Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Diagnostics and Medical Technology›Photography

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Photography

Diagnostics and Medical Technology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

Method of making images on a sensitized surface by exposure to light or other radiant energy.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (613 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Method of making images on a sensitized surface by exposure to light or other radiant energy.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Photographies.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Diagnostic Imaging; Investigative Techniques
Narrower topics
Holography; Image Enhancement; Photofluorography; Photogrammetry; Photography, Dental; Photomicrography; Time-Lapse Imaging
See also
Microfilming; Motion Pictures

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 717,292 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Photography” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 132,894 of them (18.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 258,490 records.

Reviews account for 76,158 records (10.6%) and meta-analyses for 3,316. Randomized controlled trials number 8,584 (1.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 154,705 records; 2000-2009: 171,203 records; 2010-2019: 258,490 records; 2020 onward: 132,894 records154,705through 1999171,2032000-2009258,4902010-2019132,8942020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999154,705
2000-2009171,203
2010-2019258,490
2020 onward132,894
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.2 percentReviews10.6% (76,158)Meta-analyses0.5% (3,316)Randomized controlled trials1.2% (8,584)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 717,292 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews76,15810.6%
Meta-analyses3,3160.5%
Randomized controlled trials8,5841.2%

Method: PubMed query "Photography"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology

A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Platelet activation and thrombosis in microvascular obstruction
Balmforth C, Giaj Levra A, Whittington B, Morgan A, Macaskill MG, Tzolos E, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42668434 · DOI · PMC13721768
How reliable is deep inspiration breath hold at CT simulation? Clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training in breast cancer radiotherapy
Dietrich L, Lackner N, Karius A, Brand J, Lobao R, Huseynli A, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42698070 · DOI · PMC13543520
Motion correction algorithm improves right coronary artery image quality at heart rates > 75 bpm in non-ECG-gated coronary CT angiography
Wang M, Tao L, Li W, Cao Y, Wu H, Zhang Z
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42745134 · DOI · PMC13578101

Platelet activation and thrombosis in microvascular obstruction [1]

Research article Balmforth C, Giaj Levra A, Whittington B, Morgan A, Macaskill MG, Tzolos E, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AimsMicrovascular obstruction (MVO) remains a major complication following coronary reperfusion, but its pathogenesis is poorly defined.
Closing excerpt
These findings are consistent with an important mechanistic contribution of platelet-mediated microvascular thrombosis to no-reflow and MVO, highlighting a potentially targetable biological pathway in a condition for which effective therapies remain elusive.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (209 words)

AimsMicrovascular obstruction (MVO) remains a major complication following coronary reperfusion, but its pathogenesis is poorly defined. We evaluated myocardial platelet activation and thrombosis using fluorine-18-labelled GP1 ([18F]GP1) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Methods and resultsIn a single-centre observational cohort study, 100 patients with acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction underwent hybrid cardiac [18F]GP1 PET and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with gadolinium enhancement and repeat imaging at 3-6 months. Myocardial [18F]GP1 uptake was quantified using target-to-background ratio (TBRmax) and percentage myocardial uptake (burden) and compared with MR measures of infarction, MVO and adverse ventricular remodelling. One hundred patients (60 ± 10 years, 91% male) underwent [18F]GP1 PET/MR imaging at a median of 13 days following index presentation. Increased myocardial [18F]GP1 uptake was observed in 44% of participants (TBRmax 1.89 ± 0.50). All 40 patients with MR-defined MVO demonstrated myocardial [18F]GP1 uptake. Myocardial [18F]GP1 uptake burden correlated with (ρ = 0.84; P ConclusionMVO following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is universally associated with myocardial platelet activation, extending beyond structural abnormalities identified by cardiac MR. These findings are consistent with an important mechanistic contribution of platelet-mediated microvascular thrombosis to no-reflow and MVO, highlighting a potentially targetable biological pathway in a condition for which effective therapies remain elusive.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42668434 · DOI · PMC13721768

How reliable is deep inspiration breath hold at CT simulation? Clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training in breast cancer radiotherapy [2]

Research article Dietrich L, Lackner N, Karius A, Brand J, Lobao R, Huseynli A, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeDeep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce cardiac dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy.
Closing excerpt
The training prevents planning CTs in wrong breathing states and thus enables clinically meaningful cardiac dose reduction in breast radiotherapy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (237 words)

PurposeDeep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce cardiac dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy. However, the reliability of DIBH at CT simulation, has not been systematically evaluated despite the importance of CT simulation as the basis for treatment planning. We investigated the clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training on DIBH reliability and cardiac dose sparing.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 115 breast cancer patients undergoing DIBH CT simulation were analyzed before and after implementation of surface-guided breathing training using an SGRT system. DIBH performance was quantified by partial lung volume increase (PLVI) and breath-hold variability. Correlations between external surface motion and internal DIBH depth were assessed. Cardiac dose metrics were compared, with a subgroup analysis for patients receiving lymphatic drainage area (LDA) irradiation.ResultsPrior to training, insufficient DIBH CTs-including negative PLVI cases-were observed. After training implementation, all CT scans were acquired in intended breath-hold states, eliminating insufficient DIBH acquisitions. Mean PLVI increased by ~ 9%, and breath-hold variability decreased by ~ 26%. Sternum motion correlated most strongly with PLVI, with multiregion surface monitoring yielding the highest internal correlation. These improvements were reflected in significant reductions in cardiac dose, particularly in the LDA subgroup, with selected heart dose metrics reduced up to 96%, while maintaining target coverage.ConclusionsDIBH at CT simulation with surface-guided breathing training proves to be reliable. The training prevents planning CTs in wrong breathing states and thus enables clinically meaningful cardiac dose reduction in breast radiotherapy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42698070 · DOI · PMC13543520

