Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (963 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Estimate of an individual's genetic liability to a trait or disease, calculated according to their genotype profile and relevant genome-wide association study data. (from Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses. Nat Protoc. 2020 Sep;15(9):2759.)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Genetic Risk Scores; Risk Score, Genetic; Risk Scores, Genetic; Score, Genetic Risk; Scores, Genetic Risk; Polygenic Risk Score; Polygenic Risk Scores; Risk Score, Polygenic.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Risk Factors
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,661 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Genetic Risk Score” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,661 of them (100.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 1,661 records.
Reviews account for 170 records (10.2%) and meta-analyses for 40. Randomized controlled trials number 21 (1.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 0 |
| 2010-2019 | 0 |
| 2020 onward | 1,661 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 170 | 10.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 40 | 2.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 21 | 1.3% |
Method: PubMed query "Genetic Risk Score"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics
Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection, optimization and validation of ten chronic disease polygenic risk scores for clinical implementation in diverse US populations | 2024 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 216 | cc by PMID 38374346 · DOI · PMC10878968 |
| Examining the role of common variants in rare neurodevelopmental conditions | 2024 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 68 | cc by PMID 39567701 · DOI · PMC11634775 |
| Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score in Screening for Prostate Cancer | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 66 | cc by PMID 40214032 · DOI · PMC7617604 |
| Global multi-ancestry genome-wide analyses identify genes and biological pathways associated with thyroid cancer and benign thyroid diseases | 2026 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 6 | cc by PMID 41644669 · DOI · PMC12900643 |
Selection, optimization and validation of ten chronic disease polygenic risk scores for clinical implementation in diverse US populations [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have improved in predictive performance, but several challenges remain to be addressed before PRSs can be implemented in the clinic, including reduced predictive performance of PRSs in diverse populations, and the interpretation and communication of genetic results to both providers and patients.
- Closing excerpt
- The initial experience from eMERGE can inform the approach needed to implement PRS-based testing in diverse clinical settings.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (234 words)
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have improved in predictive performance, but several challenges remain to be addressed before PRSs can be implemented in the clinic, including reduced predictive performance of PRSs in diverse populations, and the interpretation and communication of genetic results to both providers and patients. To address these challenges, the National Human Genome Research Institute-funded Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network has developed a framework and pipeline for return of a PRS-based genome-informed risk assessment to 25,000 diverse adults and children as part of a clinical study. From an initial list of 23 conditions, ten were selected for implementation based on PRS performance, medical actionability and potential clinical utility, including cardiometabolic diseases and cancer. Standardized metrics were considered in the selection process, with additional consideration given to strength of evidence in African and Hispanic populations. We then developed a pipeline for clinical PRS implementation (score transfer to a clinical laboratory, validation and verification of score performance), and used genetic ancestry to calibrate PRS mean and variance, utilizing genetically diverse data from 13,475 participants of the All of Us Research Program cohort to train and test model parameters. Finally, we created a framework for regulatory compliance and developed a PRS clinical report for return to providers and for inclusion in an additional genome-informed risk assessment. The initial experience from eMERGE can inform the approach needed to implement PRS-based testing in diverse clinical settings.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38374346 · DOI · PMC10878968
Examining the role of common variants in rare neurodevelopmental conditions [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Although rare neurodevelopmental conditions have a large Mendelian component1, common genetic variants also contribute to risk2,3.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings indicate that future studies should investigate the possible role and nature of indirect genetic effects on rare neurodevelopmental conditions, and consider the contribution of common and rare variants simultaneously when studying cognition-related phenotypes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (232 words)
Although rare neurodevelopmental conditions have a large Mendelian component1, common genetic variants also contribute to risk2,3. However, little is known about how this polygenic risk is distributed among patients with these conditions and their parents nor its interplay with rare variants. It is also unclear whether polygenic background affects risk directly through alleles transmitted from parents to children, or whether indirect genetic effects mediated through the family environment4 also play a role. Here we addressed these questions using genetic data from 11,573 patients with rare neurodevelopmental conditions, 9,128 of their parents and 26,869 controls. Common variants explained around 10% of variance in risk. Patients with a monogenic diagnosis had significantly less polygenic risk than those without, supporting a liability threshold model5. A polygenic score for neurodevelopmental conditions showed only a direct genetic effect. By contrast, polygenic scores for educational attainment and cognitive performance showed no direct genetic effect, but the non-transmitted alleles in the parents were correlated with the child's risk, potentially due to indirect genetic effects and/or parental assortment for these traits4. Indeed, as expected under parental assortment, we show that common variant predisposition for neurodevelopmental conditions is correlated with the rare variant component of risk. These findings indicate that future studies should investigate the possible role and nature of indirect genetic effects on rare neurodevelopmental conditions, and consider the contribution of common and rare variants simultaneously when studying cognition-related phenotypes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39567701 · DOI · PMC11634775
Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score in Screening for Prostate Cancer [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe incidence of prostate cancer is increasing.
