Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Diagnostics and Medical Technology›Microbubbles

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Microbubbles

Diagnostics and Medical Technology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

Small encapsulated gas bubbles (diameters of micrometers) that can be used as contrast media, and in other diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,058 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Small encapsulated gas bubbles (diameters of micrometers) that can be used as contrast media, and in other diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Upon exposure to sufficiently intense ultrasound, microbubbles will cavitate, rupture, disappear, release gas content. Such characteristics of the microbubbles can be used to enhance diagnostic tests, dissolve blood clots, and deliver drugs or genes for therapy.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Microbubble; Colloidal Gas Aphrons; Aphron, Colloidal Gas; Aphrons, Colloidal Gas; Colloidal Gas Aphron; Gas Aphron, Colloidal; Gas Aphrons, Colloidal.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Equipment and Supplies
See also
Microspheres

Related concepts

  • Contrast Media

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,820 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Microbubbles” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,857 of them (31.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,873 records.

Reviews account for 691 records (11.9%) and meta-analyses for 9. Randomized controlled trials number 30 (0.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 1,167 records; 2010-2019: 2,873 records; 2020 onward: 1,857 records0through 19991,1672000-20092,8732010-20191,8572020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20091,167
2010-20192,873
2020 onward1,857
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.5 percentReviews11.9% (691)Meta-analyses0.2% (9)Randomized controlled trials0.5% (30)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,820 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews69111.9%
Meta-analyses90.2%
Randomized controlled trials300.5%

Method: PubMed query "Microbubbles"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology

A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Ultrasound-mediated delivery of doxorubicin to the brain results in immune modulation and improved responses to PD-1 blockade in gliomas
Arrieta VA, Gould A, Kim KS, Habashy KJ, Dmello C, Vázquez-Cervantes GI, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
91cc by
PMID 38844770 · DOI · PMC11156895
Therapeutic Agent Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier Using Focused Ultrasound
McMahon D, O'Reilly MA, Hynynen K
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
75cc by
PMID 33752471 · DOI · PMC11979953
Transcranial blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease patients using a portable focused ultrasound system with real-time 2-D cavitation mapping
Bae S, Liu K, Pouliopoulos AN, Ji R, Jiménez-Gambín S, Yousefian O, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
46cc by
PMID 39113808 · DOI · PMC11303073
Subharmonics are not an infallible safety metric for cavitation dynamics
Wu Q, Gray MD, Smith CAB, Bau L, Coussios CC, Cleveland RO, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41638992 · DOI · PMC7619635

Ultrasound-mediated delivery of doxorubicin to the brain results in immune modulation and improved responses to PD-1 blockade in gliomas [1]

Research article Arrieta VA, Gould A, Kim KS, Habashy KJ, Dmello C, Vázquez-Cervantes GI, et al. · · 2024 · cited 91 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Given the marginal penetration of most drugs across the blood-brain barrier, the efficacy of various agents remains limited for glioblastoma (GBM).
Closing excerpt
Overall, this translational study supports the utility of LIPU/MB to potentiate the antitumoral activities of doxorubicin and aPD-1 for GBM.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (200 words)

Given the marginal penetration of most drugs across the blood-brain barrier, the efficacy of various agents remains limited for glioblastoma (GBM). Here we employ low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPU) and intravenously administered microbubbles (MB) to open the blood-brain barrier and increase the concentration of liposomal doxorubicin and PD-1 blocking antibodies (aPD-1). We report results on a cohort of 4 GBM patients and preclinical models treated with this approach. LIPU/MB increases the concentration of doxorubicin by 2-fold and 3.9-fold in the human and murine brains two days after sonication, respectively. Similarly, LIPU/MB-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption leads to a 6-fold and a 2-fold increase in aPD-1 concentrations in murine brains and peritumoral brain regions from GBM patients treated with pembrolizumab, respectively. Doxorubicin and aPD-1 delivered with LIPU/MB upregulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II in tumor cells. Increased brain concentrations of doxorubicin achieved by LIPU/MB elicit IFN-γ and MHC class I expression in microglia and macrophages. Doxorubicin and aPD-1 delivered with LIPU/MB results in the long-term survival of most glioma-bearing mice, which rely on myeloid cells and lymphocytes for their efficacy. Overall, this translational study supports the utility of LIPU/MB to potentiate the antitumoral activities of doxorubicin and aPD-1 for GBM.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38844770 · DOI · PMC11156895

Therapeutic Agent Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier Using Focused Ultrasound [2]

