Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (929 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A complication of ovulation induction in infertility treatment. It is graded by the severity of symptoms which include ovary enlargement, multiple ovarian follicles; ovarian cysts; ascites; and generalized edema. The full-blown syndrome may lead to renal failure, respiratory distress, and even death. Increased capillary permeability is caused by the vasoactive substances, such as vascular endothelial growth factors, secreted by the overly-stimulated ovaries.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Hyperstimulation Syndrome, Ovarian; Hyperstimulation Syndromes, Ovarian; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndromes; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, Familial Gestational Spontaneous.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Ovarian Diseases
- See also
- Ovulation Induction
Related concepts
- Ovulation Induction
- Ovary
- Ovarian Follicle
- Ovarian Cysts
- Ascites
- Edema
- Renal Insufficiency
- Death
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
- Ovary
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,747 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 482 of them (17.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 924 records.
Reviews account for 608 records (22.1%) and meta-analyses for 107. Randomized controlled trials number 198 (7.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 538 |
| 2000-2009 | 803 |
| 2010-2019 | 924 |
| 2020 onward | 482 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 608 | 22.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 107 | 3.9% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 198 | 7.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in metabolism and endocrine disease
Studies of diabetes, obesity and hormone disorders often follow blood tests such as glucose, HbA1c or hormone levels, which are stand-ins for outcomes that matter more, such as complications. Lifestyle and diet research is largely observational, and weight and diabetes trials can differ in how long people were followed. Nothing on this page is advice about medicines, insulin or diet; talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Check whether the outcome was a lab value or a clinical event, and the type and duration of the condition studied.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment | 2012 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 90 | cc by PMID 22531097 · DOI · PMC3403873 |
| In vitro maturation (IVM) of human immature oocytes: is it still relevant? | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 57 | cc by PMID 37993914 · DOI · PMC10664544 |
| Women with PCOS who undergo IVF: a comprehensive review of therapeutic strategies for successful outcomes | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 56 | cc by PMID 37528417 · DOI · PMC10391774 |
| Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: severity predictors | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42441891 · DOI · PMC13544262 |
Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious complication of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) as part of assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
- Closing excerpt
- Some of these techniques have been widely adopted, despite the scarcity of data from randomized clinical trials to support their use.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (234 words)
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious complication of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) as part of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). While the safety and efficacy of ART is well established, physicians should always be aware of the risk of OHSS in patients undergoing COS, as it can be fatal. This article will briefly present the pathophysiology of OHSS, including the key role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), to provide the foundation for an overview of current techniques for the prevention of OHSS. Risk factors and predictive factors for OHSS will be presented, as recognizing these risk factors and individualizing the COS protocol appropriately is the key to the primary prevention of OHSS, as the benefits and risks of each COS strategy vary among individuals. Individualized COS (iCOS) could effectively eradicate OHSS, and the identification of hormonal, functional and genetic markers of ovarian response will facilitate iCOS. However, if iCOS is not properly applied, various preventive measures can be instituted once COS has begun, including cancelling the cycle, coasting, individualizing the human chorionic gonadotropin trigger dose or using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (for those using a GnRH antagonist protocol), the use of intravenous fluids at the time of oocyte retrieval, and cryopreserving/vitrifying all embryos for subsequent transfer in an unstimulated cycle. Some of these techniques have been widely adopted, despite the scarcity of data from randomized clinical trials to support their use.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22531097 · DOI · PMC3403873
In vitro maturation (IVM) of human immature oocytes: is it still relevant? [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- In vitro maturation (IVM) of human immature oocytes has been shown to be a viable option for patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), those seeking urgent fertility preservation and in circumstances where controlled ovarian stimulation is not feasible.
- Closing excerpt
- In this review, the present state of human IVM programs and future research directions will be discussed, aiming to promote a better understanding of IVM and identify potential strategies to improve the overall efficiency and success rates of IVM programs, which will in turn lead to better clinical outcomes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)
In vitro maturation (IVM) of human immature oocytes has been shown to be a viable option for patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), those seeking urgent fertility preservation and in circumstances where controlled ovarian stimulation is not feasible. Moreover, IVM techniques can be combined with ovarian tissue cryobanking to increase the chances of conception in cancer survivors. The clinical applications of IVM in the field of reproductive medicine are rapidly expanding and the technique is now classified as non-experimental. In contrast to conventional IVF (in vitro fertilization), IVM offers several advantages, such as reduced gonadotropin stimulation, minimal risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), reduced treatment times and lower costs. However, the technical expertise involved in performing IVM and its lower success rates compared to traditional IVF cycles, still pose significant challenges. Despite recent advances, such as innovative biphasic IVM systems, IVM is still an evolving technique and research is ongoing to refine protocols and identify techniques to improve its efficiency and effectiveness. A comprehensive understanding of the distinct mechanisms of oocyte maturation is crucial for obtaining more viable oocytes through in vitro methods, which will in turn lead to significantly improved success rates. In this review, the present state of human IVM programs and future research directions will be discussed, aiming to promote a better understanding of IVM and identify potential strategies to improve the overall efficiency and success rates of IVM programs, which will in turn lead to better clinical outcomes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37993914 · DOI · PMC10664544
Women with PCOS who undergo IVF: a comprehensive review of therapeutic strategies for successful outcomes [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a widespread syndrome that poses unique challenges and constraints to the field of assisted reproductive technology.
