Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (816 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A disease caused by potent protein neurotoxins produced by clostridium botulinum which interfere with the presynaptic release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. Clinical features include abdominal pain, vomiting, acute paralysis (including respiratory paralysis), blurred vision, and diplopia. Botulism may be classified into several subtypes (e.g., food-borne, infant, wound, and others). (From Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, p1208)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Clostridium botulinum Infection; Clostridium botulinum Infections; Infection, Clostridium botulinum; Botulism, Toxico-Infectious; Botulism, Toxico Infectious; Toxico-Infectious Botulism; Toxico Infectious Botulism; Botulism, Infantile.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Clostridium Infections; Neuromuscular Junction Diseases; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Foodborne Diseases
- See also
- Botulinum Toxins
Related concepts
- Neurotoxins
- Clostridium Botulinum
- Acetylcholine
- Neuromuscular Junction
- Paralysis
- Diplopia
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,439 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Botulism” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 337 of them (9.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,840 records.
Reviews account for 433 records (12.6%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 6 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,840 |
| 2000-2009 | 617 |
| 2010-2019 | 645 |
| 2020 onward | 337 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 433 | 12.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 2 | 0.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 6 | 0.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Botulism"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identification and characterization of a novel botulinum neurotoxin | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 195 | cc by PMID 28770820 · DOI · PMC5543303 |
| mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 148 | cc by PMID 28794134 · DOI · PMC5623855 |
| Pathogenicity and virulence of Clostridium botulinum | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 67 | cc by PMID 37157163 · DOI · PMC10171130 |
| Iatrogenic botulism: a risk for botulinum toxin's medical use? | 2026 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 41619021 · DOI · PMC13331936 |
Identification and characterization of a novel botulinum neurotoxin [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Botulinum neurotoxins are known to have seven serotypes (BoNT/A-G).
- Closing excerpt
- Its discovery posts a challenge to develop effective countermeasures, provides a novel tool for studying intracellular membrane trafficking, and presents a new potential therapeutic toxin for modulating secretions in cells.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)
Botulinum neurotoxins are known to have seven serotypes (BoNT/A-G). Here we report a new BoNT serotype, tentatively named BoNT/X, which has the lowest sequence identity with other BoNTs and is not recognized by antisera against known BoNTs. Similar to BoNT/B/D/F/G, BoNT/X cleaves vesicle-associated membrane proteins (VAMP) 1, 2 and 3, but at a novel site (Arg66-Ala67 in VAMP2). Remarkably, BoNT/X is the only toxin that also cleaves non-canonical substrates VAMP4, VAMP5 and Ykt6. To validate its activity, a small amount of full-length BoNT/X was assembled by linking two non-toxic fragments using a transpeptidase (sortase). Assembled BoNT/X cleaves VAMP2 and VAMP4 in cultured neurons and causes flaccid paralysis in mice. Thus, BoNT/X is a novel BoNT with a unique substrate profile. Its discovery posts a challenge to develop effective countermeasures, provides a novel tool for studying intracellular membrane trafficking, and presents a new potential therapeutic toxin for modulating secretions in cells.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28770820 · DOI · PMC5543303
mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The delivery of genetic information has emerged as a valid therapeutic approach.
- Closing excerpt
- In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the utility of formulated mRNA as a potent novel technology for passive immunization.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)
The delivery of genetic information has emerged as a valid therapeutic approach. Various reports have demonstrated that mRNA, besides its remarkable potential as vaccine, can also promote expression without inducing an adverse immune response against the encoded protein. In the current study, we set out to explore whether our technology based on chemically unmodified mRNA is suitable for passive immunization. To this end, various antibodies using different designs were expressed and characterized in vitro and in vivo in the fields of viral infections, toxin exposure, and cancer immunotherapies. Single injections of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) were sufficient to establish rapid, strong, and long-lasting serum antibody titers in vivo, thereby enabling both prophylactic and therapeutic protection against lethal rabies infection or botulinum intoxication. Moreover, therapeutic mRNA-mediated antibody expression allowed mice to survive an otherwise lethal tumor challenge. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the utility of formulated mRNA as a potent novel technology for passive immunization.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28794134 · DOI · PMC5623855
Pathogenicity and virulence of Clostridium botulinum [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Clostridium botulinum, a polyphyletic Gram-positive taxon of bacteria, is classified purely by their ability to produce botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT).