- Closing excerpt
- ).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (344 words)
BackgroundThe incidence of prostate cancer is increasing. Screening with an assay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has a high rate for false positive results. Genomewide association studies have identified common germline variants in persons with prostate cancer, which can be used to calculate a polygenic risk score associated with risk of prostate cancer.MethodsWe recruited persons 55 to 69 years of age from primary care centers in the United Kingdom. Using germline DNA extracted from saliva, we derived polygenic risk scores from 130 variants known to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Participants with a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher were invited to undergo prostate cancer screening with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transperineal biopsy, irrespective of PSA level.ResultsAmong 40,292 persons invited to participate, 8953 (22.2%) expressed interest in participating and 6393 had their polygenic risk score calculated; 745 (11.7%) had a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher and were invited to undergo screening. Of these 745 participants, 468 (62.8%) underwent MRI and prostate biopsy; prostate cancer was detected in 187 participants (40.0%). The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 57 to 73). Of the 187 participants with cancer, 103 (55.1%) had prostate cancer classified as intermediate or higher risk according to the 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria, so treatment was indicated; cancer would not have been detected in 74 (71.8%) of these participants according to the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway currently used in the United Kingdom (high PSA level and positive MRI results). In addition, 40 of the participants with cancer (21.4%) had disease classified as unfavorable intermediate risk or as high or very high risk according to NCCN criteria.ConclusionsIn a prostate cancer screening program involving participants in the top decile of risk as determined by a polygenic risk score, the percentage found to have clinically significant disease was higher than the percentage that would have been identified with the use of PSA or MRI. (Funded by the European Research Council Seventh Framework Program and others; BARCODE1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03857477.).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40214032 · DOI · PMC7617604
Global multi-ancestry genome-wide analyses identify genes and biological pathways associated with thyroid cancer and benign thyroid diseases [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Thyroid diseases are common and highly heritable.
- Closing excerpt
- Polygenic risk scores identified individuals with aggressive ThC in a biobank, creating an opportunity for genetically informed population screening.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (153 words)
Thyroid diseases are common and highly heritable. We performed a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from 19 biobanks for five thyroid diseases: thyroid cancer (ThC), benign nodular goiter, Graves' disease, lymphocytic thyroiditis and primary hypothyroidism. We analyzed genetic association data from ~2.9 million genomes and identified 313 known and 570 new independent loci linked to thyroid diseases. We discovered genetic correlations between ThC, benign nodular goiter and autoimmune thyroid diseases (rg = 0.16-0.97). Telomere maintenance genes contributed to benign and malignant thyroid nodular disease risk, whereas cell cycle, DNA repair and damage response genes were associated with ThC. We propose a paradigm that explains genetic predisposition to benign and malignant thyroid nodules. We found polygenic risk score associations with ThC risk of structural disease recurrence, tumor size, multifocality, lymph node metastases and extranodal extension. Polygenic risk scores identified individuals with aggressive ThC in a biobank, creating an opportunity for genetically informed population screening.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41644669 · DOI · PMC12900643
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Polygenic Risk Score for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Steatohepatitis: A Narrative Review [5]
- Research article Genetic and environmental risk factors for asthma: towards prevention [6]
- Research article Polygenic Risk Scores: The Next Step for Improved Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease? [7]
- Research article From Monogenic Variants to Polygenic Risk Scores in Inherited Cardiomyopathies: Clinical Utility, Ancestry Gaps, and Future Implementation in Arab Populations [8]
- Research article Pathway-specific polygenic risk scores modify the association between amyloid and tau PET accumulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease [9]
- Research article Clinical Uses of Common Genetic Variants Associated with Common Diseases [10]
References
- Lennon NJ, Kottyan LC, Kachulis C, Abul-Husn NS, Arias J, Belbin G, et al.. Selection, optimization and validation of ten chronic disease polygenic risk scores for clinical implementation in diverse US populations. . 2024. PMID 38374346 · DOI · PMC10878968
- Huang QQ, Wigdor EM, Malawsky DS, Campbell P, Samocha KE, Chundru VK, et al.. Examining the role of common variants in rare neurodevelopmental conditions. . 2024. PMID 39567701 · DOI · PMC11634775
- McHugh JK, Bancroft EK, Saunders E, Brook MN, McGrowder E, Wakerell S, et al.. Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score in Screening for Prostate Cancer. . 2025. PMID 40214032 · DOI · PMC7617604
- White SL, Brasher MS, Pattee J, Zhou W, Chapman S, Jee YH, et al.. Global multi-ancestry genome-wide analyses identify genes and biological pathways associated with thyroid cancer and benign thyroid diseases. . 2026. PMID 41644669 · DOI · PMC12900643
- Kanda T, Sasaki-Tanaka R, Abe H, Kimura N, Yoshida T, Hayashi K, et al.. Polygenic Risk Score for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Steatohepatitis: A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID 40507973 · DOI · PMC12155528
- Koppelman GH, Pino-Yanes M, Melén E, Powell P, Bracke KR, Celedón JC, et al.. Genetic and environmental risk factors for asthma: towards prevention. Lancet Respir Med. 2025. PMID 41038211 · DOI
- Stein R, Ferrari F, García-Giustiniani D. Polygenic Risk Scores: The Next Step for Improved Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease?. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024. PMID 39352188 · DOI · PMC11495647
- Abou Al-Saud S. From Monogenic Variants to Polygenic Risk Scores in Inherited Cardiomyopathies: Clinical Utility, Ancestry Gaps, and Future Implementation in Arab Populations. Genes (Basel). 2026. PMID 42938428 · DOI
- Valentim C, Denecke J, Frerich S, Betthauser TJ, Li Y, Ahmadi R, et al.. Pathway-specific polygenic risk scores modify the association between amyloid and tau PET accumulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2026. PMID 42936906 · DOI
- Hunter DJ, Inouye M. Clinical Uses of Common Genetic Variants Associated with Common Diseases. N Engl J Med. 2026. PMID 42777243 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.