Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Talus
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Talus

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The second largest of the tarsal bones.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,092 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The second largest of the tarsal bones. It articulates with the tibia and fibula to form the ankle joint.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Astragalus Bone; Astragalus Bones; Bone, Astragalus; Bones, Astragalus; Os Trigonum.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Tarsal Bones

Related concepts

  • Tarsal Bones
  • Tibia
  • Fibula
  • Ankle Joint

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,394 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Talus” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,085 of them (20.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,950 records.

Reviews account for 574 records (10.6%) and meta-analyses for 33. Randomized controlled trials number 47 (0.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,950 records; 2000-2009: 869 records; 2010-2019: 1,490 records; 2020 onward: 1,085 records1,950through 19998692000-20091,4902010-20191,0852020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,950
2000-2009869
2010-20191,490
2020 onward1,085
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.9 percentReviews10.6% (574)Meta-analyses0.6% (33)Randomized controlled trials0.9% (47)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,394 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews57410.6%
Meta-analyses330.6%
Randomized controlled trials470.9%

Method: PubMed query "Talus"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus
Dahmen J, Lambers KTA, Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ
2018Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
137cc by
PMID 28656457 · DOI · PMC6061466
Osteochondral lesions of the talus
Seo SG, Kim JS, Seo DK, Kim YK, Lee SH, Lee HS
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
51cc by
PMID 29635971 · DOI · PMC6600130
Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus
Tümer N, Arbabi V, Gielis WP, de Jong PA, Weinans H, Tuijthof GJM, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
49cc by
PMID 30393864 · DOI · PMC6284442
Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Artioli E, Mazzotti A, Faldini C
2026Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42942357 · DOI · PMC13706983

No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus [1]

Systematic review Dahmen J, Lambers KTA, Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ · · 2018 · cited 137 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeThe purpose of this systematic literature review is to detect the most effective treatment option for primary talar osteochondral defects in adults.
Closing excerpt
Level of evidenceIV.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)

PurposeThe purpose of this systematic literature review is to detect the most effective treatment option for primary talar osteochondral defects in adults.MethodsA literature search was performed to identify studies published from January 1996 to February 2017 using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE, and CENTRAL. Two authors separately and independently screened the search results and conducted the quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subsequently, success rates per separate study were calculated. Studies methodologically eligible for a simplified pooling method were combined.ResultsFifty-two studies with 1236 primary talar osteochondral defects were included of which forty-one studies were retrospective and eleven prospective. Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Heterogeneity concerning methodological nature was observed, and there was variety in reported success rates. A simplified pooling method performed for eleven retrospective case series including 317 ankles in the bone marrow stimulation group yielded a success rate of 82% [CI 78-86%]. For seven retrospective case series investigating an osteochondral autograft transfer system or an osteoperiosteal cylinder graft insertion with in total 78 included ankles the pooled success rate was calculated to be 77% [CI 66-85%].ConclusionsFor primary talar osteochondral defects, none of the treatment options showed any superiority over others.Level of evidenceIV.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28656457 · DOI · PMC6061466

Osteochondral lesions of the talus [2]

Research article Seo SG, Kim JS, Seo DK, Kim YK, Lee SH, Lee HS · · 2018 · cited 51 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background and purpose - The frequency of progression of osteoarthritis and persistence of symptoms in untreated osteochondral lesion of the talus (OCL) is not well known.
Closing excerpt
Interpretation - Nonoperative treatment can be considered a good option for patients with OCL.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (239 words)

