Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,092 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The second largest of the tarsal bones. It articulates with the tibia and fibula to form the ankle joint.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Astragalus Bone; Astragalus Bones; Bone, Astragalus; Bones, Astragalus; Os Trigonum.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Tarsal Bones
Related concepts
- Tarsal Bones
- Tibia
- Fibula
- Ankle Joint
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,394 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Talus” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,085 of them (20.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,950 records.
Reviews account for 574 records (10.6%) and meta-analyses for 33. Randomized controlled trials number 47 (0.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,950 |
| 2000-2009 | 869 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,490 |
| 2020 onward | 1,085 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 574 | 10.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 33 | 0.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 47 | 0.9% |
Method: PubMed query "Talus"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus | 2018 | Systematic review Design not recorded in structured metadata | 137 | cc by PMID 28656457 · DOI · PMC6061466 |
| Osteochondral lesions of the talus | 2018 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 51 | cc by PMID 29635971 · DOI · PMC6600130 |
| Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 49 | cc by PMID 30393864 · DOI · PMC6284442 |
| Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | 2026 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42942357 · DOI · PMC13706983 |
No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposeThe purpose of this systematic literature review is to detect the most effective treatment option for primary talar osteochondral defects in adults.
- Closing excerpt
- Level of evidenceIV.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)
PurposeThe purpose of this systematic literature review is to detect the most effective treatment option for primary talar osteochondral defects in adults.MethodsA literature search was performed to identify studies published from January 1996 to February 2017 using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE, and CENTRAL. Two authors separately and independently screened the search results and conducted the quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subsequently, success rates per separate study were calculated. Studies methodologically eligible for a simplified pooling method were combined.ResultsFifty-two studies with 1236 primary talar osteochondral defects were included of which forty-one studies were retrospective and eleven prospective. Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Heterogeneity concerning methodological nature was observed, and there was variety in reported success rates. A simplified pooling method performed for eleven retrospective case series including 317 ankles in the bone marrow stimulation group yielded a success rate of 82% [CI 78-86%]. For seven retrospective case series investigating an osteochondral autograft transfer system or an osteoperiosteal cylinder graft insertion with in total 78 included ankles the pooled success rate was calculated to be 77% [CI 66-85%].ConclusionsFor primary talar osteochondral defects, none of the treatment options showed any superiority over others.Level of evidenceIV.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28656457 · DOI · PMC6061466
Osteochondral lesions of the talus [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Background and purpose - The frequency of progression of osteoarthritis and persistence of symptoms in untreated osteochondral lesion of the talus (OCL) is not well known.
- Closing excerpt
- Interpretation - Nonoperative treatment can be considered a good option for patients with OCL.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (239 words)
Background and purpose - The frequency of progression of osteoarthritis and persistence of symptoms in untreated osteochondral lesion of the talus (OCL) is not well known. We report the outcome of a nonoperative treatment for symptomatic OCL. Patients and methods - This study included 142 patients with OCLs from 2003 to 2013. The patients did not undergo immobilization and had no restrictions of physical activities. The mean follow-up time was 6 (3-10) years. Initial MRI and CT confirmed OCL and showed lesion size, location, and stage of the lesion. Progression of osteoarthritis was evaluated by standing radiographs. In 83 patients, CT was performed at the final follow-up for analyses of the lesion size. We surveyed patients for limitations of sports activity, and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), AOFAS, and SF-36 were assessed. Results - No patients had progression of osteoarthritis. The lesion size as determined by CT did not change in 69/83 patients, decreased in 5, and increased in 9. The mean VAS score of the 142 patients decreased from 3.8 to 0.9 (p < 0.001), the mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score increased from 86 to 93 (p < 0.001), and the mean SF-36 score increased from 52 to 72 (p < 0.001). Only 9 patients reported limitations of sports activity. The size and location of the lesion did not correlate with any of the outcome scores. Interpretation - Nonoperative treatment can be considered a good option for patients with OCL.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29635971 · DOI · PMC6600130
Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The bones forming the talocrural joint (TCJ) and subtalar joint (STJ) are often assumed to be bilaterally symmetric.
