Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (934 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Catheters that are inserted into a large central vein such as a subclavian vein or femoral vein.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Catheter, Central Venous; Catheters, Central Venous; Venous Catheter, Central; Venous Catheters, Central; Central Venous Catheter.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Vascular Access Devices
- See also
- Catheterization, Central Venous
Related concepts
- Subclavian Vein
- Femoral Vein
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 4,628 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Central Venous Catheters” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 2,326 of them (50.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,401 records.
Reviews account for 601 records (13.0%) and meta-analyses for 154. Randomized controlled trials number 246 (5.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 2 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,401 |
| 2020 onward | 2,326 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 601 | 13.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 154 | 3.3% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 246 | 5.3% |
Method: PubMed query "Central Venous Catheters"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology
A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Risk factors of catheter- associated bloodstream infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionThe prevalence of catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is high and is a severe health problem associated with an increase in mortality and elevated economic costs.
- Closing excerpt
- On the other hand, monolumen devices presented a lower likelihood of triggering this infection.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (200 words)
IntroductionThe prevalence of catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is high and is a severe health problem associated with an increase in mortality and elevated economic costs. There are discrepancies related to the risk factors of CLABSI since the results published are very heterogeneous and there is no synthesis in the description of all the predisposing factors.ObjectiveWe aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize and establish the risk factors predisposing to CLABSI reported in the literature.MethodThis is a systematic review of observational studies following the PRISMA recommendations. MEDLINE and CINAHL databases were searched for primary studies from 2007 to 2021. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO CRD42018083564.ResultsA total of 654 studies were identified, 23 of which were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis included 17 studies and 9 risk factors were analyzed (total parenteral nutrition (TPN), chemotherapy, monolumen and bilumen catheters, days of catheterization, immunosuppression, kidney disease and diabetes mellitus) due to the homogeneity of their definitions and measurements. The risk factors found to increase the probability of developing CLABSI were TPN, multilumen devices, chemotherapy treatment, immunosuppression and the number of days of catheterization. On the other hand, monolumen devices presented a lower likelihood of triggering this infection.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36952393 · DOI · PMC10035840
Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundPeripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients.
- Closing excerpt
- The high prevalence of CLABSI-MDROs depicts the local microbial ecology, emphasizing the need of public health awareness.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (239 words)
BackgroundPeripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) serve as an alternative to short-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for providing intravenous access in hospitalized patients. Although a number of studies suggest that PICCs are associated with a lower risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) than CVCs, recent data concerning specific patient groups support the contrary. In this regard, we are comparing CVC- and PICC-related CLABSI rates developed in a selected group of critically ill inpatients and evaluating the CLABSI microbiological distribution.MethodsThe study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Greece between May 2017 and May 2019. We performed a two-year retrospective analysis of the data collected from medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent PICC or CVC placement.ResultsA total of 1187 CVCs placed for 9774 catheter-days and 639 PICCs placed for 11,110 catheter-days, were reported and analyzed during the study period. Among CVCs, a total of 59 (4.9%) CLABSIs were identified, while among PICCs, 18 (2.8%) cases presented CLABSI (p = 0.029). The CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days was 6.03 for CVC group and 1.62 for PICC group (p ConclusionsPICC lines were associated with significantly lower CLABSI rates comparing to CVC although they were in place longer than CVC lines. Given their longer time to the development of infection, PICCs may be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient IV access. The high prevalence of CLABSI-MDROs depicts the local microbial ecology, emphasizing the need of public health awareness.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36352414 · DOI · PMC9647909
Duration of central venous catheter placement and central line-associated bloodstream infections after the adoption of prevention bundles: a two-year retrospective study [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCentral line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain a critical and possibly fatal outcome of hospitalization.