Background and purpose - The frequency of progression of osteoarthritis and persistence of symptoms in untreated osteochondral lesion of the talus (OCL) is not well known. We report the outcome of a nonoperative treatment for symptomatic OCL. Patients and methods - This study included 142 patients with OCLs from 2003 to 2013. The patients did not undergo immobilization and had no restrictions of physical activities. The mean follow-up time was 6 (3-10) years. Initial MRI and CT confirmed OCL and showed lesion size, location, and stage of the lesion. Progression of osteoarthritis was evaluated by standing radiographs. In 83 patients, CT was performed at the final follow-up for analyses of the lesion size. We surveyed patients for limitations of sports activity, and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), AOFAS, and SF-36 were assessed. Results - No patients had progression of osteoarthritis. The lesion size as determined by CT did not change in 69/83 patients, decreased in 5, and increased in 9. The mean VAS score of the 142 patients decreased from 3.8 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), the mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score increased from 86 to 93 (p < 0.001), and the mean SF-36 score increased from 52 to 72 (p < 0.001). Only 9 patients reported limitations of sports activity. The size and location of the lesion did not correlate with any of the outcome scores. Interpretation - Nonoperative treatment can be considered a good option for patients with OCL.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29635971 · DOI · PMC6600130

Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus [3]

Research article Tümer N, Arbabi V, Gielis WP, de Jong PA, Weinans H, Tuijthof GJM, et al. · · 2019 · cited 49 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The bones forming the talocrural joint (TCJ) and subtalar joint (STJ) are often assumed to be bilaterally symmetric.
Closing excerpt
This result suggests that the shape symmetry assumption could be violated for some specific shape variations in the fibula and tibia.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (388 words)

The bones forming the talocrural joint (TCJ) and subtalar joint (STJ) are often assumed to be bilaterally symmetric. Therefore, the contralateral limb (i.e. the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus) is used as a template or an intra-subject control in clinical and research practice. However, the validity of the symmetry assumption is controversial, because insufficient information is available on the shape variations and bilateral (a)symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus. Using three-dimensional spatially dense sampled representations of bone shapes extracted from bilateral computed tomography scans of 66 individuals (55 male, mean age: 61 ± 10 years; 11 female, mean age: 53 ± 15 years), we analyzed whether: (i) similar shape patterns exist in the left and right bones of the same type; (ii) gender has an effect on bone shape variations; (iii) intra-subject shape variation is smaller than that of inter-subject for a given shape variance direction. For the first set of analyses, all left and right instances of the same type of bone were considered as two separate groups, and statistically compared with each other on multiple aspects including group location (central tendency), variance-covariance scale (dispersion) and orientation (covariance structure) using distance-based permutational tests. For the second and third sets of analyses, all left and right bones of the same type were pooled into one group, and shape variations in the TCJ and STJ bones were extracted using principal component analysis. The effects of gender on age-adjusted bone shape differences were assessed using an analysis of covariance. Moreover, intra-class correlation was employed to evaluate intra- and inter-subject bone shape variations. For each bone type, both sides had similar shape patterns (Ppermutational -values > 0.05). After Bonferroni adjustment, gender led to shape differences, which were mainly in the lateral and medial condyles of the tibia (P = 0.003), the length and height of the calcaneus (P < 0.001), the posterior and anterior talar articular surfaces of the calcaneus (P = 0.001), and in the posterior aspect of the talus (P = 0.001). Intra-subject shape variations in the tibial tuberosity together with the diameter of the tibia, and the curvature of the fibula shaft and the diameter of the fibula were as high as those of inter-subject. This result suggests that the shape symmetry assumption could be violated for some specific shape variations in the fibula and tibia.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30393864 · DOI · PMC6284442

Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [4]

Meta-analysis Artioli E, Mazzotti A, Faldini C · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background and Objectives: Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) is a regenerative technique for treating osteochondral lesions that combines microfracture with the application of an injectable atelocollagen scaffold over the defect.
Closing excerpt
Therefore, further adequately powered prospective studies directly comparing ACIC with microfracture alone are needed to better establish its clinical efficacy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (269 words)