Review article McMahon D, O'Reilly MA, Hynynen K · · 2021 · cited 75 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Specialized features of vasculature in the central nervous system greatly limit therapeutic treatment options for many neuropathologies.
Closing excerpt
This review outlines the use of FUS+MB-mediated cerebrovascular permeability enhancement as a drug delivery technique, details several technical and biological considerations of this approach, summarizes results from the clinical trials conducted to date, and discusses the future direction of the field.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (147 words)

Specialized features of vasculature in the central nervous system greatly limit therapeutic treatment options for many neuropathologies. Focused ultrasound, in combination with circulating microbubbles, can be used to transiently and noninvasively increase cerebrovascular permeability with a high level of spatial precision. For minutes to hours following sonication, drugs can be administered systemically to extravasate in the targeted brain regions and exert a therapeutic effect, after which permeability returns to baseline levels. With the wide range of therapeutic agents that can be delivered using this approach and the growing clinical need, focused ultrasound and microbubble (FUS+MB) exposure in the brain has entered human testing to assess safety. This review outlines the use of FUS+MB-mediated cerebrovascular permeability enhancement as a drug delivery technique, details several technical and biological considerations of this approach, summarizes results from the clinical trials conducted to date, and discusses the future direction of the field.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33752471 · DOI · PMC11979953

Transcranial blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease patients using a portable focused ultrasound system with real-time 2-D cavitation mapping [3]

Research article Bae S, Liu K, Pouliopoulos AN, Ji R, Jiménez-Gambín S, Yousefian O, et al. · · 2024 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background : Focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles has recently shown great promise in facilitating blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening for drug delivery and immunotherapy in Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Closing excerpt
Our study highlights the potential for accessible FUS treatment in AD, with or without drug delivery.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (437 words)

Background : Focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles has recently shown great promise in facilitating blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening for drug delivery and immunotherapy in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it is currently limited to systems integrated within the MRI suites or requiring post-surgical implants, thus restricting its widespread clinical adoption. In this pilot study, we investigate the clinical safety and feasibility of a portable, non-invasive neuronavigation-guided FUS (NgFUS) system with integrated real-time 2-D microbubble cavitation mapping. Methods : A phase 1 clinical study with mild to moderate AD patients (N = 6) underwent a single session of microbubble-mediated NgFUS to induce transient BBB opening (BBBO). Microbubble activity under FUS was monitored with real-time 2-D cavitation maps and dosing to ensure the efficacy and safety of the NgFUS treatment. Post-operative MRI was used for BBB opening and closure confirmation as well as safety assessment. Changes in AD biomarker levels in both blood serum and extracellular vesicles (EVs) were evaluated, while changes in amyloid-beta (Aβ) load in the brain were assessed through 18F-florbetapir PET. Results : BBBO was achieved in 5 out of 6 subjects with an average volume of 983 ± 626 mm3 following FUS at the right frontal lobe both in white and gray matter regions. The outpatient treatment was completed within 34.8 ± 10.7 min. Cavitation dose significantly correlated with the BBBO volume (R 2 > 0.9, N = 4), demonstrating the portable NgFUS system's capability of predicting opening volumes. The cavitation maps co-localized closely with the BBBO location, representing the first report of real-time transcranial 2-D cavitation mapping in the human brain. Larger opening volumes correlated with increased levels of AD biomarkers, including Aβ42 (R 2 = 0.74), Tau (R 2 = 0.95), and P-Tau181 (R 2 = 0.86), assayed in serum-derived EVs sampled 3 days after FUS (N = 5). From PET scans, subjects showed a lower Aβ load increase in the treated frontal lobe region compared to the contralateral region. Reduction in asymmetry standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) correlated with the cavitation dose (R 2 > 0.9, N = 3). Clinical changes in the mini-mental state examination over 6 months were within the expected range of cognitive decline with no additional changes observed as a result of FUS. Conclusion : We showed the safety and feasibility of this cost-effective and time-efficient portable NgFUS treatment for BBBO in AD patients with the first demonstration of real-time 2-D cavitation mapping. The cavitation dose correlated with BBBO volume, a slowed increase in pathology, and serum detection of AD proteins. Our study highlights the potential for accessible FUS treatment in AD, with or without drug delivery.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39113808 · DOI · PMC11303073

Subharmonics are not an infallible safety metric for cavitation dynamics [4]