- Closing excerpt
- The high prevalence of MDROs in our setting reflects the local epidemiology, highlighting a significant threat of urgent public health concern.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)
BackgroundCentral line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain a critical and possibly fatal outcome of hospitalization. Use of central venous catheter (CVC) bundles can considerably reduce CLABSI rates in hospitalized patients. However, despite widespread adoption of these bundles in hospitals worldwide, CLABSIs still remain prevalent. The aim of the present study was to determine whether longer duration of CVCs placement is related to CLABSIs in hospitalized adults, despite the implementation of preventive bundles. Also to analyse CLABSI pathogens distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles in different time intervals of catheterization.MethodsA retrospective study was performed among hospitalized patients who had a CVC inserted during a 24-month period (May 2017-May 2019) and developed CLABSIs. To evaluate the association between CVC placement duration and CLABSI events, we categorized events into three groups, each representing a 10-day time interval.ResultsA total of 59 CLABSI cases were identified among 9774 catheter/days. The CLABSI incidence rate per 1000 catheter/days was 4.80 for duration of catheterization up to 10 days, 5.92 for duration of 11-20 days, and 8.64 for duration > 20 days(p = 0.007). The CLABSI incidence rate per 1000 catheter/days due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the three groups was 2.62 for catheter duration of up to 10 days, 3.83 for 11-20 days, and 3.46 for > 20 days (p = 0.14). Among CLABSIs, the most common microorganism identified was multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, which accounted for 27.1% of the cases. There was no significant difference in the type of CLABSI pathogens isolated among the 3 groups.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that duration of CVC placement remains an important risk factor for CLABSIs in hospitalized patients, even after the adoption of prevention bundles. The high prevalence of MDROs in our setting reflects the local epidemiology, highlighting a significant threat of urgent public health concern.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35841083 · DOI · PMC9284713
Design Parametrization of Central Venous Catheters for Pediatric Dialysis: Supporting the Quest for the Most Influential Features [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Pediatric hemodialysis is a life-saving treatment for children with chronic kidney diseases.
- Closing excerpt
- The findings of this DOE show how CFD can contribute to understand the influence of design parameters and potentially guide the development of optimized pediatric-specific CVC models.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (203 words)
Pediatric hemodialysis is a life-saving treatment for children with chronic kidney diseases. Central venous catheters (CVCs) are the most commonly used vascular access, despite being commonly subject to complications leading to inadequate hemodialysis and catheter replacement. The available CVCs feature various design elements reflecting ongoing efforts to achieve optimal performance. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can contribute to analyze the flow dynamics within the CVCs. The aim of this study is to investigate the design parameters that most influence the flow performance of CVCs. A design of experiment (DOE) was set up to assess the CFD of two CVC models of 6.5F and 8F size. Blood flow rates, shear stress, residence time, and platelet lysis index were evaluated. The results showed how the proximal side holes were the most influential geometrical features, influencing both the flow rates ( r > 0.64) and the shear stress of the CVCs (| r | > 0.5). At increased flow rate, the side holes were found to be competing with the tip in terms, especially, of residence time inside the CVC. The findings of this DOE show how CFD can contribute to understand the influence of design parameters and potentially guide the development of optimized pediatric-specific CVC models.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40910923 · DOI · PMC12829507
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Complications of Central Venous Access Devices: A Systematic Review [5]
- Research article Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
- Research article Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections [7]
- Research article Central venous catheter-related thrombosis [8]
- Research article Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in children and adults [9]
- Research article Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [10]
References
- Lafuente Cabrero E, Terradas Robledo R, Civit Cuñado A, García Sardelli D, Hidalgo López C, Giro Formatger D, et al.. Risk factors of catheter- associated bloodstream infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2023. PMID 36952393 · DOI · PMC10035840
- Pitiriga V, Bakalis J, Theodoridou K, Kanellopoulos P, Saroglou G, Tsakris A. Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients. . 2022. PMID 36352414 · DOI · PMC9647909
- Pitiriga V, Bakalis J, Kampos E, Kanellopoulos P, Saroglou G, Tsakris A. Duration of central venous catheter placement and central line-associated bloodstream infections after the adoption of prevention bundles: a two-year retrospective study. . 2022. PMID 35841083 · DOI · PMC9284713
- Bruno C, Shroff R, Schievano S, Capelli C. Design Parametrization of Central Venous Catheters for Pediatric Dialysis: Supporting the Quest for the Most Influential Features. . 2026. PMID 40910923 · DOI · PMC12829507
- Ullman AJ, Marsh N, Mihala G, Cooke M, Rickard CM. Complications of Central Venous Access Devices: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2015. PMID 26459655 · DOI
- Ziegler MJ, Pellegrini DC, Safdar N. Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection. 2015. PMID 25331552 · DOI
- Bell T, O'Grady NP. Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017. PMID 28687213 · DOI · PMC5666696
- Geerts W. Central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014. PMID 25696870 · DOI
- Citla Sridhar D, Abou-Ismail MY, Ahuja SP. Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in children and adults. Thromb Res. 2020. PMID 31981840 · DOI
- Teja B, Bosch NA, Diep C, Pereira TV, Mauricio P, Sklar MC, et al.. Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID 38436976 · DOI · PMC12285596
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.