Background and Objectives: Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) is a regenerative technique for treating osteochondral lesions that combines microfracture with the application of an injectable atelocollagen scaffold over the defect. This scaffold stabilizes the marrow clot and promotes the retention of mesenchymal stem cells at the repair site. Its use for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus (OLTs) has increased in recent years, with several studies reporting favorable clinical outcomes. However, the available evidence has not yet been comprehensively synthesized. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ACIC for the treatment of OLTs. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies evaluating ACIC for the treatment of OLTs were systematically identified and selected. Data regarding patient characteristics, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: Five studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 97 patients (50 males and 47 females) with a mean age of 40.9 years (range, 25.6-48.6 years). Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in functional outcomes, with an estimated Mean Difference (MD) in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores of 26.54 points (95% CI, 17.34-35.74; p p Conclusions: ACIC for OLTs provides consistent improvements in pain and functional outcomes across the available studies. The finding supported by the available data is that postoperative scores improved in small, predominantly uncontrolled cohorts, but the incremental benefit attributable to ACIC over conventional microfracture alone remains uncertain. Therefore, further adequately powered prospective studies directly comparing ACIC with microfracture alone are needed to better establish its clinical efficacy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42942357 · DOI · PMC13706983

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Lesion Size Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes After Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review [5]
    Ramponi L, Yasui Y, Murawski CD, Ferkel RD, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, et al. · Am J Sports Med · 2017 · cited 211 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review [6]
    Giannini S, Vannini F · Foot Ankle Int · 2004 · cited 147 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The success of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing--a systematic review of the literature [7]
    Jehan S, Shakeel M, Bing AJ, Hill SO · Acta Orthop Belg · 2011 · cited 89 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: An Individualized Treatment Paradigm from the Amsterdam Perspective [8]
    Rikken QGH, Kerkhoffs GMMJ · Foot Ankle Clin · 2021 · cited 78 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence-based treatment paradigm [9]
    Savage-Elliott I, Ross KA, Smyth NA, Murawski CD, Kennedy JG · Foot Ankle Spec · 2014 · cited 71 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Fractures of the Talus: State of the Art [10]
    Vallier HA · J Orthop Trauma · 2015 · cited 65 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Dahmen J, Lambers KTA, Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus. . 2018. PMID 28656457 · DOI · PMC6061466
  2. Seo SG, Kim JS, Seo DK, Kim YK, Lee SH, Lee HS. Osteochondral lesions of the talus. . 2018. PMID 29635971 · DOI · PMC6600130
  3. Tümer N, Arbabi V, Gielis WP, de Jong PA, Weinans H, Tuijthof GJM, et al.. Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus. . 2019. PMID 30393864 · DOI · PMC6284442
  4. Artioli E, Mazzotti A, Faldini C. Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. . 2026. PMID 42942357 · DOI · PMC13706983
  5. Ramponi L, Yasui Y, Murawski CD, Ferkel RD, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, et al.. Lesion Size Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes After Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID 27852595 · DOI
  6. Giannini S, Vannini F. Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review. Foot Ankle Int. 2004. PMID 15006340 · DOI
  7. Jehan S, Shakeel M, Bing AJ, Hill SO. The success of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing--a systematic review of the literature. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011. PMID 22187841
  8. Rikken QGH, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: An Individualized Treatment Paradigm from the Amsterdam Perspective. Foot Ankle Clin. 2021. PMID 33487235 · DOI
  9. Savage-Elliott I, Ross KA, Smyth NA, Murawski CD, Kennedy JG. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence-based treatment paradigm. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014. PMID 25100765 · DOI
  10. Vallier HA. Fractures of the Talus: State of the Art. J Orthop Trauma. 2015. PMID 26299809 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • CalcaneusAnatomy and Physiology
  • TibiaAnatomy and Physiology
  • ClavicleAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Temporal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • MastoidAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

5,394
PubMed records on this heading
20%
published since 2020
574
review articles
47
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • CalcaneusAnatomy and Physiology
  • TibiaAnatomy and Physiology
  • ClavicleAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Temporal BoneAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support