Myelography

Main textWe aim to summarize the available evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging (index test) compared to surgery (reference test) for identifying lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in adult patients.For this systematic review we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (June 2017) for studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of imaging for LDH in adult patients with low back pain and surgery as the reference standard. Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity using bivariate analysis, generated linked ROC plots in case of direct comparison of diagnostic imaging tests and assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE-approach.We found 14 studies, all but one done before 1995, including 940 patients. Nine studies investigated Computed Tomography (CT), eight myelography and six Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The prior probability of LDH varied from 48.6 to 98.7%. The summary estimates for MRI and myelography were comparable with CT (sensitivity: 81.3% (95%CI 72.3-87.7%) and specificity: 77.1% (95%CI 61.9-87.5%)). The quality of evidence was moderate to very low.ConclusionsThe diagnostic accuracy of CT, myelography and MRI of today is unknown, as we found no studies evaluating today's more advanced imaging techniques. Concerning the older techniques we found moderate diagnostic accuracy for all CT, myelography and MRI, indicating a large proportion of false positives and negatives.

BackgroundSpinal imaging is essential to identify and localize cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) patients when targeted treatment is necessary.PurposeProvide an in-depth presentation of the conventional dynamic myelography (CDM) technique for localizing spinal CSF leaks in SIH patients.Material and methodsConsecutive SIH patients with a CSF leak confirmed on CDM and postmyelography computed tomography (CT) investigated at our institution between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative reports were reviewed to confirm the accuracy of CDM.ResultsIn total, 62 patients (mean age 45 years) were included; 48 with a ventral dural tear, 12 with a meningeal diverticulum, and in 2 patients positive for spinal longitudinal extradural CSF collection the site remained unclear. The leak was identified during the first and the second CDM in 43 and 17 patients, respectively. The use of CDM correctly identified the site of the CSF leak in all but one patient undergoing surgical closure (45/46, 98%). The mean fluoroscopy time was 7.8 min (range 1.8-14.4 min) with a radiation dose for a single examination of 310 mGy (range 28-1237 mGy).ConclusionThe CDM procedure has a high accuracy for spinal CSF leak localization including dural tears and spinal nerve diverticula. It is the technique with the highest temporal resolution, is robust to breathing artifacts, allows great flexibility regarding patient positioning, compares favorably to other dynamic examinations with respect to the radiation dose and does not require general anesthesia. For CSF venous fistulas, however, other dynamic examinations, such as digital subtraction myelography, seem more appropriate.

IntroductionThe spinal cord is poorly visualized on CT images but is well visualized in MRI images. However, implants used for spinal stabilization can produce artifacts on the MRI images which can interfere with identification of the cord. CT myelography in conjunction with CT simulation helps to clearly delineate the cord.Materials and methodsCT simulation was done in a patient with vertebral hemangioma. Pre- and post myelography images were obtained. Two plans were generated on pre and post myelography CT images using Eclipse™ treatment planning system (TPS) version 10.0, Varian Medical Systems, USA. The prescribed total dose to PTV was 40 Gy in 20 fractions.ResultsThe cord was poorly visualized in the premyelogram CT images. The titanium implants used for spinal cord stabilization produced artifacts in the MRI images. Figure Post myelogram, the contrast lit up the spinal cord. There was an overlap of 0.75 cc volume of the spinal cord with the PTV in the premyelogram images. This volume was reduced to 0 cc in the post myelogram images. There was an overlap of 5.4 cc volume of the PRV of spinal cord with the PTV in the premyelogram images which was reduced to 1 cc in the post myelogram images. The overlap region between the PTV and spinal cord received around 71% of the prescribed dose in premyelogram CT could be reduced to 0% in the post myelogram CT. The mean dose received by the overlap PRV spinal cord and PTV could be increased from 70% in the premyelogram to 92% in the post myelogram plans.ConclusionCT myelogram in conjunction with CT simulation is particularly useful in cases where the tumor margin is very close to the cord and spinal implants are causing distortion of magnetic resonance images.

PurposePresented here is a strategy of sequential lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography (LDDSM) followed closely by lateral decubitus CT (LDCT) to facilitate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-venous fistula (CVF) localization.Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of patients referred to our institution for evaluation of CSF leak. Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 leaks, and those not displaying MR brain stigmata of intracranial hypotension were excluded. All patients underwent consecutive LDDSM and LDCT. If the CVF was not localized on the first LDDSM-LDCT pair the patient returned for contralateral examinations. Images were reviewed for CVF and for accumulation of contrast within the renal pelvises expressed as a renal pelvis contrast score (RPCS) in Hounsfield units (HU).ResultsTwenty-two patients were included in this study. In 21 of 22 patients (95%) a CVF was identified yielding an RPCS for the LDDSM-LDCT pair ipsilateral to the CVF ranging from 71 to 423 with an average of 146 HU. An RPCS of the negative side LDDSM-LDCT pair contralateral to a CVF was available in 8 patients and averaged 51 HU. In 4 patients the initial bilateral LDDSM-LDCT pairs did not reveal the location of the CVF however in 3 of these 4 cases the CVF was revealed on a third LDDSM repeated ipsilateral to the higher RPCS.ConclusionThe strategy of sequential LDDSM-LDCT coupled with evaluation of renal accumulation of contrast agent appears to improve the rate of CVF localization and warrants further evaluation.