Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (989 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Solid crystalline precipitates in the biliary tract, usually formed in the gallbladder, resulting in the condition of cholelithiasis. Gallstones, derived from the BILE, consist mainly of calcium, cholesterol, or bilirubin.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Biliary Calculi; Calculi, Biliary; Gall Stone; Gall Stones; Gallstone; Common Bile Duct Calculi; Biliary Calculi, Common Bile Duct; Common Bile Duct Gall Stones.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Cholelithiasis; Cholecystolithiasis; Calculi
Related concepts
- Biliary Tract
- Gallbladder
- Cholelithiasis
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 13,521 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Gallstones” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,901 of them (14.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 6,159 records.
Reviews account for 1,395 records (10.3%) and meta-analyses for 171. Randomized controlled trials number 292 (2.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 6,159 |
| 2000-2009 | 2,341 |
| 2010-2019 | 3,120 |
| 2020 onward | 1,901 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,395 | 10.3% |
| Meta-analyses | 171 | 1.3% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 292 | 2.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Gallstones"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in digestive system and liver
Gut and liver research ranges from laboratory studies of the microbiome to large trials of drugs and surgery. Symptoms such as pain, reflux or bowel change are reported by patients and overlap between conditions, and diet and microbiome studies are mostly observational. Check whether the study measured symptoms, tissue findings or long-term outcomes, how the diagnosis was made and how long people were followed. Nothing here replaces advice from a qualified clinician.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021 | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 102 | cc by PMID 37452855 · DOI · PMC10423145 |
| Metabolic dysfunction-associated gallstone disease: expecting more from critical care manifestations | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 59 | cc by PMID 37455265 · DOI · PMC10543156 |
| Differences in Cholecystectomy Outcomes and Operating Time Between Male and Female Surgeons in Sweden | 2023 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 54 | cc by PMID 37647076 · DOI · PMC10469280 |
| Diabetes Mellitus Facilitates Gallstone Formation Through CXCR2-NETs-Mediated Liver-Bile Barrier Damage | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 41698066 · DOI · PMC13116217 |
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021 [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology first published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis in 2010, followed by a revision in 2016.
- Closing excerpt
- The current revised guidelines are expected to be of great assistance to gastroenterologists and general physicians in making decisions on contemporary clinical management for cholelithiasis patients.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (250 words)
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology first published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis in 2010, followed by a revision in 2016. Currently, the revised third edition was published to reflect recent evidence on the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of cholelithiasis conforming to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Following this revision, the present English version of the guidelines was updated and published herein. The clinical questions (CQ) in the previous version were reviewed and rearranged into three newly divided categories: background questions (BQ) dealing with basic background knowledge, CQ, and future research questions (FRQ), which refer to issues that require further accumulation of evidence. Finally, 52 questions (29 BQs, 19 CQs, and 4 FRQs) were adopted to cover the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, complications, and prognosis. Based on a literature search using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases for the period between 1983 and August 2019, along with a manual search of new information reported over the past 5 years, the level of evidence was evaluated for each CQ. The strengths of recommendations were determined using the Delphi method by the committee members considering the body of evidence, including benefits and harms, patient preference, and cost-benefit balance. A comprehensive flowchart was prepared for the diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder stones, common bile duct stones, and intrahepatic stones, respectively. The current revised guidelines are expected to be of great assistance to gastroenterologists and general physicians in making decisions on contemporary clinical management for cholelithiasis patients.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37452855 · DOI · PMC10423145
Metabolic dysfunction-associated gallstone disease: expecting more from critical care manifestations [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- About 20% of adults worldwide have gallstones which are solid conglomerates in the biliary tree made of cholesterol monohydrate crystals, mucin, calcium bilirubinate, and protein aggregates.
- Closing excerpt
- In this review we discuss the key pathogenic and clinical aspects of gallstones, as the main clinical consequences of metabolic dysfunction-associated disease.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (180 words)
About 20% of adults worldwide have gallstones which are solid conglomerates in the biliary tree made of cholesterol monohydrate crystals, mucin, calcium bilirubinate, and protein aggregates. About 20% of gallstone patients will definitively develop gallstone disease, a condition which consists of gallstone-related symptoms and/or complications requiring medical therapy, endoscopic procedures, and/or cholecystectomy. Gallstones represent one of the most prevalent digestive disorders in Western countries and patients with gallstone disease are one of the largest categories admitted to European hospitals. About 80% of gallstones in Western countries are made of cholesterol due to disturbed cholesterol homeostasis which involves the liver, the gallbladder and the intestine on a genetic background. The incidence of cholesterol gallstones is dramatically increasing in parallel with the global epidemic of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, expansion of visceral adiposity, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. In this context, gallstones can be largely considered a metabolic dysfunction-associated gallstone disease, a condition prone to specific and systemic preventive measures. In this review we discuss the key pathogenic and clinical aspects of gallstones, as the main clinical consequences of metabolic dysfunction-associated disease.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37455265 · DOI · PMC10543156
