Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,176 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The making of a radiograph of an object or tissue by recording on a photographic plate the radiation emitted by radioactive material within the object. (Dorland, 27th ed)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Radioautography.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Histological Techniques; Radiometry
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 50,977 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Autoradiography” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 231 of them (0.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 44,994 records.
Reviews account for 970 records (1.9%) and meta-analyses for 0. Randomized controlled trials number 18 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 44,994 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,264 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,488 |
| 2020 onward | 231 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 970 | 1.9% |
| Meta-analyses | 0 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 18 | 0.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Autoradiography"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology
A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| An autoradiographic evaluation of AV-1451 Tau PET in dementia | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 426 | cc by PMID 27296779 · DOI · PMC4906968 |
| Autoradiography validation of novel tau PET tracer [F-18]-MK-6240 on human postmortem brain tissue | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 136 | cc by PMID 30857558 · DOI · PMC6410510 |
| Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections | 2009 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 15 | cc by PMID 19146702 · DOI · PMC2651176 |
| Autoradiography and preclinical PET studies with radiolabeled asyn-44 and ACI-12589 for imaging α-synuclein | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 41995458 · DOI · PMC13224086 |
An autoradiographic evaluation of AV-1451 Tau PET in dementia [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundIt is essential to determine the specificity of AV-1451 PET for tau in brain imaging by using pathological comparisons.
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical use of AV-1451 will require a familiarity with distinct types of "off-target" binding.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (297 words)
BackgroundIt is essential to determine the specificity of AV-1451 PET for tau in brain imaging by using pathological comparisons. We performed autoradiography in autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders to evaluate the specificity of AV-1451 binding for tau aggregates.MethodsTissue samples were selected that had a variety of dementia-related neuropathologies including Alzheimer disease, primary age-related tauopathy, tangle predominant dementia, non-Alzheimer disease tauopathies, frontotemporal dementia, parkinsonism, Lewy body disease and multiple system atrophy (n = 38). Brain tissue sections were stained for tau, TAR DNA-binding protein-43, and α-synuclein and compared to AV-1451 autoradiography on adjacent sections.ResultsAV-1451 preferentially localized to neurofibrillary tangles, with less binding to areas enriched in neuritic pathology and less mature tau. The strength of AV-1451 binding with respect to tau isoforms in various neurodegenerative disorders was: 3R + 4R tau (e.g., AD) > 3R tau (e.g., Pick disease) or 4R tau. Only minimal binding of AV-1451 to TAR DNA-binding protein-43 positive regions was detected. No binding of AV-1451 to α-synuclein was detected. "Off-target" binding was seen in vessels, iron-associated regions, substantia nigra, calcifications in the choroid plexus, and leptomeningeal melanin.ConclusionsReduced AV-1451 binding in neuritic pathology compared to neurofibrillary tangles suggests that the maturity of tau pathology may affect AV-1451 binding and suggests complexity in AV-1451 binding. Poor association of AV-1451 with tauopathies that have preferential accumulation of either 4R tau or 3R tau suggests limited clinical utility in detecting these pathologies. In contrast, for disorders associated with 3R + 4R tau, such as Alzheimer disease, AV-1451 binds tau avidly but does not completely reflect the early stage tau progression suggested by Braak neurofibrillary tangle staging. AV-1451 binding to TAR DNA-binding protein-43 or TAR DNA-binding protein-43 positive regions can be weakly positive. Clinical use of AV-1451 will require a familiarity with distinct types of "off-target" binding.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27296779 · DOI · PMC4906968
Autoradiography validation of novel tau PET tracer [F-18]-MK-6240 on human postmortem brain tissue [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- [F-18]-MK-6240, a novel tau positron emission tomography (PET) tracer recently discovered for the in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of Alzheimer disease.
