Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Digestive System and Liver›Intestinal Obstruction

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Intestinal Obstruction

Digestive System and Liver · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Any impairment, arrest, or reversal of the normal flow of intestinal contents toward the anal canal.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (951 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Any impairment, arrest, or reversal of the normal flow of intestinal contents toward the anal canal.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Intestinal Obstructions; Obstruction, Intestinal.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Intestinal Diseases
Narrower topics
Afferent Loop Syndrome; Duodenal Obstruction; Fecal Impaction; Ileus; Intestinal Volvulus; Intussusception; Meconium Ileus

Related concepts

  • Intestinal Contents
  • Anal Canal

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 52,925 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Intestinal Obstruction” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 5,861 of them (11.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 28,226 records.

Reviews account for 4,473 records (8.5%) and meta-analyses for 359. Randomized controlled trials number 586 (1.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 28,226 records; 2000-2009: 8,344 records; 2010-2019: 10,494 records; 2020 onward: 5,861 records28,226through 19998,3442000-200910,4942010-20195,8612020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199928,226
2000-20098,344
2010-201910,494
2020 onward5,861
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.1 percentReviews8.5% (4,473)Meta-analyses0.7% (359)Randomized controlled trials1.1% (586)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 52,925 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,4738.5%
Meta-analyses3590.7%
Randomized controlled trials5861.1%

Method: PubMed query "Intestinal Obstruction"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in digestive system and liver

Gut and liver research ranges from laboratory studies of the microbiome to large trials of drugs and surgery. Symptoms such as pain, reflux or bowel change are reported by patients and overlap between conditions, and diet and microbiome studies are mostly observational. Check whether the study measured symptoms, tissue findings or long-term outcomes, how the diagnosis was made and how long people were followed. Nothing here replaces advice from a qualified clinician.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Small bowel obstruction outcomes according to compliance with the World Society of Emergency Surgery Bologna guidelines
Kaplan LJ, Martinez-Casas I, Mohseni S, Cimino M, Kurihara H, Lee MJ, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
19cc by
PMID 40246692 · DOI · PMC12005947
Successful AAV8 gene therapy on hepatic ex situ machine perfusion for mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy
Brevini T, Swift L, Reynolds H, Ong J, Stopforth RJ, Malam Y, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 40774626 · DOI · PMC7619571
Multidisciplinary Postoperative Ileus Management: A Narrative Review
Yu S, Kerolus K, Jin Z, Bajrami S, Denoya P, Bergese SD
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
8cc by
PMID 40870389 · DOI · PMC12388418
Agent- and Dose-Specific Intestinal Obstruction Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Chen JJ, Hsu CW, Hung CM, Suen MW, Wang HY, Yang WC, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 41596262 · DOI · PMC12841245

Small bowel obstruction outcomes according to compliance with the World Society of Emergency Surgery Bologna guidelines [1]

Research article Kaplan LJ, Martinez-Casas I, Mohseni S, Cimino M, Kurihara H, Lee MJ, et al. · · 2025 · cited 19 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundSmall bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common surgical emergency associated with substantial morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), and healthcare cost.
Closing excerpt
Addressing evidence-to-practice gaps through implementation strategies that consider contextual factors will enhance guideline adoption and patient outcomes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (238 words)

BackgroundSmall bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common surgical emergency associated with substantial morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), and healthcare cost. The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Bologna guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations for managing adhesive SBO, promoting timely surgical intervention (or non-operative management (NOM) when ischaemia, strangulation, or peritonitis are absent). However, guideline adoption and its impact on outcomes remain under studied. Compliance with the Bologna guidelines was evaluated to determine the impact of compliance on outcomes.MethodsSnapSBO, a prospective, multicentre, time-bound, observational cohort study, captured data on patients with adhesive SBO across diverse healthcare settings and patient populations. Patient care was categorized into: successful NOM, surgery after an unsuccessful appropriate trial of NOM (NOM-T), and direct to surgery (DTS). Compliance with diagnostic, therapeutic, and postoperative Bologna guideline recommendations was assessed as either complete or partial. Primary outcomes included adherence to the Bologna guidelines, LOS, complications, and the incidence of the composite metric 'optimal outcomes' (LOS ≤5 days, discharge without complications, and no readmission within 30 days).ResultsAmong 982 patients with adhesive SBO, successful NOM occurred in 561 (57.1%), 224 (22.8%) underwent NOM-T, and 197 (20.1%) proceeded DTS. The mean(s.d.) LOS was 5.3(9.0), 12.9(11.4), and 7.7(8.0) days respectively (P ConclusionPatients with adhesive SBO whose care was aligned with the Bologna guidelines had a shorter LOS and a greater incidence of optimal outcomes. Addressing evidence-to-practice gaps through implementation strategies that consider contextual factors will enhance guideline adoption and patient outcomes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40246692 · DOI · PMC12005947

