Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Memory

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Memory

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

Complex mental function having four distinct phases: (1) memorizing or learning, (2) retention, (3) recall, and (4) recognition.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. Full-text reviews7. References8. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (503 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Complex mental function having four distinct phases: (1) memorizing or learning, (2) retention, (3) recall, and (4) recognition. Clinically, it is usually subdivided into immediate, recent, and remote memory.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Learning
Narrower topics
Deja Vu; Memory, Episodic; Memory, Long-Term; Memory, Short-Term; Mental Recall; Recognition, Psychology; Repetition Priming; Retention, Psychology; Spatial Memory

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 168,218 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Memory” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 31,462 of them (18.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 62,988 records.

Reviews account for 13,656 records (8.1%) and meta-analyses for 1,248. Randomized controlled trials number 7,779 (4.6%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 35,328 records; 2000-2009: 38,440 records; 2010-2019: 62,988 records; 2020 onward: 31,462 records35,328through 199938,4402000-200962,9882010-201931,4622020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199935,328
2000-200938,440
2010-201962,988
2020 onward31,462
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 4.6 percentReviews8.1% (13,656)Meta-analyses0.7% (1,248)Randomized controlled trials4.6% (7,779)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 168,218 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews13,6568.1%
Meta-analyses1,2480.7%
Randomized controlled trials7,7794.6%

Method: PubMed query "Memory"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Developmental Scarcity Induces Sex Differences in Social Recognition and CA2 Perineuronal Nets
Waters RC, Gore IR, Brown CJ, Skweres-Gilmartin AL, Rathaur AB, Gould E
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42692858 · DOI · PMC13592735
Remembering the "when": Hebbian memory models for the time of past events
Brea J, Modirshanechi A, Iatropoulos G, Gerstner W
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42520083 · DOI · PMC13436827
Experience reorganizes content-specific memory traces in macaques
Abbaspoor S, Aljishi A, Hoffman KL
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42527550 · DOI · PMC13433320

Developmental Scarcity Induces Sex Differences in Social Recognition and CA2 Perineuronal Nets [1]

Research article Waters RC, Gore IR, Brown CJ, Skweres-Gilmartin AL, Rathaur AB, Gould E · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Early-life adversity (ELA) has a lasting negative impact on social behavior in both humans and rodents.
Closing excerpt
Focal degradation of the extracellular matrix in the CA2 region restored social recognition function in adult males previously subjected to early stress, suggesting that the effects of developmental adversity may be improved by targeted intervention in adulthood.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Early-life adversity (ELA) has a lasting negative impact on social behavior in both humans and rodents. Sex differences exist in functional outcomes of postnatal stress, but underlying mechanisms remain incompletely explored. Using the limited bedding and nesting paradigm, a mouse model of developmental scarcity, we found sex differences in social behavior with adult males showing impaired social recognition and adult females showing intact social recognition with enhanced social novelty preference. Perineuronal nets (PNNs), specialized extracellular matrix structures, are known to inhibit developmental plasticity and are concentrated in the CA2 region of the hippocampus in adulthood. We found higher intensity of CA2 PNNs in adult males, but not adult females, after ELA. Focal degradation of the extracellular matrix in the CA2 region restored social recognition function in adult males previously subjected to early stress, suggesting that the effects of developmental adversity may be improved by targeted intervention in adulthood.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42692858 · DOI · PMC13592735

Remembering the "when": Hebbian memory models for the time of past events [2]

Research article Brea J, Modirshanechi A, Iatropoulos G, Gerstner W · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Humans and animals can remember how long ago specific events happened.
Closing excerpt
Our study shows that remembering the "when" can be implemented by many biologically plausible mechanisms and that carefully designed experiments are needed to pin down the actual neural implementation of the memory for the time of past events in different species.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)

Humans and animals can remember how long ago specific events happened. Little is known about the neural mechanisms that enable remembering the "when" of memories stored for long durations in the episodic memory system - in contrast to interval-timing on the order of seconds and minutes. Based on a systematic exploration of neural coding, association and retrieval schemes, we develop model classes that span the space of possible mechanisms for the reconstruction of the time of past events. In concrete examples we show how network architecture, Hebbian plasticity, synaptic pruning or systems consolidation allow the retrieval of the time of past events. In a simulation, we demonstrate how these mechanisms would enable food-caching animals such as corvids to remember what they cached, where, and how long ago. To dissociate different hypotheses, we propose three kinds of novel, non-verbal experiments that can be run with humans and animals. Our simulations predict the experimental results for different classes of models. Our study shows that remembering the "when" can be implemented by many biologically plausible mechanisms and that carefully designed experiments are needed to pin down the actual neural implementation of the memory for the time of past events in different species.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42520083 · DOI · PMC13436827