- Closing excerpt
- Together these novel findings provide relevant insights for the correct interpretation of in vivo [F-18]-MK-6240 PET imaging.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (321 words)
[F-18]-MK-6240, a novel tau positron emission tomography (PET) tracer recently discovered for the in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of Alzheimer disease. We have examined regional and substrate-specific binding patterns as well as possible off-target binding of this tracer on human brain tissue to advance towards its validation. We applied [F-18]-MK-6240 phosphor screen and high resolution autoradiography to postmortem samples from patients with a definite pathological diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration-tau (Pick's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration), chronic traumatic encephalopathy, frontotemporal lobar degeneration-Tar DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), dementia with Lewy bodies, cerebral amyloid angiopathy and elderly controls free of pathologic changes of neurodegenerative disease. We also directly compared the binding properties of [F-18]-MK-6240 and [F-18]-AV-1451 in human tissue, and examined potential nonspecific binding of both tau tracers to monoamine oxidases (MAO) by using autoradiography in the presence of selective monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors. Our data indicate that MK-6240 strongly binds to neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer disease but does not seem to bind to a significant extent to tau aggregates in non-Alzheimer tauopathies, suggesting that it may have a limited utility for the in vivo detection of these pathologies. There is no evidence of binding to lesions containing β-amyloid, α-synuclein or TDP-43. In addition, we identified MK-6240 strong off-target binding to neuromelanin and melanin-containing cells, and some weaker binding to areas of hemorrhage. These binding patterns are nearly identical to those previously reported by our group and others for [F-18]-AV-1451. Of note, [F-18]-MK-6240 and [F-18]-AV-1451 autoradiographic binding signals were only weakly displaced by competing concentrations of selective MAO-B inhibitor deprenyl but not by MAO-A inhibitor clorgyline, suggesting that MAO enzymes do not appear to be a significant binding target of any of these two tracers. Together these novel findings provide relevant insights for the correct interpretation of in vivo [F-18]-MK-6240 PET imaging.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30857558 · DOI · PMC6410510
Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundIn situ hybridisation (ISH) combined with autoradiography is a standard method of measuring the amount of gene expression in histological sections, but the methods used to quantify gene expression in the resulting digital images vary greatly between studies and can potentially give conflicting results.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionBased on these results, suggestions are made to reduce bias, increase precision, and ultimately provide more meaningful results of gene expression data.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (184 words)
BackgroundIn situ hybridisation (ISH) combined with autoradiography is a standard method of measuring the amount of gene expression in histological sections, but the methods used to quantify gene expression in the resulting digital images vary greatly between studies and can potentially give conflicting results.ResultsThe present study examines commonly used methods for analysing ISH images and demonstrates that these methods are not optimal. Image segmentation based on thresholding can be subject to floor-effects and lead to biased results. In addition, including the area of the structure or region of interest in the calculation of gene expression can lead to a large loss of precision and can also introduce bias. Finally, converting grey level pixel intensities to optical densities or units of radioactivity is unnecessary for most applications and can lead to data with poor statistical properties. A modification of an existing method for selecting the structure or region of interest is introduced which performs better than alternative methods in terms of bias and precision.ConclusionBased on these results, suggestions are made to reduce bias, increase precision, and ultimately provide more meaningful results of gene expression data.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 19146702 · DOI · PMC2651176
Autoradiography and preclinical PET studies with radiolabeled asyn-44 and ACI-12589 for imaging α-synuclein [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) are considered α-synucleinopathies, characterized by the presence of pathological α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates.
