Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Diagnostics and Medical Technology›Dermoscopy

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Dermoscopy

Diagnostics and Medical Technology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A noninvasive technique that enables direct microscopic examination of the surface and architecture of the SKIN.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (831 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A noninvasive technique that enables direct microscopic examination of the surface and architecture of the SKIN.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Dermoscopies; Epiluminescence Microscopy; Epiluminescence Microscopies; Microscopies, Epiluminescence; Microscopy, Epiluminescence; Dermatoscopy; Dermatoscopies; Skin Surface Microscopy.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Intravital Microscopy

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,753 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Dermoscopy” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 2,212 of them (32.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 3,835 records.

Reviews account for 785 records (11.6%) and meta-analyses for 34. Randomized controlled trials number 97 (1.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 853 records; 2010-2019: 3,835 records; 2020 onward: 2,212 records0through 19998532000-20093,8352010-20192,2122020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-2009853
2010-20193,835
2020 onward2,212
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.4 percentReviews11.6% (785)Meta-analyses0.5% (34)Randomized controlled trials1.4% (97)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,753 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews78511.6%
Meta-analyses340.5%
Randomized controlled trials971.4%

Method: PubMed query "Dermoscopy"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology

A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild
Hernández-Pérez C, Combalia M, Podlipnik S, Codella NCF, Rotemberg V, Halpern AC, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
133cc by
PMID 38886204 · DOI · PMC11183228
Actinic keratoses: review of clinical, dermoscopic, and therapeutic aspects
Reinehr CPH, Bakos RM
2019Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
106cc by
PMID 31789244 · DOI · PMC6939186
Dermoscopy for melanoma detection and triage in primary care: a systematic review
Jones OT, Jurascheck LC, van Melle MA, Hickman S, Burrows NP, Hall PN, et al.
2019Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
45cc by
PMID 31434767 · DOI · PMC6707687
A pruned and parameter-efficient Xception framework for skin cancer classification
Kılıç Ş, Doğan Y
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41805755 · DOI · PMC12974828

BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild [1]

Research article Hernández-Pérez C, Combalia M, Podlipnik S, Codella NCF, Rotemberg V, Halpern AC, et al. · · 2024 · cited 133 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Advancements in dermatological artificial intelligence research require high-quality and comprehensive datasets that mirror real-world clinical scenarios.
Closing excerpt
Additionally, we present a set of baseline classifiers based on state-of-the-art neural networks, which can be extended by other researchers for further experimentation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (181 words)

Advancements in dermatological artificial intelligence research require high-quality and comprehensive datasets that mirror real-world clinical scenarios. We introduce a collection of 18,946 dermoscopic images spanning from 2010 to 2016, collated at the Hospital Clínic in Barcelona, Spain. The BCN20000 dataset aims to address the problem of unconstrained classification of dermoscopic images of skin cancer, including lesions in hard-to-diagnose locations such as those found in nails and mucosa, large lesions which do not fit in the aperture of the dermoscopy device, and hypo-pigmented lesions. Our dataset covers eight key diagnostic categories in dermoscopy, providing a diverse range of lesions for artificial intelligence model training. Furthermore, a ninth out-of-distribution (OOD) class is also present on the test set, comprised of lesions which could not be distinctively classified as any of the others. By providing a comprehensive collection of varied images, BCN20000 helps bridge the gap between the training data for machine learning models and the day-to-day practice of medical practitioners. Additionally, we present a set of baseline classifiers based on state-of-the-art neural networks, which can be extended by other researchers for further experimentation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38886204 · DOI · PMC11183228

Actinic keratoses: review of clinical, dermoscopic, and therapeutic aspects [2]

Review article Reinehr CPH, Bakos RM · · 2019 · cited 106 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Actinic keratoses are dysplastic proliferations of keratinocytes with potential for malignant transformation.
Closing excerpt
Therapeutic modalities for actinic keratoses include topical medications, and ablative and surgical methods; the best treatment option should always be individualized according to the patient.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (160 words)