- Closing excerpt
- botulinum is a saprophytic bacterium, thought to have evolved its potent neurotoxin to establish a source of nutrients by killing its host.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (233 words)
Clostridium botulinum, a polyphyletic Gram-positive taxon of bacteria, is classified purely by their ability to produce botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT). BoNT is the primary virulence factor and the causative agent of botulism. A potentially fatal disease, botulism is classically characterized by a symmetrical descending flaccid paralysis, which is left untreated can lead to respiratory failure and death. Botulism cases are classified into three main forms dependent on the nature of intoxication; foodborne, wound and infant. The BoNT, regarded as the most potent biological substance known, is a zinc metalloprotease that specifically cleaves SNARE proteins at neuromuscular junctions, preventing exocytosis of neurotransmitters, leading to muscle paralysis. The BoNT is now used to treat numerous medical conditions caused by overactive or spastic muscles and is extensively used in the cosmetic industry due to its high specificity and the exceedingly small doses needed to exert long-lasting pharmacological effects. Additionally, the ability to form endospores is critical to the pathogenicity of the bacteria. Disease transmission is often facilitated via the metabolically dormant spores that are highly resistant to environment stresses, allowing persistence in the environment in unfavourable conditions. Infant and wound botulism infections are initiated upon germination of the spores into neurotoxin producing vegetative cells, whereas foodborne botulism is attributed to ingestion of preformed BoNT. C. botulinum is a saprophytic bacterium, thought to have evolved its potent neurotoxin to establish a source of nutrients by killing its host.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37157163 · DOI · PMC10171130
Iatrogenic botulism: a risk for botulinum toxin's medical use? [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Botulinum toxin (BT) is infamous for its extreme toxicity.
- Closing excerpt
- High BT doses should not be applied to low volumes of target tissues, in order not to exceed the BT binding capacity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (279 words)
Botulinum toxin (BT) is infamous for its extreme toxicity. If it enters the bloodstream, it can cause botulism presenting with a typical pattern of motor and autonomic dysfunction. An international expert panel organised by IAB-Interdisciplinary Working Group for Movement Disorders explored iatrogenic botulism after BT's medical use (IB), reached conclusions and formulated recommendations. When injected into its target tissue, BT binds to gangliosides on cholinergic nerve terminals before it is internalised permanently. Small amounts of BT, however, are circulating within the bloodstream. When BT type B is applied, IB-B occurs frequently, typically affecting the autonomic nervous system. When BT type A is applied, IB-A only occurs in special circumstances, even when high doses are used. We identified 236 patients with IB-A in the literature. All IB-A was mild or moderate and fully reversible. In 212 patients, it occurred with unapproved BT use. In 116 of them, unapproved BT preparations were used, in 81, unapproved indications were treated and in 15, underlying neuromuscular impairment including myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and spinal muscle atrophy were contraindications for BT use. In 24 patients, IB-A occurred in approved BT use. Their evaluation was frequently incomplete, so that causes for IB-A often remain unclear. They may include presence of differential diagnosis, subclinical neuromuscular impairment and interference with additional diseases. When IB is suspected, proper evaluation is necessary to verify it and to identify its causes. Off-label use is common in BT therapy. However, it should be performed with caution, especially in children and when high doses are applied. High BT doses should not be applied to low volumes of target tissues, in order not to exceed the BT binding capacity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41619021 · DOI · PMC13331936
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: medical and public health management [5]
- Research article Botulinum neurotoxins: genetic, structural and mechanistic insights [6]
- Research article Botulism [7]
- Research article Laboratory diagnostics of botulism [8]
- Research article Botulism in the United States: a clinical and epidemiologic review [9]
- Research article Botulinal neurotoxins: revival of an old killer [10]
References
- Zhang S, Masuyer G, Zhang J, Shen Y, Lundin D, Henriksson L, et al.. Identification and characterization of a novel botulinum neurotoxin. . 2017. PMID 28770820 · DOI · PMC5543303
- Thran M, Mukherjee J, Pönisch M, Fiedler K, Thess A, Mui BL, et al.. mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors. . 2017. PMID 28794134 · DOI · PMC5623855
- Rawson AM, Dempster AW, Humphreys CM, Minton NP. Pathogenicity and virulence of Clostridium botulinum. . 2023. PMID 37157163 · DOI · PMC10171130
- Dressler D, Frevert J, Johnson EA, Fink K, Pellett S, Pandey S, et al.. Iatrogenic botulism: a risk for botulinum toxin's medical use?. . 2026. PMID 41619021 · DOI · PMC13331936
- Arnon SS, Schechter R, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, et al.. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001. PMID 11209178 · DOI
- Rossetto O, Pirazzini M, Montecucco C. Botulinum neurotoxins: genetic, structural and mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014. PMID 24975322 · DOI
- Sobel J. Botulism. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID 16163636 · DOI
- Lindström M, Korkeala H. Laboratory diagnostics of botulism. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006. PMID 16614251 · DOI · PMC1471988
- Shapiro RL, Hatheway C, Swerdlow DL. Botulism in the United States: a clinical and epidemiologic review. Ann Intern Med. 1998. PMID 9696731 · DOI
- Montecucco C, Molgó J. Botulinal neurotoxins: revival of an old killer. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005. PMID 15907915 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.