Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Empathy

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Empathy

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

An individual's objective and insightful awareness of the feelings and behavior of another person.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. Full-text reviews7. References8. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (678 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An individual's objective and insightful awareness of the feelings and behavior of another person. It should be distinguished from sympathy, which is usually nonobjective and noncritical. It includes caring, which is the demonstration of an awareness of and a concern for the good of others. (From Bioethics Thesaurus, 1992)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Caring; Compassion.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Personality; Emotional Intelligence

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 27,204 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Empathy” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 8,238 of them (30.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 9,428 records.

Reviews account for 2,484 records (9.1%) and meta-analyses for 242. Randomized controlled trials number 848 (3.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,111 records; 2000-2009: 5,427 records; 2010-2019: 9,428 records; 2020 onward: 8,238 records4,111through 19995,4272000-20099,4282010-20198,2382020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,111
2000-20095,427
2010-20199,428
2020 onward8,238
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.9 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.1 percentReviews9.1% (2,484)Meta-analyses0.9% (242)Randomized controlled trials3.1% (848)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 27,204 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,4849.1%
Meta-analyses2420.9%
Randomized controlled trials8483.1%

Method: PubMed query "Empathy"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue Among Clinical Nurses in China
Xiong T, Wang J, Wang M
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 41424982 · DOI · PMC12714083
Intervention-induced changes in state mindfulness do not predict trait changes in mindfulness, self-compassion, or perceived stress
Borgdorf KSA, Küchler G, Wrzus C, Aguilar-Raab C
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41272222 · DOI · PMC12639022
Enhancing System Empathy Within a UK Emergency Department: A Feasibility Interprofessional Priority Setting Exercise
Howick J, Ward A, Grantham C, Bennett-Weston A
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41833058 · DOI · PMC13007488

The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue Among Clinical Nurses in China [1]

Research article Xiong T, Wang J, Wang M · · 2025 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundCompassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue are critical to nurses' well-being and patient care.
Closing excerpt
Implications for nursing managementIt is important for nursing managers to recognize the susceptibility of nurses to compassion fatigue and develop specific strategies to alleviate burnout and secondary traumatic stress while fostering compassion satisfaction.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (248 words)

BackgroundCompassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue are critical to nurses' well-being and patient care. In China, factors such as high workloads and healthcare reforms may elevate nurses' risk for compassion fatigue.AimsTo assess the prevalence and influencing factors of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue among Chinese clinical nurses.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 581 registered nurses completed surveys on demographics, work-related factors, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Psychology Capital Questionnaire, Perceived Social Support Scale, and Professional Quality of Life Scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric tests, and multiple linear regression.ResultsThe prevalence of low, average, and high levels was 5.7%, 79.2%, and 15.1% for compassion satisfaction; 31.0%, 67.6%, and 1.4% for burnout; and 34.8%, 63.5%, and 1.7% for secondary traumatic stress, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that compassion satisfaction (R 2 = 54.3%), sleep quality (β = -0.09, p = 0.005), psychological capital (β = 0.540, p β = 0.215, p R 2 = 46.9%), sleep quality (β = 0.224, p β = -0.329, p β = -0.289, p R 2 = 8.0%), sleep quality (β = 0.231, p β = -0.13, p = 0.009) were also significant predictors.ConclusionsChinese clinical nurses experience significant compassion fatigue. Sleep quality, psychological capital, and social support are key factors associated with their professional quality of life, highlighting targets for intervention by nursing management.Implications for nursing managementIt is important for nursing managers to recognize the susceptibility of nurses to compassion fatigue and develop specific strategies to alleviate burnout and secondary traumatic stress while fostering compassion satisfaction.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41424982 · DOI · PMC12714083

Intervention-induced changes in state mindfulness do not predict trait changes in mindfulness, self-compassion, or perceived stress [2]

Research article Borgdorf KSA, Küchler G, Wrzus C, Aguilar-Raab C · · 2025 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Previous research has identified state mindfulness as a key change mechanism in explicitly mindfulness-based interventions to increase trait mindfulness and reduce stress.
Closing excerpt
Results suggest that intervention framing could play a crucial role in facilitating explicit connections between state experiences and trait development, contributing to our understanding of mindfulness as a change mechanism in psychological interventions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (193 words)

Previous research has identified state mindfulness as a key change mechanism in explicitly mindfulness-based interventions to increase trait mindfulness and reduce stress. This study extends previous work by examining trajectories of state mindfulness and their associations with trait indicators of mindfulness, self-compassion, and perceived stress when mindfulness practices are delivered within a Socioemotional Competence Training (SECT) without explicit mindfulness labeling. A sample of 166 healthy younger and older German adults (75.2% female; Mage = 46.26; SDage = 18.70) participated in the 8-week SECT. State mindfulness was assessed weekly, whereas trait mindfulness, self-compassion, and perceived stress were assessed before, during, and after the training. Second-order latent growth models suggest significant pre-post improvements in all state and trait variables (d = |0.38| to |0.62|), but trait changes were not predicted by changes in state mindfulness. These findings indicate that while state mindfulness increases during the Socioemotional Competence Training, these increases alone appear insufficient to drive changes in trait mindfulness and related outcomes. Results suggest that intervention framing could play a crucial role in facilitating explicit connections between state experiences and trait development, contributing to our understanding of mindfulness as a change mechanism in psychological interventions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41272222 · DOI · PMC12639022