Successful AAV8 gene therapy on hepatic ex situ machine perfusion for mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy [2]

Research article Brevini T, Swift L, Reynolds H, Ong J, Stopforth RJ, Malam Y, et al. · · 2025 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is rapidly emerging as a novel platform for testing therapeutics in human donor livers.
Closing excerpt
gene therapy, in explanted livers.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (225 words)

Ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is rapidly emerging as a novel platform for testing therapeutics in human donor livers. Recently, perfusion of explanted patient livers was achieved, raising the possibility of using these diseased organs to increase the fidelity and resolution of drug testing and development. Here, we provide proof-of-principle for the feasibility of this approach in the context of gene therapy. We report the first successful administration of adeno-associated virus serotype 8 (AAV8) vector treatment in the explanted liver of a 34-year-old patient with mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy (MNGIE), using machine perfusion. MNGIE is caused by mutations in the thymidine phosphorylase (TYMP) gene, leading to nucleoside accumulation. The patient's liver was split into anatomical left and right lobes and perfused using separate machine perfusion devices. Prior to treatment, nucleoside accumulation was observed in the perfusate of both lobes, recapitulating the cardinal feature of MNGIE. An AAV8 vector carrying the human TYMP gene was administered in the left lobe with the right serving as a control. AAV8 gene therapy resulted in successful vector uptake, with complete nucleoside clearance within 6 days of administration. Our results constitute the first demonstration of the efficacy of gene therapy for MNGIE in a human organ and provide proof-of-principle for using machine perfusion as a new strategy for disease modelling and testing novel therapeutics, e.g. gene therapy, in explanted livers.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40774626 · DOI · PMC7619571

Multidisciplinary Postoperative Ileus Management: A Narrative Review [3]

Review article Yu S, Kerolus K, Jin Z, Bajrami S, Denoya P, Bergese SD · · 2025 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Postoperative ileus is a prolonged impairment of gastrointestinal motility following surgical procedures.
Closing excerpt
Current management relies heavily on supportive care, underscoring the need for research into the underlying neurogenic and inflammatory mechanisms to guide the development of targeted treatments.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (140 words)

Postoperative ileus is a prolonged impairment of gastrointestinal motility following surgical procedures. This often leads to increased morbidity, extended hospital stays, and high healthcare expenditures. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology underlying postoperative ileus, its epidemiology, and perioperative management strategies. Patient characteristics, as well as expected perioperative course, could be used to stratify the risks of postoperative ileus. Preventive measures hinge upon a multimodal approach, minimally invasive surgical techniques, fluid management, early postoperative ambulation, and opioid-sparing analgesia strategies. Adjuvant interventions such as alvimopan, caffeine, and chewing gum have demonstrated efficacy in modulating the neurogenic and inflammatory components of postoperative ileus. Minimally invasive approaches, comprehensive perioperative management, and adjuvant therapies hold promise for prevention. Current management relies heavily on supportive care, underscoring the need for research into the underlying neurogenic and inflammatory mechanisms to guide the development of targeted treatments.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40870389 · DOI · PMC12388418

Agent- and Dose-Specific Intestinal Obstruction Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials [4]

Research article Chen JJ, Hsu CW, Hung CM, Suen MW, Wang HY, Yang WC, et al. · · 2026 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have reshaped pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes, but emerging safety signals suggest a possible association with intestinal obstruction.
Closing excerpt
These findings refine gastrointestinal safety profiles for modern antidiabetic agents and may inform perioperative bowel management, drug selection, and dose optimization in patients at risk for ileus or adhesive obstruction.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (348 words)