Differences in Cholecystectomy Outcomes and Operating Time Between Male and Female Surgeons in Sweden [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceFemale surgeons are still in the minority worldwide, and highlighting gender differences in surgery is important in understanding and reducing inequities within the surgical specialty.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings may contribute to an increased understanding of gender differences within this surgical specialty.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (367 words)
ImportanceFemale surgeons are still in the minority worldwide, and highlighting gender differences in surgery is important in understanding and reducing inequities within the surgical specialty. Studies on different surgical procedures indicate equal results, or safer outcomes, for female surgeons, but it is still unclear whether surgical outcomes of gallstone surgery differ between female and male surgeons.ObjectiveTo examine the association of the surgeon's gender with surgical outcomes and operating time in elective and acute care cholecystectomies.Design, setting, and participantsA population-based cohort study based on data from the Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery was performed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019. The sample included all registered patients undergoing cholecystectomy in Sweden during the study period. The follow-up time was 30 days. Data analysis was performed from September 1 to September 7, 2022, and updated March 24, 2023.ExposureThe surgeon's gender.Main outcome(s) and measure(s)The association between the surgeon's gender and surgical outcomes for elective and acute care cholecystectomies was calculated with generalized estimating equations. Differences in operating time were calculated with mixed linear model analysis.ResultsA total of 150 509 patients, with 97 755 (64.9%) undergoing elective cholecystectomies and 52 754 (35.1%) undergoing acute care cholecystectomies, were operated on by 2553 surgeons, including 849 (33.3%) female surgeons and 1704 (67.7%) male surgeons. Female surgeons performed fewer cholecystectomies per year and were somewhat better represented at universities and private clinics. Patients operated on by male surgeons had more surgical complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40) and total complications (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19). Male surgeons had more bile duct injuries in elective surgery (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.22-2.34), but no significant difference was apparent in acute care operations. Female surgeons had significantly longer operation times. Male surgeons converted to open surgery more often than female surgeons in acute care surgery (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.43), and their patients had longer hospital stays (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.31). No significant difference in 30-day mortality could be demonstrated.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this cohort study indicate that female surgeons have more favorable outcomes and operate more slowly than male surgeons in elective and acute care cholecystectomies. These findings may contribute to an increased understanding of gender differences within this surgical specialty.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37647076 · DOI · PMC10469280
Diabetes Mellitus Facilitates Gallstone Formation Through CXCR2-NETs-Mediated Liver-Bile Barrier Damage [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundGallstone disease is a major health burden worldwide, and diabetes is believed to increase the risk of gallstone formation.
- Closing excerpt
- Sarcosine may serve as a potential therapeutic agent, providing a theoretical basis for clinical intervention.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)
BackgroundGallstone disease is a major health burden worldwide, and diabetes is believed to increase the risk of gallstone formation. This study investigates how diabetes promotes gallstone formation and elucidates the underlying mechanism.MethodsData from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Mendelian randomization analyses were used to identify the causal relationship between diabetes and gallstones. Through the integration of multi-omics sequencing and molecular dynamics simulation, CXCR2 was identified as a molecular bridge linking both diseases. Animal models were established, and Western blotting, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were employed to explore the relevant mechanisms.ResultsClinical data demonstrated that diabetes is an independent risk factor for gallstones. Animal experiments revealed that diabetes upregulated the expression of CXCR2 in hepatic neutrophils, thereby promoting the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Excessive NETs disrupted the tight junctions between hepatocytes, allowing NETs to enter the bile and accelerate gallstone formation. Moreover, sarcosine inhibited CXCR2 expression, reduced NETs production, and decreased gallstone formation.ConclusionsDiabetes promotes NETs formation through CXCR2 activation, which damages the liver-bile barrier and facilitates gallstone development. Sarcosine may serve as a potential therapeutic agent, providing a theoretical basis for clinical intervention.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41698066 · DOI · PMC13116217
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Gallstones [5]
- Research article Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline [6]
- Research article Gallbladder cancer [7]
- Research article Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) [8]
- Research article Epidemiology of gallstones [9]
- Research article An update on the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstone disease [10]
References
- Fujita N, Yasuda I, Endo I, Isayama H, Iwashita T, Ueki T, et al.. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021. . 2023. PMID 37452855 · DOI · PMC10423145
- Portincasa P, Di Ciaula A, Bonfrate L, Stella A, Garruti G, Lamont JT. Metabolic dysfunction-associated gallstone disease: expecting more from critical care manifestations. . 2023. PMID 37455265 · DOI · PMC10543156
- Blohm M, Sandblom G, Enochsson L, Österberg J. Differences in Cholecystectomy Outcomes and Operating Time Between Male and Female Surgeons in Sweden. . 2023. PMID 37647076 · DOI · PMC10469280
- Shi C, Feng S, Liu T, Meng Z, Zheng Y, Huang Z, et al.. Diabetes Mellitus Facilitates Gallstone Formation Through CXCR2-NETs-Mediated Liver-Bile Barrier Damage. . 2026. PMID 41698066 · DOI · PMC13116217
- Lammert F, Gurusamy K, Ko CW, Miquel JF, Méndez-Sánchez N, Portincasa P, et al.. Gallstones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016. PMID 27121416 · DOI
- Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P, et al.. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2019. PMID 30943551 · DOI
- Roa JC, García P, Kapoor VK, Maithel SK, Javle M, Koshiol J. Gallbladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022. PMID 36302789 · DOI · PMC12314663
- Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G, Gurusamy K, Sturgess R, Webster G, et al.. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut. 2017. PMID 28122906 · DOI
- Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010. PMID 20478480 · DOI
- Di Ciaula A, Wang DQ, Portincasa P. An update on the pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstone disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID 29283909 · DOI · PMC8118137
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.