Enhancing System Empathy Within a UK Emergency Department: A Feasibility Interprofessional Priority Setting Exercise [3]

Research article Howick J, Ward A, Grantham C, Bennett-Weston A · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
RationaleEmpathy in healthcare benefits patients and practitioners, yet system-level barriers inhibit empathy.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionParticipants in a UK setting were satisfied with a previously developed system empathy workshop, were able to prioritise changes that would improve system empathy, and were confident that the changes would be effective.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (237 words)

RationaleEmpathy in healthcare benefits patients and practitioners, yet system-level barriers inhibit empathy. The barriers include burnout-inducing administrative workloads, burdensome protocols, lack of wellbeing spaces, un-empathic leadership, and not emphasising empathy as an institutional value. A workshop aimed at enhancing empathic systems was successfully delivered in Canada but has not been tested in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting.Aims and objectivesThis study aimed to test the feasibility of an empathic systems workshop within the UK.MethodWe conducted an interprofessional workshop with stakeholders from an emergency department (ED). We used a modified nominal group technique to prioritise actions that enhance empathy in the ED. Satisfaction with the workshop and confidence that the workshop would lead to positive change were measured on a 10-point Likert scale.ResultsTwenty-eight participants representing the following stakeholder groups attended the workshop: medical consultants, nurses, and porters. The group agreed to generate an improved wellbeing plan and to implement an effective secondary triage system. Seventy-three percent (73%) rated their satisfaction with the workshop as eight or higher out of ten, and 63% reported being confident that the workshop would lead to improvements in system empathy. A doctor strike limited the range of stakeholders who were able to attend, and long-term follow up was not conducted.ConclusionParticipants in a UK setting were satisfied with a previously developed system empathy workshop, were able to prioritise changes that would improve system empathy, and were confident that the changes would be effective.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41833058 · DOI · PMC13007488

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: A meta-analysis [4]
    Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE, Fournier C · J Psychosom Res · 2015 · cited 745 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Exploring compassion: a meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology [5]
    MacBeth A, Gumley A · Clin Psychol Rev · 2012 · cited 717 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review [6]
    Anderson CA, Shibuya A, Ihori N, Swing EL, Bushman BJ, Sakamoto A, et al. · Psychol Bull · 2010 · cited 471 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind [7]
    Schurz M, Radua J, Tholen MG, Maliske L, Margulies DS, Mars RB, et al. · Psychol Bull · 2021 · cited 388 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A Meta-Analysis of Compassion-Based Interventions: Current State of Knowledge and Future Directions [8]
    Kirby JN, Tellegen CL, Steindl SR · Behav Ther · 2017 · cited 324 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Howick J, Moscrop A, Mebius A, Fanshawe TR, Lewith G, Bishop FL, et al. · J R Soc Med · 2018 · cited 286 times (Europe PMC)

Full-text reviews on EvidenceLib

Open-access review articles about this topic, reproduced in full with authors, licence and references.

  • Shared and distinct functional networks for empathy and pain processing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies

    Nicholas Fallon, Carl Roberts, Andrej Stancak · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2020 · CC BY 4.0

References

  1. Xiong T, Wang J, Wang M. The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue Among Clinical Nurses in China. . 2025. PMID 41424982 · DOI · PMC12714083
  2. Borgdorf KSA, Küchler G, Wrzus C, Aguilar-Raab C. Intervention-induced changes in state mindfulness do not predict trait changes in mindfulness, self-compassion, or perceived stress. . 2025. PMID 41272222 · DOI · PMC12639022
  3. Howick J, Ward A, Grantham C, Bennett-Weston A. Enhancing System Empathy Within a UK Emergency Department: A Feasibility Interprofessional Priority Setting Exercise. . 2026. PMID 41833058 · DOI · PMC13007488
  4. Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE, Fournier C. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2015. PMID 25818837 · DOI
  5. MacBeth A, Gumley A. Exploring compassion: a meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012. PMID 22796446 · DOI
  6. Anderson CA, Shibuya A, Ihori N, Swing EL, Bushman BJ, Sakamoto A, et al.. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2010. PMID 20192553 · DOI
  7. Schurz M, Radua J, Tholen MG, Maliske L, Margulies DS, Mars RB, et al.. Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind. Psychol Bull. 2021. PMID 33151703 · DOI
  8. Kirby JN, Tellegen CL, Steindl SR. A Meta-Analysis of Compassion-Based Interventions: Current State of Knowledge and Future Directions. Behav Ther. 2017. PMID 29029675 · DOI
  9. Howick J, Moscrop A, Mebius A, Fanshawe TR, Lewith G, Bishop FL, et al.. Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med. 2018. PMID 29672201 · DOI · PMC6047264

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • IntelligencePsychiatry and Psychology
  • MotivationPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AchievementPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AffectPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AggressionPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AlcoholismPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

27,204
PubMed records on this heading
30%
published since 2020
2,484
review articles
848
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • IntelligencePsychiatry and Psychology
  • MotivationPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AchievementPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AffectPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AggressionPsychiatry and Psychology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support