Motion correction algorithm improves right coronary artery image quality at heart rates > 75 bpm in non-ECG-gated coronary CT angiography [3]

Research article Wang M, Tao L, Li W, Cao Y, Wu H, Zhang Z · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundMotion artifacts caused by cardiac pulsation remain a major technical challenge in coronary CT angiography (CCTA).
Closing excerpt
However, at high HRs, CMC was significantly superior to STD with respect to vessel sharpness of the RCA (p ConclusionsThe CMC improves image quality in CCTA, with particularly notable benefits for the RCA under high HR conditions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (167 words)

BackgroundMotion artifacts caused by cardiac pulsation remain a major technical challenge in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Although an advanced cardiac motion correction (CMC) algorithm has been developed and successfully implemented in clinical practice, the effectiveness of this algorithm in improving coronary image quality in clinical settings has not yet been fully investigated.PurposeTo evaluate the impact and clinical value of a motion correction algorithm on image quality in non-ECG-gated CCTA.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 76 patients who underwent CCTA for suspected coronary artery disease. Based on the mean heart rate (HR) recorded during scanning, patients were divided into three groups: low HR (HR ≤ 60 bpm), intermediate HR (60 ResultsAt high HRs, the difference in subjective image quality of the right coronary artery (RCA) between STD and CMC reached statistical significance (p 0.05). However, at high HRs, CMC was significantly superior to STD with respect to vessel sharpness of the RCA (p ConclusionsThe CMC improves image quality in CCTA, with particularly notable benefits for the RCA under high HR conditions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42745134 · DOI · PMC13578101

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Ultrasonography vs Computed Tomography for Papillary Thyroid Cancer Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [4]
    Alabousi M, Alabousi A, Adham S, Pozdnyakov A, Ramadan S, Chaudhari H, et al. · JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg · 2022 · cited 73 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Primary Staging before Definitive Treatment [5]
    Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, Quarta L, Chen DC, Thomson A, Barletta F, et al. · Eur Urol · 2025 · cited 43 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Detection of periodontal bone loss and periodontitis from 2D dental radiographs via machine learning and deep learning: systematic review employing APPRAISE-AI and meta-analysis [6]
    Khubrani YH, Thomas D, Slator PJ, White RD, Farnell DJJ · Dentomaxillofac Radiol · 2025 · cited 43 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Radiomics Quality Score Assessment of CT Radiomics-Based Models Predicting Tumor EGFR Mutation Status in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [7]
    Felfli M, Liu Y, Zerka F, Voyton C, Thinnes A, Jacques S, et al. · Int J Mol Sci · 2023 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Node-RADS: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance, category-wise malignancy rates, and inter-observer reliability [8]
    Zhong J, Mao S, Chen H, Wang Y, Yin Q, Cen Q, et al. · Eur Radiol · 2025 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for the Detection of Hepatic Steatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [9]
    Haghshomar M, Antonacci D, Smith AD, Thaker S, Miller FH, Borhani AA · Radiology · 2024 · cited 32 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Balmforth C, Giaj Levra A, Whittington B, Morgan A, Macaskill MG, Tzolos E, et al.. Platelet activation and thrombosis in microvascular obstruction. . 2026. PMID 42668434 · DOI · PMC13721768
  2. Dietrich L, Lackner N, Karius A, Brand J, Lobao R, Huseynli A, et al.. How reliable is deep inspiration breath hold at CT simulation? Clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training in breast cancer radiotherapy. . 2026. PMID 42698070 · DOI · PMC13543520
  3. Wang M, Tao L, Li W, Cao Y, Wu H, Zhang Z. Motion correction algorithm improves right coronary artery image quality at heart rates > 75 bpm in non-ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. . 2026. PMID 42745134 · DOI · PMC13578101
  4. Alabousi M, Alabousi A, Adham S, Pozdnyakov A, Ramadan S, Chaudhari H, et al.. Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Ultrasonography vs Computed Tomography for Papillary Thyroid Cancer Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID 34817554 · DOI · PMC8613701
  5. Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, Quarta L, Chen DC, Thomson A, Barletta F, et al.. A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Primary Staging before Definitive Treatment. Eur Urol. 2025. PMID 40155242 · DOI
  6. Khubrani YH, Thomas D, Slator PJ, White RD, Farnell DJJ. Detection of periodontal bone loss and periodontitis from 2D dental radiographs via machine learning and deep learning: systematic review employing APPRAISE-AI and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2025. PMID 39656957 · DOI · PMC11979759
  7. Felfli M, Liu Y, Zerka F, Voyton C, Thinnes A, Jacques S, et al.. Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Radiomics Quality Score Assessment of CT Radiomics-Based Models Predicting Tumor EGFR Mutation Status in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID 37511192 · DOI · PMC10380456
  8. Zhong J, Mao S, Chen H, Wang Y, Yin Q, Cen Q, et al.. Node-RADS: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance, category-wise malignancy rates, and inter-observer reliability. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID 39505734 · DOI · PMC12021726
  9. Haghshomar M, Antonacci D, Smith AD, Thaker S, Miller FH, Borhani AA. Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for the Detection of Hepatic Steatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2024. PMID 39499183 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Brain MappingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • CholangiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Computed Tomography AngiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • ConnectomeDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Coronary AngiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology

All 110 articles in Diagnostics and Medical Technology →

At a glance

717,292
PubMed records on this heading
19%
published since 2020
76,158
review articles
8,584
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Brain MappingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • CholangiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Computed Tomography AngiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • ConnectomeDiagnostics and Medical Technology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support