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have reshaped pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes, but emerging safety signals suggest a possible association with intestinal obstruction. Because many candidates for these agents already harbor risk factors for ileus and bowel obstruction, clarifying agent- and dose-specific gastrointestinal safety is clinically important. We aimed to re-evaluate the risk of intestinal obstruction across individual GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors, with particular attention to dose stratification. We systematically searched eight databases through 21 January 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or active comparators in adults. The primary outcome was incident intestinal obstruction (small or large bowel). A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across drugs and dose tiers; Bayesian models and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) metrics were used for sensitivity analyses and treatment ranking. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed with standard Cochrane and GRADE-adapted tools. Fifty RCTs (47 publications; 192,359 participants) met inclusion criteria. Overall, canagliflozin use was associated with a higher incidence of intestinal obstruction than control therapies (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.01-6.49), corresponding to an absolute risk difference of 0.15% and a number needed to harm of 658. High-dose canagliflozin (300 mg/day) showed the clearest signal (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.08-10.76). In contrast, liraglutide was associated with a lower risk of intestinal obstruction (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.81), with an absolute risk reduction of 0.34% and a number needed to treat of 295. No other GLP-1 receptor agonist or SGLT2 inhibitor demonstrated a statistically significant increase in obstruction risk. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses yielded concordant estimates and rankings. From a randomized-trial perspective, intestinal obstruction risk is not elevated for most GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors. A dose-dependent safety signal was observed only for high-dose canagliflozin, whereas liraglutide may confer a protective effect. These findings refine gastrointestinal safety profiles for modern antidiabetic agents and may inform perioperative bowel management, drug selection, and dose optimization in patients at risk for ileus or adhesive obstruction.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41596262 · DOI · PMC12841245

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis [5]
    ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ, Bouvy ND, Kruitwagen RF, Jeekel J, et al. · BMJ · 2013 · cited 451 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery [6]
    Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F · Br J Surg · 2008 · cited 222 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Blaser AR, Starkopf J, Kirsimägi Ü, Deane AM · Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · 2014 · cited 179 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Boeckxstaens G, D'Hoore A · Colorectal Dis · 2016 · cited 157 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Stent as bridge to surgery for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction reduces adverse events and stoma rate compared with emergency surgery: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [9]
    Arezzo A, Passera R, Lo Secco G, Verra M, Bonino MA, Targarona E, et al. · Gastrointest Endosc · 2017 · cited 156 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction [10]
    Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D · Br J Surg · 2010 · cited 144 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Kaplan LJ, Martinez-Casas I, Mohseni S, Cimino M, Kurihara H, Lee MJ, et al.. Small bowel obstruction outcomes according to compliance with the World Society of Emergency Surgery Bologna guidelines. . 2025. PMID 40246692 · DOI · PMC12005947
  2. Brevini T, Swift L, Reynolds H, Ong J, Stopforth RJ, Malam Y, et al.. Successful AAV8 gene therapy on hepatic ex situ machine perfusion for mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy. . 2025. PMID 40774626 · DOI · PMC7619571
  3. Yu S, Kerolus K, Jin Z, Bajrami S, Denoya P, Bergese SD. Multidisciplinary Postoperative Ileus Management: A Narrative Review. . 2025. PMID 40870389 · DOI · PMC12388418
  4. Chen JJ, Hsu CW, Hung CM, Suen MW, Wang HY, Yang WC, et al.. Agent- and Dose-Specific Intestinal Obstruction Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. . 2026. PMID 41596262 · DOI · PMC12841245
  5. ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ, Bouvy ND, Kruitwagen RF, Jeekel J, et al.. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ. 2013. PMID 24092941 · DOI · PMC3789584
  6. Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2008. PMID 18844267 · DOI
  7. Blaser AR, Starkopf J, Kirsimägi Ü, Deane AM. Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014. PMID 24611520 · DOI
  8. Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Boeckxstaens G, D'Hoore A. Incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2016. PMID 26558477 · DOI
  9. Arezzo A, Passera R, Lo Secco G, Verra M, Bonino MA, Targarona E, et al.. Stent as bridge to surgery for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction reduces adverse events and stoma rate compared with emergency surgery: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017. PMID 28392363 · DOI
  10. Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2010. PMID 20205228 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • IleusDigestive System and Liver
  • Duodenal ObstructionDigestive System and Liver
  • Intestinal Pseudo-ObstructionDigestive System and Liver
  • Malabsorption SyndromesDigestive System and Liver
  • SteatorrheaDigestive System and Liver
  • Colonic Pseudo-ObstructionDigestive System and Liver

All 66 articles in Digestive System and Liver →

At a glance

52,925
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
4,473
review articles
586
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • IleusDigestive System and Liver
  • Duodenal ObstructionDigestive System and Liver
  • Intestinal Pseudo-ObstructionDigestive System and Liver
  • Malabsorption SyndromesDigestive System and Liver
  • SteatorrheaDigestive System and Liver

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support