Experience reorganizes content-specific memory traces in macaques [3]

Research article Abbaspoor S, Aljishi A, Hoffman KL · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Memory formation relies on the reorganization of neural activity patterns during experience that persist in subsequent sleep.
Closing excerpt
These findings reveal rapid organization and stabilization of neural activity in the primate brain, suggesting potential mechanisms for balancing learning with memory linking and durability.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (156 words)

Memory formation relies on the reorganization of neural activity patterns during experience that persist in subsequent sleep. How these processes promote learning while preserving established memories remains unclear. Here we recorded neural ensemble activity from the hippocampal and associated regions in freely moving macaques as they recalled item sequences presented that day ('new'), 1 day earlier ('recent') or more than 2 weeks earlier ('old'). Cell assemblies biased for old sequences showed less drift, greater network connectivity and stronger sleep reactivation than new-biased assemblies. Pairs of old and recent assemblies formed persistent task-to-sleep coupling ('metassemblies'), unlike new assembly pairs, and these assembly pairs showed longer interactions over time than the new pairs. In the hippocampus, the propensity for superficial and deep CA1 pyramidal cells to form integrated assemblies increased with memory age. These findings reveal rapid organization and stabilization of neural activity in the primate brain, suggesting potential mechanisms for balancing learning with memory linking and durability.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42527550 · DOI · PMC13433320

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review [4]
    Melby-Lervåg M, Redick TS, Hulme C · Perspect Psychol Sci · 2016 · cited 506 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis [5]
    de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, Visscher C, Hartman E · J Sci Med Sport · 2018 · cited 415 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review [6]
    Moran TP · Psychol Bull · 2016 · cited 407 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect [7]
    Rowland CA · Psychol Bull · 2014 · cited 358 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cognitive training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of clinical and neuropsychological outcomes from randomized controlled trials [8]
    Cortese S, Ferrin M, Brandeis D, Buitelaar J, Daley D, Dittmann RW, et al. · J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry · 2015 · cited 314 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: A meta-analysis and integrative review [9]
    Shields GS, Sazma MA, McCullough AM, Yonelinas AP · Psychol Bull · 2017 · cited 301 times (Europe PMC)

Full-text reviews on EvidenceLib

Open-access review articles about this topic, reproduced in full with authors, licence and references.

  • Stress resilience in plants: the complex interplay between heat stress memory and resetting

    Tobias Staacke, Bernd Mueller‐Roeber, Salma Balazadeh · The New Phytologist 2025 · CC BY 4.0

  • The Frontal Aslant Tract: A Systematic Review for Neurosurgical Applications

    Emanuele La Corte, Daniela Eldahaby, Elena Greco et al. · Frontiers in Neurology 2021 · CC BY 4.0

References

  1. Waters RC, Gore IR, Brown CJ, Skweres-Gilmartin AL, Rathaur AB, Gould E. Developmental Scarcity Induces Sex Differences in Social Recognition and CA2 Perineuronal Nets. . 2026. PMID 42692858 · DOI · PMC13592735
  2. Brea J, Modirshanechi A, Iatropoulos G, Gerstner W. Remembering the "when": Hebbian memory models for the time of past events. . 2026. PMID 42520083 · DOI · PMC13436827
  3. Abbaspoor S, Aljishi A, Hoffman KL. Experience reorganizes content-specific memory traces in macaques. . 2026. PMID 42527550 · DOI · PMC13433320
  4. Melby-Lervåg M, Redick TS, Hulme C. Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016. PMID 27474138 · DOI · PMC4968033
  5. de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, Visscher C, Hartman E. Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2018. PMID 29054748 · DOI
  6. Moran TP. Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychol Bull. 2016. PMID 26963369 · DOI
  7. Rowland CA. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychol Bull. 2014. PMID 25150680 · DOI
  8. Cortese S, Ferrin M, Brandeis D, Buitelaar J, Daley D, Dittmann RW, et al.. Cognitive training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of clinical and neuropsychological outcomes from randomized controlled trials. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015. PMID 25721181 · DOI · PMC4382075
  9. Shields GS, Sazma MA, McCullough AM, Yonelinas AP. The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: A meta-analysis and integrative review. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID 28368148 · DOI · PMC5436944

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AssociationPsychiatry and Psychology
  • CuesPsychiatry and Psychology
  • LearningPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Open Field TestPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Problem SolvingPsychiatry and Psychology
  • PunishmentPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

168,218
PubMed records on this heading
19%
published since 2020
13,656
review articles
7,779
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AssociationPsychiatry and Psychology
  • CuesPsychiatry and Psychology
  • LearningPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Open Field TestPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Problem SolvingPsychiatry and Psychology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support