially improve pregnancy outcomes and offspring health during their life-course.Study funding/competing interest(s)This work was funded by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.Trial registration numberNL4115.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39288433 · DOI · PMC11532603
Associations of ambient temperature exposure with embryonic and early fetal development [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundExposure to heat and cold are associated with adverse birth outcomes, but whether ambient temperature affects embryonic and early fetal development remains unclear.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings indicate that early gestational development may be sensitive to ambient temperature and, as environmental conditions shift, may have potential clinical implications for birth outcomes and long-term health.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (261 words)
BackgroundExposure to heat and cold are associated with adverse birth outcomes, but whether ambient temperature affects embryonic and early fetal development remains unclear. We aimed to examine the association between ambient temperature exposure during early pregnancy and crown-rump length (CRL).MethodsData from the Generation R Next Study (2017-2021) were analysed, with findings replicated in the Generation R Study (2002-2006), both population-based cohorts based in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Weekly mean temperatures were modeled from the last menstrual period onward at a spatial resolution of 100 × 100 m by using the UrbClim™ model. The CRL was measured via 2D ultrasound at approximately 8, 10, and 12 weeks' gestation in pregnancies with regular menstrual cycles. Distributed lag nonlinear models were applied.ResultsIn Generation R Next (N = 1378; mean maternal age 31.9 years), higher temperatures during the first 9 weeks were associated with a smaller CRL at 12 weeks {e.g. -7.2 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) -12.0, -2.3] at 19.2 vs 9.0°C during weeks 1-6}. Colder exposures during the first 11 weeks were also associated with a smaller CRL [-7.6 mm (95% CI -11.9, -3.3) at 3.6 vs 9.0°C during weeks 1-11]. No associations were observed for CRL at 8 or 10 weeks. Similar associations with cold, but not heat, were observed in the replication cohort (N = 1520).ConclusionModerate cold and heat exposure during early pregnancy may affect fetal development as early as the first trimester. These findings indicate that early gestational development may be sensitive to ambient temperature and, as environmental conditions shift, may have potential clinical implications for birth outcomes and long-term health.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42177794 · DOI · PMC13198863
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester [5]
- Research article Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts [6]
- Research article Guideline No. 388-Determination of Gestational Age by Ultrasound [7]
- Research article Crown-rump length discordance and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
- Research article Role of 3-D ultrasound in clinical obstetric practice: evolution over 20 years [9]
- Research article Embryonic growth discordance and early fetal loss: the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort and systematic review [10]
References
- Aris IM, Rifas-Shiman SL, Li LJ, Yang S, Belfort MB, Thompson J, et al.. Association of Weight for Length vs Body Mass Index During the First 2 Years of Life With Cardiometabolic Risk in Early Adolescence. . 2018. PMID 30646168 · DOI · PMC6324504
- Ohuma EO, Papageorghiou AT, Villar J, Altman DG. Estimation of gestational age in early pregnancy from crown-rump length when gestational age range is truncated: the case study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. . 2013. PMID 24314232 · DOI · PMC4029763
- Roelants JA, Vermeulen MJ, Willemsen SP, Been JV, Koning AH, Eggink AJ, et al.. Embryonic size and growth and adverse birth outcomes: the Rotterdam Periconception Cohort. . 2024. PMID 39288433 · DOI · PMC11532603
- Essers E, de Groot JM, Graafland N, Gonçalves R, Iñiguez C, Petricola S, et al.. Associations of ambient temperature exposure with embryonic and early fetal development. . 2026. PMID 42177794 · DOI · PMC13198863
- Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M, Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy, Barnhart KT, et al.. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID 24106937 · DOI
- Napolitano R, Dhami J, Ohuma EO, Ioannou C, Conde-Agudelo A, Kennedy SH, et al.. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts. BJOG. 2014. PMID 24387345 · DOI
- Butt K, Lim KI. Guideline No. 388-Determination of Gestational Age by Ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019. PMID 31548039 · DOI
- D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Pagani G, Papageorghiou AT, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Crown-rump length discordance and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID 24585501 · DOI
- Tonni G, Martins WP, Guimarães Filho H, Araujo Júnior E. Role of 3-D ultrasound in clinical obstetric practice: evolution over 20 years. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015. PMID 25748522 · DOI
- D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Mantovani E, Thilaganathan B, Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative. Embryonic growth discordance and early fetal loss: the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort and systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID 23847112 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.