- Closing excerpt
- This result suggests that the shape symmetry assumption could be violated for some specific shape variations in the fibula and tibia.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (388 words)
The bones forming the talocrural joint (TCJ) and subtalar joint (STJ) are often assumed to be bilaterally symmetric. Therefore, the contralateral limb (i.e. the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus) is used as a template or an intra-subject control in clinical and research practice. However, the validity of the symmetry assumption is controversial, because insufficient information is available on the shape variations and bilateral (a)symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus. Using three-dimensional spatially dense sampled representations of bone shapes extracted from bilateral computed tomography scans of 66 individuals (55 male, mean age: 61 ± 10 years; 11 female, mean age: 53 ± 15 years), we analyzed whether: (i) similar shape patterns exist in the left and right bones of the same type; (ii) gender has an effect on bone shape variations; (iii) intra-subject shape variation is smaller than that of inter-subject for a given shape variance direction. For the first set of analyses, all left and right instances of the same type of bone were considered as two separate groups, and statistically compared with each other on multiple aspects including group location (central tendency), variance-covariance scale (dispersion) and orientation (covariance structure) using distance-based permutational tests. For the second and third sets of analyses, all left and right bones of the same type were pooled into one group, and shape variations in the TCJ and STJ bones were extracted using principal component analysis. The effects of gender on age-adjusted bone shape differences were assessed using an analysis of covariance. Moreover, intra-class correlation was employed to evaluate intra- and inter-subject bone shape variations. For each bone type, both sides had similar shape patterns (Ppermutational -values > 0.05). After Bonferroni adjustment, gender led to shape differences, which were mainly in the lateral and medial condyles of the tibia (P = 0.003), the length and height of the calcaneus (P < 0.001), the posterior and anterior talar articular surfaces of the calcaneus (P = 0.001), and in the posterior aspect of the talus (P = 0.001). Intra-subject shape variations in the tibial tuberosity together with the diameter of the tibia, and the curvature of the fibula shaft and the diameter of the fibula were as high as those of inter-subject. This result suggests that the shape symmetry assumption could be violated for some specific shape variations in the fibula and tibia.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30393864 · DOI · PMC6284442
Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Background and Objectives: Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) is a regenerative technique for treating osteochondral lesions that combines microfracture with the application of an injectable atelocollagen scaffold over the defect.
- Closing excerpt
- Therefore, further adequately powered prospective studies directly comparing ACIC with microfracture alone are needed to better establish its clinical efficacy.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (269 words)
Background and Objectives: Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) is a regenerative technique for treating osteochondral lesions that combines microfracture with the application of an injectable atelocollagen scaffold over the defect. This scaffold stabilizes the marrow clot and promotes the retention of mesenchymal stem cells at the repair site. Its use for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus (OLTs) has increased in recent years, with several studies reporting favorable clinical outcomes. However, the available evidence has not yet been comprehensively synthesized. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ACIC for the treatment of OLTs. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies evaluating ACIC for the treatment of OLTs were systematically identified and selected. Data regarding patient characteristics, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: Five studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 97 patients (50 males and 47 females) with a mean age of 40.9 years (range, 25.6-48.6 years). Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in functional outcomes, with an estimated Mean Difference (MD) in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores of 26.54 points (95% CI, 17.34-35.74; p p Conclusions: ACIC for OLTs provides consistent improvements in pain and functional outcomes across the available studies. The finding supported by the available data is that postoperative scores improved in small, predominantly uncontrolled cohorts, but the incremental benefit attributable to ACIC over conventional microfracture alone remains uncertain. Therefore, further adequately powered prospective studies directly comparing ACIC with microfracture alone are needed to better establish its clinical efficacy.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42942357 · DOI · PMC13706983
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Lesion Size Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes After Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review [5]
- Research article Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review [6]
- Research article The success of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing--a systematic review of the literature [7]
- Research article Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: An Individualized Treatment Paradigm from the Amsterdam Perspective [8]
- Research article Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence-based treatment paradigm [9]
- Research article Fractures of the Talus: State of the Art [10]
References
- Dahmen J, Lambers KTA, Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus. . 2018. PMID 28656457 · DOI · PMC6061466
- Seo SG, Kim JS, Seo DK, Kim YK, Lee SH, Lee HS. Osteochondral lesions of the talus. . 2018. PMID 29635971 · DOI · PMC6600130
- Tümer N, Arbabi V, Gielis WP, de Jong PA, Weinans H, Tuijthof GJM, et al.. Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus. . 2019. PMID 30393864 · DOI · PMC6284442
- Artioli E, Mazzotti A, Faldini C. Autologous Collagen-Induced Chondrogenesis (ACIC) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. . 2026. PMID 42942357 · DOI · PMC13706983
- Ramponi L, Yasui Y, Murawski CD, Ferkel RD, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, et al.. Lesion Size Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes After Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID 27852595 · DOI
- Giannini S, Vannini F. Operative treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: current concepts review. Foot Ankle Int. 2004. PMID 15006340 · DOI
- Jehan S, Shakeel M, Bing AJ, Hill SO. The success of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing--a systematic review of the literature. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011. PMID 22187841
- Rikken QGH, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: An Individualized Treatment Paradigm from the Amsterdam Perspective. Foot Ankle Clin. 2021. PMID 33487235 · DOI
- Savage-Elliott I, Ross KA, Smyth NA, Murawski CD, Kennedy JG. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence-based treatment paradigm. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014. PMID 25100765 · DOI
- Vallier HA. Fractures of the Talus: State of the Art. J Orthop Trauma. 2015. PMID 26299809 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.