Actinic keratoses are dysplastic proliferations of keratinocytes with potential for malignant transformation. Clinically, actinic keratoses present as macules, papules, or hyperkeratotic plaques with an erythematous background that occur on photoexposed areas. At initial stages, they may be better identified by palpation rather than by visual inspection. They may also be pigmented and show variable degrees of infiltration; when multiple they then constitute the so-called field cancerization. Their prevalence ranges from 11% to 60% in Caucasian individuals above 40 years. Ultraviolet radiation is the main factor involved in pathogenesis, but individual factors also play a role in the predisposing to lesions appearance. Diagnosis of lesions is based on clinical and dermoscopic examination, but in some situations histopathological analysis may be necessary. The risk of transformation into squamous cell carcinoma is the major concern regarding actinic keratoses. Therapeutic modalities for actinic keratoses include topical medications, and ablative and surgical methods; the best treatment option should always be individualized according to the patient.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31789244 · DOI · PMC6939186

Dermoscopy for melanoma detection and triage in primary care: a systematic review [3]

Systematic review Jones OT, Jurascheck LC, van Melle MA, Hickman S, Burrows NP, Hall PN, et al. · · 2019 · cited 45 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveMost skin lesions first present in primary care, where distinguishing rare melanomas from benign lesions can be challenging.
Closing excerpt
Trial registration numberCRD42018091395.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (297 words)

ObjectiveMost skin lesions first present in primary care, where distinguishing rare melanomas from benign lesions can be challenging. Dermoscopy improves diagnostic accuracy among specialists and is promoted for use by primary care physicians (PCPs). However, when used by untrained clinicians, accuracy may be no better than visual inspection. This study aimed to undertake a systematic review of literature reporting use of dermoscopy to triage suspicious skin lesions in primary care settings, and challenges for implementation.DesignA systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and SCOPUS bibliographic databases from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2017, without language restrictions.Inclusion criteriaStudies including assessment of dermoscopy accuracy, acceptability to patients and PCPs, training requirements, and cost-effectiveness of dermoscopy modes in primary care, including trials, diagnostic accuracy and acceptability studies.Results23 studies met the review criteria, representing 49 769 lesions and 3708 PCPs, all from high-income countries. There was a paucity of studies set truly in primary care and the outcomes measured were diverse. The heterogeneity therefore made meta-analysis unfeasible; the data were synthesised through narrative review. Dermoscopy, with appropriate training, was associated with improved diagnostic accuracy for melanoma and benign lesions, and reduced unnecessary excisions and referrals. Teledermoscopy-based referral systems improved triage accuracy. Only three studies examined cost-effectiveness; hence, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions. Costs, training and time requirements were considered important implementation barriers. Patient satisfaction was seldom assessed. Computer-aided dermoscopy and other technological advances have not yet been tested in primary care.ConclusionsDermoscopy could help PCPs triage suspicious lesions for biopsy, urgent referral or reassurance. However, it will be important to establish further evidence on minimum training requirements to reach competence, as well as the cost-effectiveness and patient acceptability of implementing dermoscopy in primary care.Trial registration numberCRD42018091395.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31434767 · DOI · PMC6707687

A pruned and parameter-efficient Xception framework for skin cancer classification [4]

Research article Kılıç Ş, Doğan Y · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent and potentially lethal diseases worldwide, with early detection being critical for patient survival.
Closing excerpt
This framework demonstrates the effectiveness of combining model pruning, oversampling, and advanced pooling methods to build robust and efficient skin cancer classification systems suitable for clinical applications.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (193 words)

Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent and potentially lethal diseases worldwide, with early detection being critical for patient survival. This study presents a novel framework that leverages transfer learning, pruning, SMOTE, data augmentation, and the advanced Avg-TopK pooling method to improve the accuracy and efficiency of skin cancer classification using dermoscopic images. The HAM10000 dataset was used to evaluate the performance of various transfer learning models, with Xception as the top performer. A layer-based pruning strategy was proposed to optimize the model and reduce its complexity. SMOTE and data augmentation were applied to address the class imbalance within the dataset, significantly improving the model's generalization across all skin lesion classes. The utilization of the Avg-TopK pooling technique further enhanced model accuracy by preserving crucial image features during the downsampling process. The proposed approach achieved an overall accuracy of 91.52%, surpassing several state-of-the-art models. Following pruning, the model's parameter count was reduced by approximately 35%, from 20.9 million to 13.5 million, improving efficiency and performance. This framework demonstrates the effectiveness of combining model pruning, oversampling, and advanced pooling methods to build robust and efficient skin cancer classification systems suitable for clinical applications.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41805755 · DOI · PMC12974828

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy [5]
    Kittler H, Marghoob AA, Argenziano G, Carrera C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, et al. · J Am Acad Dermatol · 2016 · cited 192 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Reflectance confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: From bench to bedside [6]
    Rajadhyaksha M, Marghoob A, Rossi A, Halpern AC, Nehal KS · Lasers Surg Med · 2017 · cited 149 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Dermoscopy in general dermatology [7]
    Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Di Stefani A, Ferrara G, Marghoob AA, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, et al. · Dermatology · 2006 · cited 129 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Reiter O, Mimouni I, Gdalevich M, Marghoob AA, Levi A, Hodak E, et al. · J Am Acad Dermatol · 2019 · cited 109 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society [9]
    Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, Malvehy J, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, et al. · J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol · 2013 · cited 101 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Lichen planus pigmentosus and its variants: review and update [10]
    Robles-Méndez JC, Rizo-Frías P, Herz-Ruelas ME, Pandya AG, Ocampo Candiani J · Int J Dermatol · 2018 · cited 82 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hernández-Pérez C, Combalia M, Podlipnik S, Codella NCF, Rotemberg V, Halpern AC, et al.. BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild. . 2024. PMID 38886204 · DOI · PMC11183228
  2. Reinehr CPH, Bakos RM. Actinic keratoses: review of clinical, dermoscopic, and therapeutic aspects. . 2019. PMID 31789244 · DOI · PMC6939186
  3. Jones OT, Jurascheck LC, van Melle MA, Hickman S, Burrows NP, Hall PN, et al.. Dermoscopy for melanoma detection and triage in primary care: a systematic review. . 2019. PMID 31434767 · DOI · PMC6707687
  4. Kılıç Ş, Doğan Y. A pruned and parameter-efficient Xception framework for skin cancer classification. . 2026. PMID 41805755 · DOI · PMC12974828
  5. Kittler H, Marghoob AA, Argenziano G, Carrera C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, et al.. Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016. PMID 26896294 · DOI · PMC5551974
  6. Rajadhyaksha M, Marghoob A, Rossi A, Halpern AC, Nehal KS. Reflectance confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: From bench to bedside. Lasers Surg Med. 2017. PMID 27785781 · DOI · PMC5575825
  7. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Di Stefani A, Ferrara G, Marghoob AA, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, et al.. Dermoscopy in general dermatology. Dermatology. 2006. PMID 16319467 · DOI
  8. Reiter O, Mimouni I, Gdalevich M, Marghoob AA, Levi A, Hodak E, et al.. The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. PMID 30582991 · DOI
  9. Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, Malvehy J, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, et al.. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013. PMID 23181611 · DOI
  10. Robles-Méndez JC, Rizo-Frías P, Herz-Ruelas ME, Pandya AG, Ocampo Candiani J. Lichen planus pigmentosus and its variants: review and update. Int J Dermatol. 2018. PMID 29076159 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • MicroscopyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Molecular ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Brain MappingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • CholangiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Computed Tomography AngiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology

All 110 articles in Diagnostics and Medical Technology →

At a glance

6,753
PubMed records on this heading
33%
published since 2020
785
review articles
97
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • MicroscopyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Molecular ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Brain MappingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • CholangiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support