Research article Wu Q, Gray MD, Smith CAB, Bau L, Coussios CC, Cleveland RO, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveThere has been a substantial increase in the range of applications for focused ultrasound in recent years with multiple clinical trials reporting promising results.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionThese results suggest that caution is needed in utilizing simple metrics such as the presence or absence of a subharmonic signal as an indicator of cavitation; especially in applications where off-target cavitation represents a safety concern.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (274 words)

ObjectiveThere has been a substantial increase in the range of applications for focused ultrasound in recent years with multiple clinical trials reporting promising results. Reliable treatment monitoring protocols will be essential for future clinical development of these therapies. Acoustic emissions provide a valuable source of data for real time monitoring, especially for procedures in which cavitation plays an important role. Currently, however, there is a lack of consensus as to whether specific frequency components (e.g., broadband noise or subharmonics) are more or less valuable as indicators of cavitation. Our aim in this study was to investigate the relationship between cavitation bubble dynamics and corresponding acoustic emissions from single bubbles, with a specific focus on the conditions producing subharmonic emissions.MethodWe used a combination of acoustic measurements and ultra-high speed imaging captured simultaneously from single phosphoplipid-coated microbubbles generated using a microfluidic device to control their size and separation.ResultsContrary to much of the literature, we found that there were no well-defined thresholds in any of the frequency components commonly used in cavitation monitoring (harmonics, subharmonics, ultraharmonics or broadband noise) at a driving frequency of 0.5 MHz within a therapeutically relevant range of pressures (0.12-1.2 MPa), nor was there any clear relationship between changes in the vigor of cavitation bubble dynamics and the corresponding subharmonic emissions. In addition, the magnitude of the subharmonic signal power was typically an order of magnitude lower than the local broadband noise, even after compensating for receiver sensitivity.ConclusionThese results suggest that caution is needed in utilizing simple metrics such as the presence or absence of a subharmonic signal as an indicator of cavitation; especially in applications where off-target cavitation represents a safety concern.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41638992 · DOI · PMC7619635

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery [5]
    Hernot S, Klibanov AL · Adv Drug Deliv Rev · 2008 · cited 661 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions [6]
    Lindner JR · Nat Rev Drug Discov · 2004 · cited 499 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review [7]
    Pitt WG, Husseini GA, Staples BJ · Expert Opin Drug Deliv · 2004 · cited 375 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment [8]
    Agarwal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y · Chemosphere · 2011 · cited 341 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview [9]
    Cosgrove D · Eur J Radiol · 2006 · cited 286 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering [10]
    Qin S, Caskey CF, Ferrara KW · Phys Med Biol · 2009 · cited 283 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Arrieta VA, Gould A, Kim KS, Habashy KJ, Dmello C, Vázquez-Cervantes GI, et al.. Ultrasound-mediated delivery of doxorubicin to the brain results in immune modulation and improved responses to PD-1 blockade in gliomas. . 2024. PMID 38844770 · DOI · PMC11156895
  2. McMahon D, O'Reilly MA, Hynynen K. Therapeutic Agent Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier Using Focused Ultrasound. . 2021. PMID 33752471 · DOI · PMC11979953
  3. Bae S, Liu K, Pouliopoulos AN, Ji R, Jiménez-Gambín S, Yousefian O, et al.. Transcranial blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease patients using a portable focused ultrasound system with real-time 2-D cavitation mapping. . 2024. PMID 39113808 · DOI · PMC11303073
  4. Wu Q, Gray MD, Smith CAB, Bau L, Coussios CC, Cleveland RO, et al.. Subharmonics are not an infallible safety metric for cavitation dynamics. . 2026. PMID 41638992 · DOI · PMC7619635
  5. Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008. PMID 18486268 · DOI · PMC2720159
  6. Lindner JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004. PMID 15173842 · DOI
  7. Pitt WG, Husseini GA, Staples BJ. Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2004. PMID 16296719 · DOI · PMC1361256
  8. Agarwal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y. Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere. 2011. PMID 21689840 · DOI
  9. Cosgrove D. Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview. Eur J Radiol. 2006. PMID 16938418 · DOI
  10. Qin S, Caskey CF, Ferrara KW. Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering. Phys Med Biol. 2009. PMID 19229096 · DOI · PMC2818980

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Culture MediaDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • EchocardiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Computed Tomography AngiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • CholangiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Optical ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Contrast SensitivityPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Diagnostics and Medical Technology →

At a glance

5,820
PubMed records on this heading
32%
published since 2020
691
review articles
30
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Culture MediaDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • EchocardiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Computed Tomography AngiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • CholangiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Optical ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support