Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Nomograms
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Nomograms

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Graphical representation of a statistical model containing scales for calculating the prognostic weight of a value for each individual variable.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (857 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Graphical representation of a statistical model containing scales for calculating the prognostic weight of a value for each individual variable. Nomograms are instruments that can be used to predict outcomes using specific clinical parameters. They use algorithms that incorporate several variables to calculate the predicted probability that a patient will achieve a particular clinical endpoint.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Nomogram; Partin Tables; Partin Table; Table, Partin; Tables, Partin; Partin Nomograms; Nomogram, Partin; Nomograms, Partin.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Prognosis; Models, Statistical; Mathematical Concepts
See also
Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Grading

Related concepts

  • Algorithms

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 16,470 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Nomograms” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 13,024 of them (79.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 13,024 records.

Reviews account for 294 records (1.8%) and meta-analyses for 39. Randomized controlled trials number 489 (3.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 601 records; 2010-2019: 2,886 records; 2020 onward: 13,024 records0through 19996012000-20092,8862010-201913,0242020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-2009601
2010-20192,886
2020 onward13,024
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 1.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.0 percentReviews1.8% (294)Meta-analyses0.2% (39)Randomized controlled trials3.0% (489)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 16,470 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2941.8%
Meta-analyses390.2%
Randomized controlled trials4893.0%

Method: PubMed query "Nomograms"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Do conventional intracerebral hemorrhage functional scores apply to mild-to-moderate hemorrhage?
Chen A, Peng J, Guo L, Zhou R
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42656267 · DOI · PMC13506375
A Cross-Nationally Validated Nomogram for Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Overweight/Obese Older Adults: CHARLS and HRS Cohorts
Wei Y, He S, Chen H, Wang Y
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42410308 · DOI · PMC13538773
Clinico-genomic nomograms for estimation of survival risk in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer
Kohli M, Shankar A, Lloyd J, Wang L, Huo X, Fadlullah MZ, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42231792 · DOI · PMC13231001

Do conventional intracerebral hemorrhage functional scores apply to mild-to-moderate hemorrhage? [1]

Research article Chen A, Peng J, Guo L, Zhou R · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundConventional intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) functional scores are typically developed based on clinical factors for assessing mortality risk, and their applicability in evaluating functional outcomes in patients with the specific hemorrhagic subtype of mild to moderate ICH(MTM-ICH) remains unclear.
Closing excerpt
In contrast, conventional ICH functional scores demonstrate certain limitations when assessing this specific hemorrhage subtype.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (350 words)

BackgroundConventional intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) functional scores are typically developed based on clinical factors for assessing mortality risk, and their applicability in evaluating functional outcomes in patients with the specific hemorrhagic subtype of mild to moderate ICH(MTM-ICH) remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to construct a nomogram model to predict early functional dependence in this patient population and to validate three previous general ICH functional scores.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 575 patients with MTM-ICH (GCS score ≥ 9) treated at our hospital between January 2018 and July 2025. The baseline demographic information, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. Early functional dependence was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (MRS) score ≥ 3 at discharge or 30 days after ICH. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to screen for risk factors for early functional dependence and construct a predictive model. The model was visualized using a nomogram, and its predictive performance was compared with three existing ICH functional scores (FUNC, ICH-GS and ICH-FOS). Internal validation of the nomogram was performed using a 10-fold cross-validation combined with bootstrap resampling.ResultsAmong 575 patients with MTM-ICH, 198 (34.4%) developed early functional dependence. LASSO and stepwise logistic regression analyses identified six independent predictors: age, admission GCS score, hematoma volume, thalamic hemorrhage, basal ganglia hemorrhage, and mechanical ventilation. The nomogram based on these factors demonstrated good calibration and superior predictive performance compared to three existing ICH functional scores (AUC = 0.856 for our nomogram, 0.579 for FUNC, 0.601 for ICH-GS, and 0.714 for ICH-FOS, respectively). The decision curve analysis further demonstrated that the model had greater net benefit than the three previous general ICH functional scores. Internal validation confirmed the model's stability and generalizability (10-fold cross-validation mean: 0.846; bootstrap-corrected C-index: 0.844).ConclusionAmong patients with MTM-ICH, advanced age, lower admission GCS score, larger hematoma volume, thalamic or basal ganglia hemorrhage, and mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher risk of early functional dependence. The nomogram developed based on these factors demonstrated high predictive performance. In contrast, conventional ICH functional scores demonstrate certain limitations when assessing this specific hemorrhage subtype.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42656267 · DOI · PMC13506375

A Cross-Nationally Validated Nomogram for Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Overweight/Obese Older Adults: CHARLS and HRS Cohorts [2]

Research article Wei Y, He S, Chen H, Wang Y · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AimsMiddle-aged and older adults with overweight or obesity are at increased risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM), yet validated prediction tools tailored to this population remain limited.
Closing excerpt
The external HRS validation showed fair discrimination, suggesting that model recalibration may be necessary before broad cross-national implementation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)