- Closing excerpt
- Overall, patients with PCOS require careful individual tailoring of their IVF cycle to achieve optimal results.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (213 words)
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a widespread syndrome that poses unique challenges and constraints to the field of assisted reproductive technology. This condition is the most common cause of anovulation among infertile couples. Debate exists over the best therapeutic course of action when patients with PCOS proceed to IVF. In this review, we evaluate the best-performing and safest methods of IVF preparation, ovarian stimulation, trigger method for maturation of stimulated egg growth, and planning for embryo transfer. Pre-IVF considerations include being aware of individual AMH and vitamin D levels as well as BMI prior to selecting an ovarian stimulation protocol. Numerous supplements such as myo-inositol complement the benefits of lifestyle change and may enhance IVF performance including oocyte yield and pregnancy rate. Concerning stimulation protocols, antagonist cycles with the judicious use of GnRH agonist trigger, pre-treatment with metformin and vitamin D repletion may help mitigate the accompanied risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Following ovarian stimulation, PCOS patients typically undergo programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles which are more conducive for women with irregular cycles, but likely carry a higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. However, newer stimulated FET protocols using Letrozole may offer improved outcomes. Overall, patients with PCOS require careful individual tailoring of their IVF cycle to achieve optimal results.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37528417 · DOI · PMC10391774
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: severity predictors [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical and laboratory parameters associated with the severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and to assess pregnancy outcomes in women hospitalized with moderate or severe OHSS.
- Closing excerpt
- Basal serum albumin concentration, together with total protein level and hematocrit, are predictive factors for OHSS severity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (238 words)
ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical and laboratory parameters associated with the severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and to assess pregnancy outcomes in women hospitalized with moderate or severe OHSS. Several risk factors, including elevated antral follicle count (AFC), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), and serum estradiol (E2) levels, increase the risk of OHSS.MethodsWe studied 71 women with a median age of 32.7 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 22.8 kg/m2 with moderate (n=38) and severe (n=31) OHSS. We measured E2, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), creatinine, albumin (Alb), total protein (TP), D-dimer (DD), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels on the day of hospitalization and every second day until discharge. Data on the length of hospitalization, along with pregnancy outcomes, were recorded.ResultsThere were no intergroup differences between women with moderate and severe OHSS in terms of age and BMI. The total pregnancy rate in both moderate (18/38) and severe (9/31) OHSS was 27/69; however, in women with severe OHSS, the positive pregnancy outcome was approximately half that observed in the moderate OHSS group and was accompanied by longer hospitalization (2.9-fold). All women with OHSS had elevated initial E2 levels (>6910pg/mL). Women with severe OHSS had higher initial E2 (p=0.001) and Hct (p=0.006) levels, together with lower Alb and TP concentrations (both pConclusionElevated estradiol concentration is an associated factor for OHSS in women undergoing COH. Basal serum albumin concentration, together with total protein level and hematocrit, are predictive factors for OHSS severity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42441891 · DOI · PMC13544262
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review [5]
- Research article Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment [6]
- Research article AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis [7]
- Research article Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline [8]
- Research article Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician [9]
- Research article The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [10]
References
- Fiedler K, Ezcurra D. Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment. . 2012. PMID 22531097 · DOI · PMC3403873
- Das M, Son WY. In vitro maturation (IVM) of human immature oocytes: is it still relevant?. . 2023. PMID 37993914 · DOI · PMC10664544
- Kotlyar AM, Seifer DB. Women with PCOS who undergo IVF: a comprehensive review of therapeutic strategies for successful outcomes. . 2023. PMID 37528417 · DOI · PMC10391774
- Piróg M, Kacalska-Janssen O, Ogiegło A, Jach R. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: severity predictors. . 2026. PMID 42441891 · DOI · PMC13544262
- Delvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2002. PMID 12498425 · DOI
- Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992. PMID 1633889 · DOI
- Broer SL, Dólleman M, Opmeer BC, Fauser BC, Mol BW, Broekmans FJ. AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2011. PMID 20667894 · DOI
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID 27678032 · DOI
- Humaidan P, Quartarolo J, Papanikolaou EG. Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID 20416867 · DOI
- Whelan JG, Vlahos NF. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000. PMID 10785212 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.