Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat›Blepharoptosis

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Blepharoptosis

Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Drooping of the upper lid due to deficient development or paralysis of the levator palpebrae muscle.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (836 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Drooping of the upper lid due to deficient development or paralysis of the levator palpebrae muscle.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Blepharoptoses; Ptosis, Eyelid; Eyelid Ptoses; Eyelid Ptosis; Ptoses, Eyelid.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Eyelid Diseases
See also
Blepharoplasty

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,743 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Blepharoptosis” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,039 of them (15.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,946 records.

Reviews account for 471 records (7.0%) and meta-analyses for 15. Randomized controlled trials number 52 (0.8%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,946 records; 2000-2009: 1,166 records; 2010-2019: 1,592 records; 2020 onward: 1,039 records2,946through 19991,1662000-20091,5922010-20191,0392020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,946
2000-20091,166
2010-20191,592
2020 onward1,039
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.8 percentReviews7.0% (471)Meta-analyses0.2% (15)Randomized controlled trials0.8% (52)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,743 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4717.0%
Meta-analyses150.2%
Randomized controlled trials520.8%

Method: PubMed query "Blepharoptosis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in eye, ear, nose and throat

Eye, hearing, nose and throat studies rely on specialist tests (visual acuity, eye pressure, audiograms, scopes) and on patient-reported symptoms, which vary between people and with age. Some conditions improve without treatment, so comparison groups matter. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; sudden loss of sight or hearing needs urgent care from a qualified clinician. Check how the outcome was tested, the age of the people studied and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Paediatric single mitochondrial DNA deletion disorders: an overlapping spectrum of disease
Broomfield A, Sweeney MG, Woodward CE, Fratter C, Morris AM, Leonard JV, et al.
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
103cc by
PMID 25352051 · DOI · PMC4432108
A review of acquired blepharoptosis: prevalence, diagnosis, and current treatment options
Bacharach J, Lee WW, Harrison AR, Freddo TF
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
85cc by
PMID 33927356 · DOI · PMC8376882
Homozygous frameshift mutations in FAT1 cause a syndrome characterized by colobomatous-microphthalmia, ptosis, nephropathy and syndactyly
Lahrouchi N, George A, Ratbi I, Schneider R, Elalaoui SC, Moosa S, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
36cc by
PMID 30862798 · DOI · PMC6414540
Computational Modelling Suggests Bacteriostatic Saline Does Not Reverse Botulinum Toxin-Induced Brow Ptosis
Rahman E, Michon A, Rao P, Sharif AQMO, Webb WR, Carruthers JDA
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 41150199 · DOI · PMC12568129

Paediatric single mitochondrial DNA deletion disorders: an overlapping spectrum of disease [1]

Research article Broomfield A, Sweeney MG, Woodward CE, Fratter C, Morris AM, Leonard JV, et al. · · 2015 · cited 103 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundSingle large-scale mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions (SLSMDs) are amongst the most frequently diagnosed mtDNA disorders in childhood, yet their natural history remains poorly understood.
Closing excerpt
SLSMDs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all children presenting with ptosis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (262 words)

BackgroundSingle large-scale mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions (SLSMDs) are amongst the most frequently diagnosed mtDNA disorders in childhood, yet their natural history remains poorly understood. We report the natural history of a large multicentre cohort of such children.MethodsWe reviewed case notes from three different UK centres to determine the clinical course of 34 patients (16 female, 18 male) with childhood-onset mitochondrial disease caused by SLSMDs. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare survival of patients presenting with haematological features (Pearson syndrome) and those with nonhaematological presentations.ResultsThe most frequent initial presentation was with isolated ptosis (16/34, 47%). Eleven (32%) patients presented with transfusion-dependent anaemia soon after birth and were diagnosed with Pearson syndrome, whilst ten were classified as having Kearns-Sayre syndrome, three as having progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO) and seven as having PEO-plus. Three patients did not conform to any specific mitochondrial syndrome. The most frequently affected organ during the disease course was the kidney, with documented tubular or glomerular dysfunction in 17 of 20 (85%) cases who had detailed investigations. SLSMDs were present in blood and/or urine cells in all cases tested, indicating that muscle biopsy is not necessary for diagnosis in the paediatric age range. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significantly worse mortality in patients with Pearson syndrome compared with the rest of the cohort.ConclusionsMitochondrial disease caused by SLSMDs is clinically heterogeneous, and not all cases conform to a classical mitochondrial syndrome. Multisystem disease is the norm, with anaemia, renal impairment and endocrine disturbance being the most frequent extraneurological features. SLSMDs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all children presenting with ptosis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25352051 · DOI · PMC4432108