AimsMiddle-aged and older adults with overweight or obesity are at increased risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM), yet validated prediction tools tailored to this population remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a multidimensional nomogram integrating metabolic, functional and psychological predictors.Materials and methodsUsing the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) data (2011 and 2015), 3965 overweight/obese adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24.0 kg/m2 were randomly split into development (n = 2775) and validation (n = 1190) sets. Candidate predictors spanned socio-demographic, lifestyle, functional, psychological and biochemical factors. External validation included 8180 overweight/obese participants from the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression were applied to build a nomogram. Performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration and decision curve analysis.ResultsCMM prevalence was 3.91%. Eight variables were retained: residence, Activities of daily living (ADL) score, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10) score, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), hypertension, arthritis, dyslipidaemia and memory disorder. AUCs were 0.871 (95% CI: 0.838-0.905) (development), 0.817 (95% CI: 0.768-0.867) (validation) and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.714-0.751) in HRS external validation, with acceptable calibration in CHARLS and evidence of underestimation in HRS that improved after intercept recalibration, and clear net benefit. Positive predictive values were additionally reported to support clinical interpretation under the low CMM prevalence.ConclusionsThis nomogram integrating metabolic, functional and psychological predictors demonstrated strong discrimination in the CHARLS cohort and maintained adequate discriminative performance in a cross-national external validation using the US HRS cohort despite differences in population characteristics and measurement instruments, supporting its potential utility for early CMM risk stratification in overweight/obese older adults. The external HRS validation showed fair discrimination, suggesting that model recalibration may be necessary before broad cross-national implementation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42410308 · DOI · PMC13538773

Clinico-genomic nomograms for estimation of survival risk in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer [3]

Research article Kohli M, Shankar A, Lloyd J, Wang L, Huo X, Fadlullah MZ, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTo enhance risk stratification in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we developed clinical and integrated clinico-genomic prognostic nomograms combining clinical prognostic factors with copy number alteration-based risk scores (RSs) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and metastatic tissue to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) probabilities.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsAn integrated clinico-genomic nomogram with ctDNA RSs achieved the highest t-AUC for 3-year survival in mCRPC and may enable precision in identification of poor-prognosis subgroups based on somatic alterations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)

BackgroundTo enhance risk stratification in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we developed clinical and integrated clinico-genomic prognostic nomograms combining clinical prognostic factors with copy number alteration-based risk scores (RSs) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and metastatic tissue to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) probabilities.MethodsA clinical prognostic nomogram was developed from publicly accessed Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) data-sciences project (N = 1088 patients). A second publicly available independent dataset (N = 82) with an 11-gene prognostic RS developed concurrently obtained ctDNA and matched metastatic tissue specimens (gains: AR, MYC, COL22A1, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, NOTCH1; losses: TMPRSS2, NCOR1, ZBTB18, TP53, NKX3-1) was used to develop an integrated clinico-genomic survival nomogram. Independent predictors for survival were identified in each dataset using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard. Multivariate regression coefficients with statistical significance (P ResultsThe YODA dataset t-AUCs for the prognostic nomogram for estimating OS at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.74, 0.70, and 0.74. In the independent second dataset, the integrated clinico-genomic prognostic nomogram was observed to have higher t-AUCs for predicting 3-year mCRPC survival at 0.807 compared with 0.714 using clinical factors alone.ConclusionsAn integrated clinico-genomic nomogram with ctDNA RSs achieved the highest t-AUC for 3-year survival in mCRPC and may enable precision in identification of poor-prognosis subgroups based on somatic alterations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42231792 · DOI · PMC13231001

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye [4]
    Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP · Lancet Oncol · 2015 · cited 2,831 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis [5]
    Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS · J Clin Oncol · 2008 · cited 2,549 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature [6]
    Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, Kattan MW · Clin Cancer Res · 2008 · cited 234 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools [7]
    Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Roehrborn CG, Kattan MW · Cancer · 2008 · cited 207 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of the Performance of the Decipher Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Men After Prostatectomy to Predict Development of Metastatic Disease [8]
    Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, Ross AE, Den RB, Schaeffer EM, et al. · J Clin Oncol · 2017 · cited 196 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Nomograms for staging, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes [9]
    Touijer K, Scardino PT · Cancer · 2009 · cited 133 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Chen A, Peng J, Guo L, Zhou R. Do conventional intracerebral hemorrhage functional scores apply to mild-to-moderate hemorrhage?. . 2026. PMID 42656267 · DOI · PMC13506375
  2. Wei Y, He S, Chen H, Wang Y. A Cross-Nationally Validated Nomogram for Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Overweight/Obese Older Adults: CHARLS and HRS Cohorts. . 2026. PMID 42410308 · DOI · PMC13538773
  3. Kohli M, Shankar A, Lloyd J, Wang L, Huo X, Fadlullah MZ, et al.. Clinico-genomic nomograms for estimation of survival risk in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. . 2026. PMID 42231792 · DOI · PMC13231001
  4. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015. PMID 25846097 · DOI · PMC4465353
  5. Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID 18323559 · DOI
  6. Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, Kattan MW. Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. PMID 18628454 · DOI
  7. Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Roehrborn CG, Kattan MW. An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools. Cancer. 2008. PMID 18823041 · DOI
  8. Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, Ross AE, Den RB, Schaeffer EM, et al.. Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of the Performance of the Decipher Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Men After Prostatectomy to Predict Development of Metastatic Disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID 28358655 · DOI · PMC6530581
  9. Touijer K, Scardino PT. Nomograms for staging, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes. Cancer. 2009. PMID 19544538 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Linear ModelsClinical Research
  • Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Confidence IntervalsClinical Research
  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research
  • Disease-Free SurvivalClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

16,470
PubMed records on this heading
79%
published since 2020
294
review articles
489
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Linear ModelsClinical Research
  • Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Confidence IntervalsClinical Research
  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support