- Closing excerpt
- The limitations of both [3H]asyn-44 and [3H]ACI-12589 reported here support the development of additional derivatives and structural scaffolds of asyn-44 with the potential to improve radiotracer specificity and selectivity towards α-syn.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (374 words)
BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) are considered α-synucleinopathies, characterized by the presence of pathological α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates. A positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for imaging α-syn aggregates in vivo is highly sought after, as disease progression correlates with the accumulation of aggregated α-syn. We recently reported [18F]asyn-44 as a radiotracer for α-syn, worthy of evaluation in higher species, based on in vitro binding data from human brain tissues and in vivo PET imaging studies in rodents.Objective[3H]ACI-12589 is a promising α-syn PET tracer which recently showed binding in MSA patients but appears to have limited utility in other α-synucleinopathies. Objective 1) compare the in vitro binding properties of our lead, [3H]asyn-44, to [3H]ACI-12589; Objective 2) evaluate [18F]asyn-44 and [18F]ACI-12589 kinetics by in vivo PET imaging in normal rodents; Objective 3) assess pharmacokinetic properties and metabolism of [18F]asyn-44 in normal pig and non-human primate (NHP).MethodsIn vitro autoradiography with [3H]asyn-44 and [3H]ACI-12589 was performed to compare radiotracer binding in PD, MSA, Alzheimer's disease and healthy control post-mortem brain tissue. Additionally, preclinical PET imaging was performed in rats with [18F]ACI-12589 to compare with our previously reported [18F]asyn-44 data. Further evaluation of [18F]asyn-44 in higher species was carried out by preclinical PET imaging in pig and NHP with metabolite analysis. Liver microsome assays and mass spectrometry were performed to identify the metabolites formed in NHP.Results[3H]Asyn-44 and [3H]ACI-12589 displayed different binding properties in both PD and MSA tissue, suggesting that the tracers target different binding sites and asyn-44 might therefore be more suited for PD imaging. In the pig, [18F]asyn-44 readily entered the brain and no brain penetrant metabolites were observed in arterial blood samples. In the NHP, [18F]asyn-44 readily entered the brain but was rapidly metabolized. Radiolabeled metabolites of asyn-44 were proposed and will be considered in the design of future derivatives.ConclusionsSpecies differences in metabolism of [18F]asyn-44 are observed between pig and NHP, and do not support the further translation of [18F]asyn-44. Additionally, autoradiography with [3H]asyn-44 revealed low signal specificity and high non-displaceable binding. We report evidence for off-target binding of [3H]ACI-12589 to amyloid-β plaques. The limitations of both [3H]asyn-44 and [3H]ACI-12589 reported here support the development of additional derivatives and structural scaffolds of asyn-44 with the potential to improve radiotracer specificity and selectivity towards α-syn.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41995458 · DOI · PMC13224086
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Autoradiography, MALDI-MS, and SIMS-MS imaging in pharmaceutical discovery and development [5]
- Research article Technical review: In situ hybridization [6]
- Research article Neurotransmitter receptor mapping by autoradiography and other methods [7]
- Research article Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) incorporation into the brain from plasma, as an in vivo biomarker of brain DHA metabolism and neurotransmission [8]
- Research article Autoradiography techniques and quantification of drug distribution [9]
- Research article Cell population kinetics of bone growth: the first ten years of autoradiographic studies with tritiated thymidine [10]
References
- Lowe VJ, Curran G, Fang P, Liesinger AM, Josephs KA, Parisi JE, et al.. An autoradiographic evaluation of AV-1451 Tau PET in dementia. . 2016. PMID 27296779 · DOI · PMC4906968
- Aguero C, Dhaynaut M, Normandin MD, Amaral AC, Guehl NJ, Neelamegam R, et al.. Autoradiography validation of novel tau PET tracer [F-18]-MK-6240 on human postmortem brain tissue. . 2019. PMID 30857558 · DOI · PMC6410510
- Lazic SE. Statistical evaluation of methods for quantifying gene expression by autoradiography in histological sections. . 2009. PMID 19146702 · DOI · PMC2651176
- Varlow C, Pees A, Stehouwer JS, Grotegerd AK, Bleher D, Guarino DS, et al.. Autoradiography and preclinical PET studies with radiolabeled asyn-44 and ACI-12589 for imaging α-synuclein. . 2026. PMID 41995458 · DOI · PMC13224086
- Solon EG, Schweitzer A, Stoeckli M, Prideaux B. Autoradiography, MALDI-MS, and SIMS-MS imaging in pharmaceutical discovery and development. AAPS J. 2010. PMID 19921438 · DOI · PMC2811645
- Jensen E. Technical review: In situ hybridization. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2014. PMID 24810158 · DOI
- Kuhar MJ, De Souza EB, Unnerstall JR. Neurotransmitter receptor mapping by autoradiography and other methods. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1986. PMID 2423006 · DOI
- Rapoport SI, Ramadan E, Basselin M. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) incorporation into the brain from plasma, as an in vivo biomarker of brain DHA metabolism and neurotransmission. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2011. PMID 21704722 · DOI · PMC3202024
- Solon EG. Autoradiography techniques and quantification of drug distribution. Cell Tissue Res. 2015. PMID 25604842 · DOI
- Kember NF. Cell population kinetics of bone growth: the first ten years of autoradiographic studies with tritiated thymidine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971. PMID 4931059 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.