A review of acquired blepharoptosis: prevalence, diagnosis, and current treatment options [2]

Review article Bacharach J, Lee WW, Harrison AR, Freddo TF · · 2021 · cited 85 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Blepharoptosis (ptosis) is among the most common disorders of the upper eyelid encountered in both optometric and ophthalmic practice.
Closing excerpt
Particular attention is paid to the differential diagnosis of acquired ptosis and emerging treatment options, including surgical and pharmacologic approaches.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (109 words)

Blepharoptosis (ptosis) is among the most common disorders of the upper eyelid encountered in both optometric and ophthalmic practice. The unilateral or bilateral drooping of the upper eyelid that characterises ptosis can affect appearance and impair visual function, both of which can negatively impact quality of life. While there are several known forms of congenital ptosis, acquired ptosis (appearing later in life, due to a variety of causes) is the predominant form of the condition. This review summarises the prevalence, causes, identification, differential diagnosis, and treatment of acquired ptosis. Particular attention is paid to the differential diagnosis of acquired ptosis and emerging treatment options, including surgical and pharmacologic approaches.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33927356 · DOI · PMC8376882

Homozygous frameshift mutations in FAT1 cause a syndrome characterized by colobomatous-microphthalmia, ptosis, nephropathy and syndactyly [3]

Research article Lahrouchi N, George A, Ratbi I, Schneider R, Elalaoui SC, Moosa S, et al. · · 2019 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
A failure in optic fissure fusion during development can lead to blinding malformations of the eye.
Closing excerpt
Our findings establish FAT1 as a gene with pleiotropic effects in human, in that frameshift mutations cause a severe multi-system disorder whereas recessive missense mutations had been previously associated with isolated glomerulotubular nephropathy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (139 words)

A failure in optic fissure fusion during development can lead to blinding malformations of the eye. Here, we report a syndrome characterized by facial dysmorphism, colobomatous microphthalmia, ptosis and syndactyly with or without nephropathy, associated with homozygous frameshift mutations in FAT1. We show that Fat1 knockout mice and zebrafish embryos homozygous for truncating fat1a mutations exhibit completely penetrant coloboma, recapitulating the most consistent developmental defect observed in affected individuals. In human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells, the primary site for the fusion of optic fissure margins, FAT1 is localized at earliest cell-cell junctions, consistent with a role in facilitating optic fissure fusion during vertebrate eye development. Our findings establish FAT1 as a gene with pleiotropic effects in human, in that frameshift mutations cause a severe multi-system disorder whereas recessive missense mutations had been previously associated with isolated glomerulotubular nephropathy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30862798 · DOI · PMC6414540

Computational Modelling Suggests Bacteriostatic Saline Does Not Reverse Botulinum Toxin-Induced Brow Ptosis [4]

Research article Rahman E, Michon A, Rao P, Sharif AQMO, Webb WR, Carruthers JDA · · 2025 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Anecdotal reports have recently circulated suggesting that intramuscular injection of bacteriostatic saline (BS)-which contains benzyl alcohol (BnOH)-can reverse botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA)-induced brow ptosis.
Closing excerpt
Instead, these results emphasize the need for mechanistic scrutiny when evaluating rapid-reversal claims, particularly those propagated through anecdotal or social media channels without supporting biological plausibility.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (326 words)

Anecdotal reports have recently circulated suggesting that intramuscular injection of bacteriostatic saline (BS)-which contains benzyl alcohol (BnOH)-can reverse botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA)-induced brow ptosis. Given the well-established intracellular persistence of BoNTA's light chain and its irreversible cleavage of SNAP-25, such rapid functional recovery challenges existing pharmacological understanding. This study employed high-resolution pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling using the AesthetiSim™ platform to systematically evaluate this hypothesis. A total of 30,000 virtual patients were randomized to receive BoNTA alone, BoNTA followed by BS injection, or BoNTA followed by normal saline (NS) at Day 7. The model incorporated BoNTA diffusion, internalization, SNAP-25 cleavage, neuromuscular output, and transient BS effects on membrane permeability and endosomal trafficking. Simulated recovery trajectories were tracked over 90 days. The primary outcome, time to 80% restoration of baseline frontalis muscle force (T80), averaged 42.0 days in the BoNTA-only group and 35.5 days in the BS group (Δ = -6.5 days; p 80 threshold by Day 30. Partial reactivation (T30) occurred earlier with BS (21.8 ± 5.3 days vs. 27.3 ± 4.9 days), and the area under the effect curve (AUEC) was increased by 9.7%, reflecting higher overall muscle function over time. In molecular simulations, BnOH produced a minor rightward shift in the BoNTA-SNAP-25 dissociation curve, but receptor occupancy remained above 90% at therapeutic toxin concentrations, suggesting no meaningful impairment of binding affinity. A global Sobol sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the primary driver of recovery kinetics was intracellular LC degradation (49% of T80 variance), while BS-modulated extracellular parameters collectively contributed less than 20%. These findings indicate that BS does not reverse the molecular action of BoNTA but may transiently influence recovery kinetics via non-receptor-mediated pathways such as increased membrane permeability or altered vesicular trafficking. The magnitude and variability of this effect do not support the notion of a true pharmacologic reversal. Instead, these results emphasize the need for mechanistic scrutiny when evaluating rapid-reversal claims, particularly those propagated through anecdotal or social media channels without supporting biological plausibility.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41150199 · DOI · PMC12568129

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Ptosis: causes, presentation, and management [5]
    Finsterer J · Aesthetic Plast Surg · 2003 · cited 240 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Congenital ptosis [6]
    SooHoo JR, Davies BW, Allard FD, Durairaj VD · Surv Ophthalmol · 2014 · cited 98 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for sagging eyelids [7]
    Jacobs LC, Liu F, Bleyen I, Gunn DA, Hofman A, Klaver CC, et al. · JAMA Dermatol · 2014 · cited 60 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The mechanistic classification of ptosis [8]
    Frueh BR · Ophthalmology · 1980 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Naso-jugal groove leveling with fat tissue [9]
    Loeb R · Clin Plast Surg · 1993 · cited 57 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Botulinum toxin-induced blepharoptosis: Anatomy, etiology, prevention, and therapeutic options [10]
    Nestor MS, Han H, Gade A, Fischer D, Saban Y, Polselli R · J Cosmet Dermatol · 2021 · cited 55 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Broomfield A, Sweeney MG, Woodward CE, Fratter C, Morris AM, Leonard JV, et al.. Paediatric single mitochondrial DNA deletion disorders: an overlapping spectrum of disease. . 2015. PMID 25352051 · DOI · PMC4432108
  2. Bacharach J, Lee WW, Harrison AR, Freddo TF. A review of acquired blepharoptosis: prevalence, diagnosis, and current treatment options. . 2021. PMID 33927356 · DOI · PMC8376882
  3. Lahrouchi N, George A, Ratbi I, Schneider R, Elalaoui SC, Moosa S, et al.. Homozygous frameshift mutations in FAT1 cause a syndrome characterized by colobomatous-microphthalmia, ptosis, nephropathy and syndactyly. . 2019. PMID 30862798 · DOI · PMC6414540
  4. Rahman E, Michon A, Rao P, Sharif AQMO, Webb WR, Carruthers JDA. Computational Modelling Suggests Bacteriostatic Saline Does Not Reverse Botulinum Toxin-Induced Brow Ptosis. . 2025. PMID 41150199 · DOI · PMC12568129
  5. Finsterer J. Ptosis: causes, presentation, and management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003. PMID 12925861 · DOI
  6. SooHoo JR, Davies BW, Allard FD, Durairaj VD. Congenital ptosis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID 24657037 · DOI
  7. Jacobs LC, Liu F, Bleyen I, Gunn DA, Hofman A, Klaver CC, et al.. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for sagging eyelids. JAMA Dermatol. 2014. PMID 24869959 · DOI
  8. Frueh BR. The mechanistic classification of ptosis. Ophthalmology. 1980. PMID 7017524 · DOI
  9. Loeb R. Naso-jugal groove leveling with fat tissue. Clin Plast Surg. 1993. PMID 8485948 · DOI
  10. Nestor MS, Han H, Gade A, Fischer D, Saban Y, Polselli R. Botulinum toxin-induced blepharoptosis: Anatomy, etiology, prevention, and therapeutic options. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021. PMID 34378298 · DOI · PMC9290925

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • EyelidsAnatomy and Physiology
  • AniseikoniaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • AphakiaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • AsthenopiaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • AstigmatismEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • CataractEye, Ear, Nose and Throat

All 51 articles in Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat →

At a glance

6,743
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
471
review articles
52
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • EyelidsAnatomy and Physiology
  • AniseikoniaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • AphakiaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • AsthenopiaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • AstigmatismEye, Ear, Nose and Throat

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support